¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
Correction -- My unit is not illegal on all bands. Spectrum Analyzer output for each band can be found in the Photos section at?/g/BITX20/album?id=65861. Here is the summary: 80
By Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...> · #55747 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
Warren, Not for harmonics.? The spur issue took precedence. They were shared in other message threads here. The spur issue was discovered during power amp improvements. IT was announced here in the
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #55746 ·
Re: Ubitx will be here tomorrow. Any suggestions for a Bitx newbie #ubitx
This picture shows the 2 way pins can be soldered reverse on the nano, i choose the first one (not on the desktop) leaving plastic on the CH340 side, it allow using the nano either normal or reverse
By f1mqj · #55745 ·
New file uploaded to [email protected]
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. *File:* ubitx_cat.ino_modified_KD8CEC_F1MQJ.txt *Uploaded
By [email protected] Notification <BITX20+notification@...> · #55744 ·
Re: Volume with switch
Hi Eddie, it is hotmail.com. so it is Ian.radio workshop@ hotmail.Co.UK. Regards. Ian M0IDR Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ Sent: Saturday, August 4,
By Ian Reeve <ian.radioworkshop@...> · #55743 ·
Re: Volume with switch
Ian, Thanks, I think the usb lead out the back is the plan.? Didn't get the pot pic.? Or haven't found it yet.? Yes, the shaft on Sunil's pot is too small for the knob.? Did you remove his power
By Eddie Esserman · #55742 ·
Re: Volume with switch
Ian, the list server deletes emails.? What is your domain after the @ xxxxx.yyy Thanks. Eddie
By Eddie Esserman · #55741 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
My unit puts out illegal harmonics on SSB on all bands below 20 meters. WA8TOD
By Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...> · #55740 ·
Re: Front Panel Stereo Socket Board Wiring Layout
Thanks, Ian.? Got it.? Eddie
By Eddie Esserman · #55739 ·
Re: hacking bitx40 for 20 metre #bitx40
Terry, You need a separate band pass filter for each band if you want to use the single conversion BitX40. The UbitX uses double conversion that eliminates that requirement. You could use a multiple
By Richie Chambless · #55738 ·
Re: New "ANTENNAS" group has been formed.
A search within yahoo groups and groups.io for "antennas" finds dozens of such groups. Also also some in the www.arrl.org forum, and forums.qrz.com forums, among others. Some with one or two members.
By Jerry Gaffke · #55737 ·
Re: any tips for debugging RFI issue? #ubitx-help
Mike, You solved the source issue.... with the counterpoise as suggested I did say the SWR will likely change. Generally the 1:9 scheme is problematic for RF in the shack unless you have luck or
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #55736 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
This is primarily an SSB transceiver, and harmonic suppression seems adequate in that mode on the stock rig.? Best and easiest fix is probably to either not use CW mode, or do a minor hack to move
By Jerry Gaffke · #55735 ·
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX #ubitx
Iz oos, TLTs can be made with low loss.? ? However making a matched set may be harder as they have to have the exact same phase response. Also the 1:9 is 450 ohms? (50*9). Allison
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #55734 ·
Re: None supprest carrier in TX
Make sure you have adjusted the BFO to the correct frequency.? The carrier will drop. Allison
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #55733 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
Allison Have you shared your past findings here? I did a search and found nothing but I could have missed it. It would seem to me that if you knew the product was illegal for use on the air you would
By Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...> · #55732 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
Warren, Latching relays have a higher cost, I like the idea though.? However there are lower power relays that would do the job.? Since the radio eats power on TX anyway another 200ma is tolerable.
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #55731 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
Arv, For bitx20 (or 40) a monoband radio traps and Caur filters are a good solution. For a multi band radio its a spot solution that is likely to case troubles on other bands. The fundamental issue
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #55730 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
Warren, In my testing I also found the isolation across one relay was barely 45db in one configuration and 50 in another. Using one relay to switch both ends of a filter will compromise the filter
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #55729 ·
Re: Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW
I am not sure Arv. The real solution here is like a "fork lift" upgrade, replacing everything after T11 in the transmit chain. If I were doing a redesign I would use the same four filters, add five
By Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...> · #55728 ·