Date

Re: RSGB review of the ubitx

 

Hi,

It's in the December RadCom (vol 96, no 12). Arrived a day or so ago (UK). It's a good, favourable review. I can try and scan it later if folks are interested.

Cheers,

Dave.


Sent with Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐� Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐�
On Tuesday, November 17, 2020 2:19 PM, Scott McDonald via groups.io <ka9p@...> wrote:

November is available online now but the Reviews section in the TOC doesn’t list a uBITX as best I can see on my phone.  I’ll look through the mag on a real screen in a bit.

Scott ka9p

Make something good happen!

On Nov 17, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


The Oct issue arrived about a week ago and there is nothing in it that I see on the µBITX. My guess is it will be a couple of more weeks before I get the Nov issue.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 7:27:57 AM EST, Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:


Has anyone seen the latest RSGB's magazine? I believe it has a review of the ubitx. 

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: Interesting QST article

Jack, W8TEE
 

Thanks, Bob! I'm really looking forward to it.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 9:20:20 AM EST, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


Jack, you have very nice images on your qrz.com webpage. Very nice...and impressive.

I'm sure you will be adding to this forum considering your background in education and ham radio. I look forward to your input.

Bob � KK5R

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 9:05:41 AM EST, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Hi Bob:

I just joined the group a few days ago and look forward to working on it. I've ordered a µSDR kit, but hope to modify it for a TFT display and a Teensy T4 processor. I'm not very adept at EE stuff, but not too bad on the firmware. I'm looking forward to it.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 7:26:23 AM EST, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


That is indeed an interesting concept. I wonder if it would pass an FCC certification, though. A lowpass filter is needed, no doubt, and I don't see one. Nor AGC, etc., etc. But it is indeed interesting.

Bob � KK5R

Schematic of the uSDX...

Inline image


On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 6:46:58 AM EST, Bob Benedict, KD8CGH <rkayakr@...> wrote:


If you're interested in a truly amazing use of an Arduino in an SDR check out the uSDX transceiver
/g/ucx
--
  73
    Bob  KD8CGH

--
Jack, W8TEE

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: Interesting QST article

 

Jack, you have very nice images on your qrz.com webpage. Very nice...and impressive.

I'm sure you will be adding to this forum considering your background in education and ham radio. I look forward to your input.

Bob � KK5R

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 9:05:41 AM EST, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Hi Bob:

I just joined the group a few days ago and look forward to working on it. I've ordered a µSDR kit, but hope to modify it for a TFT display and a Teensy T4 processor. I'm not very adept at EE stuff, but not too bad on the firmware. I'm looking forward to it.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 7:26:23 AM EST, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


That is indeed an interesting concept. I wonder if it would pass an FCC certification, though. A lowpass filter is needed, no doubt, and I don't see one. Nor AGC, etc., etc. But it is indeed interesting.

Bob � KK5R

Schematic of the uSDX...

Inline image


On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 6:46:58 AM EST, Bob Benedict, KD8CGH <rkayakr@...> wrote:


If you're interested in a truly amazing use of an Arduino in an SDR check out the uSDX transceiver
/g/ucx
--
  73
    Bob  KD8CGH

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: RSGB review of the ubitx

 

November is available online now but the Reviews section in the TOC doesn’t list a uBITX as best I can see on my phone.  I’ll look through the mag on a real screen in a bit.

Scott ka9p

Make something good happen!

On Nov 17, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:

The Oct issue arrived about a week ago and there is nothing in it that I see on the µBITX. My guess is it will be a couple of more weeks before I get the Nov issue.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 7:27:57 AM EST, Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:


Has anyone seen the latest RSGB's magazine? I believe it has a review of the ubitx. 

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: Interesting QST article

Jack, W8TEE
 

Hi Bob:

I just joined the group a few days ago and look forward to working on it. I've ordered a µSDR kit, but hope to modify it for a TFT display and a Teensy T4 processor. I'm not very adept at EE stuff, but not too bad on the firmware. I'm looking forward to it.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 7:26:23 AM EST, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


That is indeed an interesting concept. I wonder if it would pass an FCC certification, though. A lowpass filter is needed, no doubt, and I don't see one. Nor AGC, etc., etc. But it is indeed interesting.

Bob � KK5R

Schematic of the uSDX...

Inline image


On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 6:46:58 AM EST, Bob Benedict, KD8CGH <rkayakr@...> wrote:


If you're interested in a truly amazing use of an Arduino in an SDR check out the uSDX transceiver
/g/ucx
--
  73
    Bob  KD8CGH

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: RSGB review of the ubitx

Jack, W8TEE
 

The Oct issue arrived about a week ago and there is nothing in it that I see on the µBITX. My guess is it will be a couple of more weeks before I get the Nov issue.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 7:27:57 AM EST, Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:


Has anyone seen the latest RSGB's magazine? I believe it has a review of the ubitx. 

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: GPSDO ubitx ?

 

I just bought one of the VFO/SigGen kits from QRP-Labs and they already have a GPS disciplined option for it if you want to try it out. It is only 1PPS but apparently does the job. I haven't built my GPS kit yet so I can't give any personal details atm. You have to provide the 5v supply on your own so that is some extra work.

Just a thought in case you hadn't seen that project yet.


RSGB review of the ubitx

 

Has anyone seen the latest RSGB's magazine? I believe it has a review of the ubitx. 


Re: Interesting QST article

 

That is indeed an interesting concept. I wonder if it would pass an FCC certification, though. A lowpass filter is needed, no doubt, and I don't see one. Nor AGC, etc., etc. But it is indeed interesting.

Bob � KK5R

Schematic of the uSDX...

Inline image


On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 6:46:58 AM EST, Bob Benedict, KD8CGH <rkayakr@...> wrote:


If you're interested in a truly amazing use of an Arduino in an SDR check out the uSDX transceiver
/g/ucx
--
  73
    Bob  KD8CGH


Re: Interesting QST article

 

If you're interested in a truly amazing use of an Arduino in an SDR check out the uSDX transceiver
/g/ucx
--
  73
    Bob  KD8CGH


Re: #For Sale A Few QRP Goodies #for

 

PM here or e-mail via QRZ listed e-mail: dherron at live dot com

sorry forgot that in the main post.

73

ٲ


#For Sale A Few QRP Goodies #for

 

I have for sale a few kits from my radio desk that just don't get used.

50w QRP-Labs Amp 40m:
Built and tested by me with added 24v fan. I will also include a hand PTT that plug's into the amp and hit the red button when you are ready to TX (9v not included). PTT on this amp is high 5v and was meant to be used with the QCX line of radios. I made the hand key to use with other radios and testing, it's a 5v regulator and a push button wired to the 9v battery.



Asking 75$ Shipped CONUS or 90$ Shipped EU/UK or 85$ shipped CA

Antuino Black Box Testing Unit:
Bought from HFsignals at 2019 FDIM. This has been calibrated and updated with the new hardware mods and latest firmware. Tested and working! Box paint keeps chipping off real easy, see pictures.



Asking 80$ Shipped CONUS or 95$ EU/UK or 90$ CA

Phaser 40m:
SER#80
Built and tested by me run's solid FT8/JS8 with enclosure, calibrated getting about 3-4Watts out.



105$ Shipped CONUS or 120$ EU/UK or 115$ CA

Take the lot for: 250$ Shipped CONUS or 265$ EU/UK or 260$ CA

Paypal preferred I pay fee's, ALL friends and family payments will be rejected.

Thanks for looking.

73
--
David


Re: Can’t shut off emails from this group

 

If you are using Firefox with add on noscript then give full permission to gropus.io and
repeat and save your setting. No script messes up some things on my desktop.

Raj

At 16/11/2020, you wrote:
Arv,

Still receiving email notifications. Received 8 overnight...Not sure whats going on so can you please have another look?

Thanks


Re: GPSDO ubitx ?

 

Worth trying, but the NEO-7M is very cheap and does not give a clean square wave.
Any corrections in edge count to better agree with the satellite will disturb that square wave.

In the discussion I pointed to, it was suggested the NEO-7M was mostly clean at 24mhz.
However, since it is then dividing by two from 48mhz, it can only slow down, by adding
an extra 48mhz clock in there.  It cannot speed up, if that's what the satellite wants it to do.

Best bet is to spend a little bit more money on a better GPS module that has a clean reference.

Jerry


On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:14 PM, Rafael Diniz wrote:
So it is worth trying to connect the NEO-7M GPS module (48MHz divided by
4) to the Si5351A and see what happens, as it is already there in the
Raduino. Hopefully it will be good enough to provide a precise and
jitter-free frequency synthesis!


Interesting QST article

 

The December issue of QST has an interesting article about using an Arduino in a simple transmitter (Page 30).

It is hardly as sophisticated as the use of the technology here but it may be of interest to see what someone else is doing with the technology.

Bob � KK5R


Re: My son's QRM/RFI

 

It could be something as simple as a bad connection somewhere nearby that acts as a mixer for other frequencies and then gets re-transmitted. Finding it and getting it repaired is not going to be easy, if this is what's happening.

Bob � KK5R

On Monday, November 16, 2020, 8:33:56 PM EST, Curt via groups.io <wb8yyy@...> wrote:


Good approach. Except for overwhelming the front end, I don't sense 5G and cell tower being the major effects. But I am only aware that their RF is much higher than HF. My brief experience setting up HF is a high rise is everyone's cabke box, routers, TV sets etc may be the overwhelming source. I remember many of the birdies are unstable oscillators that slowly drift around. Many with those limits operate sota, pota etc to get away from that stuff when weather allows.

73 curt


Re: GPSDO ubitx ?

 

So it is worth trying to connect the NEO-7M GPS module (48MHz divided by
4) to the Si5351A and see what happens, as it is already there in the
Raduino. Hopefully it will be good enough to provide a precise and
jitter-free frequency synthesis!

Rafael

On 11/17/20 12:07 AM, Jerry Gaffke via groups.io wrote:
Here's an interesting note regarding a 10mhz reference output 
from a cheap NEO-7M GPS module:   

/g/HBTE/topic/69599658#699
</g/HBTE/topic/69599658#699>
#####
It is worth noting that the module only produces a "nice" output at
divisions of it's internal reference (48MHz). At any other The output
is erratic. A frequency counter (which only counts edges) will show
the correct frequency (e.g 10MHz) but a spectrum analyser will show
the truth, and an oscilloscope will exhibit multiply triggering.
#####

That discussion continues in a couple other threads:
/g/HBTE/topic/69627276
</g/HBTE/topic/69627276>
/g/HBTE/topic/69910563
</g/HBTE/topic/69910563>

Programming the NEO-7M for 24mhz and 12mhz is done with an even divide
by 4, and so creates a clean clock.
Other divide ratios use a dual modulus divider, and thus the clock has
lots of jitter.
Another issue, that clock apparently comes from an internal crystal
oscillator, it is occasionally disturbed
by corrections to keep the edge counts agreeing with what is coming in
from the GPS satellite.
So edge counts over a second or so are very accurate, but as an RF
source the NEO-7M is rather noisy.
That may or may not be suitable for use as an Si5351 reference,
depends on what SiLabs did
with regard to the loop filter on their VCO.

The Si5351A in the MSOP10 would probably work fine with a 24mhz
reference clock
into one of the crystal pins.  The datasheet says 25 to 27mhz, but
24mhz is pretty close.
And it actually does work with a reference of 10mhz, but the Si5351
outputs have more jitter.
The Si5351C does have a dedicated CLKIN pin that is spec'd for a much
wider frequency range.

There are better GPS modules than the very cheap NEO-7M that do give a
clean reference clock.

Jerry, KE7ER


uple other threads of interest (a continuation of the discussion

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:01 PM, Rafael Diniz wrote:

That makes total sense. I have some affordable GPSDO with 10MHz
output I
got from ebay. I feel your suggestion might be the best solution, of
course, at the cost of re-doing the Raduino and adding (may be in the
same Raduino board?) the GPSDO with 10MHz output already connected to
the refclk pin of the Si5351C, plus a new SMA connector for the
GPS antenna.


Re: GPSDO ubitx ?

 

Here's an interesting note regarding a 10mhz reference output 
from a cheap NEO-7M GPS module:   

/g/HBTE/topic/69599658#699
#####
It is worth noting that the module only produces a "nice" output at divisions of it's internal reference (48MHz). At any other The output is erratic. A frequency counter (which only counts edges) will show the correct frequency (e.g 10MHz) but a spectrum analyser will show the truth, and an oscilloscope will exhibit multiply triggering.
#####

That discussion continues in a couple other threads:
/g/HBTE/topic/69627276
/g/HBTE/topic/69910563

Programming the NEO-7M for 24mhz and 12mhz is done with an even divide by 4, and so creates a clean clock.
Other divide ratios use a dual modulus divider, and thus the clock has lots of jitter.
Another issue, that clock apparently comes from an internal crystal oscillator, it is occasionally disturbed
by corrections to keep the edge counts agreeing with what is coming in from the GPS satellite.
So edge counts over a second or so are very accurate, but as an RF source the NEO-7M is rather noisy.
That may or may not be suitable for use as an Si5351 reference, depends on what SiLabs did
with regard to the loop filter on their VCO.

The Si5351A in the MSOP10 would probably work fine with a 24mhz reference clock
into one of the crystal pins.  The datasheet says 25 to 27mhz, but 24mhz is pretty close.
And it actually does work with a reference of 10mhz, but the Si5351 outputs have more jitter.
The Si5351C does have a dedicated CLKIN pin that is spec'd for a much wider frequency range.

There are better GPS modules than the very cheap NEO-7M that do give a clean reference clock.

Jerry, KE7ER


uple other threads of interest (a continuation of the discussion


On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:01 PM, Rafael Diniz wrote:
That makes total sense. I have some affordable GPSDO with 10MHz output I
got from ebay. I feel your suggestion might be the best solution, of
course, at the cost of re-doing the Raduino and adding (may be in the
same Raduino board?) the GPSDO with 10MHz output already connected to
the refclk pin of the Si5351C, plus a new SMA connector for the GPS antenna.


Re: GPSDO ubitx ?

 

Hi Jerry,

That makes total sense. I have some affordable GPSDO with 10MHz output I
got from ebay. I feel your suggestion might be the best solution, of
course, at the cost of re-doing the Raduino and adding (may be in the
same Raduino board?) the GPSDO with 10MHz output already connected to
the refclk pin of the Si5351C, plus a new SMA connector for the GPS antenna.

Thanks!
Rafael PU2UIT

On 11/16/20 6:19 PM, Jerry Gaffke via groups.io wrote:
If you are sticking with the Si5351 family for this and are ok with
laying out a new board,
I'd use the $2 Si5351C in the QFN package.  It has a refclk input that
can work with
directly with the 10mhz reference clock often available from GPS modules.
   
<>

The $1 Si5351A in the MSOP10 that we normally use can take a reference
clock
in on one of the crystal pins, but spec sheet says it's only good for
25 to 27 mhz.
Reports are that it does work with a reference clock of 10mhz, but with
significantly more jitter.

Jerry, KE7ER


Re: GPSDO ubitx ?

 

Thanks Tom, that is a good idea!

Rafael PU2UIT

On 11/16/20 5:26 PM, Tom, wb6b wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 05:27 AM, Rafael Diniz wrote:

Did anybody managed to add a GPS to external referente the SI 5351?

Might be a round about way to do it. Depending on available pins.

In the time that the Nano processor is not doing much, let the Nano
read the 1 PPS pulses from a GPS to get a counter value that would
represent how far off the 16mhz CPU clock is. 

Then, once and a while, let the SI5351 generate a couple of mhz signal
(extra unused SI5351 output) that is fed into an input of the Nano.
Count that frequency, also.

Then calculate a correction factor for the SI5351 values needed to
program it to the correct frequency.

Just a rough idea. Haven't kept track if any extra pins are still
available on the Nano recently.

Tom, wb6b