Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Attachment bloat!
Cuz she's peevish.? ;-)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
But when it comes to RF design, tends to know more than the rest of us put together. So we mostly put up with it. Jerry, KE7ER On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:51 PM, Mark - N7EKU wrote: I don't understand the reason for your peevish reply... |
Re: Attachment bloat!
Mark,
Not at all.? ? Its just traffic, and it was? the original complaint too much traffic and larger stuff was harder to take... Well, why did you reply to something long dead?? FIrst the assumption is people use the web version and then even look at the subscription settings. Or know they even exist, that include the wiki, photos, and files... Oh right its groups.io, same topic needs to pop up periodically as its been long forgotten...? ? ;) Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket. |
Re: Attachment bloat!
Mark - N7EKU
Is it wrong to reply to older threads now?
I was looking at the group's space and attachments and saw this post about attachment size.? One option for sure is no email, but I think the OP needed to keep emails going but had a hard time dealing with large attachments.? I seached and found out that groups.io allows one to limit attachment size on emails.? I didn't know that before and thought that some others may appreciate the info. I don't understand the reason for your peevish reply... 73,? Mark |
Re: Linear amplifiers for UBITX6 and other QRP transceivers...
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:32 PM, Dan Eggers N7DE wrote: ...in push-pull amps.? ? ?This isn't likely to be a good option for, for example, the MRF101 amp. Thankfully there two LPF options for that project. 73, Andy
|
Re: Attachment bloat!
This string was moribund since june and suddenly its a thing?
FYI I chose the most aggressive stance, no email at all. I use the web and I get to see it all.... even that the message before this is from June 7! Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket. |
Re: What's New? NANO every
If using flash, put what has been EEPROM data into RAM, make any changes there for current operating mode. On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 02:27 PM, ajparent1/kb1gmx wrote: If the number of write cycles are low I think flash can be used as well. |
Re: Attachment bloat!
Mark - N7EKU
Hi Hylton,
Each user may control their own email/attachment preferences.? Just click the "Subscription" link on the left menu, then click on the drop-down arrow for "Advanced Preferences".? In this section, you can choose your attachment size limit to receive, or even set it to zero bytes.? Then the attachments will only appear as downloadable links. Cheers and 73, Mark |
Re: sBitx #sBitx PA MOD Plan
#sBitx
Mark,
Generally space is not the issue, though its just being courteous. I've seen way too many fuzzy and other marginally useful pictures.? That prompted my comment. Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket. |
Re: What's New? NANO every
Size as the mega is only the older uno size board...
Price is not the issue usually as people are hanging expensive displays and what not. For a lot of stuff the Nano EVery was a solver for me as it fit the footprint. Less EEprom for the aps i do it not an issue. If the number of write cycles are low I think flash can be used as well. Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket. |
Re: sBitx #sBitx PA MOD Plan
#sBitx
I will combine two comments.
Since the mod manual will be likely electronic, the size of the images relative to the page is not as important as resolution.? ?That makes it easy to bring up the page and seriously enlarge it for detail on the screen. That means lots of photos, at high resolution, and most importantly in focus for the area of the board discussed.? Enlarged and fuzzy is not useful. Further the result should have updated legible schematics. Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket. |
Re: What's New? NANO every
What's interesting is the Arduino mega was passed over
completely. With more IO and 250K of flash,more ram and EEprom yet for work that otherwise fits the 8bit realm it was passed. Not knocking the 32bitters but they eat flash faster, and Eeprom is likely external anyway.? The got used because they were ubiquitous or cheap.? For DSP or dsp like work they are a better for for the math needed. The Nano Every, gets some of that at the cost of EEprom but its easy to add externally if it were really needed. Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket. |
Re: sBitx #sBitx PA MOD Plan
#sBitx
In the final MOD doc would you please make the photos full page.
John |
Re: What's New? NANO every
Dean
|
Re: Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect
Yes, the software and voltage are the real issues. You might also worry about the pull-up voltage on the i2c bus.?
?
Also the kd8cec uBITX memory manager doesn¡¯t work with the rp2060. So I am rewriting it¡ ? ? |
Re: Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect
Looking at the pinout diagrams, I don't see any conflicts there. But watch out for the voltage; the Nano is usually operated at 5V, while the RP2040 is a 3V3 chip and its inputs are not 5V tolerant. On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 9:49 PM Mark Erbaugh <mark.election@...> wrote: Does anyone know whether the Arduino Nano in the uBitx 6 could be replaced with an Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect without any other hardware changes? I realize the software would have to be adjusted, but are there any pin conflicts that can't be resolved in code? |