Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: sBitx running FT8
Hey Josh - here are some links on setting up?pulseaudio client/server to remote the audio 73 Lou KI5FTY On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 4:03 PM Lou Scalpati <lscalpati@...> wrote:
|
Re: sBitx Update Kit Received!
#sBitx
Shirley, followed your directions and it work perfectly, thanks 73 Lou KI5FTY On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 11:37 PM Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:
|
Re: sBitx running FT8
Buck, To send a reply to someone's reply to your CQ. You have to touch/click on the responder's message. That fills up the log line with the contact's callsign. From that point on, the FT8 should proceed and complete the QSO. I hope I am not repeating what you already know. - f On Sun, Sep 18, 2022, 5:21 AM Buck <hiramlewis4@...> wrote: Ashhar, |
Re: sBitx running FT8
Ashhar,
Hope this is not a stupid question but I also have been having problems with completing contacts on FT8. I send CQ and someone responds. I send reply with signal report (also need to know how to change that from -10 or is it always set to -10?). Anyway, I haven't been getting a reply signal report from the replying station and the Log line just stays there waiting for the "My:-" signal to be filled in. Then most of the time, someone else calls and changes the station in the Log line and by that time, the last station is off the screen. And I end up not completing the QSO. Is there a way to scroll up through the contacts to find the original replying station? Also, do you know why I am not getting the signal reports from the replying station? I ended up going ahead and completing the QSOs myself by replying with RR73 and then logging the contact, but when I go to the log, it lacks "My:-" signal. So, technically its not a QSO. Are the replying stations leaving me hanging or is there something I am missing?? Thanks, 73? Buck - WV8BUC |
Re: Replacement Nano problem uBitx V6
Howard,
Reached the end of my knowledge. Will lurk and see what the final resolution is. The "good news" is that lack of response to touch isolates things to a couple pins. I assume you can click the encoder button to get in and out of "fast tune"? That at least would suggest that the firmware is not hung for some reason. 73 Mark AJ6CU |
Re: sBitx running FT8
Hey Josh,
Not sure if you saw my questions at the end of this feed or not, but I am reposting to you in case you didn't see them. I see now that you are going to try to get WSJT-X and JS8Call going. I'm interested in doing that too. 2 things from you other videos that I'm sure you are aware of but just in case you are not, I will state here. The waterfall looks much better if you raise the floor through the IF setting to just above the noise floor and don't forget to change the callsign and grid from Ashhar's to yours. lol?? Here is the post: Ashhar, I love the radio. I have serial number #123. I have ran FT8 a few times and it worked properly. I have experienced 2 issues though. 1. When I checked my log file, it lists all the contacts including the ones you made with the radio during testing as being made through "CW" mode. I'm not sure if that is how FT8 is supposed to be logged or not. 2. When I attempted to respond to a POTA station, the macro put POTA as the callsign and the callsign was in the next data cell. I'm not sure how to fix that other than not using the macros to reply to POTAs. If there is something I am missing, please let me know. Also, I would like to check my propagation through WSJT-X but I haven't been able to run it through the sBITx. I will be watching Josh (Hoshnasi - HRCC - KI6NAZ) in about an hour or so and maybe he will answer these issues.? Thanks, 73 Buck WV8BUC |
Re: sBitx running FT8
Ashhar,
I love the radio. I have serial number #123. I have ran FT8 a few times and it worked properly. I have experienced 2 issues though. 1. When I checked my log file, it lists all the contacts including the ones you made with the radio during testing as being made through "CW" mode. I'm not sure if that is how FT8 is supposed to be logged or not. 2. When I attempted to respond to a POTA station, the macro put POTA as the callsign and the callsign was in the next data cell. I'm not sure how to fix that other than not using the macros to reply to POTAs. If there is something I am missing, please let me know. Also, I would like to check my propagation through WSJT-X but I haven't been able to run it through the sBITx. I will be watching Josh (Hoshnasi - HRCC - KI6NAZ) in about an hour or so and maybe he will answer these issues.? Thanks, 73 Buck WV8BUC |
Re: Replacement Nano problem uBitx V6
The other difference here is you are starting up with the onboard eeprom being all zeros, even after installing the firmware. I assume that the V6 and V6 addon (M6ME) software would initiate the EEPROM to some reasonable values (KD8CEC does) and in the worst case you would just need to recallibrate.? I assume that somene that has gone this route can confirm? this? Hard to believe that this path is not simple...
73 Mark |
Re: #sBitx Incorrect frequency display
#sBitx
Anthony Good
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
Re: sBitx running FT8
Yea - not like the flex DAX???.? Only cat control.? You can redirect pulse audio over the network between linux machines.? I have done that in the past on real linux boxes and it works.? A little more complicated but I found a howto on the net a long time ago. 73 Lou KI5FTY On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 3:13 PM Hoshnasi <hoshnasi@...> wrote: Thanks Lou I'll give it a shot.?? |
sBitx command question
#sBitx
PeteWK8S
A little clarification please.
What is the difference ?\cw_tx_pitch ?and ?\txpitch ? If I set \txpitch to whatever value \cw_tx_pitch seems to echo it, and vice versa but cw_tx_pitch doesn't give feedback if set or quiried. What is the purpose of each and, by the way, the names are so similiar its confusing. Thanks, Pete WK8S |
Re: #sBitx Incorrect frequency display
#sBitx
PeteWK8S
Goody, here are my results using Icom 7610 and the sBitx each using 700Hz pitch for the \addcwpitch ?on and off
First transmitting on 7610 then transmitting on sBitx ---- both units using Dummy Loads ? \addcwpitch ON IC7610 ?TX on 14.060.00? sBitx ? ? RX on 14.060.70 ? (up 700Hz) ------------------------------------- IC7610 ?RX on 14.060.00 sBitx ? ? TX ?on 14.060.00 ========================== \addcwpitch OFF IC7610 TX on 14.060.00 sBitx ? ?RX on 14.060.00 ------------------------------ IC7610 RX on 14.060.70 ?(up 700Hz) sBitx ? ?TX ?on 14.060.00 Pete WK8S? |
Re: Replacement Nano problem uBitx V6
Another possibility since you have two failures..
Are you using a Nextion. I find that if the wires to it get too close to the Raduino I get a loud wine on startup even with volume at its lowest setting.? If Volume is set half way no wine. But the obvious solution *if* that was your problem would be to route your wires to the Nextion away from the Raduino. I also used those boards with no problems. I did manage to kill one somehow, but I am sure that it was totally my carelessness. 73 Mark.? |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss