¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Does any one have their oscilloscope peak to peak volts measurements for the receive transistors (with a specific signal generator volts/ of of course)???
Q10,11,12 base and collector and Q30,31,32?
I can measure and post mine.? I noticed their is very minimal gain at Q10 and Q30, almost so small my scope can't really see much difference.
(My scope only goes down to 20mv/div I think)


Re: bitx40 displays version, hums, but does not receive #bitx40help #bitx40 #radiuno

 

The latest version is v1.28.1, but v1.27.7 should also work OK.
It should work even without any of the modifications as described in the instructions. However, I would recommend to at least install the function button. Keeping the function button pressed during power on will restore all settings to the default values.

73 Allard PE1NWL


Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

Evan,
?it is simple.
?I uploaded a file? refresh_eeprom.ino ( i GOT IT FROM MY CLOSE FRIEND OM MAHESH? VU2IIA AND WORKED FINE FOR ME)
1. place the usb card and connect it to your laptop. Of course I use windows.
2. call for the file (after unzipping AND PLACING IN A FOLDER)
3. COMPILE AND LOAD
ONCE UPLOADED .
?YOUR JOB IS DONE AND THE EEPROM IS CLEARED.
?NOW YOU CAN LOAD STOCK FIRMWARE FRESH AND MANAGE YOUR rADUINO AND UBITX.

?ALL THE BEST
?


On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 4:25 AM Evan Hand <elhandjr@...> wrote:
Sarma,

I am confusing the thread with the prior email.? ?I really was asking the question if you meant by "clearing the contents with ino" in your original post to load another .ino program.? You have now explained that you meant to recompile the .ino file from CEC using the Arduino developer program to load into the nano.? To me that was not clear.

Apologize if I am confusing the issues, rather than helping.

Based on the posts to sell the auxiliary equipment from Uniflight58, I assume that he is giving up.

Again, sorry to all that I could not help more

Evan
AC9TU


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

This is a great idea/process when used with the CEC sw and memory manager.? One thing I did do was find an offline program:


Was real easy to use a usb mic as input to the program on Windows 10.

Really improved the receive quality for my v4 ubitx.? Right after I was able to contact Florida from Chicago using only a OCFD in my attic.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: ubitx receive signal

jim
 

I used a 'random noise source' and Spectrogram? (maybe still? available on ELECRAFT K2 website)

easy/peasy

Jim


On Saturday, December 15, 2018, 3:36:16 PM PST, Mark McNabb <n7eku@...> wrote:


Just checking something,


I think the "Spectrogram" program can do this live, instead of having to make a recording each time.

73,


Mark.


Re: Case and screen for sale.

 

sold


Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

sold


Missing front panel socket board for amaterradiokits.in uBitx case

John Parnell
 

Hello - I tried searching the messages here and can't find any info on this:

I am finally was able to start on putting my? early ver 3 ubitx boards into one of Sunil's great looking cases. The case was one of the first ones; I received it in late April of this year. I went to the builder's info on Sunils and ubitx.net and immediately noted that I was missing the Front Panel Socket Board.
I was thinking that maybe the early ones did not have the board included, but the only reference I could find to wiring up the case without the front socket board was some photos he took of the prototype that did not have the board (and included a warning not to try and do it without the board unless one is a advanced builder,? which I am not).
To make sure it was not an add-on to the case package, I also checked all the kits and PCB's on Sunil's www site and didn't see the Front Panel board being sold, so am assuming it should have been shipped with the case.??
I found the N5WLF's excellent "mini manual" that shows the wiring specifics for ver 4 board for those rolling their own cases,? but am not sure if it is usable on ver 3 boards. My other issue is that I am handy with soldering, but go crossed-eyed following schematics - which is why I opted for the ready made case in the first place.??I sent amateur radio kits an inquiry about this but have not heard back. .
If all else fails, I can probably dope out how to put it all together without the "training wheels" , but it will be a struggle. Any ideas or suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated.?

73,?

John, K7HV


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Thanks, interesting.? May have to think about something like that since it just doesn't want to hear much at the moment.


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Thanks didn't know that but retried. Still signals seem very faint/garbled.? Even tuning around things don't get better.? Seems like it just can't pull the signals out of the noise.

I can tune something on my regular rig and it's clear as day and using the same antenna hear nothing on the ubitx.

I can't do the mic tuning part yet I didn't get my mic hooked up yet.


Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

I would take the setup


Re: ubitx receive signal

Mark McNabb
 

Just checking something,

Woody and Dave, when you do your BFO adjustment, you know you to adjust both the BFO and the tuning of the receiver?? You can't just stay on one exact frequency as you adjust it, you need to fine tune a bit with each move of the BFO freqency to see how clear each setting is.

Another way to adjust it at the start is to do it "by ear".? Just tune to background static only. ? If the background static is low pitched, muffled and hollow sounding, the BFO is set too close to center.? If the background static consists of only very high pitched sounds, then it is too far away.? Aim for something in between to start with.

A really good method is just putting the receiver on a frequency with no signal again, record the background static, then use Audacity to analyze the spectrum. This will show you where the BFO bandwidth is set.? You want it around 300Hz to 2700Hz.

I think the "Spectrogram" program can do this live, instead of having to make a recording each time.

73,


Mark.


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

I agree with Curt, the BFO might need adjustment.? Here is the link to HF Signals reccommended tune up page:


To check on the relays, I would refer back to the schematic in the circuit description:


Hope this helps

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

Thanks for your help everyone. If someone would like to try to fix it I will be happy to ship it. No charge to you. I would like to recoup some losses by selling the case and screen. You dont have to buy them to get the board


Yes correct ty 73

 




Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

Sarma,

I am confusing the thread with the prior email.? ?I really was asking the question if you meant by "clearing the contents with ino" in your original post to load another .ino program.? You have now explained that you meant to recompile the .ino file from CEC using the Arduino developer program to load into the nano.? To me that was not clear.

Apologize if I am confusing the issues, rather than helping.

Based on the posts to sell the auxiliary equipment from Uniflight58, I assume that he is giving up.

Again, sorry to all that I could not help more

Evan
AC9TU


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Hi,

How did you do with the "calibration" process?

73,

Bill KU8H

On 12/15/18 4:31 PM, Dave Space wrote:
Ah you are right I do see that short to ground through the inductor. I can receive signals but they are so low they are almost unintelligible and hard to sound centered on.? Tried the BFO but its as good as it gets on the default.? I tried some different earphones but still no luck signal either can't be heard or if it can be it's hard to hear.
Tried hooking up a speaker but don't hear anything out of it (have to check if it's hooked up right or drive.)? It sounds to be like there is not enough RF gain perhaps though the noise level is already pretty high so no sure if more gain would make it easier to hear.
I've listened to some folks with their ubitx on youtube and they can send crystal clear and loud enough but mine doesn't seem to have those qualities.? Mostly hard to pick up anything, even on the strongest remote signals not very clear.? Trying with a close radio at 5 watts its a lot louder as expected and clearer but still pretty muddy but intelligible.
--
bark less - wag more


Re: ubitx receive signal

Woody
 

Also did a careful calibration and BFO adjustment - several times ;)
Woody

On 12/15/2018 21:31, Dave Space wrote:
Ah you are right I do see that short to ground through the inductor.? ? I can receive signals but they are so low they are almost unintelligible and hard to sound centered on.? Tried the BFO but its as good as it gets on the default.? I tried some different earphones but still no luck? signal either can't be heard or if it can be it's hard to hear.

Tried hooking up a speaker but don't hear anything out of it (have to check if it's hooked up right or drive.)? It sounds to be like there is not enough RF gain perhaps though the noise level is already pretty high so no sure if more gain would make it easier to hear.

I've listened to some folks with their ubitx on youtube and they can send crystal clear and loud enough but mine doesn't seem to have those qualities.? Mostly hard to pick up anything, even on the strongest remote signals not very clear.? Trying with a close radio at 5 watts its a lot louder as expected and clearer but still pretty muddy but intelligible.


--


Re: ubitx receive signal

Woody
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Dave,

Your issues are similar to mine.? Low and distorted audio and lack of RF sensitivity.?? I never fully resolved the situation.? Tried tracing the receive signal with a good scope, but there was too much garbage (no matter where I grounded the probe) to observe changes in the RX signal.? My solution was brute force...?
Audio:? I bypassed the audio PA section and fed the volume pot wiper to an opamp preamp, then to a ~2 watt audio PA chip.? Plenty of not too distorted audio now.
RF:? Built a preamp with attenuator (for AGC).? Used a low noise MMIC for the amp followed by a pin diode (pie) attenuator.? The attenuator works great on a manual control pot.?? Have it working with an audio derived AGC amp now, but that really needs more work since it attacks a bit slowly and has some pumping on very strong signals. I long for one of the old, discontinued Plessey AGC ICs.? I have one in an old homebrew rig and it is great.?

I posted more info on the RF amp / Attn. several days ago...? Subject: ? ?

Good Luck,
Woody



On 12/15/2018 21:31, Dave Space wrote:
Ah you are right I do see that short to ground through the inductor.? ? I can receive signals but they are so low they are almost unintelligible and hard to sound centered on.? Tried the BFO but its as good as it gets on the default.? I tried some different earphones but still no luck? signal either can't be heard or if it can be it's hard to hear.

Tried hooking up a speaker but don't hear anything out of it (have to check if it's hooked up right or drive.)? It sounds to be like there is not enough RF gain perhaps though the noise level is already pretty high so no sure if more gain would make it easier to hear.

I've listened to some folks with their ubitx on youtube and they can send crystal clear and loud enough but mine doesn't seem to have those qualities.? Mostly hard to pick up anything, even on the strongest remote signals not very clear.? Trying with a close radio at 5 watts its a lot louder as expected and clearer but still pretty muddy but intelligible.


_._,_._,_


--


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

If you have a version 4 board low audio seems to be a standard. You can make, or buy a small audio amp or use this fix:?

Iam not started my build yet but I do read a lot.