¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: How to get 5W on 10m?

 

What about adding a capacitor (like a 180pf or maybe a higher value) in parallel with r83? Would it increase the 10m power output without decreasing the output in the other bands (I wish I knew how to use LTspice)?


Il 02/mar/2019 11:47, "iz oos via Groups.Io" <and2oosiz2=[email protected]> ha scritto:

I replaced the cap at the emitter of Q90 with a 470pf instead of the 0.1nF. In the meanwhile I replaced the bifilar antenna wire with a short coax. Output power on 40 marginally diminished from 15 to 12.5w about. The power on higher bands marginally increased from nearly 2w to nearly 2.5w. But the 'instability' issue with full throttle noise on SSB on 10m has disappeared and I can also not attenuate the Vogad output. Overall I am happy with this one component replacement.


Il 01/mar/2019 08:40, "iz oos via Groups.Io" <and2oosiz2=gmail.com@groups.io> ha scritto:

Thanks for all the replies. According to the old schematics of my ver. 3 ubitx C81 should be 0.1nF, so I will see what changes with a 470pf as suggested by Farhan.


Il 28/feb/2019 23:58, "ajparent1/KB1GMX" <kb1gmx@...> ha scritto:
BITX V5 as distriibuted.? I believe its part of the Zip file on github.
Here is a copy attached.

As far as power amp there were no changes and is the same for emitter cap (c81) on Q90
going back to V3.

Allison


Re: uBitx V4 Audio extremely quiet and other needed mods#ubitx

 

Raj, I hope this is a joke and not a real true...? :/


Il 07/mar/2019 14:10, "Raj vu2zap" <rajendrakumargg@...> ha scritto:
Today they have the technology to put in the magic smoke even in the smallest components.
Nobody can stop the release of the smoke, not even me.

Amazing!

Raj, vu2zap

At 07-03-19, you wrote:
Come on now.... that is half the fun of ham radio.... doing something you don¡¯t have a clue about just to see if it works.? It¡¯s like going to the casino and hoping it¡¯s your lucky day.? Ha!? When the smoke comes out you learn an unforgettable lesson.

David J. Wilcox K8WPE¡¯s iPad

On Mar 6, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Wayne Leake <wayneleake@...> wrote:

?The mention of not plugging or unplugging the headphone/speaker with the radio on reminded me of an incident years ago.
?I did radio repairs in my brothrs TV hop yers ago.
?Had a customer brought in a Bearcat IV scanner with no audio.
?seems he decided to install an RCA jack on the back to plug an external speaker in.
?However, he did so with the radio plugged in and "ON"
?Cost him a few $$ to replace the audio IC.
?A bit of a costly lesson for him.

?Always work on things with the radio off, and even unplugged, except for making tests when you know what you are doing.
?Wayne WA2YNE


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

 

I wouldn't wait for a ver 6. Although I would have liked to read an independent and thorough SA analysis by users or a QST review with the ARRL measurements. Version 3 was deeply analyzed. Criticisms by Allison (SSB spurs above 17m) and Warren/Allison (unsufficient harmonics suppression) seems tackled in this version 5. The low audio issue typical of version 4 also seems solved for good.


Il 09/mar/2019 05:36, "Jack Purdum via Groups.Io" <jjpurdum=[email protected]> ha scritto:
Something else to consider: Al and I have build a number of ?BITX's as have members of our Builders Group. All of them that we know about are within spec on 80M and 40M. All were also on spec on 20M, but 2 were "on spec", but close enough that it might be within or outside of spec on a lab SA. Both of those, however, were within 1.96¦Ò.

So, if you only have an antenna for 80 and 40 meters, it's likely a moot question. If you plan to work 20M and below, I'd say buy it and see if it's in spec or not. If not, chances are you can sell it on this Forum for close to what you paid for it.

I'd hate to see you pass up the enjoyment this little rig can afford you. You're going in with your eyes open and if it doesn't make you happy, you have a plan for recouping the lion's share of your cost. What the heck...Custer took a chance...

My $0.02 are in the ring...stepping down from soapbox...

Jack, W8TEE

On Friday, March 8, 2019, 11:02:57 PM EST, Brutus Laurentius <markhamfarm14@...> wrote:


We all have our biases, which include maybe a bit of projection ... and I'm projecting that this is a fun kit well worth buying.

Now, in saying that, I am pretty handy with a soldering iron and hot air too, along with magnified goggles and good lighting.??

Like anything this fun, there are a lot of ways to approach it.? But the thing is, this radio is very hackable.??

I believe, especially if you adjust Rv1 for 5 watts and do the other calibration required, you won't be getting cited by the FCC.

My experience is with a V4 with all the "fixes" plus I? incorporated most of the changes (except for the IF frequency change) from the V5, as well as replacing the driver transistors, etc.? I ultimately put the filters on a little daughter card on top of the originals.? Next I'll be adding agc.

I happen to have access to a spectrum analyzer at work, and with that done, as long as I kept the output below 7.5 w on my band of choice, I had nothing that was a problem.? ?

A bit of patience, tweaking and fun, and at least for me, the rig has turned out usable!


Re: Which version of the ubitx board is currently shipping?

 

Yes it is Ver.5


On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, 9:58 am Kelly Mabry <kmabry2007@... wrote:

Just to ask, is the V5 board shipping as of today? Sorry for the question? here, I did not see a "contract us" @ hfsignals.com...

Kelly K5AID?


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


Re: Which version of the ubitx board is currently shipping?

Kelly Mabry
 

Thank you so much!

Kelly K5AID?


Re: Which version of the ubitx board is currently shipping?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yes as of a few weeks ago, Farhan posted this info to the group.

Skip Davis, NC9O?

On Mar 8, 2019, at 23:28, Kelly Mabry <kmabry2007@...> wrote:


Just to ask, is the V5 board shipping as of today? Sorry for the question? here, I did not see a "contract us" @ ...

Kelly K5AID?


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

Jack Purdum
 

Something else to consider: Al and I have build a number of ?BITX's as have members of our Builders Group. All of them that we know about are within spec on 80M and 40M. All were also on spec on 20M, but 2 were "on spec", but close enough that it might be within or outside of spec on a lab SA. Both of those, however, were within 1.96¦Ò.

So, if you only have an antenna for 80 and 40 meters, it's likely a moot question. If you plan to work 20M and below, I'd say buy it and see if it's in spec or not. If not, chances are you can sell it on this Forum for close to what you paid for it.

I'd hate to see you pass up the enjoyment this little rig can afford you. You're going in with your eyes open and if it doesn't make you happy, you have a plan for recouping the lion's share of your cost. What the heck...Custer took a chance...

My $0.02 are in the ring...stepping down from soapbox...

Jack, W8TEE

On Friday, March 8, 2019, 11:02:57 PM EST, Brutus Laurentius <markhamfarm14@...> wrote:


We all have our biases, which include maybe a bit of projection ... and I'm projecting that this is a fun kit well worth buying.

Now, in saying that, I am pretty handy with a soldering iron and hot air too, along with magnified goggles and good lighting.??

Like anything this fun, there are a lot of ways to approach it.? But the thing is, this radio is very hackable.??

I believe, especially if you adjust Rv1 for 5 watts and do the other calibration required, you won't be getting cited by the FCC.

My experience is with a V4 with all the ubitx.net "fixes" plus I? incorporated most of the changes (except for the IF frequency change) from the V5, as well as replacing the driver transistors, etc.? I ultimately put the filters on a little daughter card on top of the originals.? Next I'll be adding agc.

I happen to have access to a spectrum analyzer at work, and with that done, as long as I kept the output below 7.5 w on my band of choice, I had nothing that was a problem.? ?

A bit of patience, tweaking and fun, and at least for me, the rig has turned out usable!


Which version of the ubitx board is currently shipping?

Kelly Mabry
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


Just to ask, is the V5 board shipping as of today? Sorry for the question? here, I did not see a "contract us" @ hfsignals.com...

Kelly K5AID?


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

Kelly Mabry
 

Brutus, you have said the magic words....hackable.? This has me hooked. Indeed, I will be ordering the? radio next month or so..due to finances. No I won't be selling my ts 590sg, hi hi.?

I welcome the things that I have learned from researching this radio... and all of you..on this thread. You CAN teach an old ham new tricks. Like the 9:1 un un I plan to build to utilize a long wire with the ubitx. Considering things like a tuner and or swr homebrew devices for qrp.

73,?

Kelly K5AID?


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

 

We all have our biases, which include maybe a bit of projection ... and I'm projecting that this is a fun kit well worth buying.

Now, in saying that, I am pretty handy with a soldering iron and hot air too, along with magnified goggles and good lighting.??

Like anything this fun, there are a lot of ways to approach it.? But the thing is, this radio is very hackable.??

I believe, especially if you adjust Rv1 for 5 watts and do the other calibration required, you won't be getting cited by the FCC.

My experience is with a V4 with all the ubitx.net "fixes" plus I? incorporated most of the changes (except for the IF frequency change) from the V5, as well as replacing the driver transistors, etc.? I ultimately put the filters on a little daughter card on top of the originals.? Next I'll be adding agc.

I happen to have access to a spectrum analyzer at work, and with that done, as long as I kept the output below 7.5 w on my band of choice, I had nothing that was a problem.? ?

A bit of patience, tweaking and fun, and at least for me, the rig has turned out usable!


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

 

There nothing call FINAL / ULTIMATE in any walk of hobby. Designs evolve sorting shrtvommings of previous, adding extra facilities, etc.
IMHO, THERE IS NO POINT WAITING .?

Obviously cost of making a rig would tend to go northwards, as material cost increases.
V5 had solved many issues. Carrier supression is to be checked after aone or 2 calibration cycles. Calibration itself is not a difficult task.

At hobby level most of us can't afford all T&M equipment at home.

Thise who have are already serving the hams with their tests and improvement mods. We can perhaps implement them.

All the best
Sarma
vu3zmv

On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, 8:23 am Kelly Mabry <kmabry2007@... wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 06:37 PM, Dexter N Muir wrote:
Oh FGS, peeps. Buying a KIT does NOT get you a commercial RIG - it gets you the basis on which to work. I have a Bitx40 that I've never really got working in years (#4/9126V?). I might have, had I sussed out the whole-of-HF S8 interference. Help from the R.I tracked that to my disused VHF FT227 still powered up, but by then I'd taken down the dipole. I couldn't get hold of a 2N700-type FET to quell the Tx/Rx thump (I tried a transistor scheme that didn't work over 3 or 4 iterations), and won't get to it 'til I can afford some (I don't control the purse strings, and we have other more urgent (family) matters to deal with) - and the time and space to work on it, but I WILL! (and possibly AGC too). The love of RF - the very definition of "amateur Radio" - is in my very bones! Unless you go QRO with externals, the Bitxes are functional as presented. Spurs and harmonics? Piffle! GOTA! What nearby would likely be affected, let alone detect ithem?
73
Dex, ZL2DEX

?Gordon, I understand? your point.? Being disabled, I no longer have the resources for buying ready built gear. It takes months to squeeze? $$ for anything over $100 to$200.

And Dexter, I am not saying this radio should equal a kenwood. Far from it.? I expect to struggle and modify this...I thrive on it. This is no noob ham here.? I am just getting opinions and logically proceeding. I am amazed at the work contributed in this group, et. al.?
73,
Kelly? K5AID?


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

Kelly Mabry
 

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 06:37 PM, Dexter N Muir wrote:
Oh FGS, peeps. Buying a KIT does NOT get you a commercial RIG - it gets you the basis on which to work. I have a Bitx40 that I've never really got working in years (#4/9126V?). I might have, had I sussed out the whole-of-HF S8 interference. Help from the R.I tracked that to my disused VHF FT227 still powered up, but by then I'd taken down the dipole. I couldn't get hold of a 2N700-type FET to quell the Tx/Rx thump (I tried a transistor scheme that didn't work over 3 or 4 iterations), and won't get to it 'til I can afford some (I don't control the purse strings, and we have other more urgent (family) matters to deal with) - and the time and space to work on it, but I WILL! (and possibly AGC too). The love of RF - the very definition of "amateur Radio" - is in my very bones! Unless you go QRO with externals, the Bitxes are functional as presented. Spurs and harmonics? Piffle! GOTA! What nearby would likely be affected, let alone detect ithem?
73
Dex, ZL2DEX

?Gordon, I understand? your point.? Being disabled, I no longer have the resources for buying ready built gear. It takes months to squeeze? $$ for anything over $100 to$200.

And Dexter, I am not saying this radio should equal a kenwood. Far from it.? I expect to struggle and modify this...I thrive on it. This is no noob ham here.? I am just getting opinions and logically proceeding. I am amazed at the work contributed in this group, et. al.?
73,
Kelly? K5AID?


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

 

Oh FGS, peeps. Buying a KIT does NOT get you a commercial RIG - it gets you the basis on which to work. I have a Bitx40 that I've never really got working in years (#4/9126V?). I might have, had I sussed out the whole-of-HF S8 interference. Help from the R.I tracked that to my disused VHF FT227 still powered up, but by then I'd taken down the dipole. I couldn't get hold of a 2N700-type FET to quell the Tx/Rx thump (I tried a transistor scheme that didn't work over 3 or 4 iterations), and won't get to it 'til I can afford some (I don't control the purse strings, and we have other more urgent (family) matters to deal with) - and the time and space to work on it, but I WILL! (and possibly AGC too). The love of RF - the very definition of "amateur Radio" - is in my very bones! Unless you go QRO with externals, the Bitxes are functional as presented. Spurs and harmonics? Piffle! GOTA! What nearby would likely be affected, let alone detect ithem?
73
Dex, ZL2DEX


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

If you want to really well-finished, ?ready-to-go Rig, buy something built by some commercial firm. ? Different strokes for different folks!?

?If you want a fun radio project that will teach you a ton with the traditional frustrations and successes Of that kind of learning, the bitx line ?are wonderful devices. ? I have shipped one to Haiti as a receiver to teach a fledgling technician class Of ?students, ?along with speaker wire to make a transmission line and Antenna. ?They will likely never be able to afford expensive foreign radios, so learning from the beginning to work with their minds and their hands is a good thing


Gordon



On Mar 9, 2019, at 04:18, Kelly Mabry <kmabry2007@...> wrote:

Thank you very much. With the spring coming up soon, I'm anxious to get out and do some portable work with a new qrp radio. The Shack I have is still in the works being built from the inside now. The money I would have spent into a portable say ft-817nd radio, I'm putting into my shack. And until that's done I can't operate my? radio. So it's very important to me to be able to go portable. I'm very impressed with the ubitx and I will have the case next week and the display from soon. EVERYONE,? thank you for your input.

73,

Kelly K5AID?


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

Kelly Mabry
 

Thank you very much. With the spring coming up soon, I'm anxious to get out and do some portable work with a new qrp radio. The Shack I have is still in the works being built from the inside now. The money I would have spent into a portable say ft-817nd radio, I'm putting into my shack. And until that's done I can't operate my? radio. So it's very important to me to be able to go portable. I'm very impressed with the ubitx and I will have the case next week and the display from banggood.com soon. EVERYONE,? thank you for your input.

73,

Kelly K5AID?


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

 

Kelly

Concensus is any version needs some mods for spurious. I trust proven recipes are in the works. I am enjoying my v4. Its a blast with simple or exotic mods.

Curt


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

Kelly Mabry
 

Bill, I agree with the no amp comment. I have a TS590SG for that.
As for the other person's comment,? I am hoping to utilize this both qrp portable and mobile. I am a fatalistic optimist....(laughs are appropriate here) and I can merge a radio and maker hobby. Well Versed in arduino and pi architectures. No test equipment at my shack, but this seems fun and viable. $600 mobile rigs are nice, but not customizable,? which I prefer. I do not fear HW and SW; I embrace it....(hooo-peeeer). (Sorry for channeling my inner Vader)
Kelly? K5AID?


Re: ScotchLok Two Wire Connectors

 

ScotchLoks are just another IDC (Insulation Displacement Connector) with the added bonus of silicone grease to weatherproof the connections. They're used all the time in the telecom & traffic signals industry, Certainly OK for low voltage/current. I think that keeping those wires as short as possible is the most important thing to be concerned about.

You'll get no objection from me :)
73 de Mike
On Friday, March 8, 2019, 7:42:22 p.m. EST, Pat Anderson <anderson5420@...> wrote:


Anybody have heartburn if I were to use ScotchLok two wire connectors for the wires connecting the Raduino and the DDS instead of soldering them? I have used these connectors for most connections on my boat between GPS and autopilot and other devices that connect to the chart plotter. All solid as a rock so far.


ScotchLok Two Wire Connectors

Pat Anderson
 

Anybody have heartburn if I were to use ScotchLok two wire connectors for the wires connecting the Raduino and the DDS instead of soldering them? I have used these connectors for most connections on my boat between GPS and autopilot and other devices that connect to the chart plotter. All solid as a rock so far.


Re: Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Sorry meant to say don¡¯t would not recommend running an amp.


On Mar 8, 2019, at 7:02 PM, bill richardson via Groups.Io <ng1p.bill@...> wrote:

I have built 3 so far and have had great luck with no problems at all. My first 2 builds was with the V3 boards and both had great audio on RX and TX. I just got the V5 board and it has worked equally as well as the V3 boards. I skipped the V4 boards due to the audio issues. I¡¯d feel completely safe getting the V5 ubitx. As long as you:

1.) don¡¯t over drive it turn down vr1. Just using one of the online SDR RX sites you will be able to adjust until your with in 3khz bandwidth. Since you are looking at QRP field ops this should be fine as I would recommend running an amp.

2.) get the BFO adjusted to minamize carrier. This is the case on all versions of ubitx¡¯s

3.) Take your time wiring up the radio and double check your self.

4.) most important have fun building!?

73 Bill ng1p


On Mar 8, 2019, at 6:43 PM, dey <deyoung1@...> wrote:

Expectations??

?

?

Mine were to be able to purchase a kit, build it and have a working QRP HF rig (much like I did when I bought a HeathKit back in the ¡®60s).?

?

I purchased the V4 board and the case, spent several hours putting it together only to find that I have no audio and need to add an amplifier.? Also have problems with the display and encoder switch.

?

Not sure that I will go back and finish this kit or not.? What I received was not what I was led to believe ¨C the board did not work.???

?

No, I will not purchase a V5 board because I have no certainty that the V4 problems were fixed or what new issues were introduced.

?

There are a number of enhancements on the market that address all of the issues I have, but all there is an associated cost in money and time that is discouraging.

?

I wanted something small, that I could use on field day as well as while traveling.? This is not it.

?

sorry

?

Derrick

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Doug W

Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 5:31 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [BITX20] Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

?

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 02:36 PM, Kelly Mabry wrote:

should I wait to buy a ubitx

what are your goal and expectations?

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Doug W
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 5:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Should I wait to buy a ubitx?

?

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 02:36 PM, Kelly Mabry wrote:

should I wait to buy a ubitx

what are your goal and expectations?
?
--