¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: R1.4.0 Software Release #ubitx #nano #v6 #ubitxv6

G.A.(Jerry) Minor
 

I assembled a v.6 last night, and installed Reed's firmware. Playing around with it, I cannot make sense out of the favorite frequency function. Do the favorites need to be defined in a sketch prior to compiling? I tried short/long presses trying to transfer the frequency into the selected favorite, and it doesn't appear to work. Also, I am wondering if you are limited to 4 favorite frequencies. I looked at Reed's documentation on Github, but still came up blank. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

On 4/11/21 11:59 AM, jerry@... wrote:

? I know this isn't the right forum for this - anybody know of
a forum for people building linear amps?

There is the Hardrock line of amp kits:




and a forum on Google groups:




-Dj


--
Dj Merrill - N1JOV
Currently Flying: Glastar
Previously: Cessna 150 - Glasair 1 FT - Grumman AA1B


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

On 2021-04-11 12:41, Rafael Diniz wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Which transistors are in the finals of this kit you bought?
MRF300AN and MRF300BN. They are said to have an in-circuit gain of 20dB.
If that's true, then 6W in - gets you 600W out.

- Jerry KF6VB







I'm using a BLF9120 based kit I bought on aliexpress, it works pretty
well, but up to 100W at most.
Rafael
PU2UIT
On 4/11/21 12:59 PM, jerry@... wrote:
All,
?? I know this isn't the right forum for this - anybody know of
a forum for people building linear amps?
?? Last night, I had my first contact in some years.? A pleasant
gentleman in Calgary.? Unfortunately, he could not hear me as well as
I heard him, and we had to cut it short.? So frustrating!? I was
reminded of why we have linear amps.? I was running barefoot, 100W.
?? So this morning, I hauled the 30L-1 out of the shed. Oh my aching
back!? The 30L-1 is a 60's vintage Collins linear with 4 811-A tubes.
It's big.? It's heavy.? It does Not Belong in this bedroom.
?? I'm looking forward to building the LDMOS amp that I ordered on Ebay.
Also looking forward to the uBITX transceiver.
? For me, ham radio is about two things - building equipment, and
chatting about building equipment :).
??????????????? - Jerry KF6VB
On 2021-04-11 07:50, Evan Hand wrote:
Jerry,
I did do the testing of my modified v4 against my unmodified v5.? I
have posted the power levels of the v4 on this thread.? The IMD
measurements that I got are as follows:
Modified v4:
80meters: -21db
40meters: -19db
20meters: -20db
Unmodified v5:
80meters: -22db
40meters: -21db
20meters: -19db
As far as I can tell there is not really much difference in the SSB
performance with the change of C81 to 2670pF.
The only comment that I would make is that overall the IMD3
performance is not what I would like.? Another 5 to 6 dB would have
been better.
Harmonics were down 51db for both rigs.? I did not test for the spur
on the v4.
Harmonic tests were done with a TinySA connected through a homebrew
50db tap and a step attenuator.
IMD3 tests were done with an RSP1A and the RSP-Spectrum Analyzer
program using the same connections.
At this point, I do not plan to modify my v6 as CW is not a mode I
use.? Also, I have other rigs that excel at QRP CW that I would use
instead.? So my conclusion is to make the mod IF you want the CW
capability.? It does not make sense if you are using SSB.
73
Evan
AC9TU
Links:
------
[1] /g/BITX20/message/87545
[2] /mt/81780486/243852
[3] /g/BITX20/post
[4] /g/BITX20/editsub/243852
[5] /g/BITX20/leave/10189903/243852/952924773/xyzzy


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

Hi Jerry,

Which transistors are in the finals of this kit you bought?

I'm using a BLF9120 based kit I bought on aliexpress, it works pretty
well, but up to 100W at most.

Rafael
PU2UIT

On 4/11/21 12:59 PM, jerry@... wrote:
All,

?? I know this isn't the right forum for this - anybody know of
a forum for people building linear amps?

?? Last night, I had my first contact in some years.? A pleasant
gentleman in Calgary.? Unfortunately, he could not hear me as well as
I heard him, and we had to cut it short.? So frustrating!? I was
reminded of why we have linear amps.? I was running barefoot, 100W.

?? So this morning, I hauled the 30L-1 out of the shed. Oh my aching
back!? The 30L-1 is a 60's vintage Collins linear with 4 811-A tubes.
It's big.? It's heavy.? It does Not Belong in this bedroom.

?? I'm looking forward to building the LDMOS amp that I ordered on Ebay.
Also looking forward to the uBITX transceiver.

? For me, ham radio is about two things - building equipment, and
chatting about building equipment :).

??????????????? - Jerry KF6VB






On 2021-04-11 07:50, Evan Hand wrote:
Jerry,

I did do the testing of my modified v4 against my unmodified v5.? I
have posted the power levels of the v4 on this thread.? The IMD
measurements that I got are as follows:

Modified v4:
80meters: -21db
40meters: -19db
20meters: -20db

Unmodified v5:
80meters: -22db
40meters: -21db
20meters: -19db

As far as I can tell there is not really much difference in the SSB
performance with the change of C81 to 2670pF.

The only comment that I would make is that overall the IMD3
performance is not what I would like.? Another 5 to 6 dB would have
been better.

Harmonics were down 51db for both rigs.? I did not test for the spur
on the v4.

Harmonic tests were done with a TinySA connected through a homebrew
50db tap and a step attenuator.
IMD3 tests were done with an RSP1A and the RSP-Spectrum Analyzer
program using the same connections.

At this point, I do not plan to modify my v6 as CW is not a mode I
use.? Also, I have other rigs that excel at QRP CW that I would use
instead.? So my conclusion is to make the mod IF you want the CW
capability.? It does not make sense if you are using SSB.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Links:
------
[1] /g/BITX20/message/87545
[2] /mt/81780486/243852
[3] /g/BITX20/post
[4] /g/BITX20/editsub/243852
[5] /g/BITX20/leave/10189903/243852/952924773/xyzzy




Better heat sinking

 

I was never overly confident of the two small heat sinks supplied for the IRF 510's. I had made a modification to get rid of the heat on the 5 volt regulator and also steady the vertical board which is slotted into the main board. The rig is a V5 board.

I fitted a copper heat sink that I had left over from a long defunct laptop. I also took the opportunity to fit the 2 back to back diodes to protect Q90, which I had to replace a few months ago.

I had to butcher the back of the case (bought on Alibaba) as the power sockets, fuse holder and on/off switch were located there and the new heat sink wouldn't fit with them there.

The photos show the rig, and the heat sinks that are fitted. The aluminium strap stabiliser/heat sink was fitted when I first built the rig.

The heat sink is at top of photo, the aluminium strap on the left stabilises the vertical board and acts as a heat sink for the 5v reg.The small board on the right is a CW filter from Sotabeams and makes working CW a pleasure.

The new copper heat sink from above


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

High power amplifiers seems to be the antithesis of where we are
going on a mostly QRP based discussion group.? Some may disagree,
and they are entitled to do so, but please respect the fact that this is
basically a QRP focused group.

Arv
_._


On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:29 PM Jerry Gaffke via <jgaffke=[email protected]> wrote:
After looking around the web some at anything "amateur linear amplifier",
seems to be mostly CB'ers speaking a mostly different language.
They seem obsessed with how many "pills" (output transistors)
an amp has rather than any meaningful specs.
I'd guess that's the crowd many of the ebay amp kits are aimed at.
Makes me wonder how many get put on the air without any attempt at an LPF.

Here's where I go when I want to daydream about ridiculously powerful transmitters:
? ??

Jerry, KE7ER


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

After looking around the web some at anything "amateur linear amplifier",
seems to be mostly CB'ers speaking a mostly different language.
They seem obsessed with how many "pills" (output transistors)
an amp has rather than any meaningful specs.
I'd guess that's the crowd many of the ebay amp kits are aimed at.
Makes me wonder how many get put on the air without any attempt at an LPF.

Here's where I go when I want to daydream about ridiculously powerful transmitters:
? ??

Jerry, KE7ER


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 


??

_._


On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:52 AM jerry@... <jerry@...> wrote:
On 2021-04-11 09:56, Jerry Gaffke via wrote:
> Jerry, KF6VB,
>
> There might well be better forums to complain that 100W is not enough.
>? ;-)

Indeed.


> I'd take another look at that antenna.

*** It's a 6BTV vertical perched on the side of a hill.? I'm pretty sure
the hill is the problem.? I used to get excellent reports from the south
Pacific.

? ? ?There's a 300-foot coax run from the antenna to the bedroom.? It's
good stuff - Davis Buryflex RG/8.? And yes, some of it is buried :).? To
minimize coax losses, I have an automatic tuner right under the antenna.

> Should be a bunch more sunspots coming along soon.
>
> Let me know when the XYL finally convinces you to put that 30L-1 out
> on the sidewalk.

*** Sure thing!? Actually, it's in the downstairs bedroom/office.? Not
where we sleep.? I wouldn't dare put it up there.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Jerry KF6VB





> If it's in the bedroom now, I'm guessing sooner rather than later.
>
> Jerry, KE7ER
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] /g/BITX20/message/87549
> [2] /mt/82016650/243852
> [3] /g/BITX20/post
> [4] /g/BITX20/editsub/243852
> [5] /g/BITX20/leave/10189903/243852/952924773/xyzzy






Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

On 2021-04-11 09:56, Jerry Gaffke via groups.io wrote:
Jerry, KF6VB,
There might well be better forums to complain that 100W is not enough.
;-)
Indeed.


I'd take another look at that antenna.
*** It's a 6BTV vertical perched on the side of a hill. I'm pretty sure the hill is the problem. I used to get excellent reports from the south Pacific.

There's a 300-foot coax run from the antenna to the bedroom. It's
good stuff - Davis Buryflex RG/8. And yes, some of it is buried :). To
minimize coax losses, I have an automatic tuner right under the antenna.

Should be a bunch more sunspots coming along soon.
Let me know when the XYL finally convinces you to put that 30L-1 out
on the sidewalk.
*** Sure thing! Actually, it's in the downstairs bedroom/office. Not
where we sleep. I wouldn't dare put it up there.

- Jerry KF6VB





If it's in the bedroom now, I'm guessing sooner rather than later.
Jerry, KE7ER
Links:
------
[1] /g/BITX20/message/87549
[2] /mt/82016650/243852
[3] /g/BITX20/post
[4] /g/BITX20/editsub/243852
[5] /g/BITX20/leave/10189903/243852/952924773/xyzzy


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

There is one on facebook. I am no longer on facebook so I can't retrieve the page's link.?
- f

On Sun 11 Apr, 2021, 9:30 PM jerry@..., <jerry@...> wrote:
All,

? ? I know this isn't the right forum for this - anybody know of
a forum for people building linear amps?

? ? Last night, I had my first contact in some years.? A pleasant
gentleman in Calgary.? Unfortunately, he could not hear me as well as
I heard him, and we had to cut it short.? So frustrating!? I was
reminded of why we have linear amps.? I was running barefoot, 100W.

? ? So this morning, I hauled the 30L-1 out of the shed. Oh my aching
back!? The 30L-1 is a 60's vintage Collins linear with 4 811-A tubes.
It's big.? It's heavy.? It does Not Belong in this bedroom.

? ? I'm looking forward to building the LDMOS amp that I ordered on Ebay.
Also looking forward to the uBITX transceiver.

? ?For me, ham radio is about two things - building equipment, and
chatting about building equipment :).

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?- Jerry KF6VB






On 2021-04-11 07:50, Evan Hand wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I did do the testing of my modified v4 against my unmodified v5.? I
> have posted the power levels of the v4 on this thread.? The IMD
> measurements that I got are as follows:
>
> Modified v4:
> 80meters: -21db
> 40meters: -19db
> 20meters: -20db
>
> Unmodified v5:
> 80meters: -22db
> 40meters: -21db
> 20meters: -19db
>
> As far as I can tell there is not really much difference in the SSB
> performance with the change of C81 to 2670pF.
>
> The only comment that I would make is that overall the IMD3
> performance is not what I would like.? Another 5 to 6 dB would have
> been better.
>
> Harmonics were down 51db for both rigs.? I did not test for the spur
> on the v4.
>
> Harmonic tests were done with a TinySA connected through a homebrew
> 50db tap and a step attenuator.
> IMD3 tests were done with an RSP1A and the RSP-Spectrum Analyzer
> program using the same connections.
>
> At this point, I do not plan to modify my v6 as CW is not a mode I
> use.? Also, I have other rigs that excel at QRP CW that I would use
> instead.? So my conclusion is to make the mod IF you want the CW
> capability.? It does not make sense if you are using SSB.
>
> 73
> Evan
> AC9TU
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] /g/BITX20/message/87545
> [2] /mt/81780486/243852
> [3] /g/BITX20/post
> [4] /g/BITX20/editsub/243852
> [5] /g/BITX20/leave/10189903/243852/952924773/xyzzy






Re: Many uBitx's have reduced power on 40m CW

 

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:49 AM, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
Would be useful to know a bit more about how you conducted the IMD test:
? What tones were injected into the mike jack, and at what level.
700 and 1900 hertz were injected into the mic jack.? I had adjusted the level for the maximum power without causing an increase in the IMD3 measurement.
? Exactly which unwanted product was observed when measuring IMD
I measured the expected 2xfa +/- fb.? 4 values that were all fairly equal.
? Signal level observed into Q90.
I did not probe with the scope.
? Power out to the dummy load.
Power out varied from 10 on 80meters to 2 on 10meters
Just figures for 40m would be most helpful.
Will do it later this week.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Linear Amplifier Build

 

Jerry, KF6VB,

There might well be better forums to complain that 100W is not enough.? ;-)
I'd take another look at that antenna.
Should be a bunch more sunspots coming along soon.

Let me know when the XYL finally convinces you to put that 30L-1 out on the sidewalk.
If it's in the bedroom now, I'm guessing sooner rather than later.

Jerry, KE7ER


Re: SI labs generator chip which has an FM input pin

John Cunliffe W7ZQ
 

Why not use phase modulation instead pure FM? The receiver doesn't know the difference and a simple phase modulator stage could be fitted after the clock output, I recall using a germanium transistor and later a FET and coupling the signal from drain and source, balancing it and then unbalancing the whole circuit by having a capacitance diode in one leg that was modulated by the audio. That was in late 60's. early 70s, and my recollection to the details might suffer a little. I bet the circuit can be found and adopted from old books.

John


Linear Amplifier Build

 

All,

I know this isn't the right forum for this - anybody know of
a forum for people building linear amps?

Last night, I had my first contact in some years. A pleasant gentleman in Calgary. Unfortunately, he could not hear me as well as
I heard him, and we had to cut it short. So frustrating! I was reminded of why we have linear amps. I was running barefoot, 100W.

So this morning, I hauled the 30L-1 out of the shed. Oh my aching back! The 30L-1 is a 60's vintage Collins linear with 4 811-A tubes.
It's big. It's heavy. It does Not Belong in this bedroom.

I'm looking forward to building the LDMOS amp that I ordered on Ebay.
Also looking forward to the uBITX transceiver.

For me, ham radio is about two things - building equipment, and chatting about building equipment :).

- Jerry KF6VB

On 2021-04-11 07:50, Evan Hand wrote:
Jerry,
I did do the testing of my modified v4 against my unmodified v5. I
have posted the power levels of the v4 on this thread. The IMD
measurements that I got are as follows:
Modified v4:
80meters: -21db
40meters: -19db
20meters: -20db
Unmodified v5:
80meters: -22db
40meters: -21db
20meters: -19db
As far as I can tell there is not really much difference in the SSB
performance with the change of C81 to 2670pF.
The only comment that I would make is that overall the IMD3
performance is not what I would like. Another 5 to 6 dB would have
been better.
Harmonics were down 51db for both rigs. I did not test for the spur
on the v4.
Harmonic tests were done with a TinySA connected through a homebrew
50db tap and a step attenuator.
IMD3 tests were done with an RSP1A and the RSP-Spectrum Analyzer
program using the same connections.
At this point, I do not plan to modify my v6 as CW is not a mode I
use. Also, I have other rigs that excel at QRP CW that I would use
instead. So my conclusion is to make the mod IF you want the CW
capability. It does not make sense if you are using SSB.
73
Evan
AC9TU
Links:
------
[1] /g/BITX20/message/87545
[2] /mt/81780486/243852
[3] /g/BITX20/post
[4] /g/BITX20/editsub/243852
[5] /g/BITX20/leave/10189903/243852/952924773/xyzzy


Re: Many uBitx's have reduced power on 40m CW

 

Evan,

That all looks good, thanks for doing such a thorough analysis!

IMD could vary wildly depending on mike gain, and RV1 setting.
Also, various builds may have significantly different gains due to differences in filters and transistors.
Would be useful to know a bit more about how you conducted the IMD test:
? What tones were injected into the mike jack, and at what level.
? Exactly which unwanted product was observed when measuring IMD
? Signal level observed into Q90.
? Power out to the dummy load.

Just figures for 40m would be most helpful.

I doubt this signal is any wider than an AM phone station,
and should thus be quite acceptable at these power levels.
Of course, creating nearby hash in low power digital mode watering holes could be of concern.
IMD is of even more concern if the uBitx is used with a high powered linear.

Jerry, KE7ER




On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 07:50 AM, Evan Hand wrote:

I did do the testing of my modified v4 against my unmodified v5.? I have posted the power levels of the v4 on this thread.? The IMD measurements that I got are as follows:


Re: Many uBitx's have reduced power on 40m CW

 

Jerry,

I did do the testing of my modified v4 against my unmodified v5.? I have posted the power levels of the v4 on this thread.? The IMD measurements that I got are as follows:

Modified v4:
80meters: -21db
40meters: -19db
20meters: -20db

Unmodified v5:
80meters: -22db
40meters: -21db
20meters: -19db

As far as I can tell there is not really much difference in the SSB performance with the change of C81 to 2670pF.

The only comment that I would make is that overall the IMD3 performance is not what I would like.? Another 5 to 6 dB would have been better.??

Harmonics were down 51db for both rigs.? I did not test for the spur on the v4.

Harmonic tests were done with a TinySA connected through a homebrew 50db tap and a step attenuator.
IMD3 tests were done with an RSP1A and the RSP-Spectrum Analyzer program using the same connections.

At this point, I do not plan to modify my v6 as CW is not a mode I use.? Also, I have other rigs that excel at QRP CW that I would use instead.? So my conclusion is to make the mod IF you want the CW capability.? It does not make sense if you are using SSB.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Farhan to give sBITX talk at FDIM

 

I am looking forward to this talk.? I have at least one ?BITX that I plan to convert.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Farhan to give sBITX talk at FDIM

 

I am really looking forward to this talk. It is the summary of almost a year's experiments in SDR starting from zero. I also describe how to convert a standard issue ubitx into an?sdr using a raspberry pi.
- f

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 5:29 PM Bob Benedict, KD8CGH <rkayakr@...> wrote:

note this talk "Ashhar Farhan VU2ESE - sBITX - An Open Source SDR that YOU can hack!"

--
? 73
??? Bob? KD8CGH


Relay computers

 

farhan@...> wrote:

My embarrassment would be the relay-based computer science fair
project that I tried to design in 6th grade. It did work to some
extent until the actual fair. By then the relays were intermittent
and timing between them made it unreliable I know now why relays
can not be used for fast calculations.
*** In a former life, I was responsible for repair & maintenance of something called the "Omni 2000". It was an elaborate rack wiring tester. Given a prewired equipment rack, this thing would test it to see that everything was connected to what it was supposed to be connected to, AND that nothing was connected to anything it was NOT supposed to be connected to.

This thing had 7000 reed relays. Almost every day, I would have to replace one or more of them. Generally, one would be stuck closed. But opens were common also.

I still remember the sound of the Omni's self test. Those relays would whizz in a musical crescendo.

It was a union shop. By investing in elaborate test jigs like the Omni, the company was able to use "testers" instead of "technicians" to do the testing. Testers didn't make as much $$ as technicians.

The lady who ran the Omni would always say "But Jerry, it worked just this morning!". My answer: "Hazel, everything works until it stops working" :).

- Jerry KF6VB


Farhan to give sBITX talk at FDIM

 


note this talk "Ashhar Farhan VU2ESE - sBITX - An Open Source SDR that YOU can hack!"

--
? 73
??? Bob? KD8CGH