¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: uBITX ... AGC or AVC?

 

Loris,

Try something else..

Use a SBL-1 or similar. DBM. it is a BiDi device

Connect one? RF port to signal INput and second to OUTput or other way.

Feed a DC control voltage through a resistor to the IF port. Try with 1-10K.
Vary the voltage and see the signal level change. The behavior is opposite
of the varicap control voltage.

We can use this for AGC and ALC in either direction.

Raj

At 28/10/2020, you wrote:

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:31 PM, Raj vu2zap wrote:
I had experimented with a AGC which was very simple. Disconnect R23 and R43 from ground and introduce
a varicap which I had MV2109. A series resistor to the varicap through which you varied the capacitance
and thereby the gain. This method worked very well with both IF stages and even on the TX branch.

I wish some members would experiment on this approach.

Hello Raj ...
Interesting solution, if I have some free time I could try it!
I would like to have an explanation from you:
what is the function of AGC? transmission for uBITX? ... perhaps as a compressor instead of an external speech-processor?
Thank you, 73 Loris - IW4AJR


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC?

 

Sorry guys,

On the TX side it is R23/43 on RX side is R13/33. It worked as AGC for RX and ALC on TX.
On RX I controlled the gain from received audio on TX was a DC gain control pot.

I can't provide specific circuit details from here as I am holed up at the farm. All these
experiments were done on a bitxv3 board. To experiment with this idea you will need
to be knowledgeable on the subject and not for beginners.

Raj

At 28/10/2020, you wrote:

Loris is right, Raj's R23 and R43 are both on the transmit side of the uBitx bidi amps.
So perhaps not AGC for the receiver, which is what most would be interested in.
But could also work on the receive side of the bidi amps.

A clear and complete description from Raj would help others to try it,
"introduce a varicap" is not terribly specific.

A search in the forum posts for "Raj AGC" finds no hits on this AGC scheme.


Don, ND6T, had a couple blog posts about easy hacks to implement manual RF gain
on the Bitx40, should be possible to make these work on the uBitx.


Dozens of threads in the forum on adding AGC to the Bitx40 and uBitx.
The "automatic" part of AGC may not be needed, but a simple RF gain control
to avoid receiver overload would be good.
That and back-to-back diodes in the audio chain somewhere
to prevent blown eardrums when using headphones.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 06:10 AM, IW4AJR Loris wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:31 PM, Raj vu2zap wrote:
I had experimented with a AGC which was very simple. Disconnect R23 and R43 from ground and introduce
a varicap which I had MV2109. A series resistor to the varicap through which you varied the capacitance
and thereby the gain. This method worked very well with both IF stages and even on the TX branch.

I wish some members would experiment on this approach.

Hello Raj ...
Interesting solution, if I have some free time I could try it!
I would like to have an explanation from you:
what is the function of AGC? transmission for uBITX? ... perhaps as a compressor instead of an external speech-processor?
Thank you, 73 Loris - IW4AJR


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maybe that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

 

The LED solutions always seemed too fussy for me - too component dependent so I took a different approach,? I recently built a new audio module for my not-a-biTx "Furlough 40" SSB transceiver which you can read about and see demonstrations of on the ? This circuit includes and audio AGC and relative strength signal sensor (S-Meter).? It would be fairly easy to adapt to the uBitx but I haven't done so.? I haven't done a post of the new audio module yet - but it will go something like this.....

The audio AGC works by sampling the audio output of the LM-386 audio amp (in parallel with the speaker jack) - and feeding it back through a simple diode/capacitor peak detector that drives a BS170 MOSFET which is used as a voltage controlled variable resistor that forms 1/2 of a voltage divider with the other half being the volume pot wiper.? The AGC level is controlled by a 10K trimmer at the output of the LM386.?? To adjust it I set the volume pot to about 50% and adjust the trimmer until both weak and strong signal sound good.? It attenuates the very strong signals sufficiently that I no longer jump out of my chair when they come on and I have plenty of volume control for weak signals.? Hint - use a multi-turn trimmer for finer adjustment.? Many thanks to uber-Elmer N6QW, Pete Juliano for this sub-circuit.

The relative signal strength meter works by sampling the output of the audio pre-amp through an op-amp to another diode/capacitor peak detector.? The voltage on the cap is sampled by an Arduino analog input pin and a simple look up table conversion is used to translate sampled voltage into an "S level" on the display.? Attentive readers will recognize the signal strength sensor as the same one the Ian Lee KD8CEC proposed some time ago and is well documented on his blog. So my circuit should work just fine with the KD8CEC firmware if you decide to use it. Just plug the output of the sensor into Arduino pin A7 and you should be golden.? Similar to KD8CE, my sketch uses a look up table of sampled voltage to convert to "S levels". I calibrated it by adjusting the lookup table until the S display matched what I saw on my Kenwood transceiver for the same signal.? Not scientific, nor precise - but it matches my commercial rig and allow me to say "You are S9+20 OM, Fine Business, indeed."? No, it does not measure ?V at the antenna and convert it to a log scale - but it's output matches my commercial rig. And it makes a nice bouncy display to impress all of your friends and family. If you follow the reviews in QST you will know that event the "best" commercial rig S-meters vary a lot and don't do much better than this simple circuit, despite the IARU S-level specification.

Have fun - and if anyone decides to build this please drop me a line.? Happy to share the s-meter code from my sketch if anyone is interested.

73,
Dean
KK4DAS


Re: A strange thing about calibration!!

 

Gerard

Calibrating bfo setting is necessary for ubitx and many receivers. Try listening to an AM signal in both lsb and usb, there should not be difference in sound when well aligned. The limited bandwidth of the crystal filter should keep things in our audio range, except when bfo setting is way off.

73 curt


Re: Duh-oo

Jack, W8TEE
 

I have a T-shirt that says:

??? In my defense, I was left unsupervised

Kinda true for me, since I don't know much about the circuits in the uBITX. However, when Al and I did the JackAl DSP code, we had a AGC in it and we also had an S-meter. Peter's AGC works as I implemented a version for an early BITX I had. However, it is different than the AGC the JackAl has.

BTW, the schematics for the JackAl and its software are Open Souce and available on my SoftwareControlledHam Radio site.

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 8:07:18 PM EDT, Curt via groups.io <wb8yyy@...> wrote:


Let's see you guys are making too much of this -- the meter operation was an after thought in the scheme of this AGC.?

Certainly there is no log response in this circuit that an S-meter needs.? The function is this - the audio is sampled and amplified, fed to an ordinary silicon diode - and this drives a transistor with a dc bias in linear fashion (more or less) that feeds an LED.? The current through the LED is measured using an ammeter shunted with a small appropriate resistor (4.7 ohms for the meter that Sunil shipped).? That's it for the meter.? (possibly the brightness of this LED may be a better measure of signal strength than meter deflection perhaps).? I need to make a couple updates to the AGC schematic - but it is very similar to what VK3YE sketched out.? It works nice enough in this transceiver to suppress big signals.? I will caution that the behavior needs some tweaking to actual LED and LDR parts - but it works nicely.?

73 curt

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: Duh-oo

 

It appears that we are talking about two different circuits, causing even more confusion.

Going back to making soup. {;->

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 8:07:12 PM EDT, Curt via groups.io <wb8yyy@...> wrote:


Let's see you guys are making too much of this -- the meter operation was an after thought in the scheme of this AGC.?

Certainly there is no log response in this circuit that an S-meter needs.? The function is this - the audio is sampled and amplified, fed to an ordinary silicon diode - and this drives a transistor with a dc bias in linear fashion (more or less) that feeds an LED.? The current through the LED is measured using an ammeter shunted with a small appropriate resistor (4.7 ohms for the meter that Sunil shipped).? That's it for the meter.? (possibly the brightness of this LED may be a better measure of signal strength than meter deflection perhaps).? I need to make a couple updates to the AGC schematic - but it is very similar to what VK3YE sketched out.? It works nice enough in this transceiver to suppress big signals.? I will caution that the behavior needs some tweaking to actual LED and LDR parts - but it works nicely.?

73 curt


Re: Duh-oo

 

Let's see you guys are making too much of this -- the meter operation was an after thought in the scheme of this AGC.?

Certainly there is no log response in this circuit that an S-meter needs.? The function is this - the audio is sampled and amplified, fed to an ordinary silicon diode - and this drives a transistor with a dc bias in linear fashion (more or less) that feeds an LED.? The current through the LED is measured using an ammeter shunted with a small appropriate resistor (4.7 ohms for the meter that Sunil shipped).? That's it for the meter.? (possibly the brightness of this LED may be a better measure of signal strength than meter deflection perhaps).? I need to make a couple updates to the AGC schematic - but it is very similar to what VK3YE sketched out.? It works nice enough in this transceiver to suppress big signals.? I will caution that the behavior needs some tweaking to actual LED and LDR parts - but it works nicely.?

73 curt


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maybe that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

 

Notice that I said that if "calibrated" that it would be accurate at one point, the point where it was calibrated. Therefore, you are right that: "you will never be able to calibrate it correctly over the entire range."

HOWEVER, it would possibly be useful for the engine behind an AGC circuit. Also, who cares (I don't...) if a signal is S7, S9 or 40 over S9. I don't unless someone asks about his/her signal ¡ª which is rare. An AGC circuit would be more useful, anyway.? The label for the diagram, that it an S-Meter circuit, was the label from the Indonesian designers. I wonder if you paid notice to this.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 6:56:51 PM EDT, IW4AJR Loris <lorisbollina@...> wrote:


Hello Bob
I do not agree with you, a VU-meter will never be able to give a reading that is responsive to ?V levels in the antenna, you will never be able to calibrate it correctly over the entire range of signals! if it suits you it will indicate signals from S6 or S7 upwards and in any case certainly not related to the signals in the antenna, I did it with an ILER-40 and I assure you that the withdrawal from the BF is only used to swing a needle on the indicator instrument.
Not for nothing, all the rigs that are respected, take the signal in MF (directly proportional to the signal received in the antenna) and convert it in various ways.
Have you ever observed what the RSSI is out of some MF chips? (eg NE614) ... well, read the data sheet a bit and maybe you will understand what I mean by S-Meter that is useful for something!
Instead of working on various software and having two computers connect to each other and then saying that we did a DX, it would be better if we reviewed what it means is "learning and experimenting with wireless communications" and what data we exchange, don't you think?
Ciao de ?IW4AJR Loris


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maAgain,e that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

IW4AJR Loris
 

Hello Jack,
from the volume control you can only read a VU-meter, to have a real S-meter it is essential to take the medium frequency signal and treat it properly, instead, to read the SWR or better to say the "standing waves" in transmission, It is essential to insert a "directional coupler" in series between the TX and the antenna to obtain the two values of direct power and reflected power and relate them through a specific formula.
Hi de, Loris IW4AJR


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maybe that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

IW4AJR Loris
 

Hello Bob
I do not agree with you, a VU-meter will never be able to give a reading that is responsive to ?V levels in the antenna, you will never be able to calibrate it correctly over the entire range of signals! if it suits you it will indicate signals from S6 or S7 upwards and in any case certainly not related to the signals in the antenna, I did it with an ILER-40 and I assure you that the withdrawal from the BF is only used to swing a needle on the indicator instrument.
Not for nothing, all the rigs that are respected, take the signal in MF (directly proportional to the signal received in the antenna) and convert it in various ways.
Have you ever observed what the RSSI is out of some MF chips? (eg NE614) ... well, read the data sheet a bit and maybe you will understand what I mean by S-Meter that is useful for something!
Instead of working on various software and having two computers connect to each other and then saying that we did a DX, it would be better if we reviewed what it means is "learning and experimenting with wireless communications" and what data we exchange, don't you think?
Ciao de ?IW4AJR Loris


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maAgain,e that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

 

It is certainly neither!? The meter fidelity wasn't a key objective except I needed to feed something to the panel meter on my imported case.? I am curious how some high end ubitx circuits are getting a log type S-meter behavior (is the amplitude linear sensed and the log in the computing math?).?

The AGC behavior in gently reducing large signals is my AGC interest.? I need to examine the actual built circuit hopefully tomorrow.? I remember VK3YE had a mistaken resistor value that I copied into my schematic - even though I corrected it in my build.? I think it is the base resistor feeding the second transistor, closest to the LED - seems my board may have 560 ohms here a huge change.? As I added some parts for the meter function - it will take a little time to unravel my board.? As this circuit is rather simple and it does the function, I recommend considering and trying it - but expect some experimenting around the particular LED and LDR you possess.?

73 curt wb8yyy


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maybe that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

 

You are right, Loris. If meter has a VU readings on meter face and calibrated as such, it would be accurate at one point on the meter ... per the calibration.

The circuit was "borrowed" from the schematic of a radio produced in Indonesia ... and labeled as such. I put it out there for anyone who might want to play with it. Nothing more.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 5:53:31 PM EDT, IW4AJR Loris <lorisbollina@...> wrote:


The circuit you show is not an S-meter, but a VU-meter, it is proportional to the quadratic law of the diodes used, quite similar to the logarithmic law of dBV (mostly referred to an impedance of a few hundred ¦¸) to l output from circuit BF, responding poorly to RF levels received in the antenna.
An S-meter is a substantially different circuit, it is proportional to precise RF levels (defined by the IARU as in the table below for the HF) at the antenna input and varies in steps of 6 dBm referred to the ?V levels on an impedance of 50¦¸.
If you want to see a needle that moves it's fine, if you want to give reports that make sense it's useless!
Regards, Loris IW4AJR.


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maybe that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

IW4AJR Loris
 

The circuit you show is not an S-meter, but a VU-meter, it is proportional to the quadratic law of the diodes used, quite similar to the logarithmic law of dBV (mostly referred to an impedance of a few hundred ¦¸) to l output from circuit BF, responding poorly to RF levels received in the antenna.
An S-meter is a substantially different circuit, it is proportional to precise RF levels (defined by the IARU as in the table below for the HF) at the antenna input and varies in steps of 6 dBm referred to the ?V levels on an impedance of 50¦¸.
If you want to see a needle that moves it's fine, if you want to give reports that make sense it's useless!
Regards, Loris IW4AJR.


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maAgain,e that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

 

Right Arv ... Software is the way to go. Otherwise someone is being amazed by flashing lights and bird whistles. This is just one opinion, however.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 3:12:56 PM EDT, Arv Evans <arvid.evans@...> wrote:


Bob and Jack

Seems that if you are using that circuit and an ADC input in place of an analog?
meter, you could use software to convert the ADC readings into VU meter,?
S-meter, or anything else.? Might be a way to show Peak readings versus?
Average, and even to calculate receiver input in Microvolts.

Arv
_._


On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:26 AM Bob Lunsford via <nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:
The signal off the volume control can be used as a signal source for either S-meter purposes OR a way to control an AGC circuit by causing attenuation for signals above a pre-set level. However, I learned with my G90 that there are times when the AGC should be shut off to provide maximum signal gain.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:56:25 PM EDT, Jack, W8TEE via <jjpurdum=[email protected]> wrote:


Again, I'm not an EE type, but if the metering is done off the volume control, is it really an SWR meter or a VU meter??

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:49:45 PM EDT, Bob Lunsford via <nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:


This again is offered to show an S-meter circuit borrowed from the transceiver circuit being sold from Indonesia. It is apparently attachable to the volume control and since it's in the receive system, it does not affect the transmit system. It can be "rubbered" here and there since the component values may be the best for this considering that they are what is available to the builders in Indonesia, the FET and transistor can work equally well when using substitutes. Attaching to the high end of the uBITX's volume control and making the 47K variable in the circuit below a set resistor for calibration purposes results in making this a usable circuit. The meter, of course, can be substituted with an LED barcode circuit OR merely provide a source signal for an on-screen display of received signal level. The circuit as shown is relatively simple, however.

Bob ¡ª KKR

Inline image


On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 7:06:58 AM EDT, IW4AJR Loris <lorisbollina@...> wrote:


On the CCARC (Carroll County Amateur Radio Club, Inc.) website I found a very interesting article on automatic gain control that is worth reading!
Without many frills Carol makes us understand that an AGC (automatic gain control) on the IF of the uBITX, due to the nature of the amps used (bidirectional), is very complex to make at this level of the circuit ...
therefore ? ...
Much better and less invasive to act directly on the volume control, implementing a simple but effective automatic volume control (AVC)!
Think man ... think ...
A little less software and a little more electronic experimentation and, with much less effort, very complex problems can be solved!
Think man ... think !
Greetings to all, Loris IW4AJR

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: Duh-oo

 

Everything is relative. One's S-meter reading depends on the receiver AND the antenna. One too many variables. A Volume Unit reading is based on voltage across a standard resister value. The VU reading may be more accurate but still has too many variables.

Personally, I do not need an S-meter and unless someone asks me, I do not give a Signal Strength report. It means little to me when we are talking about readability.

I can come up with a circuit that may warm someone's heart but my V6 does not need an S-meter. HOWEVER, the same circuit can be an operator for the AGC circuit. Old time operators used to pull the "cans" off the ears and put them over the temple to either adjust the audio level or keep excessive volume from waking them up. Been there, done that...

Bob ¡ª KK5R



On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 2:26:54 PM EDT, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


My bad, it should have read:

Again, I'm not an EE type, but if the metering is done off the volume control, is it really an? S meter or a VU meter??

Jack, W8TEE


On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 1:26:27 PM EDT, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


The signal off the volume control can be used as a signal source for either S-meter purposes OR a way to control an AGC circuit by causing attenuation for signals above a pre-set level. However, I learned with my G90 that there are times when the AGC should be shut off to provide maximum signal gain.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:56:25 PM EDT, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Again, I'm not an EE type, but if the metering is done off the volume control, is it really an SWR meter or a VU meter??

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:49:45 PM EDT, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


This again is offered to show an S-meter circuit borrowed from the transceiver circuit being sold from Indonesia. It is apparently attachable to the volume control and since it's in the receive system, it does not affect the transmit system. It can be "rubbered" here and there since the component values may be the best for this considering that they are what is available to the builders in Indonesia, the FET and transistor can work equally well when using substitutes. Attaching to the high end of the uBITX's volume control and making the 47K variable in the circuit below a set resistor for calibration purposes results in making this a usable circuit. The meter, of course, can be substituted with an LED barcode circuit OR merely provide a source signal for an on-screen display of received signal level. The circuit as shown is relatively simple, however.

Bob ¡ª KKR

Inline image


On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 7:06:58 AM EDT, IW4AJR Loris <lorisbollina@...> wrote:


On the CCARC (Carroll County Amateur Radio Club, Inc.) website I found a very interesting article on automatic gain control that is worth reading!
Without many frills Carol makes us understand that an AGC (automatic gain control) on the IF of the uBITX, due to the nature of the amps used (bidirectional), is very complex to make at this level of the circuit ...
therefore ? ...
Much better and less invasive to act directly on the volume control, implementing a simple but effective automatic volume control (AVC)!
Think man ... think ...
A little less software and a little more electronic experimentation and, with much less effort, very complex problems can be solved!
Think man ... think !
Greetings to all, Loris IW4AJR

--
Jack, W8TEE

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maAgain,e that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

Jack, W8TEE
 

Agree.

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 3:12:56 PM EDT, Arv Evans <arvid.evans@...> wrote:


Bob and Jack

Seems that if you are using that circuit and an ADC input in place of an analog?
meter, you could use software to convert the ADC readings into VU meter,?
S-meter, or anything else.? Might be a way to show Peak readings versus?
Average, and even to calculate receiver input in Microvolts.

Arv
_._


On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:26 AM Bob Lunsford via <nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:
The signal off the volume control can be used as a signal source for either S-meter purposes OR a way to control an AGC circuit by causing attenuation for signals above a pre-set level. However, I learned with my G90 that there are times when the AGC should be shut off to provide maximum signal gain.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:56:25 PM EDT, Jack, W8TEE via <jjpurdum=[email protected]> wrote:


Again, I'm not an EE type, but if the metering is done off the volume control, is it really an SWR meter or a VU meter??

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:49:45 PM EDT, Bob Lunsford via <nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:


This again is offered to show an S-meter circuit borrowed from the transceiver circuit being sold from Indonesia. It is apparently attachable to the volume control and since it's in the receive system, it does not affect the transmit system. It can be "rubbered" here and there since the component values may be the best for this considering that they are what is available to the builders in Indonesia, the FET and transistor can work equally well when using substitutes. Attaching to the high end of the uBITX's volume control and making the 47K variable in the circuit below a set resistor for calibration purposes results in making this a usable circuit. The meter, of course, can be substituted with an LED barcode circuit OR merely provide a source signal for an on-screen display of received signal level. The circuit as shown is relatively simple, however.

Bob ¡ª KKR

Inline image


On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 7:06:58 AM EDT, IW4AJR Loris <lorisbollina@...> wrote:


On the CCARC (Carroll County Amateur Radio Club, Inc.) website I found a very interesting article on automatic gain control that is worth reading!
Without many frills Carol makes us understand that an AGC (automatic gain control) on the IF of the uBITX, due to the nature of the amps used (bidirectional), is very complex to make at this level of the circuit ...
therefore ? ...
Much better and less invasive to act directly on the volume control, implementing a simple but effective automatic volume control (AVC)!
Think man ... think ...
A little less software and a little more electronic experimentation and, with much less effort, very complex problems can be solved!
Think man ... think !
Greetings to all, Loris IW4AJR

--
Jack, W8TEE


--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: ?BITX ... AGC or AVC? an interesting article by Curt WB8YYY ... maAgain,e that's the solution to my troubles ! #ubitx #bitx40 #bitx20 #ubitxv6 #v6

 

Bob and Jack

Seems that if you are using that circuit and an ADC input in place of an analog?
meter, you could use software to convert the ADC readings into VU meter,?
S-meter, or anything else.? Might be a way to show Peak readings versus?
Average, and even to calculate receiver input in Microvolts.

Arv
_._


On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:26 AM Bob Lunsford via <nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:
The signal off the volume control can be used as a signal source for either S-meter purposes OR a way to control an AGC circuit by causing attenuation for signals above a pre-set level. However, I learned with my G90 that there are times when the AGC should be shut off to provide maximum signal gain.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:56:25 PM EDT, Jack, W8TEE via <jjpurdum=[email protected]> wrote:


Again, I'm not an EE type, but if the metering is done off the volume control, is it really an SWR meter or a VU meter??

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:49:45 PM EDT, Bob Lunsford via <nocrud222=[email protected]> wrote:


This again is offered to show an S-meter circuit borrowed from the transceiver circuit being sold from Indonesia. It is apparently attachable to the volume control and since it's in the receive system, it does not affect the transmit system. It can be "rubbered" here and there since the component values may be the best for this considering that they are what is available to the builders in Indonesia, the FET and transistor can work equally well when using substitutes. Attaching to the high end of the uBITX's volume control and making the 47K variable in the circuit below a set resistor for calibration purposes results in making this a usable circuit. The meter, of course, can be substituted with an LED barcode circuit OR merely provide a source signal for an on-screen display of received signal level. The circuit as shown is relatively simple, however.

Bob ¡ª KKR

Inline image


On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 7:06:58 AM EDT, IW4AJR Loris <lorisbollina@...> wrote:


On the CCARC (Carroll County Amateur Radio Club, Inc.) website I found a very interesting article on automatic gain control that is worth reading!
Without many frills Carol makes us understand that an AGC (automatic gain control) on the IF of the uBITX, due to the nature of the amps used (bidirectional), is very complex to make at this level of the circuit ...
therefore ? ...
Much better and less invasive to act directly on the volume control, implementing a simple but effective automatic volume control (AVC)!
Think man ... think ...
A little less software and a little more electronic experimentation and, with much less effort, very complex problems can be solved!
Think man ... think !
Greetings to all, Loris IW4AJR

--
Jack, W8TEE


Duh-oo

Jack, W8TEE
 

My bad, it should have read:

Again, I'm not an EE type, but if the metering is done off the volume control, is it really an? S meter or a VU meter??

Jack, W8TEE


On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 1:26:27 PM EDT, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


The signal off the volume control can be used as a signal source for either S-meter purposes OR a way to control an AGC circuit by causing attenuation for signals above a pre-set level. However, I learned with my G90 that there are times when the AGC should be shut off to provide maximum signal gain.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:56:25 PM EDT, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Again, I'm not an EE type, but if the metering is done off the volume control, is it really an SWR meter or a VU meter??

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 12:49:45 PM EDT, Bob Lunsford via groups.io <nocrud222@...> wrote:


This again is offered to show an S-meter circuit borrowed from the transceiver circuit being sold from Indonesia. It is apparently attachable to the volume control and since it's in the receive system, it does not affect the transmit system. It can be "rubbered" here and there since the component values may be the best for this considering that they are what is available to the builders in Indonesia, the FET and transistor can work equally well when using substitutes. Attaching to the high end of the uBITX's volume control and making the 47K variable in the circuit below a set resistor for calibration purposes results in making this a usable circuit. The meter, of course, can be substituted with an LED barcode circuit OR merely provide a source signal for an on-screen display of received signal level. The circuit as shown is relatively simple, however.

Bob ¡ª KKR

Inline image


On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 7:06:58 AM EDT, IW4AJR Loris <lorisbollina@...> wrote:


On the CCARC (Carroll County Amateur Radio Club, Inc.) website I found a very interesting article on automatic gain control that is worth reading!
Without many frills Carol makes us understand that an AGC (automatic gain control) on the IF of the uBITX, due to the nature of the amps used (bidirectional), is very complex to make at this level of the circuit ...
therefore ? ...
Much better and less invasive to act directly on the volume control, implementing a simple but effective automatic volume control (AVC)!
Think man ... think ...
A little less software and a little more electronic experimentation and, with much less effort, very complex problems can be solved!
Think man ... think !
Greetings to all, Loris IW4AJR

--
Jack, W8TEE

--
Jack, W8TEE


Re: No output power on #v3

 

The only "pop and smoke" experience I ever had was when I bought a Swan 350 at a hamfest that was a "Sure, it's working!" radio so when I plugged it in at home, it sounded like a shotgun shell going off. The power supply caps had to be replaced.

Nothing like a PnS experience to add to one's bank of experience.

Bob ¡ª KK5R

On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 1:31:29 PM EDT, _Dave_ AD0B <davesters@...> wrote:


Hi Evan,
The comment was not directed at you but as information for the poster of the statement.?

I don't think that I can a recall a single instance where a pop and smoke left my equipment working.
--
73
Dave


Re: No output power on #v3

 

Dave,
I would agree that there are very few times that the combination of pop and smoke did not indicate something failed.? The only time I can think of that it was not a part failure was when a whisker from a stranded wire shorted and poped/fried.? That wire had to be repaired, however, it did not take down any of the components, nor traces on the board.? It acted as a fuse.

Kit had been working on a wiring ribbon cable, so the possibility of the same thing happening is good.? I would strongly agree with you that the rig needs to be looked over very carefully for any signs of damage, and try to find the location of the smoke.? There is at least the potential for carbon or metal splatter that can cause other issues.

Thank you for the feedback.
73
Evan
AC9TU