Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
|
Re: Antuino manual
In my experience,? yes.? I haven't used Eneloops, but IKEA Ladda (supposedly rebadged Eneloops) and Amazon rechargeable AA will power it for a short time, but quickly go too low, resulting in flickering display, and then strange operations, followed by shut down.? ?Tempted to replace with a larger tray to use more AA to solve the?problem,? but haven't yet. AA alkaline run it for quite a few hours, however.? -Josh W0ODJ? |
|
Re: BitX HW-16: full break-in high power ri
Lets see, the ubitx was advanced because many inexpensive rigs only do cw. Funny thing I mostly have done cw with the ubitx, but the early qsos were ssb.
I imagine somewhere there is a ubitx that does qsk, more likely a homebrew one. seems like a bit of work. BTW, study the qsk in some modern rig. especially the k2 100w PA to see how it gets the high negative voltage bias.? Funny thing my novice hw16 still lives. The pfr3 I have pretty much does the same thing. I did build a solid state xtal transmtter and used it with my tubed hr20. 73 curt |
|
Hi Rob,
No problems. Ok for the regulator, that should work just fine. Regarding the place to insert the Teensy, here are my thoughts: If you have an AGC then before the volume control as you mentioned should be just fine. But if you don't, you may have significant variations in signal levels.? If placed after the volume control at least you apply some level control manually. Just a thought. Also I would not worry about impedance matching until you test it. Just make sure it is AC coupled through capacitors. For the serial part: in the Nano the USB chip's serial lines are connected via 1K Ohm resistors to the D0 and D1 lines. So you can hook up a TTL serial line there but you have to be mindful of the pull-up effect of the USB chip. You can hook up the Teensy's RX and TX lines directly to the TX (D1) and RX (D0) lines (respectively) of the Nano since the Teensy 3.2 is 5v tolerant on its digital pins (which are shared with serial 1, 2 and 3). You may have to insert a 3.3V to 5V level converter for the Teensy's TX to the Nano's RX as the level may be on the low side of the specs for the Nano, but most of the time it just works.? If you have an oscilloscope it is easy to see what the levels are when sending serial data. But, keep in mind that as long as the Teensy is connected to the D0/D1 Nano lines it will prevent communicating to the Nano via the USB port (like for programming). Best would be a switch to disconnect at least the TX line from the Teensy or better both TX and RX just to make sure, although just powering down the Teensy may also do the trick (hoping all lines go to high impedance then). So I would start simple and add extra hardware if you run into issues. I like the idea of using the Teensy for microphone compression. Please share your results when you get it working. All the best, 73, John |
|
Re: UBitx v5 Not Saving Calibration or BFO adjustments with CEC v 1.20 Nextion
Can you verify that after you get the message that the setting has been saved that you completely power down the Raduino (disconnect any USB cable and power down the board)??
The new value does not come into play until the unit is restarted from power off.? If you try to go back into the calibration mode directly, the values are rest to original, and you need to start over.??I figured this out the hard way using the memory manager.? Every time I updated a value, nothing seemed to change.? One time I ran out of time, shut it all down and then the next day powered up and found the values as I had set them. Over all the process using Memory Manager is to make a change by reading the Raduino, decoding, changing, encoding and then writing to the Nano.? Power cycle everything including disconnecting the USB cable.? Verify, and go back and make another change.? This is time consuming, however you can save results on each try so you can go back to previous values. I have not tried it, however a process of using the built in calibration, power cycling, then use the Memory Manager to save and see the new value.? This would be a way to get close, then make small changes to fine tune. Above are my experiences and may be different from your own. Use the above at your own risk. 73 Evan AC9TU? |
|
Re: BitX HW-16: full break-in high power ri
Gordon Gibby
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýWell, I could probably hijack the front end of the HW 100 and use it for exactly that purpose!
|
|
John,
Thank you very much for the very thorough reply.? Mostly (!) very encouraging, as I think this will save me a lot of thinking and worrying about ground loops in my RX audio and transformers and high-impedance buffers and the list goes on... I will try just putting the Teensy/Audio Board combo into the receive audio path, and call it good (my thought is, that I should already have sufficient DC blocking in the form of the Audio Board's built-in blocking capacitors on the Line-In/Out lines, from what I can see on the schematic).? Not sure if I need any other resistors for impedance matching or what not... I may just hook it up between the preamp and volume control, and cross my fingers... I do have a decently beefy heatsink on my Raduino 5v regulator (had to bend the regulator IC "outboard", and then also bend a couple of the heatsink fins, to deconflict from the coils on the uBITX board).? But, I will try to implement a separate 5V supply for the Teensy, and add some additional filtering.? I'll have to think about the D0/D1 thing with the TTL logic... so the way I read your description, D0/D1 and the USB are really not "interchangeable", rather they just happen to be linked to each other?? Is that the case?? I know that on Teensy, Serial and USB Serial are separate, but I thought that on Nano they are the same. Are you suggesting a pulldown resistor on D1? Thanks, Rob |
|
Hello Rob,
In my experience ground loops on transceiver to CPU based units are only an issue in TX when using "longer" wires. For reference I used a second Arduino Nano mounted inside the uBitx and all signal cables not on the board, that is that are wired to other parts of the unit, are shielded audio cables (microphone type, 2mm or so diameter cables). I used the Nano to inject an audio signal into the audio (after low pass filtering) for my auto tuner and no audio harmonics or hum was audible on another receiver in the SSB passband. I also used an analog input connected to the microphone input as a VOX detector and again I can't hear anything on another radio at normal volume. In RX it should not be an issue in any case if your device is mounted inside or connected via short cables to the unit. I would use a separate supply voltage regulator for two reasons: the load on the existing regulator would be increased significantly requiring a good heatsink and this gives you the opportunity to ensure a good filtering between the Raduino and the Teensy supply and prevent any feedback/bleed through that way. It is what I did in my rig. Regarding the usage of the Teensy USB that is a good idea. Just a reminder that some (most?) Nanos keep? the USB chip powered up when supplied from the internal supply (that is even if the Nano's USB is not connected) and therefore inject a TTL logical zero (+5VDC) when idle. Therefore you need to make sure you pull the digital line D1 (Rx) to a low enough voltage to ensure you get a solid TTL logical one (0VDC) when communicating with the Teensy. See an example of that issue on this post (and the previous posts in the thread): /g/BITX20/message/66289 Hope that helps. All the best, 73, John? (VK2ETA) |
|
Re: BitX HW-16: full break-in high power ri
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 09:33 AM, Gordon Gibby wrote:
full break in HW 16Brings back memory's of when I was first interested in Ham radio. The description of that radio/transmitter with dual conversion and crystal filters was something that made me want that rig. I did not become a Ham until much later when I hooked up a down converter to a Radio Shack general coverage shortwave receiver and started following a group of Hams, on 2 meters (I had to slope detect), that would meet after work at a near by Denny's restaurant. I became interested in joining in, they were frequently discussing interesting radio/technical things, so I contacted (by mail) one of the Hams, he lent me some more gear, I studied, got my tech license, and could join in of the work commute and Denny's. Back to full break in mode. Tubes are still popular in the audio circles. Wonder if it would be possible (or valid) to create a stand alone tube RF pre-amplifier for receivers that would be bullet proof against (at least in terms of not burning out) being attached to a coax line while a transmitter is powered up on the same coax. This could be great for near by lightning strikes, too.? Then you could put a tee connector in your coax to directly connect to the vacuum tube pre-amp. To some extent this tube pre-amp may be sold more on the?nostalgia of the gold old tube days. And unfortunately some marketers may start selling it on the claim that if gives your radio the much improved "tube" sound quality. But it might be a cool idea. Especially if the tube sticks?prominently out of the top of the box, so you can see the red filament glow, and maybe a ring of blue LEDs at the base to add to the cool tube effect. Joking aside, it may possible there could be a place for a vacuum tube in RF front ends.? Tom, wb6b |
|
Relay Board Mod for V3/V4 are in!
All pre-orders have been shipped and I have 12 kits left More will be ordered as time goes on so if they are sold out I will have more coming. I will also have a digital interface coming soon as well watch for it in the next two weeks. Attached are the instructions from Gordon for those that can not get them via the sites account orders page due to errors my host has been giving on the site. 73 -- ?N8DAH ConstructionDocumentv1.1.pdf
ConstructionDocumentv1.1.pdf
OutboardRelaysDesignDocumentTry3_1_.pdf
OutboardRelaysDesignDocumentTry3_1_.pdf
|
|
Graphics files for Nextion LCD displays.
In a past life, I did a lot of graphics design, mostly using Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop.? I'd like to take a stab at a custom uBitx UI for the Nextion 5" and I'm wondering what, if any graphics files exist for the displays. I am NOT referring to the Nextion Editor files, I've got those.? I'm looking for the actual graphics that are imported into the editor to create the UI.? It seems that KD8CEC was the first to implement these for the uBitx but I've looked in all the relevant places and have not seen the files I'm looking for.? Ian, (KD8CEC), how did you go about doing the original design for the Nextion UI?? I'd love Adobe Illustrator files (or even Inkscape if you used that) for the UI if you have them.
-- John - N0CTL - Fulltime RV in a 40' motorhome |
|
Re: UBitx v5 Not Saving Calibration or BFO adjustments with CEC v 1.20 Nextion
thanks for the info; it's seems nothing changed also with your method; i tried with another nano (programmed etc) but the mast cal value is lost...anyone has CEC 1.200 and ubitx v5 and has the same problem?
Another solution i can try: recover original firmware, set calibration and re-update to CEC 1.200 firmware; if the problem is caused by a little bug in the software (he can't write in the E2PROM) i think will work (because with firmware upgrade the cal value is not touched) Thanks for support guys |
|
Calibration
#calibration
Please could someone help me calibrate ubitx ver 5.1,i have tried but am not succeeding at all
|
|
Re: BitX40
Roger Tuffin
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýAfter triple checking everything, it fired up. ?The display was blocks which adjusted with the pot on the Rad board. ?Was drawing 140ma on idle initially, but seems to have dropped back to 70ma after having been on for a while.BUT, whilst there is a soft hiss on the speaker, nothing on receive. ?Put the sig gen near on 7.1, but nothing when tuning, although there was a slight noise around 40 megs when I tuned around with the sig gen. ?Makes a clack clack noise while tuning which I suppose is the Rad incrementing. ?Bizarrely, moving the tuning control near full deflection either way starts the freq counter counting on at about 5 KC¡¯s/sec, such that it will count up to 7.5 and back to 6.9 the other way. ?Tuning control is very sensitive. Any suggestions of tests would be appreciated. ?Wondering if I¡¯m just unlucky with a duff DDS. ?I have a scope and sig gen. Roger, M0TJK On 4 Sep 2019, at 9:49 am, Vaughn <vlkteach@...> wrote:
|
|
BitX HW-16: full break-in high power ri
Gordon Gibby
?Many years ago, as a teenager I had a full break in HW 16 ; ?had to give it up for my next rig.?
?I¡¯m starting to think there is a way to re-create it, using two UBitx, ?and the carcass of a HW 100 ?? ?Use one of the UBitx as the receiver; ? ?Use the other as the exciter to drive the last two stages of the HW 100 ¡ª gives ?100 W output, ?although I¡¯ll add my relay daughter board, those two stages add additional useful filtering? ?Add in some diode networks, or maybe a pin diode if required, and some slick fast bias changes on the vacuum tube finals, ?which can be moved in and out of cut off, class C and class AB1.... One raduino ?can provide all the frequencies for both rigs; ?relays only have to change state when you Change bands; ? Transistor control of Vcc wires ; One of them is always receiving, the other is always ¡°transmitting ¡° ¡ª ?just instantaneously biased into operation and back out ? ?Lots of shieldiing each uBitx ?in some shielded compartment? ?Change a just few things and it does digital & regular single side band as well? ?Relatively inexpensive, high-performance full break in high power radio, ?Computer controllable, digital frequency control? ?Use some digital filter when using CW? Gordon? |
|
Re: CEC firmware upgrade issues...
Sharing your joy, but felt I may have mislead you by saying "It should default to V5".
I pulled a fresh copy from github this AM. It's already set-up for V5 and LCD1602P.? makes me think you got your code from an alternate source, and word of caution that there may be other differences. in ubitx.h: //==============================================================================
// Compile Option
//==============================================================================
//Ubitx Board Version
#define UBITX_BOARD_VERSION 5? ? ? ? ? ?//v1 ~ v4 : 4, v5: 5
?
//Depending on the type of LCD mounted on the uBITX, uncomment one of the options below.
//You must select only one.
#define UBITX_DISPLAY_LCD1602P? ? ? ? //LCD mounted on unmodified uBITX (Parallel) |
|
Re: CEC firmware upgrade issues...
I assume you downloaded the zip file from here:
In it are the different versions for screens that can be used, as well as the different ways that the screen is connected to the Raduino. From the description of the screen, I assume that you are using the stock 16x2 display, which has a parallel data input.? You need to select one of the files based on what else you will be adding. From the uBITXV5 folder the selection would be: http://www.hamskey.com/2018/04/various-lcd-support-in-ubitx-with.html
prefix : UBITXV5_CEC_
Version : Vxxxx (ex: V1.097)
LCD Type : _XXX (ex: 16x02 Parallel = 16P, 20x04 Parallel = 20P, 20x04 I2C = 20I, Nextion LCD = NX)
Signal Meter Type (Option) : none : Analaog Meter using A7 PIN
_S : I2C Signal Meter using I2C Port
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_16P.hex : It is the LCD equipped with uBITX. Default LCD, 16x02 Parallel LCD
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_16P_S.hex : _16P with I2C Meter
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_16I.hex : 16x02 I2C LCD
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_16I_S.hex : _16I with I2C Meter
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_20P.hex : 20x04 Parallel LCD
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_20P_S.hex : _20P with I2C Meter
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_20I.hex : 20x04 I2C LCD
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_20I_S.hex : _20I with I2C Meter
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_16D.hex : 16x02 I2C Dual LCD
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_16D_S.hex : _16D with I2C Meter
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_NX.hex : Nextion LCD
UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_NX_S.hex : _NX with I2C Meter
I will assume that you are staying stock, and IF you want to add an S meter, it will be a direct measurement using the spare analog input pin on the Raduino, rather than through a second I2C connected Nano to do the S meter and other things.? Most of the time the second Nano is for added functionality that uses the Nextion graphic screen(s). With those assumptions, you would need to load the?UBITXV5_CEC_Vxxxxx_16P.hex filling in the xxxxx with the current version number which is 1.200. Hope this helps. 73 Evan AC9TU |
|
Re: New wiring diagram version
If thr reverse diode could be placed after fuse, 1n4007 would suffice as fuse acts On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, 10:54 am Adrien F4IJA, <adrien.grelet@...> wrote: I received yesterday a mail from Bob Fischer. In his idea the diode could be on the common ground, protecting that way both the 2 circuits.? |
|
Re: New wiring diagram version
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýExcept that you¡¯ll have voltage across the PA V+ and main V+. ?If the PA V+ is actually negative the parasitic diode in the final transistors will conduct and you¡¯ll have reverse voltage to the main V+ and ground. ?No protection.Use two diodes. Clark Martin KK6ISP
|
|
Re: New wiring diagram version
Adrien F4IJA
I received yesterday a mail from Bob Fischer. In his idea the diode could be on the common ground, protecting that way both the 2 circuits.?
The point is to find a quite high current diode because the whole current of the uBITX (PA +ubitx) will go through it.? -- 73's Adrien F4IJA |
N8DAH
John Scherer
to navigate to use esc to dismiss