¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Customisable panel cutout template for the EF01 project box #bitx40

phraxoid
 

@Vince - OK well at least it's not just me then. Bit of a shame but not that surprised, it was exceptionally cheap.

@Arv - Yes don't see why this isn't possible. I've not seen any work done on this in my? extensive research on B40 mods.. You could make a feature request to Allard perhaps :-)


uBitx 472kHz?

 

Hi all

I am new to this group and just got uBitx from the custom...only 22% VAT was added

I am wondering if uBitx? can somehow work on 472kHz amateur band?

Kari OH5YW


Re: BITX40 Display problem

 

The Red LED on the Arduino board is on solid.


Re: Win a BitX40 kit January 6, by showing off your project, in East TN in a nice warm building see you there and meet Dr. Jack Purdum and bring everything he has ever written for him to autograph

 

Followup on the Builders Fest in East TN, it was great, ask Dr. Jack, he packed the house with Bitx enthusiasts. And the hamfest with its indoor arena tailgating was at capacity for the first time ever. ?

No Doubt BitXes brought a good number of them in.

I was hoping to have some nice pictures, so I could have posted a link by now and said, here go look....but, clubs being what they are, I am not taking the hit, I had a few of the contributors on the board contribute to door prizes and guys I am struggling to get pictures of what took place. ?The club has chosen to suppress any pictures....for reasons I can only guess pretty accurate. ?So, I am disappointed in myself for not believing what I was experiencing....So enough of that,?

The enthusiasm was there for the expo, to do what Farhan is doing and actually have builds on the spot....wow....what I do to get to one of those....can't make it to India, I hope he has better luck with pictures.

Craig?
KM4YEC


Re: group build at LARC'18

 

let me be the first to say...you are mistaken.?

I am interested. ?I would surely be safe to say there are others....

I invited BitXes to East Tennessee, USA ?just yesterday, and I very badly wanted to share the results with everyone here to show that very point, just how much interest there is. The BitXes showed up from Washington State, Arkansas, Kentucky, Virginia, and images of BitX40s were sent in from the Netherlands and Venezuela....and maybe other places, I have to admit I don't know the full extent of my production in East TN, as my EX-club as of yesterday, cut me off from feedback before the show even started, and I won't be getting any photos and Christmas Cards either. ?But, I got Dr. Jack and bunch of BitXes to East TN.....so....you betcha we are interested.?

Dr. Jack filled the house with BitX enthusiasts.

I say, please share, and others take notes. ?Please have some kind of photo record to share.?

Craig
KM4YEC


group build at LARC'18

 

This is probably not of universal interest to the group...

My club, the Lamakaan Amateur Radio Club is organizing the LARC'18 on January 26th and 27th. On the 27th afternoon, we are organizing a group wire-up of uBITX. VU3ELR, Sasi has designed a steel nice case for the ubitx. He is also organizing the speaker, mic and other things. We hope to bring up many uBITX during the workshop.?

Those in India who would like to attend this can register at . Note that you have to separately opt-in for the ubitx workshop. The Rs.7000 includes a ubitx kit, the case, etc. You have to bring your tools: own soldering iron, VOM, power supply, screw driver, pliers, cutter and wire-stripper.

See you all there.?

- f


Re: worried now

 

Jack,
Thank you for the draft copy of the chapter from your book!? I put the book on my wife's Amazon wish list and told her I would really love it for my birthday this month.... Crossing my fingers...:)
Tom
AB7WT

PS - If I don't get it for my BDAY I'll just buy it asap....:)


Re: Tuning reversed issue

Gordon Gibby
 

If you're having problems with audio harmonics, yes, you would want to put your tones higher than the midpoint of the filter....but with any reasonable sound card, there should be negligible harmonics, so I don't completely understand the issue or concern....I use $5 Adafruit 1475 usb dongles without any untoward effects that I know of....


________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Tim Gorman <tgorman2@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 11:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuning reversed issue

With a 2.4khz to 2.5khz filter you wouldn't want to run the tones any
lower than about 1.25khz so you could filter out any audio harmonics,
right?

My guess is that if you are generating audio harmonics you have
something else badly wrong!

tim ab0wr

On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 04:46:35 +0000
"Gordon Gibby" <ggibby@...> wrote:

Using FLDIGI, you can put your RTTY tonesanywhere you want them.....

And by watching the waterfall, you can visualize your receiving
filter as well.

gordon


Re: Tuning reversed issue

 

With a 2.4khz to 2.5khz filter you wouldn't want to run the tones any
lower than about 1.25khz so you could filter out any audio harmonics,
right?

My guess is that if you are generating audio harmonics you have
something else badly wrong!

tim ab0wr

On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 04:46:35 +0000
"Gordon Gibby" <ggibby@...> wrote:

Using FLDIGI, you can put your RTTY tonesanywhere you want them.....

And by watching the waterfall, you can visualize your receiving
filter as well.

gordon


Re: Tuning reversed issue

Gordon Gibby
 

Using FLDIGI, you can put your RTTY tonesanywhere you want them.....

And by watching the waterfall, you can visualize your receiving filter as well.

gordon


________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Tim Gorman <tgorman2@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 11:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuning reversed issue

Jim,

Aren't RTTY tones 2125hz and 2295hz? The filter in the ubitx should be
narrow enough to filter out 2nd and 3rd harmonics of these frequencies.

If it can't filter out the harmonics of these tones then the SSB voice
signal is probably also far wider than it should be.

tim ab0wr



On Sun, 07 Jan 2018 18:11:44 -0800
"Jim Sheldon" <w0eb@...> wrote:

After Ron helped me get over the "stupids" and I finally learned how
to properly compile & upload stuff to the Raduino, I now have Ron's
mods running and he's fixed a lot of little annoying things (annoying
to me anyway). In between bricking & fixing the rig (all firmware,
no hardware) I managed to make a couple of real nice 20 meter SSB
QSO's and also a couple of 40 meter CW QSO's as well with it.

I heard a lot of RTTY (contest this weekend) and sure wish there were
at least 5 more digital pins on the Nano. Then it would really easy
to implement a good CW Keyer and even implement true FSK for RTTY.
You'd still need a computer with sound card running something like
Mako Mori's (JE1HHT) MMTTY program, but that would really work well.
Hardware FSK would be much cleaner to implement than tones into the
SSB section. As wide as the filter is, I'd be wary of the 2nd and
maybe even 3rd harmonics of the tones being transmitted at the same
time as the fundamentals. That would really create havoc on the
bands especially during a RTTY contest, not to mention incur the
wrath of the FCC as well.

Jim - W0EB

This little rig just keeps getting better and quite rapidly too!


Re: Tuner Kit Progress

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

There is plenty of overlap in the inductance rank now. ?The final kit will probably be closer to doubling.?


Dr.?William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

?

Owner - Operator

Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC

Staunton, Illinois

?

Owner ¨C Operator

Villa Grand Piton - J68HZ

Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.

Rent it:


email:??bill@...

?


On Jan 7, 2018, at 9:06 PM, Kelly Jack <kellyjack1968@...> wrote:

Hi Bill,

Great project. Very interested in this as a remote tuner.?

One query - why are the last two 5.2uH and 10.6uH as opposed to continuing to double up? Not a criticism just seeking to understand.

Regards

Simon VK3ELH?


Re: Tuning reversed issue

 

Jim,

Aren't RTTY tones 2125hz and 2295hz? The filter in the ubitx should be
narrow enough to filter out 2nd and 3rd harmonics of these frequencies.

If it can't filter out the harmonics of these tones then the SSB voice
signal is probably also far wider than it should be.

tim ab0wr



On Sun, 07 Jan 2018 18:11:44 -0800
"Jim Sheldon" <w0eb@...> wrote:

After Ron helped me get over the "stupids" and I finally learned how
to properly compile & upload stuff to the Raduino, I now have Ron's
mods running and he's fixed a lot of little annoying things (annoying
to me anyway).? In between bricking & fixing the rig (all firmware,
no hardware) I managed to make a couple of real nice 20 meter SSB
QSO's and also a couple of 40 meter CW QSO's as well with it.

I heard a lot of RTTY (contest this weekend) and sure wish there were
at least 5 more digital pins on the Nano.? Then it would really easy
to implement a good CW Keyer and even implement true FSK for RTTY.
You'd still need a computer with sound card running something like
Mako Mori's (JE1HHT) MMTTY program, but that would really work well.
Hardware FSK would be much cleaner to implement than tones into the
SSB section.? As wide as the filter is, I'd be wary of the 2nd and
maybe even 3rd harmonics of the tones being transmitted at the same
time as the fundamentals.? That would really create havoc on the
bands especially during a RTTY contest, not to mention incur the
wrath of the FCC as well.

Jim - W0EB

This little rig just keeps getting better and quite rapidly too!


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, January 7, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere

 

Same here I didn't hear anything.
--
73, Yvon NU6I


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, January 7, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere

John P
 

I've been lobbying for an afternoon time for months now. A few of us got on at 3PM EST a month or so ago and made a number of contacts.

So if anyone can agree on a betting time I'm in.?
--
John - WA2FZW


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, January 7, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

This is kinda? normal....the critical frequency (vertical 180 degree refraction) is dropping to 80 meters or BELOW right after dark over a lot of North America....traffic hounds in the north are having to use 160 meters at times....? ?


Cuba station checked into my WINLINK server in late afternoon on 40 meters --- 570 km south of me, great propagation.??


Australia has multiple web pages that show exactly how propgation is going and what frequencies will work for what distances, anywhere in the world, all based on radioionosonde data gathered from those stations scattered around the world.....


take a look at this web page:? ??


As I write this, the critical frequency for most of north america is TWO MEGAHERTZ.


If you're working a longer distances, the MUF will of course be higher than the CRITICAL FREQUENCY as glancing signals are much more easily refracted than straight-up-and-down ones, but this is all fairly well understood and available information now for all of us to use!


Cheers,


gordon




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Tom VE3THR <muzzmobility@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 11:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] BITX QSO Night, Sunday, January 7, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
?
noticed same thing here up north since last fall. After grey line NOTHING! Local path only. I suggest earlier times - 4pm EDT - 2100 Z perhaps. Real hit and miss an evening net this time of year and crappy propagation. Thanks for trying. I usually listen on 7.277 during the day if I'm in the shack and not doing my "chores". Don't be afraid to call CQ anytime anywhere.


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, January 7, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere

 

noticed same thing here up north since last fall. After grey line NOTHING! Local path only. I suggest earlier times - 4pm EDT - 2100 Z perhaps. Real hit and miss an evening net this time of year and crappy propagation. Thanks for trying. I usually listen on 7.277 during the day if I'm in the shack and not doing my "chores". Don't be afraid to call CQ anytime anywhere.


Re: Ubitx calibration help

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?Ah!? ?From your QRZ page you have an ICOM 718 exactly like me.? ?


One additional question:? are you able to make small changes in the code of the firmware that you've downloaded? like minor edits?


And which VERSION of firmware are you using?


Cheers,


gordon



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 10:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Ubitx calibration help
?

?Can you give a little more information?


How far off?? Exactly how did you measure???


What did you do (give the details) when you tried "calibrating"??


Do you have accesss to an accurate existing receiver with a digital readout?


Cheers,


gordon



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Art Olson <olson339@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 10:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [BITX20] Ubitx calibration help
?
Need some advice on how to calibrate my ubitx. I have read the instructions. ?After several tries no success. Reloaded the firmware but freq is still off. Is there a better way to calibrate?

Art- N2AJO?


Re: Ubitx calibration help

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?Can you give a little more information?


How far off?? Exactly how did you measure???


What did you do (give the details) when you tried "calibrating"??


Do you have accesss to an accurate existing receiver with a digital readout?


Cheers,


gordon



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Art Olson <olson339@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 10:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [BITX20] Ubitx calibration help
?
Need some advice on how to calibrate my ubitx. I have read the instructions. ?After several tries no success. Reloaded the firmware but freq is still off. Is there a better way to calibrate?

Art- N2AJO?


Re: Tuning reversed issue

 

Jack you are right.

I was thinking of this ubitx software center git.

Ron



From: Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuning reversed issue

Sounds like more work to me. There's nothing sacrosanct about the two analog pins. As far as changing sketches, whose sketches? If you write your own, it really doesn't matter. If you use someone else's, make a few typing changes and you're done. If you change the wires and then replace the board, then what? Quite often it is easier to make a software change than a hardware change.

Jack, W8TEE



From: John McFadden <johnamcf@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuning reversed issue

Even easier is using a small object (thumb tack, tiny drill bit, etc) to unhook the black and brown wires from the header and reverse their positions. Then you can change sketches without worry in the future.
John

On 1/7/2018 4:22 PM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io wrote:
One of the beautiful things in C are symbolic constants. These are textual strings that get substituted by the compiler. Around line 75 in ubitx_20.ino you will find? these two symbolic constants:

#define ENC_A (A0)
#define ENC_B (A1)

these define encoder tab A and B to be assigned to Nano pins A0 and A1. Now reverse these to:

#define ENC_A (A1)??????????? // NOTE: these are reversed from the original code
#define ENC_B (A0)

and everywhere those symbolic constants (END_A and ENC_B) are used have now been reversed. Save, recompile, and upload and you're done.

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? OR

you can open your ?BITX, unsolder pins A1 and A0, reverse those two connections, resolder the two leads, and put everything back in it's case. To me, the software change is easier and the change presented here doesn't mess with the function code.

Jack, W8TEE



From: Ronald Pfeiffer via Groups.Io <w2ctx@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 4:09 PM
Subject: [BITX20] Tuning reversed issue

Working with Jim, W0EB, I found that if the black and brown wires
are reversed on the encoder then the frequency tuning is backwards.
Some people, including myself, just changed the "doTuning" routine
to reverse the offsets.? This however fixes the frequency tuning but
the menus options seem to be backwards.

Better fix is to change the enc_read(void) routine and then both the
freq tuning and menus selections are in sync.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Ron








Re: Tuning reversed issue

Jack Purdum
 

Sounds like more work to me. There's nothing sacrosanct about the two analog pins. As far as changing sketches, whose sketches? If you write your own, it really doesn't matter. If you use someone else's, make a few typing changes and you're done. If you change the wires and then replace the board, then what? Quite often it is easier to make a software change than a hardware change.

Jack, W8TEE



From: John McFadden <johnamcf@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuning reversed issue

Even easier is using a small object (thumb tack, tiny drill bit, etc) to unhook the black and brown wires from the header and reverse their positions. Then you can change sketches without worry in the future.
John

On 1/7/2018 4:22 PM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io wrote:
One of the beautiful things in C are symbolic constants. These are textual strings that get substituted by the compiler. Around line 75 in ubitx_20.ino you will find? these two symbolic constants:

#define ENC_A (A0)
#define ENC_B (A1)

these define encoder tab A and B to be assigned to Nano pins A0 and A1. Now reverse these to:

#define ENC_A (A1)??????????? // NOTE: these are reversed from the original code
#define ENC_B (A0)

and everywhere those symbolic constants (END_A and ENC_B) are used have now been reversed. Save, recompile, and upload and you're done.

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? OR

you can open your ?BITX, unsolder pins A1 and A0, reverse those two connections, resolder the two leads, and put everything back in it's case. To me, the software change is easier and the change presented here doesn't mess with the function code.

Jack, W8TEE



From: Ronald Pfeiffer via Groups.Io <w2ctx@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 4:09 PM
Subject: [BITX20] Tuning reversed issue

Working with Jim, W0EB, I found that if the black and brown wires
are reversed on the encoder then the frequency tuning is backwards.
Some people, including myself, just changed the "doTuning" routine
to reverse the offsets.? This however fixes the frequency tuning but
the menus options seem to be backwards.

Better fix is to change the enc_read(void) routine and then both the
freq tuning and menus selections are in sync.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Ron