Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: uBITX Firmware CEC Version Added WSPR function, I am looking for a beta tester.
#ubitx
Carlos E. Wenzel
Ian The problem has gone. It was a wrong/thin/broken cable. I changet it. I also found a missing power output if you operate wspr function far away from the original ubitx frequency. I agree with Phillips abt this issue, BPF maybe remains locked on the original band. "
?the display shows 14.097100?MHz which is the frequency I selected in uBITX manager, but the RF being transmitted is in fact 14.099330?MHz..??"? cero beat on 14.099330 mHz when ubitx displays 14.097100 mHz (is not right?.... 2.2kHz) Carlos 2018-03-09 15:33 GMT+01:00 Ian Lee <kd8cec@...>:
--
|
Re: tx pop
PeteWK8S
I have implemented Greg W3NW's circuit using the same values BS170, 300K, 1N4148, 440nF and it does eliminate the pops.
However it's also almost completely quieted the sidetone even with R253 shorted. I can hear the sidetone at full volume but that's way, way too loud a setting for received signals. Any suggestions? Pete WK8S |
Re: #uBitx - No TX
#ubitx
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi All,Just to let you know that thanks to your help, I confirmed my first QSO yesterday evening with FY5KE in CW (439/439). Cndx: uBitx around 10W, trap dipole in attic. Bet 73, Philippe
|
Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.
Yes, 2000 is pretty much unbelievable. I'll try a couple of things, 1 measure with a scope looking at the flutter for more accuracy 2 try to check my counter using wwv ft Collins or wherever it comes from now in the same way,(possibly this should be the first step, I've put it off long enough)? 3 after I've determined a semi warm measurement where its been running continuously (I can actually measure the temp with my little orange non contact for fun, and measure the supply and 5v's just in case) , I'll turn off ONLY the uBITX and measure it in the AM . Also, I'll put a little video on for those who might want to see how I'm doing these things. Remembering that this is a Raduino that is working quite well. This is an exercise so that I'll be VERY familiar,? for my work with an Raduino that doesn't sound so good when used.. ? On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Michael Shreeve <shreevester@...> wrote:
--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG |
Re: Fw: uBitx delivery
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýGreat question..? what TDA 2820s are they shipping in the current batch? 73 - Gary ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Noel f6bgc ? Hi uBITX group, ? who knows if March 9th delivery batch has good?or tested??TDA 2822 ? ? 73 - noel f6bgc ? 2018-03-09 17:47 GMT+01:00 Nelson <ngtdlt@...>:
? |
Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.
Yes, I'll need to hook a scope to hear the 3 or 4 hz flutter when your spot on. Thanks Jerry. Hopefully doing more today, as its raining here finally. On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote: That's an excellent method to measure the frequency of the 25mhz oscillator. --
Michael Shreeve N6GRG |
Re: Fw: uBitx delivery
Noel f6bgc
Hi uBITX group, who knows if March 9th delivery batch has good?or tested??TDA 2822 ? 73 - noel f6bgc 2018-03-09 17:47 GMT+01:00 Nelson <ngtdlt@...>:
|
Re: Fw: uBitx delivery
Hoowdy All, I ordered my uBITX on January 11th, 2018 and was notified by PayPal that my order shipped today (March 9th, 2018).? I had it shipped by India Post so expect another month for it to arrive... Nelson On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:38 PM, John KG9DK <jab3739@...> wrote: Nick, --
I always thought the Universe was a wonderfully strange place until I?studied Particle Physics - I now know the Universe is, in fact, profoundly odd in nature
|
Re: Shipping Update
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOrdered on January 13th. ?Received shipping notice via PayPal today. ?Estimated delivery is Tuesday 3/13 via DHL. ??WoooooHooooo! On Mar 9, 2018, at 7:28 AM, Xcott Craver <xcottcraver@...> wrote:
|
Re: uBITX Mic Wireup
How is this an advantage?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 07:23 am, Tim Gorman wrote: The mic is only actually connected when the PTT switch is pushed. ....? ?This is why I recommend using a communications mike instead of a standalone mic with a separate PTT switch. |
Shipping notice today, ordered Jan 12
#ubitx
I know people are tracking the shipping dates, so I offer this as a data point.? ?Hooray!
Thanks, Xcott K2CAJ |
Re: uBITX Mic Wireup
Shaun,
I am using an old CB microphone. Inside of it is a multi-pole switch. Most communication mics have the same. I have wired mine so the positive side of the mic goes through one switch pole to the microphone connector. The mic is only actually connected when the PTT switch is pushed. The negative side of the mic goes to the shield of the mic cord. The PTT lead from the mic connecotor goes through another switch pole and is connected to the shield via the switch when the PTT is pushed. This is why I recommend using a communications mike instead of a standalone mic with a separate PTT switch. You can get old CB mics off of ebay pretty cheap. You can probably find one for almost nothing at garage sales this summer. tim ab0wr On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 21:54:42 -0600 "Shaun" <slong682000@...> wrote: Does anybody have a diagram or description of the mic wire up for the |
Re: Dynamic mic on ubitx
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 01:07 am, Walter wrote:
I solved my Dynamic mic problem by installing the 5 Band Mic Processor by UR8QW.? I mounted the potentiometers on the front panel so that I now have a mic processor with compression, mic level and output level.? Works beautifully with my dynamic mic.Update.? It appeared to put out about the rating of the ubitx.? But I have to talk very loud and it does not sound right.? When I get the new mic cord from China I will install the mic that came with the unit.? Since I cannot alter this mic as it does not belong to me.? I have given up on the dynamic mic idea.? LOL. I am giving this update to keep folk from thinking this mod worked for dynamic mics.? It does not work well. ? -- 73, W9KJO Walter |
Re: uBITX Firmware CEC Version Added WSPR function, I am looking for a beta tester.
#ubitx
Hi Ian.
The frequency error is down to the way uBITX manager calculates the RF frequency. If I enter into the Band 2 box 14094850 Hz, then the audio comes out of my radio at 1.5 KHz, when it is tuned to 14.09560 MHz. Now my WSPR is going all around the world. I do find that I get a bit confused by all the calculations, when trying to work out all this stuff. Anyway thanks for putting WSPR in to the uBITX, a great bonus. Philip G7JUR? |
Re: cheap logic analyzer
Rod Of the cheap instruments I bought, the logic analyzer was my favorite instrument. That is very simple, small and easy use. I abandoned the big logic analyzer that I used. However, it is only a logic analyzer.?Only the logic analyzer was the most useful instrument among the cheapest instruments. To connect Wsjt-X for Linux to Nano, I recommend keeping Reset Pin high. Ian KD8CEC 2018-03-09 20:33 GMT+09:00 Rod Self <km6sn@...>: In the previous email, I am not sure why the PULSEVIEW screen looks fuzzy- however, on the actual PC screen, it is quite sharp and clear, |
Re: uBITX Firmware CEC Version Added WSPR function, I am looking for a beta tester.
#ubitx
Philip Thank you very much Your feedback is a great help to me because I am not in an environment where I can test now. I will update the program within a day or two and upload it again and announce it through the group. Note that the BPF selection uses some tricks as a constraint on program memory. I will check that again. Once again, I sincerely appreciate your test. Ian KD8CEC 2018-03-09 22:36 GMT+09:00 Philip <philip.g7jur@...>: Hi Ian. |
Re: Wiring of the CW jack
Can tags be added to posts once they are posted?? It would be nice to differentiate which one it's for.?? I had to come back here to read the original to make sure which one it's for.?? I like the picture.? I just needed to keep it straight which one it's for.
73, Michael KM4OLT |
Re: Variable power control
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:23 pm, LKNDAVE wrote:
i did the hokie pokie and this jpg came outBased on this design I built this attached circuit. It controls voltage nicely.? Really helps limit output power while working digital. However the TIP 142 really generates some heat.? I have a heat sink on it but it will need to be much larger.? it is only drawing about .5 amp (1/2 amp) while transmitting. Does that seem normal?? it the heat something I should be concerned about?? Or just provide a better heat sink and run it? Thanks for the circuit idea and plan. ? -- 73, W9KJO Walter |
Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz. Documentation says one thinng, but this is what I measured.
Jack Purdum
Nicely done... Jack, W8TEE From: Lawrence Galea <9h1avlaw@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 7:03 AM Subject: Re: [BITX20] Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz. Documentation says one thinng, but this is what I measured. Sorry for the incomplete email.? Pushed the wrong button on the keyboard while still compiling this draft before any corrections..
OK.Let's see if I can make it easy. Lets say that we have a 12 MHz carrier and we want to convert it to transmit to the 28 MHz band. We could either mix the 12 MHz carrier with a 16 MHz signal (12 MHz + 16 MHz = 28 MHz) or a 40 MHz (40 MHz - 12 MHz = 28 MHz). In the case of mixing the 12 MHz carrier with the 40 MHz signal we will also get 52 MHz which we do not require and which we will filter out. Let's say that now we have a 12 MHz filter which passes the lower side-band and we want to mix the filter output signal to transmit on the 28 MHz band. Let's say that the carrier frequency is exactly 12 MHz and we modulate the carrier with a 1 kHz audio tone. In a normal AM transmitter, we end up with the carrier and two side bands, one which is 12 MHz + 1 kHz = 12,001,000 MHz which is the Upper Side Band (USB) and the other 12 Mhz - 1 kHz = 11.999,000 MHz which is the lower side band? Now let's take the same example as above but the signals are passed through a filter which passes the lower side-band (LSB) (11,999,000 MHz in the example) and filters out the Upper Side-band (USB) (12,001,000 MHz). The carrier is also attenuated somewhat by the filter as it is placed down the slope of the filter curve to cut the lower voice frequencies as we are not after generating a hi-fi signal and are not really required for intelligibility apart from other considerations while the carrier is further heavily attenuated in the balanced modulator. Theoretically, if the balanced modulator was perfectly balanced and everything screened, the carrier attenuation will be infinite, but practically it is attenuated to a very very low level as to be considered as being suppressed. Now let's say that the carrier was not suppressed but the lower side-band was passed by the filter and we mix them with a 40 MHx oscillator. (Remember that the upper side-band was suppressed by the filter and theoretically is not present, leaving us with the 12 mHz carrier and the 11.999,000 MHz signals) The output of the mixer will contain the 40 MHz oscillator, the 12 MHz carrier and the 11.999.000 MHz lower side-band including other mixer products which for the present purpose we shall ignore. By using a balanced mixer as used in the 12 MHz side-band generator the 40 MHz signal can be cancelled (attenuated to a very low level) and we will have an output signal from the mixer of 40 MHz + 12 MHz = 52 MHz and 40 MHz - 12 MHz = 28.000,000 MHz and also 40 MHz + 11.999,000 MHz = 51.999,000 MHz and 40 MHz - 11.999,000 = 28.001,000 MHz. However, since we used a balanced modulator at 12 MHz, the 12 MHz carrier was suppressed and only the lower side band was allowed to pass through, which simplifies the matter as when we mix the lower side band from the filter with the 40 MHz oscillator will will only get??40 MHz + 11.999,000 MHz = 51.999,000 MHz and 40 MHz - 11.999,000 = 28.001,000 MHz. At the output of the mixer we put a filter to select our wanted 28 MHz signal and strip the unwanted 52 MHz signal. This clearly shows how the lower side-band from the filter (11.999,000 MHz) in relation to the original carrier frequency of 12 MHz has been turned into an upper side-band by the mixer when we used an oscillator frequency for mixing higher then the output frequency required. Now if we take the lower side band which is 11.999.000 Mhz and mix it with a 40 MHz oscillator, we can also get on the 50 MHz band, but in this case it is easy to see that we will still end up with a side-band transmission if you work out the simple mathematics. Now let's say that instead of mixing our crystal filter output with 40 MHz, we mix it with 16 MHz to get on the 28 MHz band (16 MHz + 12 MHz = 28 MHz). But since we have suppressed the carrier and we only have an 11.999,000 MHz signal, 16 MHz + 11,999,000 = 27.999,000 signal which in this case will be outside the 28 MHz band but serves to illustrate our purpose. 16 MHz - 11.999,000 Mhz will also give us 4,001.000 MHz which we can easily filter out. If our side-band filter passed the upper side-band, the opposite will be true As you can see it is simple mathematics but may be difficult to understand without some numbers. Hope this explained the difficulty. Regards Lawrece
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Lawrence Galea <9h1avlaw@...> wrote:
|