¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Spurs/Harmonics fixes for v4 based on v5 board design?

 

Actually meant high pass filter into the chain.? Maybe add another filter in the transmit path right after the 45MHZ 15khz bandwidth filter Possibly somewhere before C20 on the v4 board (40MHZ high pass filter perhaps)?? ?That way it feeds into an amp before getting mixed again.


On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 08:17 AM, Dave Space wrote:
Thanks Raj.? I already replaced all 5 relays just to be safe with axicom ones and now also the L5 and L7 fix.? Would it be possible to add a low pass filter into the transmit chain somewhere to prevent that mixer product?



On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:14 PM, Raj vu2zap wrote:
What inductors did you use, please share a pic.

There is always a carrier leak at 12Mhz and 12-7 = ~5 Mhz could be what you see.

Most spurs are created by the harmonics of the carrier feeding back to the first BiDi amp. Changing to Axicom relays
eliminates a lot of these dancing dervishes.

Raj



At 02-02-19, you wrote:
Thanks I'll try the two tone test next. Tonight I replaced L5 and L7 Raj's fix to see if I noticed any differences. Using LSB on 7.15 into 40db attenuator get-55db main signal and I see some sort of spur at around 5MHZ that is about -85db, doesn't fluctate with voice it's constant when I key the transmitter. Wonder what could be producing around 5 MHZ.

I wonder if the v5 board redesign changes next might help. Might see if I can figure out where on the board that could be introduced.


Re: Spurs/Harmonics fixes for v4 based on v5 board design?

 

Thanks Raj.? I already replaced all 5 relays just to be safe with axicom ones and now also the L5 and L7 fix.? Would it be possible to add a low pass filter into the transmit chain somewhere to prevent that mixer product?



On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:14 PM, Raj vu2zap wrote:
What inductors did you use, please share a pic.

There is always a carrier leak at 12Mhz and 12-7 = ~5 Mhz could be what you see.

Most spurs are created by the harmonics of the carrier feeding back to the first BiDi amp. Changing to Axicom relays
eliminates a lot of these dancing dervishes.

Raj



At 02-02-19, you wrote:
Thanks I'll try the two tone test next. Tonight I replaced L5 and L7 Raj's fix to see if I noticed any differences. Using LSB on 7.15 into 40db attenuator get-55db main signal and I see some sort of spur at around 5MHZ that is about -85db, doesn't fluctate with voice it's constant when I key the transmitter. Wonder what could be producing around 5 MHZ.

I wonder if the v5 board redesign changes next might help. Might see if I can figure out where on the board that could be introduced.


Re: SMD inductors

 

Peter, I should, then, feel sorry for wasting your funds???

On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 7:28 PM Peter Russell <peter.russell@...> wrote:
The ones I found on Ebay were too small (0603) and a lot of the
offerings were not shielded.
Couldn't find the right ones at Mouser either.

Peter G8FWY


On 02/02/2019 10:50, Fast hosts wrote:
> Are they a special type, as I see them on eBay for ?1.11 each? Am I
> missing something? Postage was just over a pound too.
> Have you tried <>?
> Keith M6OLP
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 14:23, Peter Russell
> <peter.russell@... <mailto:peter.russell@...>>
> wrote:
>
>? ? ?Can someone help me with the part number and supplier ( UK ) for the
>? ? ?680nH smd inductors used to replace L5 and L7.
>
>? ? ?Just found some on Digikey but they were very small (0603) and they
>? ? ?wanted ?12 for shipping!
>
>? ? ?Peter G8FWY.
>
>? ? ?---
>? ? ?This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>? ? ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Keith Baker - Communications technician (retired)
>




Re: Spurs/Harmonics fixes for v4 based on v5 board design?

 

Correction in red: harmonics

At 02-02-19, you wrote:

What inductors did you use, please share a pic.

There is always a carrier leak at 12Mhz and 12-7 = ~5 Mhz could be what you see.

Most spurs are created by the harmonics of the carrier feeding back to the first BiDi amp. Changing to Axicom relays
eliminates a lot of these dancing dervishes.

Raj



At 02-02-19, you wrote:
>Thanks I'll try the two tone test next.? Tonight I replaced L5 and L7 Raj's fix to see if I noticed any differences.? Using LSB on 7.15 into 40db attenuator get-55db main signal and I see some sort of spur at around 5MHZ that is about -85db, doesn't fluctate with voice it's constant when I key the transmitter.? Wonder what could be producing around 5 MHZ.
>
> I wonder if the v5 board redesign changes next might help.?? Might see if I can figure out where on the board that could be introduced.


Re: SMD inductors

Peter Russell
 

The ones I found on Ebay were too small (0603) and a lot of the offerings were not shielded.
Couldn't find the right ones at Mouser either.

Peter G8FWY

On 02/02/2019 10:50, Fast hosts wrote:
Are they a special type, as I see them on eBay for ?1.11 each? Am I missing something? Postage was just over a pound too.
Have you tried mouser.co.uk <>?
Keith M6OLP
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 14:23, Peter Russell <peter.russell@... <mailto:peter.russell@...>> wrote:
Can someone help me with the part number and supplier ( UK ) for the
680nH smd inductors used to replace L5 and L7.
Just found some on Digikey but they were very small (0603) and they
wanted ?12 for shipping!
Peter G8FWY.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.

--
Keith Baker - Communications technician (retired)


Re: Spurs/Harmonics fixes for v4 based on v5 board design?

 

Thanks Raj for the explanation.? Makes total sense to me.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: SMD inductors

 

I ordered a package of 300 of these and I'd be happy to help out the folks in the USA who would like to implement this fix. Not looking for a profit, just cost plus shipping.?

I'll reply again when I receive them with details.
Mike M.
KU4QO

On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 1:52 AM Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@...> wrote:
I requested him to sell small lots but he was not willing. He suggested that I buy his lots and
sell in small amounts. Maybe someone can do this for good of mankind :-)..

One or two lots in US and EU will help everyone.

At 02-02-19, you wrote:
>sorry for wrong typing Raj sir.
>
>regards
>sarma
>vu3zmv


Re: uBitX PTT cycling

 

Why, yes I have! Lots of low-power HT's and such are in plastic. My BitX40 has worked fine for a year now in plastic and I have used it mobile many times. Just yesterday I was traveling from PA to SE VA with the BitX40 using a cigarette lighter plug (this is not a 100w radio, the capacity of the plug is plenty sufficient) and a 40m Hamstick on a magnet mount on the roof. From MD I was able to check in with a station in Cape May, NJ, and had a 59+ signal report from a station in NH, and this with the bands in terrible shape. I had previously tuned the Hamstick using an SWR bridge to set it for this installation so in use it was just connected directly to the BitX40. Being able to use this mobile when I was in my wife's truck was one design criteria when I built this rig.

=Vic=


Re: SMD inductors

Fast hosts
 

Are they a special type, as I see them on eBay for ?1.11 each? Am I missing something? Postage was just over a pound too.
Have you tried ?
Keith M6OLP


On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 14:23, Peter Russell <peter.russell@...> wrote:
Can someone help me with the part number and supplier ( UK ) for the
680nH smd inductors used to replace L5 and L7.

Just found some on Digikey but they were very small (0603) and they
wanted ?12 for shipping!

Peter G8FWY.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.






--
Keith Baker - Communications technician (retired)


Re: SMD inductors

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Peter I'm in the UK and will be happy to take 10 off you please let me know when you have them and we can sort payment thank you



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

-------- Original message --------
From: Peter Russell <peter.russell@...>
Date: 02/02/2019 08:53 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: Re: [BITX20] SMD inductors

Thanks for that Sarma.

I've placed an order for 300 and I expect them around 11 february.

As I'll have a lot to spare, I'm quite willing to pass them on at cost
(plus postage) to anyone in UK who needs them.

I'll let you know when they arrive.

Peter G8FWY


On 02/02/2019 06:39, MVS Sarma wrote:
> I can't buy that large quantity? as it is not edible item. we cant use .
> But this is supposedly the part that RaAJ used.
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/300pcs-inductor-coil-smd-680nH-2-4R-size-1210-B82422A3681K-EPCOS-/142986858930
>
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 11:12 AM Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@...
> <mailto:rajendrakumargg@...>> wrote:
>
>???? 0603 does not work.
>
>???? At 01-02-19, you wrote:
>????? >Can someone help me with the part number and supplier ( UK ) for
>???? the 680nH smd inductors used to replace L5 and L7.
>????? >
>????? >Just found some on Digikey but they were very small (0603) and
>???? they wanted ?12 for shipping!
>????? >
>????? >Peter G8FWY.
>
>
>
>
>

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com





Re: Efficient Class E generation of SSB Using the EER Method

 

That's really interesting. I googled Guido and QCX and found the thread on the QRP Labs group and another interesting hit.

I'll include the links here for anyone interested.

/g/QRPLabs/message/30792

This is a fun topic with some interesting experimentation going on.?I think FT8 could be generated just by updating the Si5351 over i2c?¨¤ la what CEC did for WSPR in his firmware. But that is a side issue not directly related to the SSB topic.

Yes, the DSP code for a digital approach would be interesting.

Tom, wb6b


Re: SMD inductors

Peter Russell
 

Thanks for that Sarma.

I've placed an order for 300 and I expect them around 11 february.

As I'll have a lot to spare, I'm quite willing to pass them on at cost (plus postage) to anyone in UK who needs them.

I'll let you know when they arrive.

Peter G8FWY


On 02/02/2019 06:39, MVS Sarma wrote:
I can't buy that large quantity? as it is not edible item. we cant use . But this is supposedly the part that RaAJ used.

On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 11:12 AM Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@... <mailto:rajendrakumargg@...>> wrote:
0603 does not work.
At 01-02-19, you wrote:
>Can someone help me with the part number and supplier ( UK ) for
the 680nH smd inductors used to replace L5 and L7.
>
>Just found some on Digikey but they were very small (0603) and
they wanted ?12 for shipping!
>
>Peter G8FWY.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.


Re: SMD inductors

 

I requested him to sell small lots but he was not willing. He suggested that I buy his lots and
sell in small amounts. Maybe someone can do this for good of mankind :-)..

One or two lots in US and EU will help everyone.

At 02-02-19, you wrote:
sorry for wrong typing Raj sir.

regards
sarma
vu3zmv


Re: SMD inductors

 

sorry for wrong typing Raj sir.

regards
sarma
vu3zmv
?


Re: SMD inductors

 

I can't buy that large quantity? as it is not edible item. we cant use . But this is supposedly the part that RaAJ used.



On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 11:12 AM Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@...> wrote:
0603 does not work.

At 01-02-19, you wrote:
>Can someone help me with the part number and supplier ( UK ) for the 680nH smd inductors used to replace L5 and L7.
>
>Just found some on Digikey but they were very small (0603) and they wanted ?12 for shipping!
>
>Peter G8FWY.





Re: uBitX PTT cycling

 

If the circuit board design includes a really solid ground layer(s) and lots of via connections to them should work better with plastic cases. In the case of the uBITX, with likely circulating ground loops from the finals, the power connector, some of the IF chain, and to other parts of the board, bolting the four corners of the board, the antenna connector and such to a good ground plane like a metal case may help. A metal case may make the radio get along with the other transmitters in your shack; especially if they are high power. [although the recent fixes show that ground loops are not a major contributor to the spurs].

Speaking of copper tape. I ordered a roll and generally like it. It is handy for creating big ground islands on prototype boards as well as shielding. However, the claim that the adhesive is conductive was bogus. I cut a hole in a piece of paper and stuck one layer of copper tape to another. The hole in the paper made sure the edges of the top layer of copper tape did not make contact with the bottom layer it was stuck to. I could not measure any conductivity between the layers.

If you stick one layer over another and let the edges touch the bottom layer, a connection may be made where the rough edge of the top layer presses against the bottom layer. So, I solder the edges at multiple points to assure a reliable connection where the tape joins together.?

Tom, wb6b


Re: Spurs/Harmonics fixes for v4 based on v5 board design?

 

What inductors did you use, please share a pic.

There is always a carrier leak at 12Mhz and 12-7 = ~5 Mhz could be what you see.

Most spurs are created by the harmonics of the carrier feeding back to the first BiDi amp. Changing to Axicom relays
eliminates a lot of these dancing dervishes.

Raj

At 02-02-19, you wrote:
Thanks I'll try the two tone test next. Tonight I replaced L5 and L7 Raj's fix to see if I noticed any differences. Using LSB on 7.15 into 40db attenuator get-55db main signal and I see some sort of spur at around 5MHZ that is about -85db, doesn't fluctate with voice it's constant when I key the transmitter. Wonder what could be producing around 5 MHZ.

I wonder if the v5 board redesign changes next might help. Might see if I can figure out where on the board that could be introduced.


Re: Spurs/Harmonics fixes for v4 based on v5 board design?

 

Thanks I'll try the two tone test next.? Tonight I replaced L5 and L7 Raj's fix to see if I noticed any differences.? Using LSB on 7.15 into 40db attenuator get-55db main signal and I see some sort of spur at around 5MHZ that is about -85db, doesn't fluctate with voice it's constant when I key the transmitter.? Wonder what could be producing around 5 MHZ.

?I wonder if the v5 board redesign changes next might help.? ?Might see if I can figure out where on the board that could be introduced.


On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 03:02 PM, Evan Hand wrote:
I did not measure with no sound, as that should be almost 43 db down already (no audio).? At that low of a level you may see things relative to the carrier that leaks through.? I would not expect to see harmonics.? Wonder if the BFO is off so that the crystal filter is not removing the BFO that becomes the "carrier"??

Can you do the test with a dual tone input to the mic?? There is a simple PC 2 tone generator that you can use through the mic to run the test:?


I did a quick test that way before I completed the 2 tone audio circuit from Peter Rachow, DK7IH.

Ran it with a 9v battery.??



Not Pretty, but it works

I also used the "multi tone" setting on my Koolertron signal generator and got the same general results.

To be able to keep the transmitter on, I added a slide switch to the tone board and connected through the 3.5mm plug to the PTT and the tone out to the mic input on the ubitx.? I was careful and monitored the temps on the finals (they did get warm when I had the audio drive too high).

As I stated in the prior email, I used the CW power output reading on my Nissei SWR/Power meter to set the audio drive to get the same power out.? I had adjusted the two tones relative amplitude to each other using the audio spectrum analyzer program that I listed before.? Would like to know the design value for the audio input of the ubitx, would be easy to set that up with a scope.

Net result is that there is a spur issue, though not high enough, nor on a band that I use.? CW harmonics are out of compliance, however there were not above the -43db with the two tone input.? Became just as bad if audio drive was increased to an above CW power level (8.5 watts for me on 40 meters with 13.5 volts to PA only, 12v to rest of rig)

Still learning how to use the tools.? Not exactly as I expected, need to adapt to what is available.? Still think a Siglent or Rigol is in my future shack.

Waiting on the QSX to become available to do comparison testing.

Above are my interpretations of my experiences.? Yours may differ
73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: uBitX PTT cycling

 

At 02-02-19, you wrote:
Plastic cases and RF do NOT Go together. Have you ever seen a radio in a plastic case?
Yes, many!

FT747 is in a plastic case. All my "radios" are in plastic cases! :-))


Re: SMD inductors

 

0603 does not work.

At 01-02-19, you wrote:
Can someone help me with the part number and supplier ( UK ) for the 680nH smd inductors used to replace L5 and L7.

Just found some on Digikey but they were very small (0603) and they wanted ??12 for shipping!

Peter G8FWY.