Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
If C52 and C64 are isolated by diodes then the RX and TX voltages will have no large capacitors to filter low frequency noises. ?It might not be a problem here but I've had a number of "unexplained" problems turn out to be a lack of sufficient filter capacity. ?
73, Tom ?W1EAT |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Its not obvious so I'll try to explain.
Lets say we have two transformers (any for the moment save for they are the same). Also the transformer have a separated primary and secondary as that makes it easier to see. So we hook them up back to back and hook the primaries to the tracking generator and the? spectrum analyser input.? So far we have complete circuits that do not depend on any circuit common or "ground". For that case if I said the transformers did such and so we can see and evaluate it. Now what if...? I break? the back to back connection for one lead and insert 2M of wire nicely laid out on the bench would you be happy with that?? ? I know I would not as that 2M of wire is about 2.6uH of inductance give or take.? So I'd expect the trace to show some loss especially at 28mhz? especially since that 2.6Uh is about 480 ohms of reactance.? ?Please do not argue the amount of inductance its magnitude is less important than the fact that its there at all. So if I go back to the back to back original transformer and instead take the other leads apart and connect them to the input side shield of the coax what have we? THe secondary are connect together via a 2M lead that also includes the frame of the SA.? ?But the SA is ground.... no it has a common, but ground is likely about 3.5ft under it or more and the lead getting it to that mythical point is 3.5ft long or more with its inductance.? IF you go to the 3 wire cord its 3-6ft long to the safety ground pin on the receptacle which is not RF ground so it does not help and likely adds problems to ponder. So as we follow the current around the circuit we find we have a 2M?loop again and that loop has an added unknowns in the middle. Its very easy to do this and not realize there is more going on but it is far from complicated only that there are many parts to it.? Solution is to fix the test to remove that potential error. Allison |
CW keying shape improvement in uBitx
I found that by simply increasing C1 to 2.2 uF (just parallel the existing 0.1 uF cap) the keying shape is greatly improved with about 3 ms attack and 6 ms decay. That is much better than the key click machine it was originally with about 0.5 ms attack and decay times.
73, Bob N1KW |
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
Bob Interesting.? Maybe that indicates that the solution by Allison is still best...? Actively pulling the RX power line to ground when switching to transmit mode seems productive.? Could solve the receive Click problem but may need something similar for the TX power line to stop the 20 ms RF burst at beginning of transmission.? Thanks for the attempt.? Arv _._ On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:14 PM <n1kw@...> wrote: UPDATE!!!!! |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Great suggestion Alan. I went so far as to create the folder and then produce a PDF of the email trail. It turns out the PDF was under 1 MB so I am attaching it here.? |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
The cables add common mode inductance.? That is an incorrect assumption as a result.
We had this conversation before. In this stream. ?Allison |
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
UPDATE!!!!!
I tried my earlier suggestion about putting a diode in series with R66 and it causes another problem. The energy stored in C64 keeps the mic amplifier running for about a half a second after releasing PTT, feeding mic audio into the audio output stages resulting in feedback and a nice squeal in the audio output! Maybe all (or half) of N3GO's solution would be better, at least for clamping the TX line.? 73, Bob N1KW |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Warren Allgyer
Allison With regard to seeking the permission of the participants in the email trail; no, I did not. |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýAlso, make sure you are using the
latest version of the Arduino compiler.
On 7/31/2018 2:12 PM, terryhugheskirkcudbright via Groups.Io wrote: hi
|
Re: Need Help
Hi Allison,
Thanks for your help! That what I thought so I order a replacement encoder from Digi-Key and installed it this morning still the same. I just received my uBITX last week, it seemed to be working with a bit of hum but yesterday when I turned it on my encoder seems to have stopped working. When I turn the uBITX on the top line of the display reads uBITX v4.3 and the bottom line reads LSB A 7.149.950, when I turn the encoder shaft it changes only from 7.149.900 to 7.149.950! When I push the shaft in I get on the top line Band Select and an arrow that¡¯s all that happens. Best regards, |
Is? ubitx_cat.ino in the same directory as the V4.3 code?
There should be 7 files: ubitx_si5351.ino ubitx_menu.ino ubitx_keyer.ino ubutx_factory_alignment.ino? ubitx_ui.ino ubitx_cat.ino ubitx_v4.3_code.ino Why does this happen?? Usually its because if the Arduino-IDE is loading a file for the first time the file and the directory have to match and if it doesn't it will create it and copy that one file to the directory.? However as your can see the sketch is spread across 7 files all of which should be in the same directory. The error message was the compiler saying "hey? you told me I need this and cant find it!".. Allison |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Warren,
Did you ground coax at the transformer to the the other in the back to back test? For clarity a piece of heavy wire from the coax connector of one to the coax connector of the other transformer. IF no, redo your work and report if there is a difference. Allison |
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
?Did the other participants grant permission to post that?? As that would be my
first question.? I see no such permission granted.? As such if they ask the mods? to take it down I'd not?be surprized. Allison |
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
Bob Agreed.? That sounds good. Arv On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:40 AM <n1kw@...> wrote: Hi Arv, |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss