¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: uBITX 5 - Backing Away #calibration

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I'm enclosing a blank template 8.5 x 11 inch version in .odt (open office) format.? ? All you have to do is add your text chapter by chapter, and your drawings etc, with a word processor and bingo! you can have? documentation book written!? ?You can even update it later on to create new editions.??


Creating the cover is as easy or as difficult as you wish it to be, and then you just pick your markets, and how much you want them to charge for it.? ?Costs you NOTHING??


And plenty of you are capable of doing this!!


If you want help, I'll be glad to help.


Cheers,


gordon gibby



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 6:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] uBITX 5 - Backing Away #calibration
?
Several of you guys here are plenty brilliant enough to write Heathkit level documentation for several of these versions. ??

Creating a book on Kindle or in paperback through Amazon is absolute duck simple. ? Cost zero dollars. ? Amazon will sell and distribute & do everything for you?

All you have to do is write it in a word processor.?

That would help the community significantly. ? You might make enough moolah to supersize your McDonald¡¯s!

If anybody is willing to work at that, I can help you to get started. ? ?I have 11 books published; none of them are stellar, but they all help teach things.



Gordon?


On Mar 27, 2019, at 18:22, John Faivre <wa9sgd@...> wrote:

Sounds like you want a Heathkit level of documentation. Well my 1976 HW104 cost over $600 in 1976 dollars. This radio will cost you less than $150 in a nice enclosure. For me the satisfaction was in the challenge. I learned a lot building it and would not think twice about doing it again. It is a bit fiddly for the appliance user, but it is a great radio.
--
John Faivre?WA9SGD


Re: uBITX 5 - Backing Away #calibration

brad martin
 

If you would like to donate a uBitx to the creation of a manual, someone here may do it.? While you cant go to the bank and cash in 80 hours for money, time is not free.? I¡¯m surprised after you have written 11 books, how much you downplay the time and energy required to document something as well as you would like it.

Brad

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:59 PM Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...> wrote:
Several of you guys here are plenty brilliant enough to write Heathkit level documentation for several of these versions. ??

Creating a book on Kindle or in paperback through Amazon is absolute duck simple. ? Cost zero dollars. ? Amazon will sell and distribute & do everything for you?

All you have to do is write it in a word processor.?

That would help the community significantly. ? You might make enough moolah to supersize your McDonald¡¯s!

If anybody is willing to work at that, I can help you to get started. ? ?I have 11 books published; none of them are stellar, but they all help teach things.



Gordon?


On Mar 27, 2019, at 18:22, John Faivre <wa9sgd@...> wrote:

Sounds like you want a Heathkit level of documentation. Well my 1976 HW104 cost over $600 in 1976 dollars. This radio will cost you less than $150 in a nice enclosure. For me the satisfaction was in the challenge. I learned a lot building it and would not think twice about doing it again. It is a bit fiddly for the appliance user, but it is a great radio.
--
John Faivre?WA9SGD

--


Re: uBITX 5 - Backing Away #calibration

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Several of you guys here are plenty brilliant enough to write Heathkit level documentation for several of these versions. ??

Creating a book on Kindle or in paperback through Amazon is absolute duck simple. ? Cost zero dollars. ? Amazon will sell and distribute & do everything for you?

All you have to do is write it in a word processor.?

That would help the community significantly. ? You might make enough moolah to supersize your McDonald¡¯s!

If anybody is willing to work at that, I can help you to get started. ? ?I have 11 books published; none of them are stellar, but they all help teach things.



Gordon?


On Mar 27, 2019, at 18:22, John Faivre <wa9sgd@...> wrote:

Sounds like you want a Heathkit level of documentation. Well my 1976 HW104 cost over $600 in 1976 dollars. This radio will cost you less than $150 in a nice enclosure. For me the satisfaction was in the challenge. I learned a lot building it and would not think twice about doing it again. It is a bit fiddly for the appliance user, but it is a great radio.
--
John Faivre?WA9SGD


Re: uBITX 5 - Backing Away #calibration

John Faivre
 

Sounds like you want a Heathkit level of documentation. Well my 1976 HW104 cost over $600 in 1976 dollars. This radio will cost you less than $150 in a nice enclosure. For me the satisfaction was in the challenge. I learned a lot building it and would not think twice about doing it again. It is a bit fiddly for the appliance user, but it is a great radio.
--
John Faivre?WA9SGD


Re: Shaking my head in disbelief....

Kelly Mabry
 

Arv, when in doubt, use Github! It works, but doesn't fill the screen. I do have the KD 8 CEC software though.
I'm done modding for the moment...? ?I found ubitx_35E7.tft...now to go play awhile...

Kelly K5AID?


Re: ubitx 5 board

Kelly Mabry
 

Hi Bill, same here; I used ubitx_35E7.tft...it says 3.5 but doesn't fill out the display....

73,
Kelly K5AID?


Re: ubitx 5 board

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Dan,

I loaded UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16P.hex into my v5 and it works great.

Hope you have the same results.

But I am still trying to get my 3.2 NX display to work right - it leaves about 1/2 inch on the right side.

but for now I just use the 16 x 2

Bill K9JUI


On 3/27/2019 4:17 PM, Dan Pflugrath wrote:

I downloaded the Zip file with the firmware hex files.? Which hex file should I load for a stock uBITX V5 with the stock 2 line display.
Thanks
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16D.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16D_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16I.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16I_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16P.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16P_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20I.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20I_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20P.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20P_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_NX.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_NX_S.hex


Re: ubitx 5 board

Kelly Mabry
 

Hi Dan, if you look at top line of where you downloaded those files it should say filename info. Click it and it will tell you which one is for the stock display, but you may have read each description.?

Kelly K5AID?


Re: Black Squares on Raduino Display Redux #bitx40 #raduino

Pat Anderson
 

Read carefully! I did not say LInux does not use device drivers, I said LInux does not use device drivers "the way Windows and Macs do"! All the device drivers I need for Ubuntu are already included in the distro, and and they are remarkably non-fussy about this chip or that chip. Counterfeit Prolific chips work just fine with /dev/tty!


On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:37 AM Christopher J. Shaker <cjshaker@...> wrote:

Actually, Linux (and Unix) DO use device drivers. You just don't typically have to deal with installing them.
I was a device driver writer for HP-UX in a previous life.
Chris Shaker

On 3/26/2019 3:25 PM, Pat Anderson wrote:
I understand what you are saying, and would agree if I were using Windows or Mac. I am pretty confident it is not a problem on my computer end...Linux does not use "drivers" the way Windows and Macs do - everything going out a USB port in Linux goes out using the dialout device, /dev/tty. When the user is a member of the dialout group, and there is an FTDI or Prolific (even counterfeit) chip on the other end, a /dev/ttyUSB0 device is created, which is then made read/write with chmod. Linux is remarkably un-fussy about what the chip is. Whatever the chip in the Raduino is, it does not seem my computer is not having a problem with it.

Whatever the chip is in the Raduino is, /dev/tty is? recognizing it and creating the USB device on? the computer. The IDE knows the USB device is there, and I am making it read/write, which has always worked for everything else.

Thanks for the input though. I think I may j just set this aside for a while and come back to it later.



On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:22 PM <johnbahun@...> wrote:
If you are unable to upload ANY code to the processor - it is likely a problem with the serial port and/or driver on your computer.? This issue is always a black eye with new setups.? Some Arduino boards use FTDI devices and others use CHD devices.? It seems that most of the Chinese clones are using CHD340/341 devices. ? HTH


Re: ubitx 5 board

 

I downloaded the Zip file with the firmware hex files.? Which hex file should I load for a stock uBITX V5 with the stock 2 line display.
Thanks
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16D.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16D_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16I.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16I_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16P.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_16P_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20I.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20I_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20P.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_20P_S.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_NX.hex
UBITXV5_CEC_V1.122_NX_S.hex


Re: V4 belly up

 

Take your DVM to see if you have continuity from the center pin on the RF connector all the way back to L4.? you can do this with dc power on, such that a relay is connected.? also check to make sure you don't have a short circuit at the antenna connector.? eliminate the easy first.?

Have you checked CW transmit?? Do you have an audio sidetone and RF output??

I would check more than one band in case you knocked something loose in the low pass filter section.?

Curt


Re: Reverse Polarity Protection.

 

Tastes vary.
A series diode into P1 pin 1 plus a fuse at the power supply seems plenty elegant.
If worried about overvoltage, use an LM2940T-12 instead.

Not being a mechanical engineer, relays not so much.
But if building a 1kW linear with high currents involved, I'd consider the relay.

Jerry


On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:43 AM, MadRadioModder wrote:
More elegant solution.


Re: Shaking my head in disbelief....

 

Kelly

Someone else will have to help you with the Nextion software.? All my
systems use conventional 2-line and 4-line LCD displays.? There are plenty
of Nextion users hanging out here so someone should provide an answer
to your question.

Arv
_._


On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:46 AM Kelly Mabry <kmabry2007@...> wrote:
Hi Arv.. thanks for the info, I also have found the right programming cable in the dark depths of my junk box.? I found and uploaded? v5 firmware successfully from ian's site, but I cant find the Nextion tft for my NX4832K035_011.? Can anyone help me. I'm confused;?
I thought they were contain within the software and the different display was contained in the software but I guess I'm wrong

Kelly K5AID?


Re: My uBitx Easy-Digi interface for under $20

 

Dear OM,

I am interested for buying it.? Please inform in details.

Reply to my email address bsnvu2yc73s@...

73s.
Balsun, VU2UYC.? From KERALA STATE, INDIA.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:45 PM <howellubeen@...> wrote:
If anyone is interested, I have put together a google doc that shows part sources I used for my PC to uBitx "Easy Digi" interface, and the document includes a few tips.? It works and looks good, and I made my first PSK31 using fldigi from here in Ohio to New Mexico last Sunday night.? Works great, all for under $20, including cables.



Allen
KC8VRI


Re: Shaking my head in disbelief....

 

There are .tft available for the 3.5 under the Files tab to the left.

Or,
/g/BITX20/files/3.2%20&%203.5%20for%20Nextion%20and%20CEC%201.095


V4 belly up

 

Put?Ubitx? v4 in case, all correct, keyed up twice and now no xmit, no receive.? It did show output when I spoke into mic, but hearing was as if there was a 20db attenuator on.? Now there is neither, any ideas?
?


Re: Shaking my head in disbelief....

Kelly Mabry
 

Ah... I see that...

Kelly K5AID?


Re: Shaking my head in disbelief....

Kelly Mabry
 

Hi Arv.. thanks for the info, I also have found the right programming cable in the dark depths of my junk box.? I found and uploaded? v5 firmware successfully from ian's site, but I cant find the Nextion tft for my NX4832K035_011.? Can anyone help me. I'm confused;?
I thought they were contain within the software and the different display was contained in the software but I guess I'm wrong

Kelly K5AID?


Re: Reverse Polarity Protection.

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I far prefer the approach below as you are not crow-baring voltages, blowing fuses, shorting diodes, and letting smoke escape:

?

?

More elegant solution.

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 12:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Reverse Polarity Protection.

?

The PFET reverse polarity protection is not a bad choice if you need the minimum possible voltage drop.
But it's easy to goof up.? Some schematics for this on the web show the PFET
placed backwards, and thus offering zero protection from reverse polarity.
At power up, the intrinsic reverse diode conducts from drain to source, till the source is Vgs above the gate.
At that point, what is hopefully an enhancement mode PFET starts to conduct, reducing the voltage drop
between drain to source from a diode drop to that incurred by the current through Rds-on.

For a uBitx, I'd recommend instead a diode (most anything capable of dealing with 500ma)
in series with the main 12v into the board at P1 pin 1 (which also protects the Raduino).
We can afford a slight voltage drop there, and this is much easier to understand.

The 12v into PA-PWR on P1 pin 2 for the IRF510's can be a direct connection, since a reverse voltage
on PA-PWR will cause the IRF510's to conduct through their intrinsic reverse diode.
If there is no fuse then some easily repaired board traces (and/or L8,, L9) will blow,
but not your IRF510's.? Diode protection here is ok if you insist, but you will need
a fairly hefty diode, and the diode drop will reduce transmit power by a bit.

A 3 Amp fuse between the power supply and uBitx is highly recommended.

Without reverse protection into the main board, the Raduino can fry because
the ancient LM7805 on the Raduino does not block a negative voltage.
There are newer regulators such as the LM2940 that do.
Replacing the protection diode recommended above with an LM2940T-12,
gives protection for reverse battery voltage, it will also protect the rig
from excessive battery voltage.? (PA-PWR should not go through an LM2940T,
as that will draw too much current.)?

Jerry, KE7ER


But many people who use don't understand how it works, and often circuits found on the web show the FET backwards.

for this scheme show the FET in backwards.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 04:30 AM, Tom, wb6b wrote:

Here is an interesting link to a mosfet reverse polarity protection circuit. I found this mentioned in a post on this group from about a year ago.



Tom, wb6b


Virus-free.

--

¡­_. _._


Re: v5 in GE Phoenix SX case #ft8 #ubitx #antennas #firmware

 

Update after using the uBitx for about 2 weeks:

Listening to SSB voice was possible for strong signals after setting IF shift to 3000
(CEC firmware)

1) interference from the KGO AM station is now gone
2) it is possible to listening to strong SSB signals (I use the
to get an idea of where a strong signal can be found and then tune the uBitx to that
frequenc. S9+ SSB signals at Half Moon Bay can generally be heard by the
uBitx in Silicon Valley).

-jens (KM6ZJV)