¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: ubitx receive signal

 

This is a great idea/process when used with the CEC sw and memory manager.? One thing I did do was find an offline program:


Was real easy to use a usb mic as input to the program on Windows 10.

Really improved the receive quality for my v4 ubitx.? Right after I was able to contact Florida from Chicago using only a OCFD in my attic.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: ubitx receive signal

jim
 

I used a 'random noise source' and Spectrogram? (maybe still? available on ELECRAFT K2 website)

easy/peasy

Jim


On Saturday, December 15, 2018, 3:36:16 PM PST, Mark McNabb <n7eku@...> wrote:


Just checking something,


I think the "Spectrogram" program can do this live, instead of having to make a recording each time.

73,


Mark.


Re: Case and screen for sale.

 

sold


Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

sold


Missing front panel socket board for amaterradiokits.in uBitx case

John Parnell
 

Hello - I tried searching the messages here and can't find any info on this:

I am finally was able to start on putting my? early ver 3 ubitx boards into one of Sunil's great looking cases. The case was one of the first ones; I received it in late April of this year. I went to the builder's info on Sunils and ubitx.net and immediately noted that I was missing the Front Panel Socket Board.
I was thinking that maybe the early ones did not have the board included, but the only reference I could find to wiring up the case without the front socket board was some photos he took of the prototype that did not have the board (and included a warning not to try and do it without the board unless one is a advanced builder,? which I am not).
To make sure it was not an add-on to the case package, I also checked all the kits and PCB's on Sunil's www site and didn't see the Front Panel board being sold, so am assuming it should have been shipped with the case.??
I found the N5WLF's excellent "mini manual" that shows the wiring specifics for ver 4 board for those rolling their own cases,? but am not sure if it is usable on ver 3 boards. My other issue is that I am handy with soldering, but go crossed-eyed following schematics - which is why I opted for the ready made case in the first place.??I sent amateur radio kits an inquiry about this but have not heard back. .
If all else fails, I can probably dope out how to put it all together without the "training wheels" , but it will be a struggle. Any ideas or suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated.?

73,?

John, K7HV


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Thanks, interesting.? May have to think about something like that since it just doesn't want to hear much at the moment.


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Thanks didn't know that but retried. Still signals seem very faint/garbled.? Even tuning around things don't get better.? Seems like it just can't pull the signals out of the noise.

I can tune something on my regular rig and it's clear as day and using the same antenna hear nothing on the ubitx.

I can't do the mic tuning part yet I didn't get my mic hooked up yet.


Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

I would take the setup


Re: ubitx receive signal

Mark McNabb
 

Just checking something,

Woody and Dave, when you do your BFO adjustment, you know you to adjust both the BFO and the tuning of the receiver?? You can't just stay on one exact frequency as you adjust it, you need to fine tune a bit with each move of the BFO freqency to see how clear each setting is.

Another way to adjust it at the start is to do it "by ear".? Just tune to background static only. ? If the background static is low pitched, muffled and hollow sounding, the BFO is set too close to center.? If the background static consists of only very high pitched sounds, then it is too far away.? Aim for something in between to start with.

A really good method is just putting the receiver on a frequency with no signal again, record the background static, then use Audacity to analyze the spectrum. This will show you where the BFO bandwidth is set.? You want it around 300Hz to 2700Hz.

I think the "Spectrogram" program can do this live, instead of having to make a recording each time.

73,


Mark.


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

I agree with Curt, the BFO might need adjustment.? Here is the link to HF Signals reccommended tune up page:


To check on the relays, I would refer back to the schematic in the circuit description:


Hope this helps

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

Thanks for your help everyone. If someone would like to try to fix it I will be happy to ship it. No charge to you. I would like to recoup some losses by selling the case and screen. You dont have to buy them to get the board


Yes correct ty 73

 




Re: Version 4 bitx squealing after nextion upgrade.

 

Sarma,

I am confusing the thread with the prior email.? ?I really was asking the question if you meant by "clearing the contents with ino" in your original post to load another .ino program.? You have now explained that you meant to recompile the .ino file from CEC using the Arduino developer program to load into the nano.? To me that was not clear.

Apologize if I am confusing the issues, rather than helping.

Based on the posts to sell the auxiliary equipment from Uniflight58, I assume that he is giving up.

Again, sorry to all that I could not help more

Evan
AC9TU


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Hi,

How did you do with the "calibration" process?

73,

Bill KU8H

On 12/15/18 4:31 PM, Dave Space wrote:
Ah you are right I do see that short to ground through the inductor. I can receive signals but they are so low they are almost unintelligible and hard to sound centered on.? Tried the BFO but its as good as it gets on the default.? I tried some different earphones but still no luck signal either can't be heard or if it can be it's hard to hear.
Tried hooking up a speaker but don't hear anything out of it (have to check if it's hooked up right or drive.)? It sounds to be like there is not enough RF gain perhaps though the noise level is already pretty high so no sure if more gain would make it easier to hear.
I've listened to some folks with their ubitx on youtube and they can send crystal clear and loud enough but mine doesn't seem to have those qualities.? Mostly hard to pick up anything, even on the strongest remote signals not very clear.? Trying with a close radio at 5 watts its a lot louder as expected and clearer but still pretty muddy but intelligible.
--
bark less - wag more


Re: ubitx receive signal

Woody
 

Also did a careful calibration and BFO adjustment - several times ;)
Woody

On 12/15/2018 21:31, Dave Space wrote:
Ah you are right I do see that short to ground through the inductor.? ? I can receive signals but they are so low they are almost unintelligible and hard to sound centered on.? Tried the BFO but its as good as it gets on the default.? I tried some different earphones but still no luck? signal either can't be heard or if it can be it's hard to hear.

Tried hooking up a speaker but don't hear anything out of it (have to check if it's hooked up right or drive.)? It sounds to be like there is not enough RF gain perhaps though the noise level is already pretty high so no sure if more gain would make it easier to hear.

I've listened to some folks with their ubitx on youtube and they can send crystal clear and loud enough but mine doesn't seem to have those qualities.? Mostly hard to pick up anything, even on the strongest remote signals not very clear.? Trying with a close radio at 5 watts its a lot louder as expected and clearer but still pretty muddy but intelligible.


--


Re: ubitx receive signal

Woody
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Dave,

Your issues are similar to mine.? Low and distorted audio and lack of RF sensitivity.?? I never fully resolved the situation.? Tried tracing the receive signal with a good scope, but there was too much garbage (no matter where I grounded the probe) to observe changes in the RX signal.? My solution was brute force...?
Audio:? I bypassed the audio PA section and fed the volume pot wiper to an opamp preamp, then to a ~2 watt audio PA chip.? Plenty of not too distorted audio now.
RF:? Built a preamp with attenuator (for AGC).? Used a low noise MMIC for the amp followed by a pin diode (pie) attenuator.? The attenuator works great on a manual control pot.?? Have it working with an audio derived AGC amp now, but that really needs more work since it attacks a bit slowly and has some pumping on very strong signals. I long for one of the old, discontinued Plessey AGC ICs.? I have one in an old homebrew rig and it is great.?

I posted more info on the RF amp / Attn. several days ago...? Subject: ? ?

Good Luck,
Woody



On 12/15/2018 21:31, Dave Space wrote:
Ah you are right I do see that short to ground through the inductor.? ? I can receive signals but they are so low they are almost unintelligible and hard to sound centered on.? Tried the BFO but its as good as it gets on the default.? I tried some different earphones but still no luck? signal either can't be heard or if it can be it's hard to hear.

Tried hooking up a speaker but don't hear anything out of it (have to check if it's hooked up right or drive.)? It sounds to be like there is not enough RF gain perhaps though the noise level is already pretty high so no sure if more gain would make it easier to hear.

I've listened to some folks with their ubitx on youtube and they can send crystal clear and loud enough but mine doesn't seem to have those qualities.? Mostly hard to pick up anything, even on the strongest remote signals not very clear.? Trying with a close radio at 5 watts its a lot louder as expected and clearer but still pretty muddy but intelligible.


_._,_._,_


--


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

If you have a version 4 board low audio seems to be a standard. You can make, or buy a small audio amp or use this fix:?

Iam not started my build yet but I do read a lot.


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Ah you are right I do see that short to ground through the inductor.? ? I can receive signals but they are so low they are almost unintelligible and hard to sound centered on.? Tried the BFO but its as good as it gets on the default.? I tried some different earphones but still no luck? signal either can't be heard or if it can be it's hard to hear.

Tried hooking up a speaker but don't hear anything out of it (have to check if it's hooked up right or drive.)? It sounds to be like there is not enough RF gain perhaps though the noise level is already pretty high so no sure if more gain would make it easier to hear.

I've listened to some folks with their ubitx on youtube and they can send crystal clear and loud enough but mine doesn't seem to have those qualities.? Mostly hard to pick up anything, even on the strongest remote signals not very clear.? Trying with a close radio at 5 watts its a lot louder as expected and clearer but still pretty muddy but intelligible.



Re: Determining version/revision number of board

 

Hi,

Mine has something about Version 3 silkscreened in one corner of the board. Easy peasy for me.

73,

Bill KU8H

On 12/15/18 2:30 PM, John wrote:
How does one determine the version number of the uBitx hardware? I see the SW version flash by on the screen during powerup.
Thanks
John K5MO
--
bark less - wag more


Re: ubitx receive signal

 

Hi Dave,

Check the schematics. The antenna terminal has a DC short to ground through an inductor. I have not looked at the other items you listed there but I would not be surprised to find the windings of an inductor across those too. Those relay terminals wouldn't happen to be the relay coils would they? If not, then look where they connect forother inductors or small resistors.

If you were able to receive signals at all then your antenna terminal and others are not shorted to grouns (for rf).

73,

Bill KU8H

On 12/15/18 2:28 PM, Dave Space wrote:
I just got the ubitx and wired it up.
I was able to use a signal generator to hear a signal on 7.150MHZ that sounded good.? But listening to a station that sounded good on my regular radio I could hear it clearly but ubitx on the same antenna it was a bit weaker signal and hard to understand.
I noticed it use about 150ma just powering up for the smoke test which isn't within the documented limits.
I noticed base of Q12 has more than the documented voltage at a little over 10 volts which is above what is expected.
The two antenna pins I noticed only have about 1.8 ohm resistance not sure if that is normal, continuity tests show that as basically shorted to ground.
I noticed the K3 relay seems different than the other relays pin 9 seems shorted to pin 5.? (K3 Pin 9 Seems like the only pin of all the relays that is grounded)
K3 pins 5 and 3 seem shorted as you would expect.
I noticed all of the other relays: 12 and 5 shorted, 14 and 3 shorted and 16 and 1 show shorted but on K3 12 and 5, 14 and 3 and 16 and 1 aren't showing as connected? (they show about 10k resistance except for 16 and 1 that don't show connected at all.
Is there a K3 relay issue here perhaps or is that normal for that relay?
Any other ideas for receive strength improvement/checks?
Thanks.
--
bark less - wag more