Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: uBITX V6
开云体育
Many thanks Evan..
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Evan Hand <elhandjr@...>
Sent: 23 March 2024 22:26 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [BITX20] uBITX V6 ?
Hi Art,
They are just wire designators. The other end is on K3. During transmission, it disconnects the audio preamp from the audio amp. 73 Evan AC9TU |
Re: sBITX 64Bit Pi Image Available
#sBitx
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:13 PM, Robert AG6LK wrote:
Gyula, Rafael,I just realized that I sent the wrong link to GT. I apologize - been working extra hours at my job the past couple weeks and it was stressful. Here is the proper link to GridTracker??? |
uBITX V6
开云体育
Hi Evan,? ?could you tell mr what the M1, M2 designators on the v6 schematic are ??? I've been scratching my head trying to decide what they stand for..
Just awaiting some new relays for the v6..
Thanks
Art G3XNE
|
Re: low power on some bands
Hi Andi,
The Scale=value for 20 meters is set for 0.005.? Try increasing it to 0.006 and restarting the sbitx program.? You can edit it with vi or nano. Each band has its own scale factor.? You can tweak these to get values that are more to your liking.? Be careful not to go too high: 25 watts for bands less than 20 meters, 20 watts up to 15, 15 watts for 15 meters, and 10 watts for 10. Make minor adjustments; the drive is maxed out if you find little or no change. 73 Evan AC9TU |
Re: low power on some bands
I received my sBitx v3 last week and liking it a lot so far. I have a related question, so I just add it here The values in my unit are: 80m: 16W 40m: 24W 30m: 17W 20m: 13W 17m: 19W 15m: 15W 12m: 9W 10m: 8W Actually, I find these quite OK for IRF510s at 13.8V. My only question is - why is the 20m value so low? It should easily be around 20W like on 30 or 17m. Attached the hw_settings file! Thanks and vy 73 Andi, OE4DNS |
Re: sBITX 64Bit Pi Image Available
#sBitx
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 03:37 AM, HA3HZ wrote:
Very good... works correctly! Thanks to both of you.Hi Gyula. All the credit goes to Jerry for this one. I did not get to the point of identifying the issue, however he did and kindly shared it with us. Now I can focus on other improvements and updates to the toolbox :) -JJ |
Great work.??I love the changes.??I will have to look into this further
On Mar 23, 2024 at 2:58?PM -0400, larslund.hansen@..., wrote: sBitx v 3.02 and FT8 mode? |
sBitx v 3.02 and FT8 mode?
I love that the sBitx is a radio where one can tinker with both the hardware and software.
The unix pi app; The web ui: Currently I am working on improvements to the FT8 functionality.? The logging function works fine, but I missed visible information on which callsingns that I had QSO's with and which grids I had reached.
The solution I have come up with does a lookup in the logbook for each line in the FT8 lists.?
If the caller callsign is found in the log it is displayed in green otherwise in red.
The grids are also colored in the same way. This is one of the improvement I have made.? The software can be found on: |
Re: rs232 ptt rts (like /dev/ttyUSB0) interface support
#sBitx
It might be easier to tap into the 12-volt transmit level on Q9.? ?I assume the transistor TR1 can take 12 volts through the 2.2k resistor without issue.
73 Evan AC9TU |
Re: Sideband leakage in uBitxV6
Hi Evan,
Thanks for the explanation. I tried to do calibration again and this time I tried to keep the plateau slightly closer to 3000Hz. now no LSB is leaking. This was the issue. Now waiting for on-air report. I heard on a local WEBSDR and it was nice to hear my own transmission. 73 Ashok VU3KFK |
Re: rs232 ptt rts (like /dev/ttyUSB0) interface support
#sBitx
I meant how to add to the code to sbitx control the amplifier via USB RTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <stdio.h> #include <termios.h> #include <sys/ioctl.h> #include <fcntl.h> int PTTport,level = 0; // set RTS level, return -1 if error // termios.h int set_RTS(int level, int *fd) { int serline; ioctl (*fd, TIOCMGET, &serline); if (level == 1) { serline |= TIOCM_RTS; return ioctl (*fd, TIOCMSET, &serline); } if (level == 0) { serline &= ~TIOCM_RTS; return ioctl (*fd, TIOCMSET, &serline); } return -1; } int openserial(char *serial) { PTTport = open(serial, O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY | O_NONBLOCK | O_NDELAY); if (PTTport <0) { perror(serial); printf("error open device [%s]\n\n",serial); return -1; } return 1; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if (argc == 1) { printf("\nuse like ttyptt /dev/ttyPTT X (X=0 - set PTT-RTS off, X=1 - PTT-RTS ON)\n\n"); return(0); } if (openserial(argv[1]) < 1) return -1; if (*argv[2]=='1') level=1; else level=0; set_RTS(level,&PTTport); return (0); } |
Re: rs232 ptt rts (like /dev/ttyUSB0) interface support
#sBitx
开云体育Could you not simply use a USB-to-9pin serial adapter/cable?????? Something like: ?- de AI4AI On 3/22/24 18:02, zlamers via groups.io
wrote:
good day. please tell me how to add USB (like /dev/ttyUSB0) rs232 ptt interface support for my amplifier. |
Re: sBitx printed case
Jack, W8TEE
Mornin' Glenn: We used a similar approach for the T41. The front panel is photo paper held in place with a spray glue and then coated with clear Krylon: You can see the top joint in the middle of the case. These two pieces are held together with small bolts and 3 molded holes on a lip of the case edge. It works well and is pretty durable. Jack, W8TEE
On Saturday, March 23, 2024 at 09:34:28 AM EDT, Glenn VE9GJ <ve9gj@...> wrote:
Hi Mark I took your design and STL files and split them into 2 top and 2 bottom pieces and printed them with PLA on my ender 3. I then glued the 2 pieces together. Not super pretty but I now have a case. Just finished it last night. Are you OK with me uploading my files to thingverse, giving you full credit for the design of course? 73 Glenn VE9GJ On March 22, 2024 11:04:29?p.m. ADT, Mark Hatch <mark2382@...> wrote:
--
Jack, W8TEE |
Re: sBitx printed case
开云体育Mark, I knew someone here on this group designed this case. I could not remember who.? THANK YOU. ? I had the box printed up and had one issue with the display not sitting in the front properly. The cut out where the left side of? the display slides into, that cutout is not deep enough for the display. The channeling for the display cutout is incorrect (too high) at the top. The bottom seems? to be ok, but not deep enough. I had to take a router bit and open? this channel up to get the display to fit. One other question. The supplied? ribbon cable for this display, is that long enough to connect to the PI4? The ribbon cable supplied with my display seems too short. One thing I was very impressed with is the #4-40 pre tapped screw holes for the display holding brackets and front panel mounting screw holes.? That is so cool. I am waiting for the tilt stand rear bracket to arrive (after thought) ?then I can do final assembly. Hopefully every thing goes together with out any ?issues. Except tight fit….. As for the ribbon cable of the encoder board, I rewired my encoder board and got rid of? the IDC connector. Again, Thanks for the design and making it available. 73 Barry Sent from for Windows ? From: Mark Hatch
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2024 10:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] sBitx printed case ? Me, but of course I designed it. ;-)
? |
Re: sBitx printed case
Hi Mark I took your design and STL files and split them into 2 top and 2 bottom pieces and printed them with PLA on my ender 3. I then glued the 2 pieces together. Not super pretty but I now have a case. Just finished it last night. Are you OK with me uploading my files to thingverse, giving you full credit for the design of course? 73 Glenn VE9GJ On March 22, 2024 11:04:29?p.m. ADT, Mark Hatch <mark2382@...> wrote:
|
Re: sBITX 64Bit Pi Image Available
#sBitx
Very good... works correctly! Thanks to both of you.
Now I'm only interested in the fact that there is a built-in RTC and it is not visible with the timedatectl command. -- Gyula HA3HZ |
Re: sBITX 64Bit Pi Image Available
#sBitx
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 01:06 PM, JerryP wrote:
Hi Jerry. You are a genius! This was the fix or Band-Aid for the time dilemma. We are pulling time from NTPsec more efficiently using the system method so I believe there is no use for this part of code. I changed my file to this and it works every time regardless of the call/grid field. I can't express how grateful I am for your assistance! I also updated my repo with the change. Those running my build can do this to update your version with the fix. pi@sbitx:~/sbitx $ git reset --hard pi@sbitx:~/sbitx $ ./update?
?
-JJ
|