Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: FS Sbitx V2. (No Pi)
开云体育You can certainly use an amplified CB mic. I’ve done that with Heathkit vacuum tube transmitters successfully. ? However, it’s probably considerably cheaper to just use the element that I found worked really well all by itself.Digikey: I bought four of them just because it made the shipping more worthwhile and I’m sure I’ll use them over time! ?With these units I did not have to use any pre-amplifier with the Sbitx using my normal voice and I got good modulation. ?Local hams verified that it sounded fantastic. ? Gordon Kx4z? On Sep 25, 2023, at 15:55, Gordon Gibby via groups.io <docvacuumtubes@...> wrote:
|
Re: Baofeng Microphone for uBITX
#microphone
Aaron beat me to it. A Mic with a preamp or I had co sidered just building a simple amplifier circuit with an adjustable gain pot and wiring it between the mic input and the circuit board. Either of those seem to be a solution here.?
David WK4DS |
Re: SBitx Issues
开云体育Rose, I’ve never tried the side tone ?for voice. I don’t know anything about that?If I crank the mic gain up as high as you were saying, I’ll have terrible distortion. ? With the stock Mike you may need to speak very loudly into it, or with a -24dB hi output electret cartridge you may do better.? I think the most important thing you can tell us is, as you speak into the mic does the current draw on your power supply mimic the peaks and valleys of your voice? ? ?If not, something is being over driven or has distortion. ? You might also tell us if you have some means of measuring output power, even as simple as a old style CB SWR meter with a power measurement function Operating radios is often a learning adventure, and it sounds like you are getting the full tour! ?Many of us have been there done that with either this radio or a predecessor decades ago. Don’t give up!! Gordon Kx4z On Oct 22, 2023, at 13:18, rose@... wrote:
|
Re: Baofeng Microphone for uBITX
#microphone
Yes, that is what Farhan does to get the mikes for the hFSignals supplied radios.
|
SBitx Issues
At the request of Ashhar I'm posting this here.
Original message:? Rose, I was told by the sales that you are having trouble with your sbitx. As we mentioned in our manual as well as the website, the place to ask and quickly get help for the radios is by joining our mailing list. If you click on /g/BITX20/join, you can join us in a minute. Let me take a few minutes to explain, why the help is through the group and not a regular support by email etc. The sbitx is an open source radio. For instance, it is the ony radio in the world that supports FT8 mode without needing an external computer. The FT8, in turn, has been developed by Dan Tayloe, W1JT, a Nobel laureate. If someone runs aground with FT8, much of the protocol details are not even fully understood by me (I wrote the sbitx core). We need help from others who understand those parts better. The sBitx is an SDR, and as an SDR, almost everything is controlled by software. The sBitx software is open source, which makes it do so many things that a normal radio won't. This also means that it is being actively developed by a number of hams who don't work for us. They are all active on the bitx20 group.? The second reason for asking help in the group is that almost every conceivable problem has been voiced and resolved in the past emails. When you post a query, others just look up prior fixes to it and you the collective wisdom of the group quickly resolves the issues. Now, about your issue itself. 1. You have referred to two mics. What make and kinds are these mic? Is any of the mics supplied by us? The sbitx mic needs the tip to be connected to the mic's +ve, the ring to the PTT and the sleeve to the ground. 2. You mentioned the sidetone. it can be adjusted clicking on settings button on the left column of the user interface, this will bring up the settings that includes the sidetone volume. 3. You output power does appear to be low. I would want to know the current draw when receiving and when you try transmitting on LSB with mic gain set to 1 and drive 1 and without any speech into the mic. This will measure the idling current on transmit without any modulation. Do post the outcome of #3 to the group and we will take it up from there. My reply: Ashhar, It is good to hear from you, but I have been promised help for the past few weeks. I was really behind the concept of the radio and I understand but I excepted some kind of out of box experience with at least a minimum level of functionality. Why should I not contact the manufacturer if the thing I've purchased literally hasn't worked since day 1 out of the box. I can understand it in terms of future development and participation. 1. Yes I have used two mics, the original one provided and also a new one wired up in the same manner. A similar styled fist grip mic. I have recorded the sound from both in audacity, the one that was supplied does sound really tinny by comparison and has to be gained right up to hear anything. In software I was having to gain it up to 70-100 just to get any output at all. My new mic worked better but I've tested so many things it isn't totally consistent. My email chain has more detail. 2. Yes I am aware sidetone is adjustable, and I have tried it, it sounds awful. Like I can hear the peaks of my voice and that is it. It's choppy and incoherent. This matches with the report only contact that actually ever responded to me using this radio. 3. The radio is currently boxed up again as I had not heard anything since around the 5th. And had zero progress, again after being promised multiple times of having resolutions. But at idle at 13.5v I was drawing around 800mA. And at transmit I'm pretty sure it was around 10A but that was with tone or voice. I'll have to set it up again to gather these results as you have asked but I am away for a couple of days. Though I'm fairly sure it was in a similar range. I have had constant issues with the radio, it has not worked since I received it. To answer question 3. In LSB with drive 1 and nothing going into the mic the draw was 1.5A at 13.5V |
Re: #sBitx FFTW3 libraries
#sBitx
Mike,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks. I'm using it as a learning tool. Mark -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mike Johnshoy Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2023 11:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] #sBitx FFTW3 libraries Mark, I've been looking at all the work you've done in your sbitx-n8me repository at GitHub. You are doing a really great walk-through review and cleanup of the source. I can't keep up with you, but I'm excited to see where it all goes. -- Mike - kb2ml -- 73, Mark, N8ME |
Re: Baofeng Microphone for uBITX
#microphone
I have a cheap dynamic mic and I'm trying to convert it to an electrict and wire it up for the uBITX / sBITX and use it with my mic boom. I use a mic boom and PTT pedal with my Elecraft K2 and I really enjoy having my hands free. For my uBITX I use a?modified CB mic with built in amplifier?which really works well. I'm trying to figure out how to rig up a hands free setup like I have with my k2 but for my uBITX. Since I use my uBITX the most I would like to set it up the way that I prefer. This isn't a must have because I mostly operate CW but I also like to get on 2 meter SSB a lot.?
-- '72 Aaron? |
Re: #sBitx FFTW3 libraries
#sBitx
Mark, I've been looking at all the work you've done in your sbitx-n8me repository at GitHub. You are doing a really great walk-through review and cleanup of the source. I can't keep up with you, but I'm excited to see where it all goes.
-- Mike - kb2ml |
Re: sBitx V2 SN #141 Spurious/Harmonic Measurements
开云体育Hey Evan, could you publish some of the results you’ve gotten from your developer edition for a comparison? Maybe figure out what is the worst band, and show how good even that still looks??I worked really hard on mine and I need to go back and remeasure some of that with what I have learned. ? ?I’m betting that it looks pretty good now.!! ? Gordon On Oct 22, 2023, at 10:35, Gordon Gibby via groups.io <docvacuumtubes@...> wrote:
|
Re: Baofeng Microphone for uBITX
#microphone
开云体育I am REALLY happy with my -24DB cartridge homemade Mike. The Sbitx ?needs a good bit of audio signal input. I think this is a great chance for a cottage industry to develop selling these mics and shipping them, with the right connector, shielded cable is possible, and wwith really high output. ?It’s somewhat labor-intensive. But somebody could probably automate the process a bit. Then I think you could sell these microphones for anywhere between $30 and $50 and have a pretty good business. ? Gordon Kx4z? On Oct 22, 2023, at 09:15, Aaron K5ATG <Aaron@...> wrote:
|
Re: sBitx V2 SN #141 Spurious/Harmonic Measurements
开云体育Thanks Evan. Yes we need confirmation. One way or the other. Either I’m doing something wrong, or my unit is a complete fluke, or there’s a problem!I’m not sure why anyone would bother developing software for a radio that might not be legal to operate….. What if ?only 25% of the units have a problem? But that still way way too high!! ? This is a groundbreaking transceiver and it should not be troubled by these kinds of problems. ?We certainly fixed them on the developer unit. ?And my measurements there may have been clouded by the Heathkit Cantana so it may be even better than I know! ? The bypassing issue I think is important for the 470 ohm resistors. ?Only c204 protects at that end —-Adding several more may help. Also between the 470 and the indconductors may help It’s dicey to slow down the switchover with capacitors on the 470 K. ?Theoretically, into a 50 ohm system, the 470 K alone provides better than 60 DB isolation. ?So I’m not sure a lot needs to be done there. Maybe a few picofarads? ?The output of the RF voltage doubler has a few hundred picofarads already. ?so it provides some significant isolation. ? I think the real issues are the +12 line, where RF energy can get back into earlier stages and wreck havoc as far as spurious responses there, !!!!! and maybe just maybe on the ground line itself which I hope is solid. ? The QDX seem to show that it’s possible to fix all of this. But we’re running a lot more RF current through those diodes than it did. ?I don’t know if we need additional diode’s in parallel at the output, I just don’t know. ?? A text jig fixture and a good clean commercial transceiver might be able to prove this— run the RF through a turned-on 1N4007 and measure the spurious response afterwards; this would also be a way to select preferred diodes ?for this service I’ll be back to Gainesville in about 10 days and then I may be able to start measurements again. ? I don’t know how many other people have quality test set up such as the Siglent or Rigol spectrum analyzer‘s but we could sure use some data; as my finances allow I’m going to buy a higher power RF pad so I can easily tolerate the full output for some time. ?? Thanks for your thoughts! Gordon? On Oct 22, 2023, at 07:15, Evan Hand <elhandjr@...> wrote:
|
Re: Baofeng Microphone for uBITX
#microphone
I saw this one too, but I'm not sure it would work on the uBitx, because the mic for the uBitx has only three connections on the plug rather than four.? I think the difference is that the uBitx mic is just a mic, and not a speaker-mic.? Checked my mic for a part number, but couldn't find one.? Unfortunately, so far I've not found anything for sale that looks like it matches up.? |
Re: sBitx V2 SN #141 Spurious/Harmonic Measurements
Gordon,
If it is passed through on the bias circuit, would adding some capacitors help?? Every connection of the bias to the LPF circuit may need to be bypassed. This might mess up the filters instead of helping. So far, you are the only one that is reporting an issue.? It would help if others verified that there is an issue with other V2 sbitx or for HFSignals to respond with measurements from the production units that have been tested. 73 Evan AC9TU |
Re: Baofeng Microphone for uBITX
#microphone
Hi, may be you are looking for this: ? 73 Norbert DH5JW Aaron K5ATG <Aaron@...> schrieb am Sa., 21. Okt. 2023, 23:38: I am hoping that someone could help me out and provide me with a link on where I can purchase a Baofeng microphone. I'm referring to the one that comes with the uBITX, the hand microphone that looks like it is for an HT but it has just the one pin instead of 2 pins.? |
Re: #sBitx FFTW3 libraries
#sBitx
amazing. Gordon KX4Z On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 8:13?PM Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:
|
Re: #sBitx FFTW3 libraries
#sBitx
Mark, I thought (without really confirming this) that the rpi zero is 32 bit and hence it will work much faster with single precision math hence decided on single precision fft? The fftw? library didn't build the single precision directly, you had to first build the double precision version and then build the single precision, hence the mixup. With RPI, now that the GPU FFT library is available, the proper thing to do would be to use that, I saw someone had written a wrapper around it to be a drop-in replacement for the fftw. This will shave off many cycles from the cpu consumption. Interestingly, I ran gprof on sbitx, the timr spent on fftw is minor. Most of the cpu cycles were spent in other loops in rx_process that copy samples and bins around. There must be some DMA kind of a way to do this. - f On Sun, Oct 22, 2023, 1:09 AM Mark Erbaugh <mark.election@...> wrote: I noticed that the stock firmware uses both the standard (double) and float FFTW3 libraries. The install instructions have you build both library versions. It looks like the float libraries are only used in fft_filter.c, the standard libraries are used elsewhere. Is there a reason that fft_filter.c doesn't use the standard library? |
Re: #sBitx FFT filtering question - answer
#sBitx
I think I figured it out. The agc2() routine was only adjusting the imaginary part. I changed it to work on the real part and it works.
-- 73, Mark, N8ME |