¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: si5351 crosstalk #radiuno

 

Hi Allison,?

would you be willing to try your load testing again, with the Si5351a driving a set of high impedance loads? say something perhaps 10k Ohms or higher.?

-Justin N2TOH?

P.S. I'd like to see what the Si5351a would do driving the crystal tube oscillators in the Heathkit SB/HW101 series rigs.?


Re: Antenna Loops #off_topic

 

David

A copy of your post to the uBITX group has been forwarded to the [email protected]?discussion group.??
This group was formed to move the long and multiple off-topic posts, mostly about EFHW antennas,? to a
place where antennas would be?more on-topic.? If not already on that group you can join at
and post to [email protected]?.

Arv? K7HKL
_._


Re: uBitx Antenna #ubitx-help

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I¡¯m using one there is almost identical to the one he suggested. ?Works fine all bands as far as I can tell. ?I have used boatloads of different ones throughout the years


Those that use toroids (instead of the old parallel lines) probably use this basic circuit:


You can tell the ones that use the parallel transmission line pick ups: they are longer. ? Those with a toroids ?can be more square shaped boxes

I¡¯ve used them both, they all work

Cheers?
Gordon



On Sep 9, 2018, at 12:52, Arv Evans <arvid.evans@...> wrote:

Output of the uBITX is 50 ohms.? Your CB SWR meter should work for the upper end of?
HF range (20M through 10M) and maybe acceptably good for 80M through 10M.? Many?
of those old CB SWR meters were just copies of ham radio SWR meters of the era.??

If the CB SWR meter is not performing well, it does provide a case, meter, and knob to?
use in building a more modern bridge type SWR and power meter.

Arv
_._

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 1:12 AM, <gonewiththeego@...> wrote:
Thank you very much for your nice "Welcome aboard", indeed I appreciate all of the answers above and I'm pretty sure that this topic will have some "echo" throughout community. These are maybe the most common questions asked by those with just the license of operation in hand and a few basic knowledge of electronics. I can't wait to see the uBitx on my desk. Meanwhile, I can't find some genuine information about the output impedance of the uBitx itself. Is it 50 ohms ? Gordon Gibby previously sugested that a CB SWR-Meter will do the job on HF also. I found one but it's rated to 11m band only, or at least that's what on the label. Can someone tell me what can go wrong it I start using it ? And by experiment, does anyone know how much SWR can uBitx handle without permanent damage?



Re: Simple spur fix

Warren Allgyer
 

Allsison

9 x 50 = 450
12 x 50 = 600

12(impedance ratio)^0.5 = 3.5(turns ratio)
3.5 x 2 = 7 for integer turns
7 turn primary + 2 turn secondary = 9 turns total. 9 turns is compatible with BN-2402 cores both from the standpoint of fitting onto the core at a reasonable wire size (#30) and is also compatible, although not optimum, for 45 MHz transformer operation. Other mixes would be better but the net effect of a non-optimal mix is loss and response curve and neither of these for Type 43 material is an issue in this implementation.

It is not clear to me what advantage a 9:1 transformer would have over what I have advocated and tested. It certainly would not present a better match.

What did I miss?

WA8TOD


Re: uBitx Antenna #ubitx-help

 

Output of the uBITX is 50 ohms.? Your CB SWR meter should work for the upper end of?
HF range (20M through 10M) and maybe acceptably good for 80M through 10M.? Many?
of those old CB SWR meters were just copies of ham radio SWR meters of the era.??

If the CB SWR meter is not performing well, it does provide a case, meter, and knob to?
use in building a more modern bridge type SWR and power meter.

Arv
_._

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 1:12 AM, <gonewiththeego@...> wrote:
Thank you very much for your nice "Welcome aboard", indeed I appreciate all of the answers above and I'm pretty sure that this topic will have some "echo" throughout community. These are maybe the most common questions asked by those with just the license of operation in hand and a few basic knowledge of electronics. I can't wait to see the uBitx on my desk. Meanwhile, I can't find some genuine information about the output impedance of the uBitx itself. Is it 50 ohms ? Gordon Gibby previously sugested that a CB SWR-Meter will do the job on HF also. I found one but it's rated to 11m band only, or at least that's what on the label. Can someone tell me what can go wrong it I start using it ? And by experiment, does anyone know how much SWR can uBitx handle without permanent damage?



Re: Simple spur fix

 

Paralleling filters is not a safe thing to do.? Many too many unpredictable things happen.

Also the filter impedance is around 500-650 ohms.??

A 9:1 impedance transformer would get you close and efficiently.? Next integer version is 16:1.
A 9:1 would be close enough for low loss (under 1.5db for two using 61 material).
An L network works easier.

Allison


Re: More PA Putzing ..

 

Arv,

Its not DC resistance its RF resistance and RF inductance.? Flat conductors are?
better for the latter and need to be wider for the former.? That is the wires with RF.
The grounds are to the plane under the amp through a few tiny holes.

Also look at the routing, not at all pretty at even low VHF.

Allison


Re: More PA Putzing ..

 

Re Jerry ..Donno... need to start making some transconductance measurements too anyway ?? I was looking at the gate voltage on the mosfets ..4 V at 100 ma bias ...More swing that +/- 4 volts and distortion rears its ugly head (more like 3 volts, but who's counting?

Jim,

Also the transconductance of the mosfets is around .2 S? fairly high.? You need to bias for about 100-300ma per device
and the Drain load must be low enough to stay on the load line for the device.? Keep in mind from about 2 to 6V gate voltage
you see at DC near 0 current to over 4A so it not like you need more than a volt maybe 2 P-P especially push pull.? That
requires a load at the output that does not allow the drain to swing to zero or 12V at full power out (linear load line).? To
get that?we need a low impedance load and translation to 50 ohms.? Typical load say 25 ohms and 20V PP swing
[why not 24V?? Never go to zero or max V saturation or voltage clipping.] barely?nets 10-11W. We move lower to
about 12.5ohms and we get 22w but we are still near saturation but at 10W we are not and the result is much
cleaner.? So we need to develop power from the mosfet with minimal gate swing and maximum safe drain
current.? Both happen with about 2A drain current and conditions that keep the gate at less than 4V peak
(at the device.).? ?For push pull that means each mosfet can go to near zero current point (best not to for IMD)
but not near the power supply max (also IMD).? Its also why parallel internal architecture hexfet, LDmos, Vmos,
Tmos] or hybrids of multiple discrete are used.? IRF510 is hexfet, essentially many parallel little MOSfets in parallel.

MOSFET is a voltage controlled current generator.? That's the general model where the current is Vgs* GM.

So when I see people getting high power I know one of two things either they have transformer loading the
drains to under 15ohms or they clipping heavily.? The IRF510 (is not alone with this) however runs better
at 20-28V where much more power is possible without exceeding peak current.? FYI the current stock
transformer barely has the drains Push-pull at 50 ohms which is way too high.? It should be a 2:3?
[maybe 4:6 turns] where 2:3 ratio nets about 22ohm drain load and it likely to have a chance at
10W IMD?being acceptable at 12V.??

Back of the napkin for current stock transformer is 50ohms and we push to the edge at 12V
(22V P-P) and we get... 9.68W peak (6.7rms)!? ? Its ohms law, power law, and that simple.
More than that it will be very unclean.

Things you have to do to generate /clean/ power.


Allison




Surprised by generous and kind act #bitx40

 

Today I was greatly and pleasantly surprised.? I'd mentioned that I was thinking about converting my BITX20 to 40 meters, and I'd related some stories of frustration with the local ham community (generosity and willingness to help others seems to be a rarity in this area).

When I got our mail, there was a package in it - with a BITX40!? The housing it was in is very attractive as far as my wife and I are concerned - and perfect for our car.? The neat part was that you could see the circuitry in it - and the case also would lend itself to portable operation!

I won't embarrass the sender, but I will say it came from another state.? For many years, I've insisted that there was no such thing as Karma... but this suggests otherwise!

To the sender (not named) - a big Thank you! from both of us, and (laugh) no worry about "paying forward" - we do things all the time like that, whenever we can (we may not have much money, but we do have skills and knowledge we share).? Generosity and helping others is not a big price for gifts like this - in our opinion!


Re: More PA Putzing ..

 

Allison

can the "wimpy ground paths" part be helped by overlaying fairly heavy wires in?
parallel with existing wimpy grounds?

Arv
_._


On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:06 AM, ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...> wrote:
Jim,

Yes the big thing is developing a voltage across the capacitive gate, takes power to do that.
Also the impedance of the source (driver) has to be low at low HF as at 3mhz the gate looks
like about 220ohms reactive with whatever resistive values are applied across that.
At 30mhz its 22 ohms plus that same set if Rs and Ls.? A crappy driver can push 3mhz
but at 30 the layout and current for less than 22 ohms becomes significant.

FYI I have 4 of the the QSX amps and several I've built proving flat to 30mhz or beyond
with IRF510 is very doable.? However the board layout has to look like a VHF layout not
long thin traces with wimpy ground paths.? Also the drivers have to be able to push a
bit of power optimally about a watt.? While delivering the same gain at 3 and 30mhz.

All the at is to help you understand why it doesn't.? IF you fix drivers,, transformers,
and biasing, your still stuck with board layout.? That not to say it can't be improved greatly.
Work I did said 10-12W at 80m and 5W at 10M is very doable but to take advanage of
that you have to clean? up spurs and low pass at a minimum.

The problem was I was peeling a very pungent onion.

Allison



Re: More PA Putzing ..

 

Jim,

Yes the big thing is developing a voltage across the capacitive gate, takes power to do that.
Also the impedance of the source (driver) has to be low at low HF as at 3mhz the gate looks
like about 220ohms reactive with whatever resistive values are applied across that.
At 30mhz its 22 ohms plus that same set if Rs and Ls.? A crappy driver can push 3mhz
but at 30 the layout and current for less than 22 ohms becomes significant.

FYI I have 4 of the the QSX amps and several I've built proving flat to 30mhz or beyond
with IRF510 is very doable.? However the board layout has to look like a VHF layout not
long thin traces with wimpy ground paths.? Also the drivers have to be able to push a
bit of power optimally about a watt.? While delivering the same gain at 3 and 30mhz.

All the at is to help you understand why it doesn't.? IF you fix drivers,, transformers,
and biasing, your still stuck with board layout.? That not to say it can't be improved greatly.
Work I did said 10-12W at 80m and 5W at 10M is very doable but to take advanage of
that you have to clean? up spurs and low pass at a minimum.

The problem was I was peeling a very pungent onion.

Allison


Antenna Loops #off_topic

 

There have been many posts regarding end fed?antennas. I hope these posts were helpful.?

My favorite portable antenna are?various loops, either full-wave?loops,?quads, or Miniature Magnetic Loop Antennas. Why do I like loops:

  1. Because they are a closed circuit resulting in very low noise, far less than a dipole, verticle, or end-fed wire (NOTE: You can't work what you can't hear)
  2. Because the can be polarized vertically for low-angle radiation, horizontally, or even a hybrid of these
  3. Because they are easy to build and match to a 50-ohm coax
But for portable operation, nothing beats a Minature Magnetic Loop antenna. This is because it is light-weight, directional, and can literally sit on the ground and still work perfectly well!

I wrote an article about Miniature Magnetic Loop Antennas for the Elecraft.com team way back in 1999 when they were not yet so popular (i.e., I was a builder of the early K2 and beta tester for the 100 watt?linear). Check it out at?. You can build these antennas with materials from any home improvement store. I hope they inspire some antenna building from among the uBitx?building family.

David Posthuma, WD8PUO


Re: uBitx Antenna #ubitx-help

Richard Chan
 

I appreciate all the support I have received and thanks. I will work on some of these but the whip antenna will not work I'll the magnetic loop antenna.?
Thanks for sharing.

Richard Chan?

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 9:24 AM Warren Allgyer, <allgyer@...> wrote:
Daniel

You are receiving varied and solid advice in answer to your antenna question and I hope it helps.

Aside from that, as a new ham, I urge you to read through this board and be sure you understand some of the issues with the uBitx as it is delivered before you put it on the air. If you choose to go ahead and use the unmodified radio on the air, and many have and continue to do so, at least be sure you understand the ramifications of that decision.

Please ask questions on anything you do not understand and you will get immediate and enthusiastic response. Welcome to our hobby.

WA8TOD


Re: Lcd nextion generating qrm

 

with 5 ohms and with 100 brightness level , is there no qrm, Junior !!!\
?Congrats.
sarma
?vu3zmv


On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:44 PM J¨²nior PY2ADA via Groups.Io <aaj280174=[email protected]> wrote:

The nextion 2.8 "display is generating qrm, when I adjust the brightness control to less than 100 I have qrm at the reception, if it is 100 without problems. I installed a 5 ohm resistor in series with the power of the display, it was nice the brightness of the lcd.

?

73 de J¨²nior


Lcd nextion generating qrm

 

The nextion 2.8 "display is generating qrm, when I adjust the brightness control to less than 100 I have qrm at the reception, if it is 100 without problems. I installed a 5 ohm resistor in series with the power of the display, it was nice the brightness of the lcd.

?

73 de J¨²nior


Re: More PA Putzing ..

jim
 

Yep?? all true ... minor circuit/device constraints

Jim


On Sunday, September 9, 2018, 6:30:33 AM PDT, ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...> wrote:


jim,

input C for irf510 is in the 150-180pf range, drain to gate about 20pf.

Classic case for Triode miller effect.? Feed impendance must be low of you get the?
output voltage divided across the input 20pf and 180pf as negative feedback.
You seen this will all mosfets only the degree of it varies.

FYI the drain to gate C varies with DC drain voltage for all mosfets.

The circuit for the driver has issues:
Output impedance is not constant or low enough.
The stage voltage saturates (high emitter resistor)?
THe stage current limits due to high Collector L(transformer).
The 3904s loose gain with increasing frequency.

Allison


Re: Simple spur fix

Warren Allgyer
 

And a correction to clear up any confusion: I wrote: " Clearly we need these transformers to be impedance matched in the circuit." It should have read: "Clearly we need these FILTERS to be impedance matched in the circuit". Wish I could blame autocorrect but it was lack of proofreading.

WA8TOD


Re: Simple spur fix

Warren Allgyer
 

John

It is 7:2 or a 3.5:1 ratio. The impedance ration is the square of the turns ratio.

I honestly don't know the answer to your question about paralleling filters. I guess you could try it..... but some bad karma and icky things might result. I would have to test it to be sure. If you are going to use a transformer anyway I would just adjust the turns ratio and use one.

WA8TOD


Re: Simple spur fix

 

I don't think paralleling the filters will impact the nominal input
impedance of each filter.

If you have a SA and have something to generate a 45Mhz signal you
could sweep the filters in parallel and see what it does.

tim ab0wr

On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 12:41:16 -0700
"John KC9OJV" <greusel@...> wrote:

I rolled the dice on a pair of filters and received Toyocom 45E1A9Fs
which show up here
as
two pole filters at 1200 ohm termination impedance. If I parallel
those will I bring that impedance down to 600 and should that be a
goal? Should I try both in parallel? I do have a modest spectrum
analyzer to take a look at the results with.

John
KC9OJV



Re: Simple spur fix

 

Should the pad after the balanced modulator be changed to add more loss?
That should be easy to do.

tim ab0wr

On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 12:39:46 -0700
"ajparent1/KB1GMX" <kb1gmx@...> wrote:

Warren,

1) 120 mVrms is far above the audio level that caused unacceptable
IMD before the filter mod. IMD must be checked and the audio levels
adjusted to make it acceptable.
The problem is the balanced mod easily takes that but the gain after
it means the 2nd mixer gets hit with a very high level.? With that
the output of that mixer is high and that leads to the next mixer
getting overloaded.? There is too much gain after the balanced mod.
This is why the balanced mod needs such a low input.

Allison