¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Harmonics measured by Warren. How bad?

 

Interesting...I researched the Industry Canada documents this morning, and could not find any actual numbers for harmonics and spurious as applied to amateur radio. BASIC license holders are not allowed to home brew, except from a kit, and all I could find was 'must not cause harmful interference'. So I wonder were that leaves us Advanced guys with respect to home brew stuff? Any other VE hams want to weigh in?


Re: kd8cec sketch

 

Hi,

I compiled and installed the software on my Linux computer. I just followed the directions and corrected a couple of typos along the way.

73,

Bill KU8H

On 08/27/2018 10:39 AM, Dennis Yancey wrote:
It works fine in Linux for me.

--
72 and God bless
KD4EPG
--
bark less - wag more


Re: Keyer

 

What is the issue you're having? I'm guessing it's not working. From your description it seems like you have it wired up in the right way.

First, I would verify the paddle is mechanically functioning by verifying connectivity through the jack, i.e. one side of the paddle connects the "dit" terminal on the jack to ground and vice versa for "dah".

Once that is verified, I would make sure that the ground pin of the jack is connected to the raduino ground. I had a similar problem. If you don't ground the jack the bottom of the voltage divider used to determine whether the paddle has been keyed is floating. If this is the case (enclosure pun intended), when you key either side of the paddle nothing will happen.

Reversing the resistors will only swap dit for dah.


Keyer

Bill Robbins
 

I have Sunil's case with the front panel board.? The 4.7K resister is included on that? board.? I fashioned a plug/cable with the other two resistors as part of it.

I have the KD8CEC software installed on the uBitx v4.? I'm fairly certain of the wiring, but also reversed the leads on the key just to be sure.?? Also, I have been in the software
and changed the setting from straight key to to paddle.

What am I missing???

Bill
WA8CDU


Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX #ubitx

 

Jim,?
think about feeding it with ladder line into the balanced wire input to your tuner. Read ARRL antenna book chapt 7, pgs 1-3...?
--
72 and God bless
KD4EPG


Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX #ubitx

 

Those that missed out on the previous posts of this epic thread
might look over this one:? ??/g/BITX20/message/55641

My conclusion (opinions vary):
With careful design and perhaps a little blind luck, it is possible to build
an untuned impedance transformer for an EFHW?that works well from 3.5mhz to 30mhz.

With even more luck, this won't kick off another 340 posts here.
If you want to argue about it, perhaps a brief response here with a pointer into
another group that was created to deal with this thread:? ??/g/antennas?
Specifically, to topic??/g/antennas/topic/end_fed_wires/24160941

Jerry, KE7ER


On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 06:55 PM, Chuck, N1KGY wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:24 AM, iz oos wrote:
I would use ferrites with permeability close to 800, not the powdered iron toroids like the red and the yellow you have selected (permeability is less than 10).
For a parallel-resonant transformer, we don't want an excessively high permeability; what we want is the core material which will provide the highest Q at the frequency(ies) of interest.? The high-side winding impedance should present a reactance which is near the geometric mean (gm) between the 50 Ohm input and the? Antenna's feed impedance at its end (1500~4500 Ohms).? A 49:1 impedance transformation (7:1 turns ratio) presents a nominal impedance at the antenna terminals of 2450 Ohms as has been previously stated, and for this case the gm is ~350 ohms.? The reactance of the coil in the parallel circuit should be equal to the gm on the lower/lowest band of intended use -

I.E. a T80-2 (red) toroid with 36 turns #24 = 7.13uH.? The reactance at 7.0Mhz is ~315 ohms... close enough for our purpose.? On 40 meters a capacitance of between 65pF and 75pF will resonate the matching unit across the band, assuming the antenna wire is resonant (presents zero reactance) at ~7.100Mhz.
On 30 Meters, the same coil will present an inductive reactance of ~450 ohms, and require 32~38pF of capacitance to resonate the system, assuming the wire is resonant (again, zero reactance point) within the 10,100 ~ 10,150Mhz band.
So, a single -Resonant- EFHW tuner can be used (with separate, resonant antenna wires) on two adjacent amateur bands, I.E. 40 & 30 Meters.

On 20 Meters, the reactance of the coil is on the order of 630 ohms and required capacitance on the order of 18pF, and both of these figures present difficulties in actual implementation.? In the first issue, a gm of 630 Ohms suggests an antenna impedance of well over 6000 Ohms, which is un-achievable in nearly all terrestrial environments; the second issue is that the 18pF figure is inclusive of stray capacitance, which may be 10pF (or more) depending on materials and physical construction...? this will make tuning on 20M very sharp, and offer only a very limited tuning range because the minimum capacitance of the variable capacitor may well be equal to the capacitance necessary to resonate the antenna system.

Having two separate [switched] coils makes it possible to cover 4 or 5 bands with a single matching unit - 40/30 Meters on Coil #1, and 20/17/15 Meters on Coil #2.? Two wires will? cover four bands: A) 40/20 Meters, and B) 30/15 Meters...? a third wire is required for 17 Meters, if desired.

The gm for 40 & 30 Meters is 8.33Mhz, so the T80-2 coil should have a reactance of 350 ohms at this frequency; which is 35 turns on a T80-2 toroid.? The total capacitance necessary to resonate the system at 7.0Mhz will be in the range of 70~80pF, and at 10.12Mhz will require 30~40pF to resonate the system, minus whatever stray capacitance is present.

The gm for 20~15 Meters is ~17.52Mhz, so the T80-6 coil should have a reactance of 350 ohms at this frequency; which is 27 turns on a T80-6 toroid.? The total capacitance necessary to resonate the system at 14.0Mhz will be in the range of 36~44pF, at 18.13Mhz in the range of 20~28pF, and 15~20pF at 21Mhz, minus whatever stray capacitance is present.? The 15pF figure at 21Mhz is very low, indicating that tuning on 15 Meters will be rather sharp, that tuning range may be limited, and that efficiency will be a bit lower on 15 Meters (depending on both stray capacitance and stray inductance in the actual construction).


Re: Encoder Behavior

 

I had exactly the same issue on a raduino signal generator project...using a cheap encoder with detents.


Re: kd8cec sketch

 

It works fine in Linux for me.

--
72 and God bless
KD4EPG


Re: Encoder Behavior

 

The stock encoder doesn¡¯t have detents. Try one without the detents.?
--
72 and God bless
KD4EPG


Re: Harmonics measured by Warren. How bad?

 

Thanks Gordon
Exactly what I was looking for, and validates my circuit and calculations.


Re: Raduino Pill

 

Made some progress on this. The board is now alive. The LCD and encoder sections are functioning. Testing the Si5351 is next, then see if I can convert uBitX20 firmware to run on it.



Joe


Re: 4000 mile phone qso on 20m

 

These days what changes is the number of qsos you can do with a qrp and an ordinary 100watts trx. With a better propagation this 'spread' would be much reduced.


Il 27/ago/2018 15:20, <davesters@...> ha scritto:
I didn't realize that the band is good enough these days to go that low.


Re: 4000 mile phone qso on 20m

 

I didn't realize that the band is good enough these days to go that low.


Re: Right-sided relay harmonic attempted fix for v3/4 ubitx

Gordon Gibby
 

I'm expecting to be able to make real baseline measurements tonight.? ?My receiver (Icom 718) cannot really go past 30 Mhz so I'm restricted to measuring harmonics' strengths below that frequency.??

So here are my plans for measuring.? ?For the 30 meter band, since I'm on dummy loads (no signfiicant radiation) I'm going to sneak slightly UNDER 10 MHz so I can catch the important 3rd harmonic on the ICOM 718:

Fundamental? ?2Har? ? ? ? 3Har? ? ? ? 4Harm? ? ?5Harm? ? ?6Harm? ? ?7Harm
3.505MHz? ? ? ?7.010? ? ? ?15.515? ? 14.020? ? ?175.525? 21.030? ? ?24.535
7.005? ? ? ? ? ? 14.010? ? ? ?21.015? ? 28.020
9.995? ? ? ? ? ? 19.990? ? ? ?29.985
14.005? ? ? ? ? 28.010


Although that doesn't cover all the bands, the problem on the higher bands shifts to spurs, which the Low Pass? Filters aren't as well targeted at --- but hopefully with just these baseline measurements, the proof-of-concept of simple-minded daugherboard addition of a separate relay to avoid relayccontact-to-relaycontact blow-pass will be either proven or disproven.

I had hoped to make these measurements this morning but was not able to get that done? before going back to work.? I have the next several days "off" so this may speed up.??

Cheers,
gordon


Raduino "Clone" kit available from TSW #bitx40 #radiuno #ubitx

 

Since several asked if the Raduino "Clone" board kit available through the "Triumvirate Skonk Worx" (www.w0eb.com) would work with the BITX40, I did a little research and the answer is YES it will.? If someone orders a kit and indicates it's for the BITX40, I will swap out the uBITX's 16 pin, right angle header and supply the 5 pin "Molex Style" polarized plug used with the BITX40 for the clock signals.? One thing to consider, the "Clone" is about 9mm wider than the standard "Factory" Raduino but that should not be a problem,?

The kit comes complete with the Arduino NANO and socket material to allow for mounting it on either the front or back of the card as does the newer factory versions.? (See the website for details)? The kit's construction manual is available on the website for download and covers both versions.

Please contact me through the links on the TSW website for ordering or more information.

Jim Sheldon - W0EB


Re: kd8cec sketch

 

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:26 PM, SV9CVJ Nikos wrote:
You mast have this hex file in your personal folder? UBITX_CEC_V1.097_NX.hex


Re: kd8cec sketch

 

1.? Install Mono on Linux

2.? On terminal type? " avrdude -v -patmega328p -Uflash:w:UBITX_CEC_V1.097_NX.hex:i -carduino -b?? 57600 -P /dev/ttyUSB0 "

3.? Enter


Re: Harmonics measured by Warren. How bad?

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Brent, ? Six, 100,000 ohm resistors in parallel, coming from the dummy load, feeding two, 100 ohm resistors in parallel across a BNC connector.

Approximately 50 DB attenuation. ?

Built it to or. three days ago, working well.?

16 k feeding 50 ohms. ?

Gordon.?


On Aug 27, 2018, at 08:02, ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...> wrote:

Tom,

A L network L first is a low pass.? However most are run at such low loaded
Q they are not very useful for harmonic control.? Typical Q is under 10 and
2 is not uncommon.

Allison


Re: uBITX on CW

Bill Carpenter
 

99% CW on my uBITX.? I have the click and AGC boards installed along with a Hi-Per-Mite outboard filter. Works great.

73, Bill NZ0T


Re: kd8cec sketch

 

I put in a pull request to fix this 4 days ago.? Linux uses a case-sensitive filesystem so you need to change the case.? The case is already correct in ubitx.h.? It is incorrect in?softserial_tiny.cpp.? If you change that 1 letter it should compile for you (it did for me).

https://github.com/phdlee/ubitx/pull/41