Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Power supply question
I agree with your voltages for the discrete devices. |
Re: RF power chain mods and improvements..
Jerry is right.
?
However on design review the reason for that is interesting.
?
Simple answer too much gain in the low level parts of the radio for the TX path.
This is not a requirement of the architecture of the transceiver.? ?Turns out that
loss total is about 18db (two mixers at about 7db each and the filters at about 4db each) so a total of 18+7=25db is exactly what we need. so each stage at about 12.5db is enough, we have easily 35db or more. This is the core of the issue, carrier leakage plus signal at 45mhz?
makes the 45mhz mixer very rich in spurs. unless we keep the levels down.
?
The transmitter has much less need for gain to get clean signals.
If we have too much we end up with the first mixer the modulator leakage
as carrier.? we want as much or that mixer as we can get or about -17dbm?
as it works out.
?
The total loss (mixers, filters) is about 18db, theres about 34db of gain!
To both mixers are being pushed hard with even 50mv(70mvPP) of audio
at the mixer not the mic input.? The balanced mod should be able to take?
200mv PP (140mV RMS) of audio and if run at that level its output is clean?
with headroom but the 12 and 45 mhz mixers are being run due to the existing?
gain at very high levels hence the spurs.? And we needed to be close that?
limit for full power resulting in high order spurs that seemed random and?
well as low order spurs.? I had to really lower the audio drive (well?
below 50mV)to drop the spurs and it resulted in carrier showing even with?
a reasonable BFO offset.?
?
That resulted in an experiment. With TIA style amps the gain can be easily?
dialed down with feedback.? So with a few measurements in hand I dial the?
first amp (12mhz) down to? insure that and full modulator input the input
to the 12mhz to 45mhz? mixer is not more than -10DBM.? The 12mhz crystal?
filter has a loss of 4db so I need 12db of gain to hit -10dbm at the mixer.? ?
?
Then I repeat that and its about 4db for the 45mhz filter with matching?
network so we need another 11-12 Db of gain to keep the 45mhz mixer?
happy at -10dbm in.? The result is -17dbm output and the spurs are?
not less than 53Db down and most are more like 60-70, much cleaner.
Also the carrier to signal ratio is improved by about 10db, also better.
Yes we also need more audio drive but only little and its easy to do and?
we get a bit more headroom this way.
?
Here the annoying part, to get full power at 80m we are about ok.? At 10M
we are about 11db short of gain.? Maybe a tad more as the 30mhz filter?
eats a db or so.? So fixing the spurs by improving the gain distribution helps
clean things up but power is still wanting.
?
We go from about -18- to -19dbm at the mixer output to +40dbm(10W)
We must have 58 to 59db of gain and a stock power amp chain does?
that only on 80m with a little margin about 3db.? As we go up the amp?
as it exists has less gain.
?
So now we have killed the spurs mostly and improved the carrier leakage.
But the amps is back in line as "the project".
?
First step is to flatten the gain to less than 3dB slope and then add gain
to get the power up.? Adding gain will be some form of added stage.
at the RV1 point.
?
That is the long story of why we have spurs.? We just put too much?
into the mixers.??
?
Allison |
Re: Bitx 40 source file
Yes there are Mac users here ;)?
I've?successfully compiled and uploaded the original software for both BitX and uBITX, your BITX code, and Ian's uBITX software. It works the same way as on Windows and Linux:?All you need to do is make sure that all the files end up in the same folder, and that the folder is named?the same way as the main file (minus the .ino extension). In your screenshots, it looks like your source folder does have the .ino extension - remove that and see if you can compile the software.? -- Karl Heinz - K5KHK |
Re: LCD 20x4 I2C
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI have this one
Try all address? 0x3F and 0x27 but always equal
?
bye Matjaz
? Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] LCD 20x4 I2C ?
I would remove the 5v pullups from the LCD backpack, the Raduino still has 3.3v pullups on those lines. A 3.3v high into the PCF8574T chip on the LCD backpack board seems to work fine. ??? /g/BITX20/message/39966 ? On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:07 am, Tim Gorman wrote: You can't just connect D4 and D5 to the SDA/SCL leads. |
Re: Current Firmware
The latest is 4.3. The repo is named ubitx4. Place it anywhere. As long as all the files are in the same folder. - f On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, 23:13 Dennis, <dennis@...> wrote: I would like to upgrade my uBITX to the latest version (4 I believe), but don't know which one on Github to use. |
Re: Oscillation problems Bitx20a
The key is the low power end can be closer together than the high power end.
As a result the power amp takes up about 1/3 the total space, driver maybe 1/4. There is a shield 2" high copper clad soldered to the ground plane between? high power and driver and a second one for the driver to low level.? Holes? in the shield? for power and signal pass through. The mixers and low level stuff is on another board entirely.? Strictly power chain from the first amp to final.? ?Band pass is of board with TR. Coax from mixer filter on low level board to the amp and coax to the band pass filters both end grounded and all boards placed on a larger piece of copper clad and grounded to it at many points. Since Board pieces are cheap a wall around or between things is a good thing, add shielding and keeps the board stiff.? And unless I'm trying to be unusually compact ( like a 1W VXO tuned SSB TRX for 6M in a 4x2x2" box) I let things spread out as there is less incidental coupling or need for shielding All leads short and anything that goes to ground does so directly.? I even use SMT Parts like .1uf caps get soldered to ground and then power or other leads to be bypassed go to it.? Layout is everything.?? There is not enough difference in Q at lower HF between -6 or -2 material. FYI the loaded Q of the filters are likely less than 10. As a result stability has not been an issue even with idling drain current in the 200-250ma area. Some of the tricks I use. Allison |
Re: The new uBITX boards are here
What you say is true of the TDA2822 of the v3 uBitx board.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Some of us are talking about the 2n3904 push-pull audio amp that's in the new v4 uBitx board. On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:36 am, ajparent1/KB1GMX wrote: Actuay it does drive 4 ohm speakers at lower operating voltage.? However at 12V you really want 32 ohm. |
Re: LCD 20x4 I2C
I would remove the 5v pullups from the LCD backpack, the Raduino still has 3.3v pullups on those lines. A 3.3v high into the PCF8574T chip on the LCD backpack board seems to work fine. ? ? /g/BITX20/message/39966 ? On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:07 am, Tim Gorman wrote:
You can't just connect D4 and D5 to the SDA/SCL leads. |
Re: Ideas for AM, NB FM Demod and CW filter board
And....the modified design would no longer be a BITX. There are other low power designs out there in kit or homebrewed form that would be much easier to modify for FM and/or AM.? It would seem more productive to work toward an LF mod for the BITX and uBITX designs.? LF might be more of a challenge due to antenna requirements but should be easier to do the circuit modifications that are required. Arv K7HKL _._ On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:14 AM Tim Gorman <tgorman2@...> wrote: For AM you would have to derate the power output from the ubitx to |
Re: Oscillation problems Bitx20a
I hope you are testing with a dummy load. The bitx20/40 doesn't like reactive loads. - f On 5 Jun 2018 9:57 pm, "Fokko PH0KKO" <kaapstad1@...> wrote: Oscillation still occurs intermittently. mostly at an output of 3W or higher. There are a few RF leads where I could use short pieces of RG-174 coax cable. Is it best not to connect the shielding to anything, or maybe only solder the shielding to the copper plate on one side? Like between transformer T2 going to both IRF510s. I assume the impedance is not exactly 50 ohm so leave the shielding not connected to anything? The same goes for the input lead. Maybe it is better to use regular shielded wire. Any ideas what the best plan of action is here? |
Re: The new uBITX boards are here
I have a box full of speakers from a sale. All of them work.? On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, 22:06 Joel Caulkins, <caulktel@...> wrote: Is there going to be a nice Hi Res picture of the Ver 4 board any time soon? I would love to see what it looks like. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss