开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

Re: GPS and BITX

 

Hi Qonita,
I agree with Chris, you do not have to transmit GPS coordinates.
WSPR is a protocol for testing propagation, antennas and so on.
Using this digital mode you transmit your Callsign, first 4 chars of your locator and power in dBm.
Receiving stations report transmitter they are able to heard.
GPS usage could be to transform coordinate in Locator so you can made a beacon always transitting right locator and runtime updated.
WSJTX is a program written by John Taylor (WSPR creator and Physics Nobel Prize) for operating WSPR, JT65, FT8 etc. digital modes?

Hope this helps,
Alessandro M. IU1ETR


Re: Micro BitX No Audio TDA2822?

 

Hi, Ron.? I have a similar post for the same problem.? My U1 has the WX label on it.? I ordered a replacement and it should be here next week.? I'll post results.? Crossing my fingers......:)
Tom
AB7WT


Re: KB1OIQ BITX40 / uBITX files now on Sourceforge

 

WOW!.? I'm excited at all the work different people are doing.? This makes the Bitx40 and uBitx even more exciting.? Now if I can just retire and get to work on all this stuff I'd have a blast. lol?? Thanks to you and all the others that are coming up with some amazing ideas and Farhan.?

73, Michael
KM4OLT


Re: UBit has shipped

 

John,
More kits/projects than time permits is kinda the standard with hams I think. I keep finding kit projects I've had so long that I can't remember when/why/where I ordered them LOL. Just received my BITX40 and am anxiously awaiting my uBitx.
Don N9GOD


Re: Cases

 

Nice looking case, Carl.? I like the idea of lining the interior with metal tape for better shielding, but does it need to be copper?? I have some aluminum tape that I use for patching up ductwork, and I wonder if that will be just as effective.
--
Darren, W9ZIM


Re: Cases

 

I designed a Case specifically for the uBITX.? Please read my attached PDF File and see what you think.? I have been getting nice feedback from those that have purchased one.


Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

Jack Purdum
 

Just to make sure, if you retype the code fragment:

? ? if (prev_freq <= 10000000l && frequency > 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = true;
? ? if (prev_freq > 10000000l && frequency <= 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = false;

note that the last character in the numeric constants is an 'el' not a one. You can make this more obvious by using a capital 'L' for the data type specifier:

? ? if (prev_freq <= 10000000L && frequency > 10000000L)
? ? ? isUSB = true;
? ? if (prev_freq > 10000000L && frequency <= 10000000L)
? ? ? isUSB = false;

Jack, W8TEE



From: Michael Shreeve <shreevester@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

24.99800 MHz clock

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Michael Shreeve <shreevester@...> wrote:
Jerry, I was just looking at it. on LSB 54.99645
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on USB 54.99645
Regardless of upper or lower, no change. Does that make more sense ? When I looked before setting it, I noticed it wasn't on 10.000 MHz so I made very sure this time. Now to measure the 25 clock.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:
So, in that first instance, the rig is tuned to?54.98977-(32.99388+11.99624 ) =?9.999650
In the second instance, it is tuned to?54.99647-(56.99305-11.99624 ) =?9.999660
Since it flipped, we can assume 10mhz is somewhere in the middle, let's assume 9.999655 mhz
I'm betting your 25mhz oscillator will measure to be around? 25.0 * 9.999655/10.0 =?24.9991375 mhz

This little exercise in looking at that transition makes apparent what I think is a bug in that code scrap,?
we need to deal with the case where one or the other frequency is exactly equal to 10.0 mhz.
So code in ubitx_20.ino at line 470 should be edited to read:

? ? if (prev_freq <= 10000000l && frequency > 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = true;
? ? if (prev_freq > 10000000l && frequency <= 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = false;

I think.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 05:21 pm, Michael Shreeve wrote:
Hopeffuly you see this Jerry, its just for you. but anyone might find this usefull I hope.?

Frequencies on 10mhz lsb Clock 0 54.98977
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clock 1 32.99388
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? clock 2 11.99624

Frequencies on 10 MHz USB Clock 0 54.99647
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? Clock 1 56.99305
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Clock 2 11.99624?
And as I said in the video, haven't measured the master 25.000 MHz clock. Soon that will happen.?



--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG




Virus-free.


Re: UBit has shipped

 

I ordered mine on Jan 10th and just received notice it was shipped today. It was shipped via DHL so should be here n a few days.

Ron
W5RKW


Re: UBit has shipped

 

I ordered mine on Jan 5 and it arrived March 7. what an elegant little board. beautiful!!!!!
Jim

wb4ctx


Re: RD16HHF1 power curve flattening...some

 

John,

How did you implement the ssm2167?

I have one in my bitx40.

Regards


Simon
VK3ELH


Re: TDA2822 Replacement

David Wilcox
 

开云体育

The poor guy forgets that some of us are disabled: Pete Juliano has a disability called FFS (fat finger syndrome) whereby the fat fingers don't always hit the correct key or hit more than one key at the same time. ?If a famous person like Pete can function and produce great videos and blogs with his problem AND we all seem to understand him it can't be that bad. ?Those who would be critics are faulty in their attempts to further impair those who are disabled. ?May they see the "light". ?The rest of us will go on enjoying this fantastic hobby and also the new modes of communication that the web and nets provide. ?I just endured a 9 hour flight listening to radio blogs and videos saved on my iPhone. ?FWIW.

Dave K8WPE

On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:42 PM, Larry Smith <815cpu@...> wrote:

I had the same run in with Dex out of the blue!? i made a English usage error.? i guess typing in the middle of the night with a flashlight not wanting to wake the family is bound to cause a problem.? I see errors all the time and still "get" what the author is saying.? David just know we all know what's go'in on.

Good advice Jack.? Thanks..... Tomatoes as i recall I rem that one Hi

WA9DOH

?pompous ass ?comes to mind

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:
David:

Dex went after me a number of months ago for some spelling error I made, so I understand you anger. But stop and think about it: Despite what they might say, how unhappy does a person have to be with their life when their only apparent joy comes from criticizing others.

He's not worth your time...

Jack, W8TEE



From: N8DAH <Dherron@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] TDA2822 Replacement

Dex,
Yes it was a funny misuse of the word and it was a type-o late at night..... what is not funny is having some kiwi like you come at me and just short of call me stupid and "should go back to middle school". Maybe you should go crawl back under the rock you look like you came from....I am here to enjoy a hobby and share tips, tricks and other info with like minded Hams. I don't come here to be insulted by the likes of you or anyone for a simple type-o.
In the nicest way Dex ....Piss off!

--
David
?N8DAH




Re: RD16HHF1 power curve flattening...some

John
 

Hi Nik,

Not yet. I just received the BN43-3312?so I try that as soon as I finish the ATU (half way there).?

Been busy with mic compressor SSM2167 (done), S-Meter (hardware and software done), SWR/POWER meter (hardware done, basic display), Arduino pro mini linked by I2C to Raduino to measure power, swr, final's current (hall effect sensor) and control the ATU plus shutdown the final's bias if required.

ATU is L-Network with 2 servos controlling a variable capacitor and a two wafers rotary switch to get 6 coil positions on high impedance and 6 on low impedance.

Too much fun.

If you get the mods for the final in, please let us know the results.

Thanks and 73, John (VK2ETA)


Re: TDA2822 Replacement

 

?a?a?a.
He must have misunderstood you and thought that you meant oscilla(h)er.

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:24 AM, Nelson <ngtdlt@...> wrote:
Howdy Raj,

Well over half a century ago when I was 13, I wanted to build an oscillator to practice morse code.? One of the men at my church was an EE and also a ham (he also had a really cute daughter my age that I was kind of sweet on...).? I dropped by his house one evening and asked him if he could help me build an osculator (not a misspelling, rather a mispronunciation of oscillator).? He told me if I wanted to practice code, he would help me build an oscillator but if I had in mind some sort of practice with Janice (his daughter) I had better take up some other hobby quickly.

Nelson??

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@...> wrote:
My English teacher Mr. Hobday RIP would have explained it as oscillating occulation!

He lived down the road and would drop in some evenings and explain English words
by breaking them down. I suspect he always came for a cuppa! I managed to pass!

Raj

At 07-03-18, you wrote:

>How far away from English does Ameriglish/Yankish really go?
>Their/There/They're is bad enough, but "osculation"??? Sorry, David, go back to middle school :( or at least use a dictionary once in a while ...
>
>Still, 73
>Dex, ZL2DEX







--
I always thought the Universe was a wonderfully strange place until I?studied Particle Physics - I now know the Universe is, in fact, profoundly odd in nature



Re: Volume Control

 

I replaced mine with a logarithmic pot. ?I tried a linear type, but wasn’t happy with the result.?


Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

 

So it moved more than 2khz.
More than I would expect.

Anyways, I'm signing off for the day.

Jerry


On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:14 pm, Michael Shreeve wrote:
The clock actually warmed up in about 30 minutes it was 25.0003 . guess I'll leave it on.?
?


Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

 

And change the freq. away from 10. Ok, wanted the math to be easy, would 5.0 MHz be easy ?

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:
So did you measure the crystal directly?
If so, your probe likely modified the frequency a bit.

My calculation of 24.9991375 may be wrong for a number of reasons:

It assumed that your two readings of the three clocks were made while?
tuning through 10.0mhz in 50hz steps.? But we have since seen that there
is a bug in the code such that it would not make the LSB to USB transition while?
tuning in 50hz steps.? So not clear exactly what was going on there.

It assumes your rig was either uncalibrated (and thus si5351_vco==875.0mhz)
and that your probe on the crystal is not disturbing the crystal frequency.
Or that you are doing an si5351_setfreq() to one of the clock outputs of 25.0mhz and measuring that.

Jerry


On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 09:59 pm, Michael Shreeve wrote:
24.99800 MHz clock
?
. . .




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG


Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

 

The clock actually warmed up in about 30 minutes it was 25.0003 . guess I'll leave it on.?

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Michael Shreeve <shreevester@...> wrote:
24.99800 MHz clock

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Michael Shreeve <shreevester@...> wrote:
Jerry, I was just looking at it. on LSB 54.99645
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on USB 54.99645
Regardless of upper or lower, no change. Does that make more sense ? When I looked before setting it, I noticed it wasn't on 10.000 MHz so I made very sure this time. Now to measure the 25 clock.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:
So, in that first instance, the rig is tuned to?54.98977-(32.99388+11.99624) =?9.999650
In the second instance, it is tuned to?54.99647-(56.99305-11.99624) =?9.999660
Since it flipped, we can assume 10mhz is somewhere in the middle, let's assume 9.999655 mhz
I'm betting your 25mhz oscillator will measure to be around? 25.0 * 9.999655/10.0 =?24.9991375 mhz

This little exercise in looking at that transition makes apparent what I think is a bug in that code scrap,?
we need to deal with the case where one or the other frequency is exactly equal to 10.0 mhz.
So code in ubitx_20.ino at line 470 should be edited to read:

? ? if (prev_freq <= 10000000l && frequency > 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = true;
? ? if (prev_freq > 10000000l && frequency <= 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = false;

I think.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 05:21 pm, Michael Shreeve wrote:
Hopeffuly you see this Jerry, its just for you. but anyone might find this usefull I hope.?

Frequencies on 10mhz lsb Clock 0 54.98977
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clock 1 32.99388
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? clock 2 11.99624

Frequencies on 10 MHz USB Clock 0 54.99647
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? Clock 1 56.99305
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Clock 2 11.99624?
And as I said in the video, haven't measured the master 25.000 MHz clock. Soon that will happen.?




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG


Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

 

So did you measure the crystal directly?
If so, your probe likely modified the frequency a bit.

My calculation of 24.9991375 may be wrong for a number of reasons:

It assumed that your two readings of the three clocks were made while?
tuning through 10.0mhz in 50hz steps.? But we have since seen that there
is a bug in the code such that it would not make the LSB to USB transition while?
tuning in 50hz steps.? So not clear exactly what was going on there.

It assumes your rig was either uncalibrated (and thus si5351_vco==875.0mhz)
and that your probe on the crystal is not disturbing the crystal frequency.
Or that you are doing an si5351_setfreq() to one of the clock outputs of 25.0mhz and measuring that.

Jerry


On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 09:59 pm, Michael Shreeve wrote:
24.99800 MHz clock
?
. . .


Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

 

Ok, roger that. Got to change frequency. Changing directly from usb to lsb isn't working, so got to do that over again.?

Clock is 24.99800 . Very close to that. Zero beat. Of course, counter hasn't been calibrated in a while so who knows.

Of course this is all with the working raduino. I've got to Do this all over again, just needed to know how it would compare to a working system.?

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:35 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:
Yup, another minor bug in the code from? ?
Though neither of these bugs will be an issue for most users.

Just be aware that after going into the menu to flip between USB and LSB,
it won't take affect till after the next time the frequency is changed.

And be aware that very occasionally when tuning past 10mhz the USB/LSB flip
won't happen like it usually does.
So either tune through 10mhz again, spinning the encoder quickly this time,
or switch sidebands manually using the menu.?



The bug Michael found is in function menuSidebandToggle()? at line 155 in file??ubitx_menu.ino,?
where it currently reads:
? ? updateDisplay();
? ? menuOn = 0;

Need to add a line to update the frequency, since this function has toggled the the state of isUSB:?
? ? updateDisplay();
? ? setFrequency(frequency);
? ? menuOn = 0;
?
There are other cases of this same bug.
For example, on line 57 of that same file, in function menuVfoToggle()
? ? ? setFrequency(frequency);
? ? ? if (frequency >= 10000000l)
? ? ? ? isUSB = true;
? ? ? else
? ? ? ? isUSB = false;
? ? ? updateDisplay();

Notice that the call to setFrequency() is made before the variable isUSB is modified.
It should occur after the variable isUSB is modified.

None of this will be an issue for normal operation.
Not something I feel inclined to fix on my rig.

Jerry, KE7ER

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 09:06 pm, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
You are awfully sparse with your words, and don't fully describe what you are doing or seeing.

I suspect what you are doing is setting the frequency to exactly 10.0 mhz.
Then you go into the menu and flip between LSB and USB, and are wondering why there is no change
in the measurement of clk1 with the frequency counter.
My guess is that the code does not update the Si5351 until the frequency changes.
Move the freq by 50hz using the encoder knob and clk1 should update.
But I would carry out this experiment at something other than 10.0 mhz,
as we have too much happening there already.

You may have found another little bug in the code.?
Or as some would say, a feature.

Jerry, KE7ER




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG


Re: Raduino oscilators. 33mhz and 57mhz " . Documentation says one thing, but this is what I measured.

 

24.99800 MHz clock

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Michael Shreeve <shreevester@...> wrote:
Jerry, I was just looking at it. on LSB 54.99645
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on USB 54.99645
Regardless of upper or lower, no change. Does that make more sense ? When I looked before setting it, I noticed it wasn't on 10.000 MHz so I made very sure this time. Now to measure the 25 clock.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:
So, in that first instance, the rig is tuned to?54.98977-(32.99388+11.99624) =?9.999650
In the second instance, it is tuned to?54.99647-(56.99305-11.99624) =?9.999660
Since it flipped, we can assume 10mhz is somewhere in the middle, let's assume 9.999655 mhz
I'm betting your 25mhz oscillator will measure to be around? 25.0 * 9.999655/10.0 =?24.9991375 mhz

This little exercise in looking at that transition makes apparent what I think is a bug in that code scrap,?
we need to deal with the case where one or the other frequency is exactly equal to 10.0 mhz.
So code in ubitx_20.ino at line 470 should be edited to read:

? ? if (prev_freq <= 10000000l && frequency > 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = true;
? ? if (prev_freq > 10000000l && frequency <= 10000000l)
? ? ? isUSB = false;

I think.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 05:21 pm, Michael Shreeve wrote:
Hopeffuly you see this Jerry, its just for you. but anyone might find this usefull I hope.?

Frequencies on 10mhz lsb Clock 0 54.98977
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clock 1 32.99388
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? clock 2 11.99624

Frequencies on 10 MHz USB Clock 0 54.99647
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? Clock 1 56.99305
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Clock 2 11.99624?
And as I said in the video, haven't measured the master 25.000 MHz clock. Soon that will happen.?




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG




--
Michael Shreeve N6GRG