¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Decals, Water Slide?

 

1.? You print them.

2.? You coat them after application with very light layers of clear spray paint, like Krylon.

3.? Laser has the advantage of being waterproof, so it's likely a little more foolproof.


Re: It's alive!

 

Craig

Extra space was made to allow front panel controls to avoid the 8-pin
connector.? Since this is a temporary enclosure I added extra space
to make it easier to play with some near future modification ideas.

Arv
_._


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Craig Wadsworth <cwadsworth@...> wrote:
That looks good.? What do you plan for the open space (or was that done for front-panel control space)?? I¡¯m considering building a linear power supply or perhaps a LiIon pack into the box.





Re: Decals, Water Slide?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I would like to know more about the Decals.? I used to make lots of Test Equipment.

We bought packages of rub on decals from the electronics parts store.? They had numbers letters, and common words.

You rubbed them on with pen or hard tipped object and then coated them (like clear finger nail polish).

These water decals?? Do you print them or can you get them with words, numbers and letters?

Do you coat them?

Do I have to worry about printer, I only have B&W Laser, no inkjets.

Thanks for any info.? I looked at Amazon?? Some there but not much detail?

Mike, WA6ISP


On 12/14/2017 7:50 AM, Michael Babineau wrote:
Water-slide decals

-- 
Mike Hagen, WA6ISP
10917 Bryant Street
Yucaipa, Ca. 92399
(909) 918-0058
PayPal ID  "MotDog@..."
Mike@...


Re: 160m on ubitx??

 

I'd just configure the relays in the uBitx for 80m (the 80m LPF will pass 160m too),
then add an external LPF when using the uBitx for 160m.
If you have a separate 160m antenna, there is no loss in convenience.


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 04:54 am, Kelly Jack wrote:
Only another lpf and code changes required? Is there a spare uc pin to control some relays?


Re: Connecting Kenwood KMC 30 to bitx /uBitx #parts

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?Arvo:? ?every mic is different but there are common themes.? ?Lots of mics these days use electret elements which require a load resistor and DC voltage (the Bitx has a resistor and DC source) --- but you'd be wise to LOOK at the schematic of your chosen mic and ascertain how it is built, what it wants, what the internal technology is (electret, crystal, ceramic, dynamic, internal transistor amplifier, etc) ---? ?


On my Bitx? I specificaly provided dc-coupled output to run the standard electret mic, and then used a small electrolytic capacitor (a few uf) to DC isolate to allow a powered CB-style mic to also be used.? ?


And because I do some digital, I put a wall-mount 8-pin RJ45 female there to which the mic or the soundcard system can connect (and there you need the DC isolation because the soundcard output is a TRANSFORMER and will drag the bitx input DC way to ground.? ? )??


That's ham radio -- look at the circuitry, try to figure it out the best you can, give it a whirl and see if your understanding is correct!!?


Gordon




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Arvo KD9HLC via Groups.Io <arvopl@...>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Connecting Kenwood KMC 30 to bitx /uBitx #parts
?
Does the PC or cell phone mic need any special circuitry beyond what's already in the BITX40 or ?BitX?


Re: uBitx Wireless Memory Management #ubitx

 

David,
Thanks for the info.

The Bluetooth LE stack portion of the EPS32S might be the way to go. And your i2c ¡°gap¡± approach is what I used on the ten-tec in the vid.
But controlling from a Browser or voice assistant over WiFi, although a little beyond my comfort level, would be ideal.

Bob
wm6h?


Re: Small question about LCD mounting

 

Those look very nice!? Thank you for sharing about the decal edge spray!


Re: Connecting Kenwood KMC 30 to bitx /uBitx #parts

 

Does the PC or cell phone mic need any special circuitry beyond what's already in the BITX40 or ?BitX?


Re: Small question about LCD mounting

 

One of the biggest advantages of using Water-slide decals over some sort of label-maker
is that you can print whatever graphics you want, whereas label-makers are limited
in the choice of fonts and generally only print text. ?Here are some photos of another (non Bitx)
project that I recently completed. It is a W8TEE (et al) Modular Transceiver from the?
March 2016 QST article. I opted to use simple graphics instead of text labels, for a change,
to keep the front and rear panels clean-looking.

Note that the light angle was bad for these photos and the backing on the decals
appears much more visible in the photos than it really is in normal viewing
(it looks much better in real life than in these photos).?

Cheers

Michael VE3WMB?

P.S. Before anyone asks ... the red Chinese characters on the front panel are the number 49.
This is a tribute to the use of the rockbound Chinese Forty-9er DC 40m Rig (available on
eBay for $9) that this project is built around. ?I like to make up a logo for my home-built rigs.?


Re: Connecting Kenwood KMC 30 to bitx /uBitx #parts

John McFadden
 

Lawrence,
Fiddler on the Roof has a song for you about tradition. :-p

Plus the PTT switch and being able to switch radios easily.?

John


On Dec 14, 2017 10:34 AM, "Lawrence Galea" <9h1avlaw@...> wrote:
Anyone thought of using the commonly available computer headphones/mic combo?
Regards
Lawrence

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, John McFadden <johnamcf@...> wrote:
I'm using a Baofeng on my bitx40, I need a different option on my ubitx as the two independent jacks (3.5 and 2.5mm, a precise distance apart) sharing wires between mic, speaker, and PTT is making soldering a gigantic pain.?

Single panel mount RG45s are available in female to female, or buy a female to male, cut off the connector and you have 1' leads to play with for $6?on Prime. The female to male mount from inside the case, usually sold for Ethernet applications.?

The $20?"quality" Baofeng mic and two $8?jacks vs $35?Kenwood mic and $6?Ethernet jack, I hope the Kenwood is a viable option.?

John

On Dec 14, 2017 9:52 AM, "N8DAH" <Dherron@...> wrote:
You would need an RG45 case mount female connector and would also have to wire it for ptt/mic etc in the case. Just me but I wouldn't use it for the bitx.





Re: uBITX order enquiry

Gregory Schippers
 

I wouldn't bother them. They must be overwhelmed.... this is the
response I received:

"Hopefully, we will be able to include in the first run before
Christmas. The tracking details will be updated on the Paypal
Transaction after the shipment is done. "

Regards,
Greg, KC8HXO


Re: Connecting Kenwood KMC 30 to bitx /uBitx #parts

 

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Lawrence Galea <9h1avlaw@...> wrote:
Anyone thought of using the commonly available computer headphones/mic combo?

Absolutely. My plan is to use the same headset/mic combo that I use with my computer for video conferencing. If you wanted a very lightweight solution, you could wire up a TRRS socket and use earbuds with a built-in microphone like those that come with many cell phones.

-Neil N0FN


Re: Connecting Kenwood KMC 30 to bitx /uBitx #parts

 

Anyone thought of using the commonly available computer headphones/mic combo?
Regards
Lawrence

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, John McFadden <johnamcf@...> wrote:
I'm using a Baofeng on my bitx40, I need a different option on my ubitx as the two independent jacks (3.5 and 2.5mm, a precise distance apart) sharing wires between mic, speaker, and PTT is making soldering a gigantic pain.?

Single panel mount RG45s are available in female to female, or buy a female to male, cut off the connector and you have 1' leads to play with for $6?on Prime. The female to male mount from inside the case, usually sold for Ethernet applications.?

The $20?"quality" Baofeng mic and two $8?jacks vs $35?Kenwood mic and $6?Ethernet jack, I hope the Kenwood is a viable option.?

John

On Dec 14, 2017 9:52 AM, "N8DAH" <Dherron@...> wrote:
You would need an RG45 case mount female connector and would also have to wire it for ptt/mic etc in the case. Just me but I wouldn't use it for the bitx.




Re: uBitx Wireless Memory Management #ubitx

 

Many "Arduino compatible" things out there simply mean they work in the IDE - they don't ensure any kind of code compatibility. Any lower level code that's fiddling with registers or making assumptions about an underlying AVR architecture won't work with ESP32. I think for the most part the Raduino code is free of such low level code - you might end up changing things for interrupt handling or possibly the included libraries.

As for the ESP, not a "horror story" really, but prepare to debug many strange crashes on the ESP especially when using the WIFI stack :). For me, I was working on a APRS modem using an ESP32 and never got the WIFI working at the same time as the on-board ADC. Something to do with timers... I forget.?

Personally, I would "gap" a wireless module from the radio control and talk to it over I2C or Serial.

Good luck! Sounds interesting!

David, KM4NKU




On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:27 AM <rwhinric@...> wrote:

?

I¡¯m thinking of replacing the Radino Arduino with the EPS-32S chip (WiFi and Bluetooth) for memory and memory group creation, editing and recall. The control rf is passed through seams in your uBitx chassis (if you haven¡¯t put copper tape everywhere!).?

?

I¡¯ve never used this chip and I wonder about:

Power consumption, Arduino IDE and code compatibility, rf hash. Or any horror stories.

?

Here is a video of my implementation (using another chip) on a Ten-Tec QRP rig. Vid is only 55 seconds and NO TALKING.


Hmmm. Voice control with google voice assistant?

?

Bob wm6h?

?

Chip should be about $8 China $11 US



Re: uBitx schematic

M Garza
 

Everything you need us located here:


This schematic is here:


Marco - KG5PRT?

On Dec 14, 2017 9:11 AM, <RYERSON@...> wrote:
I'm kind of new to the BITX, but have a BITX40 that works really well.? My question is:? Where can I find the schematic and related data needed to build a uBITX??

Thanks
Rye K9LCJ since 1954



Re: uBITX Case BNC vote

 

The answer is that the old connectors are so easy to solder!

At 14/12/2017, you wrote:

Cringe

On 13/12/2017 3:34 PM, Arv Evans wrote:
RCA connectors are readily available, inexpensive, and work quite well.
_._

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Keith VE7GDH <ve7gdh@...> wrote:
Wicker (call sign?) wrote...

> I can add to the general consensus that a well thought
> out enclosure for the uBITX would appeal to me; SO-239
> preference.

I don't know why hams are "stuck" on the inferior PL-259
plug and SO-239 socket. Well, I do. It's because manufacturers
keep sticking them on the back of radios and we don't insist
that they stop using them. For a small connector, I would
prefer SMA. BNC is "OK" but the bayonets wear out if you
you connect/disconnect them enough times. For a "large"
connector, the N connector is superior in so many ways.

--
73 Keith VE7GDH


Re: Small question about LCD mounting

 

I forgot to add that there is one additional step the can be added if you want a very professional-looking result for your water-slide decals. ?After the decals have been installed and before you?
put the clear Krylon coat over the top, you can apply a product to the decals that softens the
decal backing material. I am not sure exactly what it is called but it is available at hobby shops.

What this does is to pretty much eliminate any visible "seam" at the
edge of where you cut out the decal. Once this has dried and has been fixed with clear Krylon
the end result is very close to what you would get if the lettering was printed onto the panel?
via a silkscreening procedure.?

Cheers

Michael VE3WMB?


uBitx schematic

 

I'm kind of new to the BITX, but have a BITX40 that works really well.? My question is:? Where can I find the schematic and related data needed to build a uBITX??

Thanks
Rye K9LCJ since 1954


Re: Connecting Kenwood KMC 30 to bitx /uBitx #parts

John McFadden
 

I'm using a Baofeng on my bitx40, I need a different option on my ubitx as the two independent jacks (3.5 and 2.5mm, a precise distance apart) sharing wires between mic, speaker, and PTT is making soldering a gigantic pain.?

Single panel mount RG45s are available in female to female, or buy a female to male, cut off the connector and you have 1' leads to play with for $6?on Prime. The female to male mount from inside the case, usually sold for Ethernet applications.?

The $20?"quality" Baofeng mic and two $8?jacks vs $35?Kenwood mic and $6?Ethernet jack, I hope the Kenwood is a viable option.?

John

On Dec 14, 2017 9:52 AM, "N8DAH" <Dherron@...> wrote:
You would need an RG45 case mount female connector and would also have to wire it for ptt/mic etc in the case. Just me but I wouldn't use it for the bitx.



Re: uBITX Case BNC vote

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The smallest connector would be MMCX but you really don't want that (the connector typically used on GPS modules.)

;)?? 73 de Paul (VA6PW, VE6KWI)


On 14/12/2017 2:32 AM, Kelly Jack wrote:

I would say whatever is smallest, sma? - if you're inclung that as an option coz you can always make the hole bigger. But some merit to a proper bnc hole which is supposed to be noncircular. ?Aluminium for the weight savings as portability is preferred and easier to work.


Regards Simon VK3ELH