¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: [2] Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

Arv Evans
 

Then both of you did good work!

On Sunday 14 August 2005 08:27 am, Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD wrote:
I don't get credit for that... eternalsquire did the work...I just
converted his BMPs to GIFs. --
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA


On 14 Aug 2005 08:24:46 -0600, [Arv Evans <arvevans@...>] wrote:
Ron W5RCM

Very good job on the schematics.? This should also help a lot for those
who want to do their BITX as modules.

Thanks,

Arv K7HKL

On Sunday 14 August 2005 08:05 am, Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD wrote:
>? Very nice job, Eternal Squire!
>
>? I have converted these to GIF format... you can grab them all from
> --
>? 72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
>? Austin TX / Hermanus ZA
>
>
>? On 14 Aug 2005 08:09:23 -0000, [eternalesquire
> <eternalsquire@...>] wrote: All,
>
>? I'm starting to need reading spectacles, so I took the liberty of
>? redrafting the schematic submitted by Mr. Farhan into a series of
>? modular documents that should take somewhat less effort to view finer
>? details such as decimal points.? I tried as hard as I could to make
>? them reflect best engineering practices as I currently understand them.
>
>? I've incorporated what appear to be the most popular modifications
>? I've seen in this group to date that also keep to the spirit of
>? requireing only those parts reasonably obtainable in India to an
>? amateur of limited finances.?? I've also imade annotations derived
>? from Mr. Farhan's text where appropriate for clarity.
>
>? The source documents were drawn using the latest version of LTSpice,
>? available from the Linear Technology website.? I then exported them
>? into? Word bitmap files.? Finally, I retouched those files to add
>? details not available from LTSpice, such as variable capacitors.
>
>? Please note that the LTSpice diagrams themselves are not runnable, I
>? merely used the tool as a drafting aid.
>
>? Please feel free to make corrections as appropriate.? One thing I
>? would recommend is other sets of capacitor values for different IF
>? frequencies.? I hope others will add to Table 1 in TRANSCEIVER.bmp,
>? more working choices for IF's besides 9 and 10 Mhz.
>
>? You'll find this archive uploaded into as EGR&#92;BITX.zip
>
>? Enjoy,
>
>? The Eternal Squire
>
>
>
>? ___________________________________
>
>? Free Web Space for your Amateur Radio Hobby!
>?
>
>
>
>? YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>? Visit your group BITX20 on the web.
>?
>? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>? BITX20-unsubscribe@...
>?
>? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Links










___________________________________

Free Web Space for your Amateur Radio Hobby!




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


?Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.
?
?To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
?BITX20-unsubscribe@...
?
?Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: [3] Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
 

Hey Eternal Squire,

If you make any changes to your bmps, let me know and I'll remake the gifs.
--
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA

On 14 Aug 2005 18:26:54 +0100, [Rahul Srivastava <vu3wjm@...>] wrote:
--0-175253323-1124040414=:11736
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi! Ron!

Thanks for all the efforts .
The automated system appears to have some flaws. My observations

1) Zobel at output pin 5 of 386 has cap marked 100pf this appers to be an error, similarly spk cpuling cap value is 1uF , this again highly on low side.

2) Driver stage has the 1K resistor going to ground from base before the coupling cap this again slight at err.

Just in case it does not confusion. Never the less very good work.

73

Raahul VU3WJM






Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD <w5rcm@...> wrote:
I don't get credit for that... eternalsquire did the work...I just converted his BMPs to GIFs.
--
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
--0-175253323-1124040414=:11736
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html><body>


<DIV>Hi! Ron!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks for all the efforts .</DIV>
<DIV>The automated system appears to have some flaws. My observations</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1) Zobel at output pin 5 of 386 has cap marked 100pf this appers to be an error, similarly spk cpuling cap value is 1uF , this again highly on low side.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2) Driver stage has the 1K resistor going to ground from base before the coupling cap this again slight at err. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just in case it does not confusion. Never the less very good work.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>73</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Raahul VU3WJM</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD <w5rcm@...></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style=PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid><TT>I don't get credit for that... eternalsquire did the work...I just converted his BMPs to GIFs.<BR>--<BR>72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD<BR>Austin TX / Hermanus ZA<BR><BR><BR></TT></BLOCKQUOTE><p>
<hr size=1><font size=2 face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif><a href=
Yahoo! Messenger</a>
<font color=red>NEW</font> - crystal clear PC to PC
<a href=
calling worldwide with voicemail
</a></font>



<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->

<br>
<div style=text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px;>
<hr style=border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left;>
<tt>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS</tt>
</div>
<br>
<ul>
<tt><li type=square> Visit your group <a href=>BITX20</a> on the web.<br> </tt>
<tt><li type=square> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<br> <a href=mailto:BITX20-unsubscribe@...?subject=Unsubscribe>BITX20-unsubscribe@...</a><br> </tt>
<tt><li type=square> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a href=>Yahoo! Terms of Service</a>.</tt>
</ul>
<br>
<div style=text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px;>
<hr style=border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left;>
</div>
</br>

<!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->


</body></html>

--0-175253323-1124040414=:11736--





___________________________________

Free Web Space for your Amateur Radio Hobby!


Re: [2] Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

Rahul Srivastava
 

Hi!? Ron!
?
Thanks for all the efforts .
The automated system appears to have some flaws. My observations
?
1) Zobel at output pin 5 of 386 has?cap marked 100pf this appers to be an error, similarly spk cpuling cap value is 1uF , this again highly on low side.
?
2) Driver stage has the 1K resistor going to ground from base before the coupling cap this again slight at err.
?
Just in case it does not confusion. Never the less very good? work.
?
73
?
Raahul VU3WJM
?
?
?
?


Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD wrote:
I don't get credit for that... eternalsquire did the work...I just converted his BMPs to GIFs.
--
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA



NEW - crystal clear PC to PC


Re: [2] Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
 

I don't get credit for that... eternalsquire did the work...I just converted his BMPs to GIFs.
--
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA

On 14 Aug 2005 08:24:46 -0600, [Arv Evans <arvevans@...>] wrote:
Ron W5RCM

Very good job on the schematics. This should also help a lot for those who
want to do their BITX as modules.

Thanks,

Arv K7HKL

On Sunday 14 August 2005 08:05 am, Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD wrote:
Very nice job, Eternal Squire!

I have converted these to GIF format... you can grab them all from
--
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA


On 14 Aug 2005 08:09:23 -0000, [eternalesquire
<eternalsquire@...>] wrote: All,

I'm starting to need reading spectacles, so I took the liberty of
redrafting the schematic submitted by Mr. Farhan into a series of
modular documents that should take somewhat less effort to view finer
details such as decimal points. I tried as hard as I could to make
them reflect best engineering practices as I currently understand them.

I've incorporated what appear to be the most popular modifications
I've seen in this group to date that also keep to the spirit of
requireing only those parts reasonably obtainable in India to an
amateur of limited finances. I've also imade annotations derived
from Mr. Farhan's text where appropriate for clarity.

The source documents were drawn using the latest version of LTSpice,
available from the Linear Technology website. I then exported them
into Word bitmap files. Finally, I retouched those files to add
details not available from LTSpice, such as variable capacitors.

Please note that the LTSpice diagrams themselves are not runnable, I
merely used the tool as a drafting aid.

Please feel free to make corrections as appropriate. One thing I
would recommend is other sets of capacitor values for different IF
frequencies. I hope others will add to Table 1 in TRANSCEIVER.bmp,
more working choices for IF's besides 9 and 10 Mhz.

You'll find this archive uploaded into as EGR&#92;BITX.zip

Enjoy,

The Eternal Squire



___________________________________

Free Web Space for your Amateur Radio Hobby!




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group BITX20 on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BITX20-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



Yahoo! Groups Links










___________________________________

Free Web Space for your Amateur Radio Hobby!


Re: Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

Arv Evans
 

Ron W5RCM

Very good job on the schematics. This should also help a lot for those who
want to do their BITX as modules.

Thanks,

Arv K7HKL

On Sunday 14 August 2005 08:05 am, Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD wrote:
Very nice job, Eternal Squire!

I have converted these to GIF format... you can grab them all from
--
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA


On 14 Aug 2005 08:09:23 -0000, [eternalesquire
<eternalsquire@...>] wrote: All,

I'm starting to need reading spectacles, so I took the liberty of
redrafting the schematic submitted by Mr. Farhan into a series of
modular documents that should take somewhat less effort to view finer
details such as decimal points.? I tried as hard as I could to make
them reflect best engineering practices as I currently understand them.

I've incorporated what appear to be the most popular modifications
I've seen in this group to date that also keep to the spirit of
requireing only those parts reasonably obtainable in India to an
amateur of limited finances.?? I've also imade annotations derived
from Mr. Farhan's text where appropriate for clarity.

The source documents were drawn using the latest version of LTSpice,
available from the Linear Technology website.? I then exported them
into? Word bitmap files.? Finally, I retouched those files to add
details not available from LTSpice, such as variable capacitors.

Please note that the LTSpice diagrams themselves are not runnable, I
merely used the tool as a drafting aid.

Please feel free to make corrections as appropriate.? One thing I
would recommend is other sets of capacitor values for different IF
frequencies.? I hope others will add to Table 1 in TRANSCEIVER.bmp,
more working choices for IF's besides 9 and 10 Mhz.

You'll find this archive uploaded into as EGR&#92;BITX.zip

Enjoy,

The Eternal Squire



___________________________________

Free Web Space for your Amateur Radio Hobby!




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


?Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.
?
?To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
?BITX20-unsubscribe@...
?
?Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

Ron McDowell - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
 

Very nice job, Eternal Squire!

I have converted these to GIF format... you can grab them all from
--
72, Ron - W5RCM / ZS1MCD
Austin TX / Hermanus ZA

On 14 Aug 2005 08:09:23 -0000, [eternalesquire <eternalsquire@...>] wrote:
All,

I'm starting to need reading spectacles, so I took the liberty of
redrafting the schematic submitted by Mr. Farhan into a series of
modular documents that should take somewhat less effort to view finer
details such as decimal points. I tried as hard as I could to make
them reflect best engineering practices as I currently understand them.

I've incorporated what appear to be the most popular modifications
I've seen in this group to date that also keep to the spirit of
requireing only those parts reasonably obtainable in India to an
amateur of limited finances. I've also imade annotations derived
from Mr. Farhan's text where appropriate for clarity.

The source documents were drawn using the latest version of LTSpice,
available from the Linear Technology website. I then exported them
into Word bitmap files. Finally, I retouched those files to add
details not available from LTSpice, such as variable capacitors.

Please note that the LTSpice diagrams themselves are not runnable, I
merely used the tool as a drafting aid.

Please feel free to make corrections as appropriate. One thing I
would recommend is other sets of capacitor values for different IF
frequencies. I hope others will add to Table 1 in TRANSCEIVER.bmp,
more working choices for IF's besides 9 and 10 Mhz.

You'll find this archive uploaded into as EGR&#92;BITX.zip

Enjoy,

The Eternal Squire



___________________________________

Free Web Space for your Amateur Radio Hobby!


Re: New to group and Query

ajparent1
 

Hello,

I have it on paper and in the chassis. It's still pending
getting it to an electronic form.

Basic design isa fairly stock PI form and uses 4 diodes
to attain about 40-45db of attenuation. Input and output
impedences are 50 ohms.

Allison

--- In BITX20@..., "vdberghak" <vdberghak@z...> wrote:
Did I miss this attenuator? I am interrested to see the schematic (and
if someone build it, the results).
Thanks,
Chris.

--- In BITX20@..., "ajparent1" <kb1gmx@a...> wrote:

In the RX
path after Q1 a PIN(poor mans PIN, 1n4007) diode attenuator for RX
AGC. AGC voltage will be audio derived.


Re: Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

ajparent1
 

Hello,

Is it possible to make those Word bitmap files intosomething like HTML
or other more portable format? Reason? I do not use Word and do not
have it.

Allison
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., "eternalesquire" <eternalsquire@c...>
wrote:
All,

I'm starting to need reading spectacles, so I took the liberty of
redrafting the schematic submitted by Mr. Farhan into a series of
modular documents that should take somewhat less effort to view finer
details such as decimal points. I tried as hard as I could to make
them reflect best engineering practices as I currently understand them.

I've incorporated what appear to be the most popular modifications
I've seen in this group to date that also keep to the spirit of
requireing only those parts reasonably obtainable in India to an
amateur of limited finances. I've also imade annotations derived
from Mr. Farhan's text where appropriate for clarity.

The source documents were drawn using the latest version of LTSpice,
available from the Linear Technology website. I then exported them
into Word bitmap files. Finally, I retouched those files to add
details not available from LTSpice, such as variable capacitors.

Please note that the LTSpice diagrams themselves are not runnable, I
merely used the tool as a drafting aid.

Please feel free to make corrections as appropriate. One thing I
would recommend is other sets of capacitor values for different IF
frequencies. I hope others will add to Table 1 in TRANSCEIVER.bmp,
more working choices for IF's besides 9 and 10 Mhz.

You'll find this archive uploaded into as EGR&#92;BITX.zip

Enjoy,

The Eternal Squire


Re: New to group and Query

 

Did I miss this attenuator? I am interrested to see the schematic (and
if someone build it, the results).
Thanks,
Chris.

--- In BITX20@..., "ajparent1" <kb1gmx@a...> wrote:

In the RX
path after Q1 a PIN(poor mans PIN, 1n4007) diode attenuator for RX
AGC. AGC voltage will be audio derived.


New file uploaded to BITX20

 

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the BITX20
group.

File : /BITX 20 V1,2&3 /Ver3 PCB ddouble sided/dimenV3.pdf
Uploaded by : vu3wjm <vu3wjm@...>
Description : Dimensions for Ver3 PCB valid for both single and doublesided.

You can access this file at the URL:


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:


Regards,

vu3wjm <vu3wjm@...>


Double sided layout for Ver3

vu3wjm
 

Hi!

Few friends have shown interest in making a double sided board for
BITX with top layer unetched and acting earth plane.

I have uploaded the artwork files to make it easy for them.

Missing hole on a 100E resistor in collector line of Q12 has been also
corrected.

73

Rahul VU3WJM


New file uploaded to BITX20

 

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the BITX20
group.

File : /BITX 20 V1,2&3 /Ver3 PCB ddouble sided/xray V3DOUBLE.pdf
Uploaded by : vu3wjm <vu3wjm@...>
Description : X ray view

You can access this file at the URL:


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:


Regards,

vu3wjm <vu3wjm@...>


Re: New to group and Query

Rahul Srivastava
 

Hi!
?
It would be a simple matter to upload the interconnection traces only less the?earth plane. I will simply reamove the earth plane from V3 layout.
?
Friends wishing to use a double sided board can leave the top layer unetched and countersink the non grounded connections.
?
Thankfuly being sunday will do that over next hour.
?
73
?
Rahul VU3WJM

ajparent1 wrote:
.

I prefer a two sided board where the component side has no
traces only clearance holes for non grounded components and
holes that are not clearanced so grounded components can be
soldered to it the ground plane. The bottom then only has +power
and signals simplifying layout.? The inherent shielding is excellent
with this layout and only side need be "drawn".

I have found shielding is always helpful.? For those of us here(USA)
or near WWV at 10mhz can be problematic.


SPONSORED LINKS


To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new .


Nicely drafted BITX schematics.

eternalesquire
 

All,

I'm starting to need reading spectacles, so I took the liberty of
redrafting the schematic submitted by Mr. Farhan into a series of
modular documents that should take somewhat less effort to view finer
details such as decimal points. I tried as hard as I could to make
them reflect best engineering practices as I currently understand them.

I've incorporated what appear to be the most popular modifications
I've seen in this group to date that also keep to the spirit of
requireing only those parts reasonably obtainable in India to an
amateur of limited finances. I've also imade annotations derived
from Mr. Farhan's text where appropriate for clarity.

The source documents were drawn using the latest version of LTSpice,
available from the Linear Technology website. I then exported them
into Word bitmap files. Finally, I retouched those files to add
details not available from LTSpice, such as variable capacitors.

Please note that the LTSpice diagrams themselves are not runnable, I
merely used the tool as a drafting aid.

Please feel free to make corrections as appropriate. One thing I
would recommend is other sets of capacitor values for different IF
frequencies. I hope others will add to Table 1 in TRANSCEIVER.bmp,
more working choices for IF's besides 9 and 10 Mhz.

You'll find this archive uploaded into as EGR&#92;BITX.zip

Enjoy,

The Eternal Squire


Re: New to group and Query

ajparent1
 

--- In BITX20@..., "bambazonke01" <jimandruth@s...> wrote:
Hi,

Inline comments.

---
Hi Allison,
I'd never thought of WWV being a problem in this respect in North
America. You are right.It would be annoying to hear that Tick -tick
all the time.
It showed on my 20m on the bench as a hetrodyne with modulation. with
shielding it was less pronounced but I'm near Boston.

I will have to consider some other IF frequency. First I'll have to
see what crystals are available locally and redesign the ladder filter.
Well if you get some 9.6mhz crystals as they are common and usually cheap.

Did you know that TEn Tec used to use CB crystals for their early
filters?
Yes, third overtone 27mhz. I've experimented with them and they
worked but not to my likeing.

fundamental frequency gave 9 mHz. That is why the filters were
slightly above 9 mhz. I like the idea of 9 Mhz as with the 5 to 5.5
Mhz VFO we could operate 2 bands (80 and 20)
Yep, imaging transceivers were very popular. Crystals for 9mhz
ladder filters are easy to get as that is also another microporcessor
crystal. Another possible band image TRX is 30m and 17m using 4.0mhz
IF and 14mhz VFO.

I was searching through packing crates today for my PC manufacturing
stuff without finding any. Some where I have a great setup of ultra
violet light and timer etc. I may have to go out and buy new ones.
Cool. Over the years I've used every technique from the most
primitive to advanced CADD based with commercial expose, develope
and etch systems. Nice for n>1 runs but dead bug[ugly or manhattan]
is faster for one off.

I put a block diagram of a PLL I use for many uses in the FILES
section. I've reproduced it many times using different (but similar)
Pll chips.


Regards,
Allison
KB1GMX


New file uploaded to BITX20

 

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the BITX20
group.

File : /KB1GMX/Plldesign.pdf
Uploaded by : ajparent1 <kb1gmx@...>
Description : block diagram of PLL for 6m BIT-X

You can access this file at the URL:


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:


Regards,

ajparent1 <kb1gmx@...>


Re: New to group and Query

bambazonke01
 

---
Hi Allison,
I'd never thought of WWV being a problem in this respect in North
America. You are right.It would be annoying to hear that Tick -tick
all the time.
I will have to consider some other IF frequency. First I'll have to
see what crystals are available locally and redesign the ladder filter.
Did you know that TEn Tec used to use CB crystals for their early
filters?
The 27+ Mhz crystals are 3 rd ovetone types so operating on the
fundamental frequency gave 9 mHz. That is why the filters were
slightly above 9 mhz. I like the idea of 9 Mhz as with the 5 to 5.5
Mhz VFO we could operate 2 bands (80 and 20)
I was searching through packing crates today for my PC manufacturing
stuff without finding any. Some where I have a great setup of ultra
violet light and timer etc. I may have to go out and buy new ones.
73
Jim VE3DDY


Re: New to group and Query

ajparent1
 

Hello,

Comments are inserted inline.

--- In BITX20@..., "bambazonke01" <jimandruth@s...> wrote:
Most of this V3 board is IF and BFO and as such is well shielded by
the prolific ground plane on it's single side.I like this type of
layout as it avoids a lot of ground loop problems.
I prefer a two sided board where the component side has no
traces only clearance holes for non grounded components and
holes that are not clearanced so grounded components can be
soldered to it the ground plane. The bottom then only has +power
and signals simplifying layout. The inherent shielding is excellent
with this layout and only side need be "drawn".

I have found shielding is always helpful. For those of us here(USA)
or near WWV at 10mhz can be problematic.

To get up to 6 meters I would presume you are going to heterodyne
the signal and have the final on a separate CCA. The hetrodyne
oscillator and final can be seperately well shielded from the IF and
VFO otherwise you are going to have more trouble than a barrel full
of monkeys with all the signals mixing .
This will be the 6th design for 6m I've done. Each being
significantly different in some way from previous. This will
be the first using a bidirectional IF and single conversion.
Design #5 is a BIT-X at 20m driving a TenTec 1208(or any other!)
transverter for 6M naking it dual conversion. That design (#5)
will be modded for 10M use and a later 432mhz transverter.

It's not nearly the problem if the frequencies are chosen right
and the mixer is not overloaded. I have done many a hetrodyne LO
before with excellent results. A VFO of 5mhz range and a crystal
osc at 36mhz works with a 9mhz IF for coverage of 50.0 to 50.5mhz.
The VFO and Crystal osc can be in the same module with a DBM and
the DBM output goes to a seperate module with a three tuned circuit
bandpass filter at 41mhz and output amplifer. Measured spurs were
more than 70db down at the output of the filter amp module. Much of
the work I've done with hetrodyne LO systems is well documented by
others in EMDRF.

However, this version will use a sampling PLL system of my design.
I have four of these working in various radios with the only
difference being the output frequency. The PLL is already complete
and the whole module uses 70ma and provides a 10DBm output for the
mixer in a package of 40mmx40mmx22mm. This verion will have a LO at
40.4 through 40.700 (tunes 50.0 to 50.300). I should gen up a block
diagram of this system as it's somewhat simpler and does not require
a microprocessor for tuning.

Variations on the BITx design I will be using is a commercial DBM
for the mixer (I have a bunch of SBL1/anzac108). I will put a MPF102
fet preamplifier before the bandpass filter as it's fairly lossy and
at 6m you need a good signal to noise for weak signals. In the RX
path after Q1 a PIN(poor mans PIN, 1n4007) diode attenuator for RX
AGC. AGC voltage will be audio derived. The amplifiers on the VHF
side of the DBM will be 2n5109 or 2n5176 types (Ft >1ghz). The IF
because of WWV will be 9.6mhz. Power amplifier chain will use a
2N4124, 2n5109 and 2SC1971. There may be other changes as I experiment.

Power amplifier chain will be split fairly similar to the base BIT-x
where the 2N4124 buffer (Q14) in on the main board and the driver and
final on a seperate board. I do this for two reasons. I have a good
quanitity of 2.4" wide G10 copper clad board strips of 50-60cm long
and I may later wish a different power amp design.

Hope this give some detail on how I will go about it.

FYI: My passtime is QRP 6M and 2M weak signal work.

Regards,
Allison
KB1GMX

Best of luck
Jim VE3DDY

--- In BITX20@..., "ajparent1" <kb1gmx@a...> wrote:

Hi,

It's size and the lack of two sides (top ground plane) make it
less than useful for my 6m project. I'm saving it for something
else. I mentioned it so others may know that FAR has it.

Myself I'm dead bugging it [aka ugly or manhattan] style as its
fast and offers good grounding and shielding. I have PCB making
materials but for one off stuff it's as much time to setup and
do that is just building it dead bug style. Also much smaller.
FYI: I'm targeting a 175x45x130mm package. Power output will be
in the 3-5w range with 2SC1971 transistor. So I understand you
goal for containing in a manpack.

Allison
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., "bambazonke01" <jimandruth@s...>
wrote:
The Far circuits boards are away too big for my application so
I'm
strongly considering a run of the CCA design by VU3WJM (Rahul).
This board design is 6.5 X 4.25 inches and will fit nicely
inside
the Chinese 884 VHF packset which you can buy off E-bay (Call
up "Military Radio")
I've recently relocated homes and will have to restock on G10
pcb
and resist etc.
Jim VE3DDY


--- In BITX20@..., "ajparent1" <kb1gmx@a...> wrote:
Hello,

This may not be of help to everyone but for North Americans
it would be handy to know.

FAR circuits www.farcircuits.net

They have the the BIT-X board as drawn by the creator.
The one I have measures 221mm by 82mm [8 11/16" by 3 1/4"
for the non metric]. At 19.00$US it's expensive but may
save construction time.

Allison,
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., Rahul Srivastava <vu3wjm@y...>
wrote:
Hi! Friends

Unfortunately we have still not managed to get the BITX PCB
commercialy manufactured even though it is quite cheap getting
it
done
here.
Secondly postage from India is also rather expensive ie
much
more
than the board.
Board is correct in all respect except for one hole missing
for a
resistor but that anchors to nearby component lead. Ver3 is
quite
stable too. I would be happy if some DX friends can help out
in
this
matter to all those who need PCB. I will be happy to provide
any
needed file.

The modified filter response posted by one of our french
friend
does
indeed results in improved audio. I use 82,120&150pf caps as
standard
value.



I have yet to try swaping the PD/MOD connection mod.

Lately I came across another minimalist design. Less the uC
section
and brass screw PTO it becomes quite attractive



73

Raahul VU3WJM






bambazonke01 <jimandruth@s...> wrote:
Hi Arv, and Group,
I've been looking at the CCA Version 3 by VU3WJM as it fits
the
884
packset like a glove. I have to find someone who has that
board
available or else gear up to make my own. I've made some
PCB's
in
the past. I think Far Circuits may make me one as well.
You may have seen the 884 VHF packset being sold on e-bay
for
about
$120 Canadian or $100 US. These sets are good for 6 meter
FM
but
they are ideal to use for a rebuild in an HF packset.
I have al kinds of HF gear and "Green Radios" but always
enjoy a
project like this BitX.
As time goes on PCB problems will sort themselves out. In
the
meantime, I'll start collecting components.
Jim VE3DDY

--- In BITX20@..., Arv Evans <arvevans@e...>
wrote:
Jim VE3DDY

One of my BITX units is built on a 7 inch by 4 inch PCB,
including
the
PTO/VFO, a Huff & Puff stabilizer, and three additional
transistors for T/R
power switching. It is a bit tight, but it can be done.
Since
the RF stages
require shielding from the lower power sections, the use
of
vertical sections
of blank PCB might allow parts of the circuit to be built
on
these
shielding
partitions, thus allowing a more compact design.

PCBs have been designed and may still be available as well
if
you
prefer that
method of construction. Some of the PCB layouts are
documented in
the FILES
and PHOTO sections of the forum.

Some BITX builders have constructed the unit in several
smaller
modules (about
1 inch by 2 inches) that were then assembled to make up a
very
compact
layout.

By all means, read over the older email messages, then go
to
the
FILES and the
PHOTO sections and review what is there. You will find
several
additional
ideas for modification and upgrades.

Welcome aboard and good luck with your BITX. If you run
into
problems, there
are many now on the BITX forum that may be able to help.

Arv K7HKL
_._
On Thursday 11 August 2005 05:37 am, bambazonke01 wrote:
Hi BIT-X'ers,
My name is Jim and I'm new to the group.
I'm a Canadian Radio Amateur and an avid experimenter.
I have an old Chinese type 884 VHF radio packset into
which
I'd
like
to install a Bit-X perhaps for 40 Meters.
Has anyone reconfigured the main Bit-X PCB to a smaller
configuration
approx 170 X 110 mm (6.75 X 4.25 Inches)or smaller?
I also have similar size available for the VFO and PA
modules.
I've lots of reading to catch up on.
Jim VE3DDY




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BITX20-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
Service.




SPONSORED LINKS
Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply Ham radio Hobby supply
Ham
radio
sales

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BITX20-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the
all
new
Yahoo! Security Centre.


Re: New to group and Query

bambazonke01
 

Most of this V3 board is IF and BFO and as such is well shielded by
the prolific ground plane on it's single side.I like this type of
layout as it avoids a lot of ground loop problems.
To get up to 6 meters I would presume you are going to heterodyne
the signal and have the final on a separate CCA. The hetrodyne
oscillator and final can be seperately well shielded from the IF and
VFO otherwise you are going to have more trouble than a barrel full
of monkeys with all the signals mixing .
Best of luck
Jim VE3DDY

--- In BITX20@..., "ajparent1" <kb1gmx@a...> wrote:

Hi,

It's size and the lack of two sides (top ground plane) make it
less than useful for my 6m project. I'm saving it for something
else. I mentioned it so others may know that FAR has it.

Myself I'm dead bugging it [aka ugly or manhattan] style as its
fast and offers good grounding and shielding. I have PCB making
materials but for one off stuff it's as much time to setup and
do that is just building it dead bug style. Also much smaller.
FYI: I'm targeting a 175x45x130mm package. Power output will be
in the 3-5w range with 2SC1971 transistor. So I understand you
goal for containing in a manpack.

Allison
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., "bambazonke01" <jimandruth@s...>
wrote:
The Far circuits boards are away too big for my application so
I'm
strongly considering a run of the CCA design by VU3WJM (Rahul).
This board design is 6.5 X 4.25 inches and will fit nicely
inside
the Chinese 884 VHF packset which you can buy off E-bay (Call
up "Military Radio")
I've recently relocated homes and will have to restock on G10
pcb
and resist etc.
Jim VE3DDY


--- In BITX20@..., "ajparent1" <kb1gmx@a...> wrote:
Hello,

This may not be of help to everyone but for North Americans
it would be handy to know.

FAR circuits www.farcircuits.net

They have the the BIT-X board as drawn by the creator.
The one I have measures 221mm by 82mm [8 11/16" by 3 1/4"
for the non metric]. At 19.00$US it's expensive but may
save construction time.

Allison,
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., Rahul Srivastava <vu3wjm@y...>
wrote:
Hi! Friends

Unfortunately we have still not managed to get the BITX PCB
commercialy manufactured even though it is quite cheap getting
it
done
here.
Secondly postage from India is also rather expensive ie
much
more
than the board.
Board is correct in all respect except for one hole missing
for a
resistor but that anchors to nearby component lead. Ver3 is
quite
stable too. I would be happy if some DX friends can help out
in
this
matter to all those who need PCB. I will be happy to provide
any
needed file.

The modified filter response posted by one of our french
friend
does
indeed results in improved audio. I use 82,120&150pf caps as
standard
value.



I have yet to try swaping the PD/MOD connection mod.

Lately I came across another minimalist design. Less the uC
section
and brass screw PTO it becomes quite attractive



73

Raahul VU3WJM






bambazonke01 <jimandruth@s...> wrote:
Hi Arv, and Group,
I've been looking at the CCA Version 3 by VU3WJM as it fits
the
884
packset like a glove. I have to find someone who has that
board
available or else gear up to make my own. I've made some
PCB's
in
the past. I think Far Circuits may make me one as well.
You may have seen the 884 VHF packset being sold on e-bay
for
about
$120 Canadian or $100 US. These sets are good for 6 meter
FM
but
they are ideal to use for a rebuild in an HF packset.
I have al kinds of HF gear and "Green Radios" but always
enjoy a
project like this BitX.
As time goes on PCB problems will sort themselves out. In
the
meantime, I'll start collecting components.
Jim VE3DDY

--- In BITX20@..., Arv Evans <arvevans@e...>
wrote:
Jim VE3DDY

One of my BITX units is built on a 7 inch by 4 inch PCB,
including
the
PTO/VFO, a Huff & Puff stabilizer, and three additional
transistors for T/R
power switching. It is a bit tight, but it can be done.
Since
the RF stages
require shielding from the lower power sections, the use
of
vertical sections
of blank PCB might allow parts of the circuit to be built
on
these
shielding
partitions, thus allowing a more compact design.

PCBs have been designed and may still be available as well
if
you
prefer that
method of construction. Some of the PCB layouts are
documented in
the FILES
and PHOTO sections of the forum.

Some BITX builders have constructed the unit in several
smaller
modules (about
1 inch by 2 inches) that were then assembled to make up a
very
compact
layout.

By all means, read over the older email messages, then go
to
the
FILES and the
PHOTO sections and review what is there. You will find
several
additional
ideas for modification and upgrades.

Welcome aboard and good luck with your BITX. If you run
into
problems, there
are many now on the BITX forum that may be able to help.

Arv K7HKL
_._
On Thursday 11 August 2005 05:37 am, bambazonke01 wrote:
Hi BIT-X'ers,
My name is Jim and I'm new to the group.
I'm a Canadian Radio Amateur and an avid experimenter.
I have an old Chinese type 884 VHF radio packset into
which
I'd
like
to install a Bit-X perhaps for 40 Meters.
Has anyone reconfigured the main Bit-X PCB to a smaller
configuration
approx 170 X 110 mm (6.75 X 4.25 Inches)or smaller?
I also have similar size available for the VFO and PA
modules.
I've lots of reading to catch up on.
Jim VE3DDY




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BITX20-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
Service.




SPONSORED LINKS
Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply Ham radio Hobby supply
Ham
radio
sales

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BITX20-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the
all
new
Yahoo! Security Centre.


Re: New to group and Query

ajparent1
 

Hi,

It's size and the lack of two sides (top ground plane) make it
less than useful for my 6m project. I'm saving it for something
else. I mentioned it so others may know that FAR has it.

Myself I'm dead bugging it [aka ugly or manhattan] style as its
fast and offers good grounding and shielding. I have PCB making
materials but for one off stuff it's as much time to setup and
do that is just building it dead bug style. Also much smaller.
FYI: I'm targeting a 175x45x130mm package. Power output will be
in the 3-5w range with 2SC1971 transistor. So I understand you
goal for containing in a manpack.

Allison
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., "bambazonke01" <jimandruth@s...> wrote:
The Far circuits boards are away too big for my application so I'm
strongly considering a run of the CCA design by VU3WJM (Rahul).
This board design is 6.5 X 4.25 inches and will fit nicely inside
the Chinese 884 VHF packset which you can buy off E-bay (Call
up "Military Radio")
I've recently relocated homes and will have to restock on G10 pcb
and resist etc.
Jim VE3DDY


--- In BITX20@..., "ajparent1" <kb1gmx@a...> wrote:
Hello,

This may not be of help to everyone but for North Americans
it would be handy to know.

FAR circuits www.farcircuits.net

They have the the BIT-X board as drawn by the creator.
The one I have measures 221mm by 82mm [8 11/16" by 3 1/4"
for the non metric]. At 19.00$US it's expensive but may
save construction time.

Allison,
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., Rahul Srivastava <vu3wjm@y...>
wrote:
Hi! Friends

Unfortunately we have still not managed to get the BITX PCB
commercialy manufactured even though it is quite cheap getting it
done
here.
Secondly postage from India is also rather expensive ie much
more
than the board.
Board is correct in all respect except for one hole missing for a
resistor but that anchors to nearby component lead. Ver3 is quite
stable too. I would be happy if some DX friends can help out in
this
matter to all those who need PCB. I will be happy to provide any
needed file.

The modified filter response posted by one of our french friend
does
indeed results in improved audio. I use 82,120&150pf caps as
standard
value.



I have yet to try swaping the PD/MOD connection mod.

Lately I came across another minimalist design. Less the uC
section
and brass screw PTO it becomes quite attractive



73

Raahul VU3WJM






bambazonke01 <jimandruth@s...> wrote:
Hi Arv, and Group,
I've been looking at the CCA Version 3 by VU3WJM as it fits the
884
packset like a glove. I have to find someone who has that board
available or else gear up to make my own. I've made some PCB's
in
the past. I think Far Circuits may make me one as well.
You may have seen the 884 VHF packset being sold on e-bay for
about
$120 Canadian or $100 US. These sets are good for 6 meter FM
but
they are ideal to use for a rebuild in an HF packset.
I have al kinds of HF gear and "Green Radios" but always enjoy a
project like this BitX.
As time goes on PCB problems will sort themselves out. In the
meantime, I'll start collecting components.
Jim VE3DDY

--- In BITX20@..., Arv Evans <arvevans@e...> wrote:
Jim VE3DDY

One of my BITX units is built on a 7 inch by 4 inch PCB,
including
the
PTO/VFO, a Huff & Puff stabilizer, and three additional
transistors for T/R
power switching. It is a bit tight, but it can be done.
Since
the RF stages
require shielding from the lower power sections, the use of
vertical sections
of blank PCB might allow parts of the circuit to be built on
these
shielding
partitions, thus allowing a more compact design.

PCBs have been designed and may still be available as well if
you
prefer that
method of construction. Some of the PCB layouts are
documented in
the FILES
and PHOTO sections of the forum.

Some BITX builders have constructed the unit in several
smaller
modules (about
1 inch by 2 inches) that were then assembled to make up a very
compact
layout.

By all means, read over the older email messages, then go to
the
FILES and the
PHOTO sections and review what is there. You will find
several
additional
ideas for modification and upgrades.

Welcome aboard and good luck with your BITX. If you run into
problems, there
are many now on the BITX forum that may be able to help.

Arv K7HKL
_._
On Thursday 11 August 2005 05:37 am, bambazonke01 wrote:
Hi BIT-X'ers,
My name is Jim and I'm new to the group.
I'm a Canadian Radio Amateur and an avid experimenter.
I have an old Chinese type 884 VHF radio packset into which
I'd
like
to install a Bit-X perhaps for 40 Meters.
Has anyone reconfigured the main Bit-X PCB to a smaller
configuration
approx 170 X 110 mm (6.75 X 4.25 Inches)or smaller?
I also have similar size available for the VFO and PA
modules.
I've lots of reading to catch up on.
Jim VE3DDY




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BITX20-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.




SPONSORED LINKS
Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply Ham radio Hobby supply Ham
radio
sales

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "BITX20" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
BITX20-unsubscribe@...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
new
Yahoo! Security Centre.