Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Gordon,
The coupled coils approach is so old school I'd suspect is had origins in the late 20s or 30s if not before with spark. It persists because it is easy to understand, build and?does indeed work.? It also offers selectivity as its a band pass filter.? That in? a high BC radio environment might be very helpful. They are of course local to the antenna as any form of transmission line tends to? make a simple life, complicated.? The upside is even at power they can be fairly compact. It can be done at the bottom of a half wave vertical.? As far as tuning remotely,?it could work to the limits of the variable cap?at a harmonic of the base antenna.? But do keep in mind a? full wave or longer 1.5 wave pattern is not the usual broadside sine-cosine pattern.? For a 1.5 wave vertical at 28 mhz the peak power is at something like 75 degrees, not very useful. For a half wave it will be quite low more like 21 degrees, very useful. The whole thing of compromise antennas is that for one this its that and for another its a solution. Which is which is the exercise of experience. Allison |
Re: need a new pc ??
Kevin Rea
It's warranted as new, so it is new.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Vince Vielhaber Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 9:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] need a new pc ?? If you buy it, it's "new" to you. Vince - K8ZW. On 08/01/2018 10:57 AM, Terry Morris wrote: omitting the word "new" is more accurate. I have purchased several-- Michigan VHF Corp. |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi -- I read the suggested pages, including: ?
Those are indeed quite simple and apparently effective?tuners --- but they do require tuning, and at the base of the antenna (since you wouldn't want to run this through coax!!!)....one might be able to run it through some open wire feed potentially....with
some wild impedances of course along the smith chart!!!!
The article doesn't go through a smith chart explanation of WHY one needs the TUNED circuit, but I would guess it takes out whatever reactance is there....? ?I have an ANCIENT tuner at home that works EXACTLLY this way & I've never before understood how
to use it ---- but now I might be able to get it working with an endfed and amaze and amuse my ARES group!!
The simplicity of the non-tuned transformers is seductive to many peopple I'm sure as then they can put the stuff out near the antenna and just run coax back to their shack.? ?(A more advanced build would have a remotely controlled capacitor, but in that
case, just use some form of auto-tuner....)? ??
There are compromises in every design.? ?I've never tried a tuned coupled set of coills like this one, so I learned even more!? ?Thanks!!
Gordon
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 12:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] End Fed antennas w/ uBITX ?
Gordon, The lowest loss 49:1 transformer that I have been able to construct uses BN-43-7051 cores and I have been able to get to 0.2 dB with them. For 160-20 meters I use a 14:2 ratio and for 20 - 10 a 7:1. With a true resonant half wave wire these cores get barely warm after a full minute of key down at 100 watts. However(!!!), that 0.2 dB loss rises dramatically if the cores feed a reactive load and are not substantially better in that case than are the big toroids. The best case for the EFRW (random end fed wire) remains a simple tuner. |
Re: Nextion TFT
I'm trying to buy 7" , can somebody tell me if it's ok to buy this .. English Version Nextion 7.0" HMI Intelligent LCD Tough Screen Module Display for Arduino LCD TFT Raspberry Pi ESP8266 ? to Clipboard 73, Vu3edg On Sun, Jul 29, 2018, 4:02 PM hirosmb <hirosmb@...> wrote:
|
Re: RFI Problem related by routing audio through K3 (uBitx)?
The combined effect of the rely mod and? the audio switch mod do help greatly.
If the DC switching scheme also used a pair of contacts to pull the floating TX+/RX+ to ground it would help as well.? It can be done with the N3GO two transistor mod. Allison |
Re: RFI Problem related by routing audio through K3 (uBitx)?
ABSOLUTELY! This is a no-no and needs to be corrected on all v3 PWBs. I noticed in the new design (v4) he does not use this T/R relay audio switching scheme.I suspect it was done in part to deal with the speaker thumping everyone has complained about. There are other ways to handle that issue and many are discussed at length in other posts. You need to cut the two traces that run that audio connection near the relay. One trace can be "cut" by simply removing R70. The other trace is the one just over that trace when the PWB is positioned with R70 down at the bottom. Then, remove C51 and tombstone it on the upper pad where it formerly was. Add a jumper wire between the top exposed end of C51 and the left pad where R70 was located. Now, that will completely eliminate the RFI in your audio on your PWB. The speaker thumping may in fact become worse after you make this mod. Farhan has made an easy improvement to switch off the audio on the newest version of the PWB. I hope this helps!
N2AJX? |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Warren Allgyer
Gordon, The lowest loss 49:1 transformer that I have been able to construct uses BN-43-7051 cores and I have been able to get to 0.2 dB with them. For 160-20 meters I use a 14:2 ratio and for 20 - 10 a 7:1. With a true resonant half wave wire these cores get barely warm after a full minute of key down at 100 watts. However(!!!), that 0.2 dB loss rises dramatically if the cores feed a reactive load and are not substantially better in that case than are the big toroids. The best case for the EFRW (random end fed wire) remains a simple tuner. |
Re: need a new pc ??
Vince Vielhaber
If you buy it, it's "new" to you.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Vince - K8ZW. On 08/01/2018 10:57 AM, Terry Morris wrote:
omitting the word "new" is more accurate. I have purchased several --
Michigan VHF Corp. |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
for the parallel resonant see:
Also: As to what toroid for tuned usually iron powder type -2 or -6 However I use a L-network for monoband EFHWS.? I grind the number in a spreadsheet make a coil using iron-powder or conventional solenoid coil and a capacitor with enough? voltage rating (at least 2000V) and I'm off to the races.? One trick is if I don't have the exact capacitor value needed I go with the next lower and parallel it with a section of teflon coax (about 29.4pf/foot good to 2500V).? Also if vibration is not an issue the Arco trimmers work. For wide band trasnformers I tend to do a lot of build and test to see what works. Depenign on how its would and the type (transmission line, hybrid or....) wire used and many other parameters it may use different materials.? But its been measured and tried a few ways for best result.? For the 1:49 I've had better result with mu=125 (61ish material) or sometimes 43.?? One I have copied many times with good results is a multi ratio design by K3MT. ITs part of his grasswire antenna but generally useful for many things.? The article attached.? It would be a good 1:9 transformer for those wanting to try the non-resonant 53ft or longer approach with a counterpoise.? Try the Grasswire while your at it, its easy to install! Allison |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýChuck, Alyson, and others: ?could I get a schematic of your parallel resonant tuning system? And could I get Alyson and or Warren to come yet on what permeability toroid is optimal?Warren, I¡¯m not bright enough to know if your method of trying to figure out the results of the poor load is correct or not but it seems like a good first cut. ? ?
With a bunch of series/parallel resistors it should be easy to make a 2450 load, one could even do it with surface mount devices and have very little inductance I believe. ? ... ? 40 100,000 ?half watt resistors in parallel would give a really low inductance
20 W load.? ?Cost would probably be five dollars. ?No reason not to give it a try! ?
I dimly understood Alyson¡®s concerns about the back to back system, seems like it wouldn¡¯t be too hard to try it without the connection and with the connection and see if there¡¯s any difference. ?She knows way more than I ever willabout this kind of stuff
I¡¯m trying to see if I can work up the guts to put two of our off-center fed homebrew Balun ?systems back to back and figure out what our losses were! ?I¡¯m not sure I really want to know! ?
Gordon
|
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
I don't accept their .2db.? Also their process is only workable if they do the math to back out the?
mismatch loss. Do I think their procedure is a good way to do it.? No.? Did that do the math to correct their data for mismatch loss? No I see no mention or statement correcting for that. If your argument is their test is wrongly done or has a incorrect conclusion then we do agree. The process and procedures normally used to make that kind of measurement are likely to disagree with their result and conclusions but will produce an accurate answer when performed correctly. Allison |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Tim,
I did see that.? I appreciate that but I do have stock here thank you. Allison |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Chuck, I haven't yet built two 49:1 (one is not enough for the back to back test hi hi ), but I would use ferrites with permeability close to 800, not the powdered iron toroids like the red and the yellow you have selected (permeability is less than 10). I imagine that the inductance needed at 2500ohm needs to be very high. I might be wrong as I have not made yet one with such a high transformation radio, but I feel I am quite right, IMHO. Il 01/ago/2018 15:56, "Chuck, N1KGY" <cwayers12@...> ha scritto:
|
Re: experience with Sunil VU3SUA's enclosures
#ubitx
Mine took about 6 weeks to get to Arizona, but it was worth the wait.? Good looking cabinet.? I agree with others that paint in the openings was heavy, but a little sanding with a Dremel tool took care of that.? Isn't that why you have those fun tools.? You need something to use them on!!? Also, I had to replace the on/off switch, but a trip to my local electronics supply store and $3.00 fixed that.? Besides, I found $40 worth of other stuff that I just couldn't pass up.
Moral of the story, be patient. His case is very well made and the extra parts are useful. I don't have to go looking in the junk box for a knob.? |