Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Screen showing only blocks ?
Did you try to adjust the pot on the back of the display board ? It only effects the screen and if too high you get blocks? and if too low nothing. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:30 PM, <chuckr@...> wrote: Just finished my first ubitx v4 build and things are not working as expected...Thanks first of all for any and all help. My main symptom is that on power up the display is showing a string of blocks on the bottom row.. Somewhere about two thirds to the right is one blocking dimly blinking. A quick disconnect before something went poof and subsequently with longer power on no change was had. I then plugged some ear buds into and could here some birdies and other odd sounds etc. as? I turned the tuning control. Have any of you all had or know of what this problem is or points too. I know this isn't much info to go on but all support/help/advice is appreciated. |
Re: Getting ready to build my first Ubitx ver 4
W7PEA
There's a how to build stock for the V3:?/g/BITX20/wiki/uBITX-Assembly
If feel up to it, making a v4 version of that wiki page would be a great help to others. Patrick | W7PEA |
Re: #ubitx-help Troubleshooting tips please
#ubitx-help
Bo Barry
Success! Swapping the connectors did no damage!
Issue closed.?? |
Re: Getting ready to build my first Ubitx ver 4
I would put it together stock and verify correct operation before doing ANY mods. I have a board set at home, waiting for me to have time to attack it. On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 1:42 PM, Kevin Rea <reakevinscott@...> wrote: Thanks Skip¡will do. ? Kevin ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Skip Davis via Groups.Io Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 1:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] Getting ready to build my first Ubitx ver 4 ? Yes build it stock first and get it working then do the updates/mods. This will make it easier troubleshooting anything that may be wrong.? Skip Davis, NC9O On Jul 18, 2018, at 16:36, Kevin Rea <reakevinscott@...> wrote:
|
Re: Getting ready to build my first Ubitx ver 4
Kevin Rea
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks Skip¡will do. ? Kevin ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Skip Davis via Groups.Io
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 1:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] Getting ready to build my first Ubitx ver 4 ? Yes build it stock first and get it working then do the updates/mods. This will make it easier troubleshooting anything that may be wrong.? Skip Davis, NC9O
|
Re: Getting ready to build my first Ubitx ver 4
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYes build it stock first and get it working then do the updates/mods. This will make it easier troubleshooting anything that may be wrong.?Skip Davis, NC9O On Jul 18, 2018, at 16:36, Kevin Rea <reakevinscott@...> wrote:
|
Screen showing only blocks ?
Just finished my first ubitx v4 build and things are not working as expected...Thanks first of all for any and all help. My main symptom is that on power up the display is showing a string of blocks on the bottom row.. Somewhere about two thirds to the right is one blocking dimly blinking. A quick disconnect before something went poof and subsequently with longer power on no change was had. I then plugged some ear buds into and could here some birdies and other odd sounds etc. as? I turned the tuning control. Have any of you all had or know of what this problem is or points too. I know this isn't much info to go on but all support/help/advice is appreciated.
73 chuck |
Re: I think this will work for the Ubitx...microphone
Kevin Rea
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks ! ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mike Woods
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] I think this will work for the Ubitx...microphone ? Kevin
? -- |
Re: RD16HHF1 power curve flattening...some
Kevin Rea
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHow long does it take you to receive things from polida2008 ? ? Kevin ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ashhar Farhan ? Are you sure that the pins are not shorting?? ? On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 10:23 Mvs Sarma, <mvssarma@...> wrote:
|
Re: Mike element
The "dB SPL" gives the Pascal part of 1V/Pascal, but it does not specify the 1V part.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
94 dB SPL means 94 dB above the reference sound pressure level of 20 uPa, where 20 uPa is around the bottom threshold of human hearing. ? ?? When somebody says a rock concert has a sound level of 110 dB, they mean 110 dB SPL. So? a complete spec for microphone sensitivity might say how many "dB SPL" to give 1V out. Or they might say how many "dB" to give 1V out, and mean the same thing. Those acoustic engineers only deal with one kind of dB, and assume any such figure is for dB SPL, and describes a measured sound pressure level, not a ratio. In radio work, "dB" refers to a ratio, perhaps the output power of an amp divided by the input power. To give a power measurement we might say 20 dBm, which is the ratio of the 100 milliwatts we measured divided by an inferred reference of 1 milliwatt:? ? ? 10**(20/10) = 100.? So dB is a ratio of two powers, and dBm is a specific power level.? ###################### While I'm on a rant, here's a bit more for those still puzzled but vaguely curious. I've said that dB in radio work means a ratio. A good receiver might have a dynamic range that can simultaneously deal with incoming signals of both one microvolt and one volt at the antenna, and still allow us to hear the small signal.? Since power is the square of voltage divided by resistance, that's a power ratio of 1,000,000,000,000 between the big and the little signal. These numbers quickly got out of hand, especially for those folks back in 1930 working with a slide rule. It might be easier to say that the big signal has 12 more zeros after it than the little signal. Though that isn't very precise, if the receiver front end was improved to deal with a big signal of up to 2 volts it would then have 12.6 more zeros than the little signal. (Those who remember high school algebra will understand how to deal with a fractional power of ten.) Rather than deal with fractional numbers like that, they decided to just multiply the zero count by 10, so we can now say that a receiver capable of dealing with signals between 1uV and 2V has? a dynamic range of 126 dB.? Through the magic of logarithms, when the gains of two amps in series are expressed in dB we can determine the total gain of the amp by adding a couple 2 digit numbers in our head instead of multiplying out a couple larger numbers.? You don't see dB used much in hard science such as a physics textbook, they just deal with the big numbers.? But radio engineers who live and breathe this stuff 12 hours/day needed an easier way to do the calculations in their head, and dB won out. The formula to go from a power ratio to dB is? 10*log(P1/P2). Here, "log" is base ten, and log(1000) is 3. For even powers of 10, the log() function just tells us how many zeros.?? In the case above, we have 10*log(2000000*2000000/1) = 126 dB (where voltages are expressed in microvolts). I usually use python as my calculator when figuring out this sort of thing. It's available for almost every computer (unfortunately a Nano is too small) and fully interactive, highly recommended.? The log function comes from an external library called "math", so we must first bring in that library to make it available. Here's a python session to test the above formula, it gives a more precise result than my approximation of "126 dB".: import math 10*math.log10(2000000*2000000/1) >>>? 126.02059991327963 We can go from dB back to a power ratio with this: 10**(126.0206/10) >>>??4000000079872.417 and go back to the voltage ratio by taking the square root of the power ratio: math.sqrt(4000000079872.417) >>>??2000000.019968104 Jerry, KE7ER On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:14 AM, <k1yw@...> wrote:
Just to throw in another way of specifying microphoen sensitivities . 1V/Pascal is equal to 94 dB SPL.? So you may see either terms when looking at mic specs. |
Re: receive works great, but no trans power,
#ubitx-help
Allison wrote:
"For ubitx (V3 or 4) a pair of back to back 1n194/4148 diodes from K3 Pin14 to ground is the best bet as then its only there for RX and has no impact on TX."? If there is a possibility that these diodes could cause spurs during TX (which I doubt), then it seems the safer approach is to connect the back-to-'back diodes from K1 pin 12 to ground.? K1 pin 12 is grounded and isolated from the RX/TX circuitry connected to K1 pin 14? during TX, which guarantees that the diodes can't cause spurs during TX.? Placing the the diodes from K1 pin 12 to ground should still provide the same protection for Q90 during receive as connecting them from K1 pin 14 to ground.? 73, Carl,? K0MWC |
AGC kit working great after a big "DUH!" moment
Bill Carpenter
I built and installed the Kees AGC kit yesterday but dang thing would not work.? Waited until today to check it out.? A close look at the board showed that every component was soldered properly with no solder bridges or other issues.? But then, I noticed that pins 1 and 2 at the top of the board hat a "J" printed above them with a jumper symbol.? ?That's when I re-read the instructions from Don that stated "if you are not installing an RF gain control you must jumper pins 1 and 2".
Well, DUH!? I chose to not install an RF gain control.? Once a jumper was soldered all is good Posting in case anyone else has a tendency to not read instructions slowly enough...... 73, Bill NZ0T |
Re: Unbuilt uBITX Ver4 and Blue Cabinet for sale.
SM6MOJ
William, you could consider the road that SM0JZT has taken. He installed a G4HUP buffer amplifier and uses an RTL-SDR dongle externally. This gives you the best of worlds - a low-cost transmitter and an equally low-cost SDR receiver. I have also bought the buffer amplifier, but will wait with installing it until the winter.
|