开云体育

Ah, you are correct. I did a quick read of the datasheet for the Nano Every and saw mention of an ARM processor, but it is not what our code runs on. Seemed weird that they could get the Nano module

The issue with resonators and such is that they tend to wander. This can sometimes on a few radios put a birdie right in the middle of an IF passband. The uBitx IF got moved from 12 to 11mhz because

TL:DR version: don't buy a Nano Every to use in your Raduino right now unless you are prepared to do some software development. The ATMega 4809 is not an ARM processor. It's still an 8 bit AVR. It

Not having to insulate the RD's tab from ground is definitely a win. Are you saying the RD is significantly more efficient? Do you have numbers? Or perhaps this is your way of pointing out that heat

Reliable operation of an asynchronous serial link does not require a highly accurate clock; it only needs to be within 1% or so. That's easily met by a ceramic resonator. The CH340C is probably not

Hmm,? that's a genuine "Arduino Nano Every". Has anyone tried that on a Raduino yet? I think it could be made to work, but may require some changes to the source code. This might be a better web

There are the new Nano Every and Nano 33 from Arduino. Those are different, and are not 100% compatible with the earlier Nano. You don't want either of those unless you are prepared to make changes to

That's a Nano Every. Not suitable as a direct replacement. It uses a different microcontroller and requires some code changes. wrote:

Seems for continuous digital operation the RD might be preferred just for the fact that you can bolt it's tab directly to an aluminum radio's case,, giving a very large heat sink, add to that , the RD

In HRD? - make sure you check the DTR box. That will reset the Arduino in the uBitx and it should connect and communicate ok. Other programs (WSJTX, and FLDIGI) don't expose this setting.? I find

Greetings! This is my first post to this group, and I'm more of a Raspberry Pi guy myself, so please be gentle. :-) Would this work as a replacement?

Banggood claims their Nano Clones to be "improved", though I doubt this matters to us. Banggood gives this rather cryptic comment regarding the CH340 USB chip that is used: #################### Chip:

if radio seems functional I am concerned BFO still may be off - I tuned mine by ear but using an audio FFT program might be easier - but try by ear. the 40m band should be full of RTTY signals now

Thanks Jerry. Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2021 9:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] Different Nano's Scot, I doubt they have changed. Perhaps you are looking at the bottom side of your

Scot, I doubt they have changed. Perhaps you are looking at the bottom side of your board, and the top side of the various product offerings? Be sure to buy a Nano that does not already have the pins

Fully agree that the IRF510 is O.K for amateur radio use. It can do the job and is very cheap. Only one word of warning.... buy them from a reputable source that has branded devices. There are a lot

Looking to get some more Nano's, however when shopping on Amazon, E-Bay and others, They look different. Don't see the 5 volt regulator for 1 among offer things. Have the Nano's changed? and if so,

Evan Just a follow up. I did it and and put it on the SD card ubitx_28_E.tft . This is just atrial run and it seems to have work OK! I will play with it some more. Thanks. 73 Jon

Evan I thank you! I will followup if OK. I have formatted the SD card fat32. Jon

Jon, It is the UBITX_Netion_GUI_V3.ZIP download and unzip the archive.? There is both a 2.8" Basic and 2.8" Enhanced tft and HMI files.? The tft are the already compiled files to transfer with a