¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Raduino question.

Vince Vielhaber
 

You either don't recall or you didn't read it. Yesterday afternoon I re-measured using a Tek 11402 scope and corrected my previous comment.

Vince.

On 10/24/2017 04:42 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:
As I recall, you showed some alarmingly low signal levels as the
frequency went up.
If the si5351 can only give 8ma at dc, your notes suggest it gets
awfully small at 45mhz+SignalFreq
into the first mixer on the ubitx.

Though Gordon's right, there is some conduction through a schottky diode
even at 200mv or less.
Perhaps somehow the ubitx works well enough, but could do better if the
diode ring mixers were driven harder.

Jerry

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:03 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote:

I posted the RMS values of all four output modes yesterday. Do you
also want the P-P values?

--
Michigan VHF Corp.


Re: Help with troubleshooting Bitx40 - no transmit. #bitx40help

Neris Biciunas
 

I will try again when I get home tonight, and report back.


Re: Help with troubleshooting Bitx40 - no transmit. #bitx40help

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

What were the numbers you got when measuring current?


On 10/24/2017 05:41 PM, Neris Biciunas wrote:

There are many things that I don't know, and I sincerely thank all of you for the resource that is growing here in this group.

I am looking for some assistance troubleshooting a Bitx40.
Go easy on me, I have very little idea of what I am doing.

Let me tell you what I do know...
-This is my first HF radio, and my first kit build radio - what could possibly go wrong, right?
-I am running this radio from a 12v Battery. (12.4v -13.2v ish)
-100' of coax to an inverted V that has been tuned to the middle of the band.
-Receive works well.? I can regularly hear folks from the western half of North America, and frequently the east coast as well as others speaking Spanish (Mexico?? South America?)
-Transmit appears to not work.? I have not made any successful QSO's.
-I have a QRP dummy load (), and the voltage measured (between ground and VRMS pin is something like 0.57) (RF power = (0.57^2)/50= .0065 watts) when the mic is keyed.
-I have tested the voltages of all of the transistors and while not exactly the same, they are very close to the values published by?Randy, K7AGE
-I never saw the "Magic smoke"
-There are very few mods to this BitX40.? Allard's code, extra heat-sink one the raduino, and larger heat-sink on the board, extra capacitor on tuning pot, (there is one other capacitor that I added, but at the moment, I cannot precisely describe where I put it), external speaker/mic by BTech
-I don't have access to test equipment beyond a multi meter, small dummy load, and an antenna analyser.
-I have tried to measure Amps drawn, but I was likely doing something incorrectly as the values were not even close tho what is described in the BitX40 write up.
-Nothing gets hot when powered on, no visually obvious defects.
-I have listened (via WebSDR) to a frequency that I was transmitting on, and received nothing.? I'm not sure if I was too far away, or if I was really not transmitting.? I live far away from most everything so popping over to the next ham meeting is non-trivial.


So what can I test?? Are there any other troubleshooting guides out there?
Thanks for any ideas or suggestions that you might have.

WA7NJB


Help with troubleshooting Bitx40 - no transmit. #bitx40help

Neris Biciunas
 

There are many things that I don't know, and I sincerely thank all of you for the resource that is growing here in this group.

I am looking for some assistance troubleshooting a Bitx40.
Go easy on me, I have very little idea of what I am doing.

Let me tell you what I do know...
-This is my first HF radio, and my first kit build radio - what could possibly go wrong, right?
-I am running this radio from a 12v Battery. (12.4v -13.2v ish)
-100' of coax to an inverted V that has been tuned to the middle of the band.
-Receive works well.? I can regularly hear folks from the western half of North America, and frequently the east coast as well as others speaking Spanish (Mexico?? South America?)
-Transmit appears to not work.? I have not made any successful QSO's.
-I have a QRP dummy load (), and the voltage measured (between ground and VRMS pin is something like 0.57) (RF power = (0.57^2)/50= .0065 watts) when the mic is keyed.
-I have tested the voltages of all of the transistors and while not exactly the same, they are very close to the values published by?Randy, K7AGE
-I never saw the "Magic smoke"
-There are very few mods to this BitX40.? Allard's code, extra heat-sink one the raduino, and larger heat-sink on the board, extra capacitor on tuning pot, (there is one other capacitor that I added, but at the moment, I cannot precisely describe where I put it), external speaker/mic by BTech
-I don't have access to test equipment beyond a multi meter, small dummy load, and an antenna analyser.
-I have tried to measure Amps drawn, but I was likely doing something incorrectly as the values were not even close tho what is described in the BitX40 write up.
-Nothing gets hot when powered on, no visually obvious defects.
-I have listened (via WebSDR) to a frequency that I was transmitting on, and received nothing.? I'm not sure if I was too far away, or if I was really not transmitting.? I live far away from most everything so popping over to the next ham meeting is non-trivial.


So what can I test?? Are there any other troubleshooting guides out there?
Thanks for any ideas or suggestions that you might have.

WA7NJB


Re: Raduino question.

 

Ah, ok. ?I'd somehow missed this one.

With the 8ma setting, you have 735mv rms, or 14.7ma rms.
That's a more robust driver than I was expecting. ?
Especially considering that this is an rms value.



On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:08 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
I'm going to have a look at the 2430A.

Current setup:
Tek 11402 Scope w/ 11A32 400MHz plugin
Tek P6121 10x probe - 1 meg termination in the scope
No bandwidth limiting

Adafruit si5351 board CLK2 terminated into 51 ohms.
Standalone Nano controlling it.
NOTE: CLK2 is also used for the following measurements.

There is a difference in output between 7.5MHz and 35.5MHz, but only about 15mv rms.

There's a bit of ringing on the square wave but that's probably in my setup.

Ok, with the above setup, at 11.020 MHz:

2ma setting: 190 mv rms.
4ma setting: 380 mv rms.
6ma setting: 560 mv rms.
8ma setting: 735 mv rms.


Re: Raduino question.

 

As I recall, you showed some alarmingly low signal levels as the frequency went up.
If the si5351 can only give 8ma at dc, your notes suggest it gets awfully small at 45mhz+SignalFreq
into the first mixer on the ubitx.

Though Gordon's right, there is some conduction through a schottky diode even at 200mv or less.
Perhaps somehow the ubitx works well enough, but could do better if the diode ring mixers were driven harder.

Jerry


On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:03 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
I posted the RMS values of all four output modes yesterday. Do you also want the P-P values?


Re: I made a mistake

 

I suspect the replacement diode went in the wrong way around, and that was what smoked. Drilling the board to link C130 (and D7) to the relay coil is a bit of overkill: that bit of track goes to a 'via', connecting the two planes, you could have done what I did - use an Xacto knife (I used a box-cutter!) to excise a track-width or so of the ground plane around the via's exit, clean that off as a pad and link it to the nearby coil point. The bit of track on the top having lifted, it could have just been jumpered to the (cleaned-off) top of the via. Oh, well , live and learn ...

73 de ZL2DEX


Re: Raduino question.

Vince Vielhaber
 

I posted the RMS values of all four output modes yesterday. Do you also want the P-P values?

Vince.

On 10/24/2017 02:14 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:
Hmm, my analysis in post /g/BITX20/topic/6215251
might be full of beans.

The SiLabs document an619 shows that registers 16,17,18 can set drive
levels at clk0,clk1,clk2 to values of 2,4,6 or 8 ma.
With 8ma max into 50 ohms that's a 0.008*50 = 0.4v pk-pk square wave
across the 50 ohm load.
Farhan's ubitx has a 6db pad between the raduino and T1, so the primary
of T1 sees 0.4v/2 = 0.2v.
T1 has two windings driving the diodes, a step-up transformer, so the
diodes see a 0.4v pk-to-pk.
But a single schottky diode has a forward voltage of around 0.4v at
10ma, I have no idea how this
0.4v signal source can drive two schottky diodes in series.

But the ubitx apparently works.
What am I missing here?
I'll have to put a 50 ohm load on a si5351 someday, see just how much
drive the si5351 can give.

Might be best to include a buffer amp, if only to reduce all the
crosstalk you would get between si5351 channels
when asking it to deliver maximum drive.



On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:54 am, Gordon Gibby wrote:

think you're off a decimal point there.... 2 mA into 50 ohms is 1/5
of a milliwatt so it wold not be 3dBm....

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Kelly Jack <kellyjack1968@... *Sent:* Monday, October 23,
2017 5:30 AM
this page indicates that setting the drive at 2ma equates to 3dbm
into a 50ohms load.

<>

--
Michigan VHF Corp.


Re: Raduino question.

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Oh and I forgot to say, I think if either of those two Schottky diode's conducts, you get an output. I don't think you have to make both of them conduct simultaneously. ? So I think the barrier to get some output is more like 200 mV ; and I think your signals easily provide that as you have proven.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 24, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...> wrote:

Well again, I didn't follow all of that, but if you put 8 mA into 50 ohms, you get .4 V peak; ?0.8 p-P

(Proof: ?use a halfway rectifier on your home outlet 120 V RMS, and you'll discover that you get somewhere around 160 V DC or more out of it. ? it's not 120 V peak to peak, it is 240 peak to peak!!)



Someone on this forum recently measured the voltages, out of some board or something. ?

I looked at the schematic of the micro bit X that was linked to here, and the RF signal seems to be in series with the transformer winding providing the Heterodyne signal, so the sum of the two could reach much higher levels than either alone at times.

Furthermore, I went and looked at the data sheet of a small signal Schottky diode here:

And there is significant conduction even at 200 mV. ? ?Sure, if you want 10 mA you'll need a little higher voltage, but you can get some signal out of those things at a lot lower voltage than that.

And of course, you already know the punchline, the thing does work!!



Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:

Hmm, my analysis in post
might be full of beans.

The SiLabs document an619 shows that registers 16,17,18 can set drive levels at clk0,clk1,clk2 to values of 2,4,6 or 8 ma.
With 8ma max into 50 ohms that's a 0.008*50 = 0.4v pk-pk square wave across the 50 ohm load.
Farhan's ubitx has a 6db pad between the raduino and T1, so the primary of T1 sees 0.4v/2 = 0.2v.
T1 has two windings driving the diodes, a step-up transformer, so the diodes see a 0.4v pk-to-pk.
But a single schottky diode has a forward voltage of around 0.4v at 10ma, I have no idea how this
0.4v signal source can drive two schottky diodes in series. ?

But the ubitx apparently works.
What am I missing here?
I'll have to put a 50 ohm load on a si5351 someday, see just how much drive the si5351 can give.

Might be best to include a buffer amp, if only to reduce all the crosstalk you would get between si5351 channels
when asking it to deliver maximum drive.



On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:54 am, Gordon Gibby wrote:

think you're off a decimal point there.... 2 mA into 50 ohms is 1/5 of a milliwatt so it wold not be 3dBm....?


From:?Kelly Jack <kellyjack1968@... ? ?Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 5:30 AM?
this page indicates that setting the drive at 2ma equates to 3dbm into a 50ohms load.


Re: Raduino question.

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Well again, I didn't follow all of that, but if you put 8 mA into 50 ohms, you get .4 V peak; ?0.8 p-P

(Proof: ?use a halfway rectifier on your home outlet 120 V RMS, and you'll discover that you get somewhere around 160 V DC or more out of it. ? it's not 120 V peak to peak, it is 240 peak to peak!!)



Someone on this forum recently measured the voltages, out of some board or something. ?

I looked at the schematic of the micro bit X that was linked to here, and the RF signal seems to be in series with the transformer winding providing the Heterodyne signal, so the sum of the two could reach much higher levels than either alone at times.

Furthermore, I went and looked at the data sheet of a small signal Schottky diode here:

And there is significant conduction even at 200 mV. ? ?Sure, if you want 10 mA you'll need a little higher voltage, but you can get some signal out of those things at a lot lower voltage than that.

And of course, you already know the punchline, the thing does work!!



Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:

Hmm, my analysis in post
might be full of beans.

The SiLabs document an619 shows that registers 16,17,18 can set drive levels at clk0,clk1,clk2 to values of 2,4,6 or 8 ma.
With 8ma max into 50 ohms that's a 0.008*50 = 0.4v pk-pk square wave across the 50 ohm load.
Farhan's ubitx has a 6db pad between the raduino and T1, so the primary of T1 sees 0.4v/2 = 0.2v.
T1 has two windings driving the diodes, a step-up transformer, so the diodes see a 0.4v pk-to-pk.
But a single schottky diode has a forward voltage of around 0.4v at 10ma, I have no idea how this
0.4v signal source can drive two schottky diodes in series. ?

But the ubitx apparently works.
What am I missing here?
I'll have to put a 50 ohm load on a si5351 someday, see just how much drive the si5351 can give.

Might be best to include a buffer amp, if only to reduce all the crosstalk you would get between si5351 channels
when asking it to deliver maximum drive.



On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:54 am, Gordon Gibby wrote:

think you're off a decimal point there.... 2 mA into 50 ohms is 1/5 of a milliwatt so it wold not be 3dBm....?


From:?Kelly Jack <kellyjack1968@... ? ?Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 5:30 AM?
this page indicates that setting the drive at 2ma equates to 3dbm into a 50ohms load.


Re: BITX QSO Night - Need Alternate Frequencies

philip yates
 

Be great for EU working.

Phil - G7BZD

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:54 PM, <kenvez25@...> wrote:
I agree that there is too much QRM ?with the BC station close by as I commented a few weeks ago. Before picking a new one like 7282, why don't we check for a few weeks to make sure we don't run into the same problem again. Would a freq above 7.175 and below 7.200 be better to avoid broadcast traffic?
73 Everyone
WI1B
Ken



Re: Raduino question.

 

Hmm, my analysis in post /g/BITX20/topic/6215251
might be full of beans.

The SiLabs document an619 shows that registers 16,17,18 can set drive levels at clk0,clk1,clk2 to values of 2,4,6 or 8 ma.
With 8ma max into 50 ohms that's a 0.008*50 = 0.4v pk-pk square wave across the 50 ohm load.
Farhan's ubitx has a 6db pad between the raduino and T1, so the primary of T1 sees 0.4v/2 = 0.2v.
T1 has two windings driving the diodes, a step-up transformer, so the diodes see a 0.4v pk-to-pk.
But a single schottky diode has a forward voltage of around 0.4v at 10ma, I have no idea how this
0.4v signal source can drive two schottky diodes in series. ?

But the ubitx apparently works.
What am I missing here?
I'll have to put a 50 ohm load on a si5351 someday, see just how much drive the si5351 can give.

Might be best to include a buffer amp, if only to reduce all the crosstalk you would get between si5351 channels
when asking it to deliver maximum drive.



On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:54 am, Gordon Gibby wrote:

think you're off a decimal point there.... 2 mA into 50 ohms is 1/5 of a milliwatt so it wold not be 3dBm....?


From:?Kelly Jack <kellyjack1968@... ? ?Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 5:30 AM?
this page indicates that setting the drive at 2ma equates to 3dbm into a 50ohms load.


Re: Raduino question.

 

And what would happen using Si5351 with analog switcher mixer (Tayloe detector). The square wave only close and open the switch.-
LU5DNM

-----Mensaje original-----
De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] En nombre de Pavel Milanes Costa
Enviado el: lunes, 23 de octubre de 2017 07:13 p.m.
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: [BITX20] Raduino question.


El 23/10/17 a las 16:53, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io escribi¨®:
The ARRL Handbook says square waves are better,
though does not say anything about how huge the difference is.
We are talking the same language, we are agree on the point that square
is better, but not always... I'm just making a little note to the side
of the page about a special case as per my experience...

Grab your digital copy of the ARRL handbook and keep looking at chapter
10... search for figure 10.22 on page 10.21 just in the next page of
your note. Look at the graphic at the bottom of figure 10.22 compare the
output from using a sine wave vs square wave, square wave has ALL the
harmonics (solid line), the sine one has none (dashed line)

Also the output from a sine VFO is 3dB lower than the square one. ;-)

I was only saying that if you use the Si5351 as BFO to mix with the IF
and grab the audio, and you use a low freq on it (below ~2 Mhz as per my
experience, worst on the 500 Khz range) you may get a very noisy audio
as those solid lines (harmonics) are very close each other and will mix
again and again inside the mixer/amplifiers and you will get a very
noisy reception, full of carriers here and there...

On tx there is no problem as the SSB filter wipe them away...

In deed if you use a high enough IF (as the bitx40 do, in 12 Mhz) all
the unwanted mixing are cleaned by simple filtering, but beware if you
use a low freq as 455Khz or 500 Khz... those unwanted mixing products
will haunt you...

Been there, done that, must filter it if you use a Si5351 for BFO below
~2Mhz.

--
73 CO7WT, Pavel.


Re: FS:W8TEE TFT boards and parts

 

Sold Thanks all for the interest

?73

?? David

???? N8DAH


Re: I made a mistake

Vince Vielhaber
 

tombstone?
Yep.


Vince.





On Oct 23, 2017 10:00 PM, "Vince Vielhaber" <vev@...> wrote:

You might want to tombstone it to make sure that is what's smoking.

Vince.



On 10/23/2017 10:32 PM, Barrett O wrote:

Looks like it. Nothing eles but the diode I installed in that spot

On Oct 23, 2017 9:18 PM, "Vince Vielhaber" <vev@...
<mailto:vev@...>> wrote:


C130 is a 0.1uf. It's smoking? Are you sure that's what's smoking
and not something near it?

Vince.


On 10/23/2017 10:00 PM, Barrett O wrote:

Well I got around to install a diode still no luck. I had some
1N914
which are supposed to be electrically the same. I ended up
accidentally
ripping one of the traces off that seems to lead to the relay.
I
drilled
and installed diode. I installed annode to ptt1-2 (brown side).
connected cathode side to c130. rarduino comes on. barely any
noise came
out of speaker even with antenna connected. then noticed c130
was
smoking and melting into board. Does anybody know what
capacitor
I can
switch that with?
Ps. If it sounds like I don't know what I'm doing it's because
I
don't
but trying to look at the diagram and find the nearest point
that
it
connects to solder to with the same polarity.



Barrett
KG5SSO




--
Michigan VHF Corp.






--
Michigan VHF Corp.





--
Michigan VHF Corp.


Re: I made a mistake

 

A junction transistor like the mmbt3904 (the bitx40 schematic is incorrect in labeling them bc849)
is at first glance symmetrical, running it upside down with emitter and collector reversed could sort of work.
But they are optimized for the emitter going to ground, not the collector.

Page 2 of the datasheet shows that the base-emitter breakdown voltage is only 6 volts,
? ??
so if the emitter (now pseudo-collector) is at 12v and the base is below 6v that junction will break down
like a zener and current will flow. ?Pushing that junction into breakdown can have a permanent effect on gain
if current is restricted, and blow the transistor if it isn't. ?Not something they bother to spec though.

Assuming the mmbt3904 operating upside down is acting more or less like a normal NPN transistor,
with power to the bitx40 reversed the base of Q7 is biased at ? 12v*2.2k/(1k+2.2k) = 8.25v through 1k || 2.2k = 667 ohms
and the reversed transistor is in saturation. ?The 470 ohms at R74 is the only thing restricting collector/emitter current flow
to around 12v/0.47k=25ma, and Q7 is dissipating 25ma*12v=300mw. ?Would probably survive that, but not by much.

Unfortunately, with the pseudo-emitter down near ground, the base will be too despite the best efforts of
the biasing resistors at R71 and R72. ?So the pseudo-collector to base voltage will exceed
the 6v emitter-base breakdown voltage of the datasheet, and all bets are off. ??

I'm not planning to test my guesses of what might happen on my bitx40 anytime soon.
Mine has an LM2940CT-12 regulator in the supply line from the battery.
Unlike the older LM7812, the LM2940CT-12 ?will protect against reversed battery leads.
It also protects against battery voltages in excess of 12v, and gives some semblance of overcurrent protection.

The IRF510 is powered directly from the battery with no protection, ?as the IRF510 is quite cheap.
Maybe I'll add a 2A fuse there someday. ?After watching T7, L8, and associated traces fry.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 08:20 pm, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
Q7 has mostly that 470 ohm emitter resistor to stop excessive reverse current, but probably survived.
I'm not really sure how Q7 (or any of the other transistor amps) would behave in the face of a reverse supply.


Re: uBITX Questions

 

I believe this is the latest on ubitx schematics:
? ??/g/BITX20/message/33255


On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:06 am, tArthur Bryant wrote:

I heard you are working on an updated uBITX circuit, is this true? When will the drawings be available?


Re: uBITX Questions

 

Ashhar,

I heard you are working on an updated uBITX circuit, is this true? When will the drawings be available?

Art
KB8HGW


Re: BITX QSO Night - Need Alternate Frequencies

 

I agree that there is too much QRM ?with the BC station close by as I commented a few weeks ago. Before picking a new one like 7282, why don't we check for a few weeks to make sure we don't run into the same problem again. Would a freq above 7.175 and below 7.200 be better to avoid broadcast traffic?
73 Everyone
WI1B
Ken


Re: I made a mistake

 

If you reversed the power leads into the main bitx40 board, I suspect surprisingly little would blow.

D7 and C130 are meant to be a snubber across the coil of K1, but got wired up wrong.
They are not across the coil (pins 7 and 8 of the relay) but instead are from +12v to ground.
They should have been wired up like D8 and C164 at K2, directly across the relay coil.
Since D7 and C130 ?aren't wired up right, they aren't serving any purpose and can be removed from the board.

U2 is probably blown, as the LM78L09 is not built to deal with a negative voltage at the input.
But damage probably stopped there, as Q8 and Q9 have no path from +12 to gnd of less than 1kohm.
Check for 9v at U2 pin 1, if you don't see 9v then replace U2.
Or if you are brave, just wire across U2 from pin 3 to pin 1 and cut pin 2 loose from ground,
you don't really need a regulator there if not using the analog vfo.?

Q7 has mostly that 470 ohm emitter resistor to stop excessive reverse current, but probably survived.
I'm not really sure how Q7 (or any of the other transistor amps) would behave in the face of a reverse supply.

U1 and Q16 have a handy reverse power protection diode at D18, so should have no trouble.
Likewise with the three BiDi RF amps, they all have a diode in series with the 12v supply.

There is no path around Q12 that sees less than 1kohm, and 12ma shouldn't fry anything there.
Likewise with Q10 and Q11.

If you did not press the PTT button, then the stuff around Q13, Q14 and U3 never saw power,
and should be fine. ?

If you wired up PA-PWR1 with a reversed 12v supply and powered that up, it could have blown the IRF510
as it has a reverse diode from drain to source. ?But more likely the coil at L8 or T7 would burn first.
If you did not wire up PA-PWR1 in reverse, then that stuff should all be fine.

The Raduino on the other hand is probably toast if it saw reversed supplies. ?
Maybe you do want to get U2 working again, supplying 9v to the analog vfo
so you can install a coil at L4 and play with the rig till a new Raduino arrives.

That's just a quick survey, I probably got some stuff wrong.
Could well be something more than U2 that blew on the main board.
And perhaps somebody can figure out how to bring your Raduino back from the dead.
May not be trivial to figure all of this out without a scope and some idea of what's going on.
At worst, consider this a nice cheap $59 lesson in what not to do, ?and go order another unit from hfsigs.
?
Jerry, KE7ER



On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:00 pm, Barrett O wrote:
Well I got around to install a diode still no luck. I had some 1N914 which are supposed to be electrically the same. I ended up accidentally ripping one of the traces off that seems to lead to the relay. I drilled and installed diode. I installed annode to ptt1-2 (brown side). connected cathode side to c130. rarduino comes on. barely any noise came out of speaker even with antenna connected. then noticed c130 was smoking and melting into board. Does anybody know what capacitor I can switch that with?
Ps. If it sounds like I don't know what I'm doing it's because I don't but trying to look at the diagram and find the nearest point that it connects to solder to with the same polarity.