Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: BITX VXOs
Ron Brink
Ola Miguel,
I like to see some picts of your super VXO's Miguel. Great coverage with only 3 xtals. Is the output stable over the whole range? Do you use one or more (switchable) coils in series with the xtals to cover the range?
?
I have shielded my BIT17 VFO (soldered some unetched PCB's around it) and now the VFO with Huff&Puff is also stable when I force it out-of-tune e.g. by placing the desk-lamp just above the vfo. Added one picture in the photobox.
?
73
Ron
PA2RF
Miguel Angelo Bartie wrote:
Do you Yahoo!? |
BITX VXOs
Hello
I build 3 VXOs called "hipervxos" for 40m, 20, and 10m to use with BITX, They use a classic Colpits oscilattor with 3 parallel xtals and a series inductor (special) and a series variable capacitor For 40m I use 3 x 3020 kHz xtals and the actual range is 2068 to 3010kHz For 20m I use a commercial 3 x 4194 kHz xtals covering 4190 to 3990 kHz For 10m I use a commercial 3 x 18432 kHz xtals covering 18400 to 18000kHz. The BITX 40m is running good, the 20m still in test (but is ok too), and the 10m version I built only the VXO. The exciter and the PA are the same I change the vfo, the band pass filter and the low pass filter. I will make some pictures and I will post here. 73 from PY2OHH Miguel |
Re: Good Job guys!
Hans Summers
Guys
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am planning a Huff Puff VFO kit for my 2-chip minimalist VFO see . I am sure that this would be suitable for use with BITX transceivers. I have just posted a message to the Huff Puff forum about what possible features to include in the kit. Hoping to keep the cost as absolutely minimal as possible! 73 Hans G0UPL -----Original Message-----
From: Arv Evans [mailto:arvevans@...] Sent: 10 April 2005 18:52 To: BITX20@... Subject: Re: [BITX20] Re: Good Job guys! Troy H&P stabilisation would hold your frequency to within a Hz or two for the long term, thus minimizing even a slow drift after warm up. Hans has come up with several minimalist stabilizer designs (a "One-Chip", a "two-chip" and a minimalist version of the "Fast Stabilizer"). These circuits may be found on the <HUFFPUFFVFO.yahoogroups.com> forum. Hans' stabilizer circuits may be made to lock onto 16, 32, or 64 Hz tuning steps. The one and two chip designs use a 32.768 KHz watch crystal (salvage one from a cheap watch purchased at the local dollar store).driving a 74HC4060 binary counter for the timebase. I have looked before at that receiver and counter on the web page you suggested. Hans G0UPL's web page also has some minimalist counters that could be adapted to your L.O. output, as does Onno PA2OHH <www.qsl.net/pa2ohh/sfreq.htm> and Miguel PY2OHH <>. Arv _._ On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:53:53 -0000, kc8afu1965 <kc8afu1965@...> wrote:
-- Expore all the Ideas...Exploit the good ones! Yahoo! Groups Links |
Re: Good Job guys!
Ron
Tnx for your reply dear Mike,
I did the measurement with a Philips low-budget "world" receiver (with BFO :-) ) connected to a Celeron 266 MHz PC using MixW2.10 and I suspect this radio causing most of the anomalies you indicated. And yes, I live in a pretty EM-noisy environment (GSM, wifi antennas and lot of building activities like cranes with 70cm devices in the vicinity). 73 Ron PA2RF --- In BITX20@..., "Mike W" <mike@c...> wrote: Impressive Ron, Not a criticism, but I note some products of theVFO some distance from the carrier in the unlocked pic which are not> stable but still inexpensive rig that is > capable of > > working K7HKLwith > > narrow filters for CW and PSK/MSK contacts. > > > > Arv
|
Re: Good Job guys!
Mike W
Impressive Ron, Not a criticism, but I note some products of the VFO
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
some distance from the carrier in the unlocked pic which are not noticable when the HuffPuff is operative due to the other noises. I guess you must live in a noisy enviroment. thanks for the pics though. atb Mike W, G8NXD -- On 11 Apr 2005 at 7:26, Ron wrote:
|
Re: Good Job guys!
Ron
Dear Troy,
Would like to inform you that I included the Huff&Puff circuit into my BITX17 (converted BITX20 for 18.068...18.168 MHz). In my Photobox (PA2RF) you can see 2 pictures of the VFO performance made with MixW.2.10. (witout and with Huff&Puff). The results were (and still are) amazing! I can easily decode PSK31, RTTY and other digimodes now. Bye from Holland Ron PA2RF --- In BITX20@..., "kc8afu1965" <kc8afu1965@y...> wrote: CW rcvr is the popcorn rcvr from the qrp homebuilder homepage. It hasI think I remember about 2Hz per minute after warm-up but it's been aby the H&P. Lately I have been finishing up a presettable frequencyam on the band. It can be found at: |
Re: re. TR Switching for the BITX
I have tried this method and it works well with my non-BITX 5w CW
transmitter. My receiver has an RF preamp and a post mixer amplifier. I found that if I grounded both transistor bases during transmit with a transistor switch, the transmit signal would be attenuated enough to be used as sidetone (no audio section mute.) I think this would work for SSB with lower audio output. Troy KC8AFU --- In BITX20@..., "Arv Evans" <arvevans@e...> wrote: might want toThis should |
re. TR Switching for the BITX
Arv Evans
Those BITX builders who want to have QSK operation without relays might want to
look at the web site of Miguel PY2OHH <> He shows and explains his simple diode based TR switching method. This should be adaptable to the BITX design. Arv _._ -- Expore all the Ideas...Exploit the good ones! |
Re: Good Job guys!
Arv Evans
Troy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
H&P stabilisation would hold your frequency to within a Hz or two for the long term, thus minimizing even a slow drift after warm up. Hans has come up with several minimalist stabilizer designs (a "One-Chip", a "two-chip" and a minimalist version of the "Fast Stabilizer"). These circuits may be found on the <HUFFPUFFVFO.yahoogroups.com> forum. Hans' stabilizer circuits may be made to lock onto 16, 32, or 64 Hz tuning steps. The one and two chip designs use a 32.768 KHz watch crystal (salvage one from a cheap watch purchased at the local dollar store).driving a 74HC4060 binary counter for the timebase. I have looked before at that receiver and counter on the web page you suggested. Hans G0UPL's web page also has some minimalist counters that could be adapted to your L.O. output, as does Onno PA2OHH <www.qsl.net/pa2ohh/sfreq.htm> and Miguel PY2OHH <>. Arv _._ On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:53:53 -0000, kc8afu1965 <kc8afu1965@...> wrote:
--
Expore all the Ideas...Exploit the good ones! |
Re: Good Job guys!
Thanks Arv,
I've had the AFU callsign for about ten years and you're the first person to comment on it. I thought it was funny when it was first assigned to me but nobody seemed to share my sense of humor. Thanks for noticing! Thanks for the huff&puff invite. I've also been looknig at Hans Summers website and I'm thinking about trying it out. My current CW rcvr is the popcorn rcvr from the qrp homebuilder homepage. It has an LO freq of approx 2.5 MHz (4.433 MHz IF)and is pretty stable ( I think I remember about 2Hz per minute after warm-up but it's been a while since I measured it so I could be wrong) but I am intrigued by the H&P. Lately I have been finishing up a presettable frequency counter that I can run directly off of my VFO. Now I know where I am on the band. It can be found at: It's at the bottom of the homepage. Thanks for the invite and I will start checking out the H&P group. 73's & HPE CUL. Troy KC8AFU --- In BITX20@..., "Arv Evans" <arvevans@e...> wrote: Troya center-of-the-filtertook the simple way andthough! group so I will goforum is a logicalyour BITX oscillatorcapable of working with |
Re: Good Job guys!
Now you have the benefit to read for example every day ten (for you
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
new) postings! Often it is better to follow also what happened before, preventing that the same questions are asked more often. Hear you on the band ;-) Chris, PA3CRX My only regret is that I |
Re: Good Job guys!
Arv Evans
Troy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The BITX has also been used for CW. Several builders have added a center-of-the-filter BFO oscillator that serves both send and receive CW functions. I took the simple way and just added a keyed AF oscillator that plugs into the mike jack. Love the callsign. I'll bet you get a few comments about it though! I did not see your name in the members list for the Huff and Puff group so I will go over there and send you an invite. The Huff & Puff VFO group forum is a logical extension to the BITX because using an H & P circuit to stabilize your BITX oscillator makes it into a very stable but still inexpensive rig that is capable of working with narrow filters for CW and PSK/MSK contacts. Arv K7HKL On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:23:14 -0000, kc8afu1965 <kc8afu1965@...> wrote:
--
Expore all the Ideas...Exploit the good ones! |
Good Job guys!
Hello all,
I just wanted to say what a fine group I think this is. I have not built a BITX (I do mostly CW homebrew projects) but most of the topics here have been pertinet to my homebrewing. My only regret is that I didn't join when the group was started (I've only been tuning in for the last two months). This group gets my approval as the best homebrewing group on the web. Keep up the good work guys! Troy Hunt KC8AFU. |
Re: Another slight modification to the BITX17 PA
Ron Brink
Hi Ray,
?
Yes, you are right. Just QRP?should have been?sufficient. In fact 2 Watts represents a lot of electromagnetic RF energy.
And if propagation conditions do not let you down a lot can be achieved with 2 Joules per second (Especially with the nice decoding software tools we are offered these days).
?
73 Ron
PA2RF
![]() Raj wrote: Hi Ron,
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - for Fantasy Baseball. |
Re: Another slight modification to the BITX17 PA
Raj
Hi Ron,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
QRPPPP = 5mW in my book! Every additional "P"= 1/10 power level.. I worked USA and a lot of EU with 1mW + small beam.. so you are running QRO!!! Good Dx with Bitx 73 Raj VU2ZAP with an adjustable matching network (pi-filter). No reply/qso yet (but the band was very dead after 10'o-clock in the evening in |
Another slight modification to the BITX17 PA
Ron
Dear BITX homebrew-heroes!,
I combined the ideas of Ruud and Alf and, to my surprise, the IRF510 is not self-oscillating anymore (at all DC bias settings) !! I did following (20 min work): Added 3 decoupling C's and 2 rf chokes to pa and driver circuitry and added a ferrite bead (from an old videoplayer) over the gate of the MOSFET. Also added a cap of 68 pF between drain of mosfet and gnd. I think the 10 cents ferrite did most of the job. RF power is still too low (appr. 2 Watts RF), so there is still something to do. Driver circuit needs an additional RF transisitor I guess. I found a nice 2SC1384 from an old CB-transceiver. Furthermore I can gain by further shielding the PA driver and improve the trifilair mosfet coil (I have one made, but it's behaviour seems to be similar when compared to the bifilair coil). Did some RTTY transmissions with 2 Watt yesterday though and the BITX17 sounds beautifully. Good USB, no remainders of carrierwave noticeable. I used a full lambda one-fed wire antenna (in the garden) with an adjustable matching network (pi-filter). No reply/qso yet (but the band was very dead after 10'o-clock in the evening in Holland and 2 Watt is QRPPPP). 73 and lots of homebrew fun Ron PA2RF --- In BITX20@..., "alf" <fpdbase@e...> wrote: Hi to all homebrew BITX20 members,BITX radio. After attending local hamfest at the end of February, collectingall the relevant parts, started assembly of BITX20. The chassis, L shape was salvaged from the power supply of a old Fax machine and it's circuit board was used a source of some of the parts for the BITX20. Lot's of good parts in old equipment hi hi. A piece of single sided pcb was fitted to the chassis, copper side up, and ye old ugly style construction began. The VFO was built first and a compartment of double sided PCB surrounds it. A red LED is used to fine tune the frequency and gives about 4khz range. Various coils were tried at L4 to improve frequency stability, ended up using a ferrite bobbin from the salvaged Fax board. The Receiver front end was built next, opposite side of VFO partition. T1 mixer transformer is mounted on the crystal filter side (IF) via a feedthru capacitor. The IF, BFO and audio stages assembled and tested next. Used 2N2222A transistors throughout except for the PA amplifier of course, the audio output device is a TDA2002. The PA amp was built on a small heat sink salvaged from a old TV chassis, size 8 X 4.5 cm . The 2N2218 driver coupled to IRF510 using TV balun taken from TV tuner, and some instability occurred when driving a reactive load. This was cured by fitting a ferrite bead directly onto the gate leg of IRF510 Fet. The receiver audio is very clear and sensitivity better than 0.5 uV. Don't procrastinate, if your thinking it's all too much trouble, just have a go, you will learn more by doing.
|
Slight modification to PA
开云体育Hi to all homebrew BITX20 members,
??????? Hope everybody is
having fun building their version of the BITX radio.
After attending?local hamfest at the end of February,
collecting all the relevant parts, started assembly of BITX20.?The chassis,
L? shape was salvaged from the power supply of a old ?Fax machine and
it's circuit board was used a source of some of the parts for the BITX20. Lot's
of good parts in old equipment hi hi. A piece of single sided pcb was fitted to
the chassis, copper side up, and ye old ugly style construction began. The VFO
was?built first and?a compartment of double sided PCB surrounds it. A
red LED is used to fine tune the frequency and gives about 4khz range. Various
coils were tried at L4 to improve frequency stability, ended up using a ferrite
bobbin from the salvaged Fax board. The Receiver front end was built next,
opposite side of VFO partition. T1 mixer transformer is mounted on the crystal
filter side?(IF)?via a feedthru capacitor. The IF, BFO and audio
stages assembled and tested next. ??Used 2N2222A transistors
throughout except for the PA amplifier of course, the audio output device is a
TDA2002.? The PA amp was built on a small heat sink salvaged from a old TV
chassis, size?8 X 4.5 cm?. The 2N2218 driver coupled to IRF510 using
TV balun taken from TV tuner, and some instability occurred when driving a
reactive load. This was cured by fitting a ferrite bead directly onto the gate
leg of IRF510 Fet. The receiver audio is very clear and sensitivity better than
0.5 uV.? Don't procrastinate, if your thinking it's all too much trouble,
just have a go, you will learn more by doing.
?
Many Thanks to Asher for allowing me too much
fun..
?
Best regards to all BITX members
?
Alf VK2YAC |
Re: Small mistake
Ruud Jongeling
Hi Farhan,
You can see in the schema's in the Files box under PE2BS or in the Photos box how I used the trifilair transformers. The first trifilair transformer (13 wdg on an T37-43 lookalike) is the output of the driverstage and is placed on its "print". The last trifilair transformer is made of 14 wdg trifilair on an T50-6. Like I wrote to Ron it is difficult to say what exactly solved the problem but I got rid of all the oscilations after the shielding AND the trifilair transformers. 73 Ruud. PE2BS --- In BITX20@..., "ashhar_farhan" <farhan@p...> wrote: phase of the input to the IRF510 too.phase used in the transformer?oscillating towhen set at a higher bias-level.' I had that problem too. In mine outputwork OK when I was tuning from the computer and there was no class C.when there was no modulation. Unfortunately the PA worked in byThe whole problem turned out to be an instability in the mA.the trimpot of the balanced modulator, the Id should be about 80 www.antentop.bel.ru/)(from: "A simple SSB tranceiver" by Ashar Farhan andSecond: a lot of decoupling. Thebetween the PA and the pi filter. Make it trifilair instead of noresult is also more watts RF. Evenoutput in the SWR meter and a little on the spectrumanalyzer. generate.with mismatching the system to the antenna the PA does not In CW UA3,(Hamscope and CWget on the computer) and only 5 watt I worked 17 mYO, ER, HA! iband te horen!I think your 6 Watts RF should be fine for digimode use. Or am awrong?I hope to experience this myself on short notice. Yesterday didfirst trials with the IRF510 endstage. I had 4 Watts RF out with fewRTTY test signal connected. Hope to increase output level with a realWatts (increase supply voltage and adjust pi-filter) and do some IRF510trials (hopefully 2-way comms) this weekend. Found that the level.has a tendency to start oscillating when set at a higher bias- 30Should fix that too. Also found that my (bureau) desk-light when andcm above the VFO gets this VFO change frequency; but when Huff andPuff circuit is connected, VFO frequency is corrected in a quick veryfine way..My appreciation for the BITX is growing ... combinationstrong signals, form Russia but also from the States. ofwith my sloping dipole. Stations in (for example) Bulgaria aretransistor thethe speaker. When I receive a weak station, it is just above tonoise but at the moment a strong station enters, I really have theturn down the volume potmeter immidiatly! whatstage before the LM386 I use a BC109. heardtransistors are you usingBC547s or 2n3904s73 (upssbvoice, rtty, psk31 and cw. With a one-lambda (17 m) long-wireantennaconnected. Some signals clear enough to decode... tillService.now I have only used half or quarter lambda ant's..) |
Re: Small mistake
The imput impedance of the IRF510 is very low. Therefore I made the
coil trifilar resulting in a lower impedance then originally. This gives more output but seems also give a better stability? I remember I have a low iddle current, (30 mA?) to have it stable. Higher iddle current brought not much benefits, the output increased slightly but not worth the additional heat up. Modulation is fine, several SSB contacts made with good result. Good luck, Chris. phase of the input to the IRF510 too.phase used in the transformer?oscillating minewhen set at a higher bias-level.' I had that problem too. In BITX-PSK it was not enough to lower the bias-level. |
Re: Small mistake
ashhar_farhan
what kind of chokes did you use?
73s - de farhan --- In BITX20@..., Ron Brink <pa2rf@y...> wrote: Thanks Ruud,experiment this weekend. I will start shielding the driver and make the trifilair coil.Where exactly? Bye |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss