Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
A couple of Quid/Bucks for a CB hand microphone, But a DC blocking cap on the mic lead to it from the BITX-40 and away you go .. It couldn't be any problem easier, All this talk of buying boxes and switches to make your own when it's far cheaper , Easier to buy a CB type one ..
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
A very long time ago, as a repeater user, I had a bell systems Trimline handset, and with very minor additions to the old HeahKit HW202 2 meter rig, it (the Trimline) worked as a mic, with DTMF pad.? If I remember right, I put a small pushbutton in the side, and the rest of the handset was unaffected- and I put 12V on the mic line.? It worked really well. My point being that the telephone handset may be a nice speaker/mic.? It would benefit from the electret, but the speaker element probably would be very well suited.? And a PTT switch might be possible if ground are common- leaving one conductor open. The RJ11 jack would need to be salvaged from the base 73 Larry KB3CUF (ex WB3INC) On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Ryan Flowers <geocrasher@...> wrote:
|
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
Thanks everyone, I sincerely appreciate the responses! Jack, I hadn't even considered the weight issue- thanks for bringing it up. I think a 4 conductor telephone cord will solve the problem and I'll just make a nicer looking handheld mic. I'll post what I come up with eventually. I'm still working on the case, too. Thanks again!
|
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
I *just* bought (via eBay) two 'Beofeng' microphones. One worked perfectly, the other had a solder problem with the electret (easily fixed, see: ). These are handi-talkie mics, and speaker-mics to boot - so, you can cut off the little dual-plug and wire it up how you want. Here's the fix to the one that didn't work - I just shorted two solder points - apparently the trace is bad (do look at the bubbly PCB - I'm not saying this is great quality, but it works): |
Junk CB radio source for parts
Hi I saw another message about using a mic from a CB radio. There is a lot more that you can use. An old junk CB radio is a great source of parts that you may use on your BITX40 build. Speaker Knobs Pots, maybe SO239 antenna connector Mic Mic jack Heatsink Connectors Meter, older rigs have an analog meter Power cord maybe with fuse Possible case Hardware I asked around if anyone in the local club had an old CB. Nothing. But one of the guys gave me an old Kenwood TR-7400 from back in the 70s, no tone, no memory. Not sure if it works. It is huge compared to today's radios.Soon to be gutted.? Randy, K7AGE |
Re: Would someone mind explaining to me how the BFO frequency circuit works?
Baruch Atta
Are you asking about the BFO in the transmitter circuit? The BFO in the transmitter circuit hetrodynes the 4.9-5.0 MHz single sideband signal with a 12.0 (approx) MHz BFO signal, giving 12+5=17 and 12-5=7 MHz output.? The BitX uses the 7 MHz signal which is amplified and transmitted.? See the March 2017 QST for a nice article on the original use of this method in the antique radios section.? On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM, <KD2BBW@...> wrote:
|
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
Baruch Atta
I used a mic and jack from an old CB.? I replaced the mic element with the element supplied with the BitX.? I used the jack from the CB.? On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Jason N3YUG <jbr13@...> wrote:
|
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
Jack Purdum
I like a coiled cord, too. However, unlike my base transceiver, when the rig weighs about a pound and I turn around mid-QSO to answer the phone only to see my B40 whiz by my head because of the spring-tension in the cord, that's when I went to a non-coiled cord. Jack, W8TEE From: Jason N3YUG <jbr13@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [BITX20] Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40 Hey Ryan,? I took one of my old Yaesu HT speaker mics, and rewired it for the BITX40,? It has a Electret?mic element in it already, and a PTT.? I see on amazon.com you can pic up a speaker mic for $6-$15.? I say go for it, I like having the coiled cord also! Jason N3YUG
|
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
Jason N3YUG
Hey Ryan,? I took one of my old Yaesu HT speaker mics, and rewired it for the BITX40,? It has a Electret?mic element in it already, and a PTT.? I see on amazon.com you can pic up a speaker mic for $6-$15.? I say go for it, I like having the coiled cord also! Jason N3YUG |
Re: Would someone mind explaining to me how the BFO frequency circuit works?
It's all working at about 11.998500mhz. ? Q10 is the oscillator and has some high impedance nodes on the left hand side, poking at it around the base or L5 may either disturb the oscillator or show low level signals that your instrument has trouble with. ?Q11 is an emitter follower to buffer output from the oscillator and drive a strong signal into the transformer without sucking too much power out of the oscillator. ?R104 ensures that even Q11 doesn't load down the oscillator, R104 is apparently getting stuffed with 10k these days instead of 2.2k. ?The little trimmer cap at C103 is not getting stuffed, it was found that by selecting crystals with all the same freq the BFO freq was just about right without any need for adjustment. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:36 am, <KD2BBW@...> wrote:
Also when I measure at L5 I was getting ~12MHz on my counter and when I measure at base of Q10 I was getting ~6Mhz. ? |
Re: Would someone mind explaining to me how the BFO frequency circuit works?
Q10 is the xtal oscillator with L & C in series, to pull the xtal down a bit to suit LSB.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
If you can generate a second frequency from the Si then you can remove Q10 and use Q11 to buffer it to the mixer. In the meanwhile I'll stick to my analog VFO! 73 Raj At 23/02/2017, you wrote:
I was wondering more about what the purpose of Q10 and Q11 serve. |
Re: Would someone mind explaining to me how the BFO frequency circuit works?
After all these years sometimes I get to forget!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You have a carrier frequency which you send to a mixer then mix it with some audio then you end up with one central carrier and two side bands of audio content. The carrier is a waste of your power so you take it out and so also the other side band energy which is a mirror. So your xtal filter does the job and selects one side band. When this signal is received by you then you need to re-insert the carrier (BFO) back to make the incoming signal intelligible in audio. And if you vary your BFO frequency the incoming signal may sound tinny or bassy depending where your BFO is! Hope that helps! --- Raj vu2zap At 23/02/2017, you wrote:
I know a bit about electronics but not enough apparently! |
Re: Flutter Fix
Jack Purdum
Quite often the compiler issues a line number that is a long way from where the error is. Because C is a "free form" language, the compiler parses the code as long as the next token that it sees is consistent with the grammar rules. An error that actually happens on line 500 may not cause the compiler to get into the what-the-hell-it-that state until a hundred lines later. If you'd like, send me the source file and I'll see if I can find the error and send it back to you. Jack, W8TEE From: John Smith via Groups.Io <johnlinux77@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:24 AM Subject: Re: [BITX20] Flutter Fix Ok, I copied the whole section and replaced the whole section in the sketch. And got the same error. Here is more detail- after turning line numbers it highlights in pink line #617. Here is the line- "void loop(){". This is part of the original code, and it doesn't cause an error in it's original form. And the latest error message is the same as posted before. Stand by for more details. This is the whole section I replaced- ? // the tuning knob is at neither extremities, tune the signals as usual ? else if (knob != old_knob){ ? ? ?frequency = baseTune + (50l * knob); ? ? ?old_knob = knob; ? ? ?setFrequency(frequency); ? ? ?updateDisplay(); ? } } So am I still too thick?
|
Re: Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40
Jack Purdum
My mic cost me $0.87 to build from the parts that came with the B40. (See pix.) The mic cord is an old telephone cable from the house phone line that was lying around. While its construction is pretty obvious, details will be in the April, QRP Quarterly. The green stuff is large diameter shrink tubing that I got in a Dayton grab bag...it's so big I never thought I'd find a use for it. You never know... Jack, W8TEE From: Richard Andrew Knack via Groups.Io <ihc73scout2@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:45 AM Subject: Re: [BITX20] Handheld Mic w/ PTT for BITX40 Why not this one: Rich KC8MWG On Thursday, February 23, 2017 1:58 AM, Ryan Flowers <geocrasher@...> wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:46 pm, John Smith wrote:
?I considered doing that. The biggest thing is that I want one of those mic cables because they coil up, and currently mine does not. Perhaps I just need to find a better cable for the one I have. The coiled cords are $10 everywhere I've looked, and this whole mic is $10. And it's not wasteful if it serves my purpose. I know I'll have to source an 8 pin connector for it- ?else buy a mating 4 pin connector set and replace them, which I could easily do. My concern isn't whether this is a good idea. My concern is- is there any reason it won't work? -- Ryan Flowers KC7RYS? |
Re: weak mic audio output,
Dwine,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
A quick fix? would be a speech processor. Or you could add a bigger heat sink and change the final voltage to 24V and get a bigger signal! Raj At 23/02/2017, you wrote: Is the grounding of the red wire(calibration)is no help in this situation? |