Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Spectrum purity of uBITX and BIT40
Simon
Dec 2???#62208??
Seem to hear that self build, home brew is more relax under fcc laws than mass production factroy machine, to allow progress
in test, training, education, etc., in principle.? ? NO.? The rules for factory and HB are the same.? They are not hard to meet but reasonable attempts to meet them are expected. So far the relay is not the improved one.? Its not one its four and they are a pain to extract.?? Some people have built the uBitx as a ground up project using a self designed board or ugly (Manhattan, dead-bug style) on a sheet of copper clad as a ground surface and the general result is much better.? Layout is everything. Allison |
|||||||||
Re: Totally Absurd -- Farhan being questioned in a police station about doctored sat picture
Laurence Oberman
Ashar
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Mazeltov on the awesome satellite work Regards 73 Laurence Oberman On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:42 AM Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||
Re: uBITX - Limiting power output
Charles French,
One way to find out... try it.? However use a good pot.? The shields go to one end of the resistor and not to any ground near the pot and both shields are used at ground where the pot was on the board.? Short leads and good lead dress keeping the two shielded wires away from the board. The likely problem is RF feedback and oscillation Me I'd dial it down as the sweet spot for passably decent IMD was found to be around 2W anyway (for 80/40/20). The current home brew radio I use with the 1208 is designed for it and the internal attenuator was dialed down to 3db so all I needed the radio to deliver was about 3mW! Its dedicated to the 1208.? Why?? Running the transverter and developing power to dump in resistors?resulted in a power hungry system (nearly 40W in for about 10 out).? Doing a TRX specifically for that lowered that to less than 26W (at 11W out) making it far more battery friendly. Over the years I had my first Hb 20mSSB (3.5-4W),? WM20 (about 3w), and a TT505 Argonaut (about 5W)? and all of them at one point or another drove the 1208 until I built a low low power radio as a driver.? ?It iss a fun backup to my HF-6M (Eagle) and TT526 6n2 and five HB 6M monoband radios. Allison |
|||||||||
Re: uBitx Function Button ERROR
I had removed the "Extra" purple wire that is an ADC input often used for an S meter.? I assume that you have a v3 or v4 ubitx (I have the version 4).? You explained in one of your posts that the problem goes away when you ground the output connector on the uBitx with your hand.? That is pointing to the RF coming back on the shield of the coax.? Do you have a 1:1 balun on the dipole?? If not, again I would look to grounding and adding the balun.? MFJ or others make both baluns and full cut antennas.
Have you tried grounding the case? If problems persist, I would also look at adding ferrites on the control lines from the encoder to the Raduino board.? That was one of the things I tried, again, helped but the grounding and ferrites on the feed to the antenna were the things that solved it for me. I would also verify that you are not over driving the audio: I could reduce the problem by lowering my mic gain.? This also reduces the power out, so may be just a function of the correct frequency and power getting back to the nano. Since all was well with the plastic case, I am still leaning towards the RF coming back down the coax brain, and surrounding the nano.? If there is unbalanced RF on the braid, putting the uBitx in case that is not grounded may not have helped. From another post:
?
?
?
?
?
I had the same issue, however on 20m.? Traced it to rf riding the coax braid back from an off center fed dipole (MFJ-2010).? Solved it by grounding the shield before the radio, and placing a ferrite snap on core over the coax (RG8x) between the ground point and the connection to the radio.
?
Tried the ground only first, and it helped (could raise the power out to 6 watts), then added the ferrite to get it back to peak at 14 watts without causing the menu selection.? I did not have any issues on 40m.
?
My setup (using RG8x, PL259 connectors and PL259 Lightning arrester for grounding) is:
?
uBitx ======== SWR/PWR Mtr== Arrester ======== OCFD
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ^? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?^
? ? ? ? ? ? Ferrite? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Ground (water pipe in basement)
?
Hope that helps.
?
Evan
AC9TU
|
|||||||||
Re: uBitx Function Button ERROR
RF pickup is a bit unpredictable. Long wire, more pickup
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
ONLY if they use ADC in way I described as no push button board circuit on web. Then, 0.1uF on ADC line and a good grounding point, short leads on the Arduino board ADC is mega ohm high impedence input. Can add from push button long line 10k ohm series 0.1 uF to ground On 12/4/18, Daniel <gonewiththeego@...> wrote:
Hi, and thanks for the informations. I would like to say that my antenna is |
|||||||||
Re: Totally Absurd -- Farhan being questioned in a police station about doctored sat picture
Guys, It has blown over. Thanks for all the concern. 73, f On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, 12:53 iz oos <and2oosiz2@... wrote:
|
|||||||||
Re: uBitx Function Button ERROR
Hi, and thanks for the informations. I would like to say that my antenna is an attic dipole for 40m and I use 50 ohms coax. What I didn't said in the beginning is that I disconnected the display and I used some wires to connect it to the Raduino. But the Raduino itself is still in the original socket. Can it be this happening because of the display wires ? And somebody mentioned above about a capacitor of 0.1uF in the ADC line... should I put this in paralel or in series with ADC line??
|
|||||||||
Q&A: spur at 12Mhz
How big is it? What are the suggested solutions? An effective solution could be adding an external 1/4 wave open stub cut for 12mhz made with reasonably low loss cable. In practice it would consist of adding a Tee connector and a piece (13.5feet) of RG213. It might alter SWR somehow differently across the bands but in case one uses a tuner it should not be a big problem. It might attenuate by some pinnuts the output power. |
|||||||||
Re: Spectrum purity of uBITX and BIT40
A two tone test will check for IMD (intermodulation distortion, google it!).
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It does not check for spurs or harmonics, which are the primary issues with the stock uBitx. IMD can make your signal sound bad, and cause interference to those operating nearby on frequency. If you have bad IMD, you will probably be told about it. The stock uBitx with the mike gain set to a reasonable level will have enough IMD to be slightly alarming when looking for it with a spectrum analyzer. But the IMD products are way down (50dB or so) once you get a couple khz away.? And thus it's a legal transmission anywhere AM phone is legal (at least with respect to IMD). When transmitting at 5 or 10 watts, the IMD is probably not perceptible to someone using an adjacent channel. If you have bad spurs and/or harmonics, you will be interfering with operations on totally different frequencies. For example, when operating at 28mhz, there's a? spur at 45mhz-28mhz=17mhz. This particular spur is due to the 2*45mhz second harmonic of the first IF? mixing with the high side clk2 VFO.? The VFO is always at 45mhz+DialFreq. In this case, the spur is at? 2*45mhz - (45mhz+28mhz) = 45mhz - 28mhz = 17mhz.? We also have a spur at 12mhz, due to crosstalk within the si5351? from the BFO at clk0 into the VFO at clk2.? This 12mhz energy on clk2 goes through the mixer at T2 unmolested, and continues on through the transmit power amp and the transmit low pass filters. Harmonics are simple integer multiples of the operating frequency. For example, when operating at 7mhz, we get harmonics at 2*7=14mhz and 3*7=21mhz. The transmit low pass filters at L11 through L22 should take these harmonics out, but the stock uBitx relays (and to some extent, the board placement and routing)? allow the harmonics to sneak past the low pass filter. Also, for various reasons, we have some carrier leakage, though not too bad. This results in a not quite suppressed carrier riding along with our SSB signal, sort of like an AM phone signal.? Not really much of an issue at 5 or 10 watts, but it does make our signal a bit wider than it should be. Spurs, harmonics, IMD, and residual carrier are why you should think twice before?adding a linear amp to the uBitx. Like any rig without ALC (automatic level control), increasing the mike gain too much (or shouting into the mike) will result in IMD. The Bitx40 has a much easier job with respect to spurs and harmonics.?? There is a 7mhz bandpass filter before the transmit power amp, which knocks out all those spurs. And with only one transmit low pass filter there is?no easy path for harmonics to leak out. With too much mike gain it will have IMD, and there is some carrier leakage, but these are relatively minor issues. Jerry, KE7ER On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 09:27 PM, Wayne Leake wrote:
?I notice that nobody mentions the best way to check an SSB outgoing signal. |
|||||||||
Re: uBITX V4.3
Jack Purdum
Who's code are you trying to download: the stock code from HF Signals or Dr. Lee's code? Jack, W8TEE
On Monday, December 3, 2018, 10:08:22 AM EST, MONEYSMITH <w4nfr@...> wrote:
I AM VERY NEW TO THIS. I DO HAVE A WORKING uBITX HF RADIO TRANSCEIVER. I DO NOT KNOW MUCH ABOUT PROGRAMMING.? I HAVE A QUESTION. HOW DO I GET THE FILE OR FILES TO DECODE THE MD AND UCO FILE EXTENSIONS? I NEED TO KNOW THIS AND WHICH FILES ACTUALLY GET DOWN LOADED TO THE NANO? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. |
|||||||||
uBITX V4.3
I AM VERY NEW TO THIS. I DO HAVE A WORKING uBITX HF RADIO TRANSCEIVER.
I DO NOT KNOW MUCH ABOUT PROGRAMMING.? I HAVE A QUESTION. HOW DO I GET THE FILE OR FILES TO DECODE THE MD AND UCO FILE EXTENSIONS? I NEED TO KNOW THIS AND WHICH FILES ACTUALLY GET DOWN LOADED TO THE NANO? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. |
|||||||||
Re: Bitx40 - Not Transmitting
#bitx40
#bitx40help
The problem is with your Mic connection!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Raj At 03/12/2018, you wrote:
I have a Bitx40 which was built from the kit and has been functioning rather well. |
|||||||||
Bitx40 - Not Transmitting
#bitx40
#bitx40help
I have a Bitx40 which was built from the kit and has been functioning rather well.
For no apparent reason the TX seems to have a problem (no TX) I connected a RF meter to the radio and noted that when I key the mike the needle jumps and straight back down. This indicated to me that some TX power has been supplied but not continuious. Subsiquent keying of the ptt do not have any affect I have changed the Mike , incase it was faulty. (and whistled in it too) I also have a spare main board and I replaced it, with the problem persisting. Any ideas on what further I can troubleshoot or test |
|||||||||
Re: Power for continuous digimode
With standard gain settings I would not suggest it stock on FT8 which is a 50% run time.
With a small fan blowing over the stock heatsinks the output transistors get hot on FT8 after 8 cycles I have two ubitx and it takes a minimum of about a 2x sized from normal heat sink and small fan The easiest test is to put your finger against the transistor after running it. That said I have about 3-4x heat sinks and a ducted fan over the finals on my other ubitx and run 20 volts through the finals without any heating of the transistors. Well I am sure that there is heat but it is being dissipated It shows 20 watts power output on a mfj meter. On FT8 the digital power level control works pretty good for controlling the final modulation. Antenna matching is real important too. Even a 1.4:1 makes a difference in heating. |
|||||||||
Re: Totally Absurd -- Farhan being questioned in a police station about doctored sat picture
Happens in every country. However if you feel hurt and you are convinced they did not act properly you may have the possibility to report this to other departments so they may see to investigate internally. Keep calm and ... them politely! Il 03/dic/2018 07:52, "Wayne Leake" <wayneleake@...> ha scritto:
|
|||||||||
Re: Spectrum purity of uBITX and BIT40
Warren discussed this in detail. TX IMD are quite bad, however it does not sound bad at all. Keep in mind it splatters if you shout into the mike. I will try the VOGAD add on, at least it should deliver an almost constant mic input. Il 03/dic/2018 06:27, "Wayne Leake" <wayneleake@...> ha scritto:
|