¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: ubitx example of enclosure

James Lynes
 

I purchased an assortment of Christmas tin gift boxes in a variety of sizes at Dollar Tree, Walgreen's, and Hobby Lobby. Most for $1 and all for under $3. Check out your local after Christmas sales. My uBitx and Bitx40 will be festive all year long.

James


Re: what else should I order from there? #parts

James Lynes
 

Adafruit has RG-174 in 3m lengths. I'll be ordering some soon.

Also, browse through their assorted cables.

James


Re: Laser cut ubitx case SVG

 

Nice. I will have it ;-)

Thank You

MAc


Re: OOPS!! Re-factory alignment....

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Ground loops are a major pain in the *^{%. Connecting to computers only adds more parallel paths to make loops. I¡¯m running into problems measuring current draw from my DC supply because Power is finding alternate paths back to my supply than through the negative Power lead; apparently my meter measures on the negative lead, not the positive lead. This is most pronounced in my car.?

-Mark

On Dec 30, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...> wrote:


This is not extraordinarily accurate information here.? ?


By some unknown manner, while fiddling with the uBitx today and trying various digital modes.....I accidentally entered "factory alignment" and since I hadn't even read anything about it, I suspect I fouled it up royally.? ?Transmitted signals were no longer "right on frequency".? ?


Approximate settings that might help someone with even less test equipment than *I* have were the following:

1st setting:? 10.000 MHz adjustment was on target at? "15"

2nd setting:? my best guess at when the 7.150 MHz LSB signal (generated by a vacuum tube radio driven by another raduino) was when the last digits were 96.7


At that point I was able to hit other WINLINK servers on 40 meters with less than 10 Hz apparent error.? ?(you only have to be within 200 Hz).? ?



However, it took 3 tries to get to there, as the first go-round was more like 50 Hz off on 40 and twice that on 20m.



I was a bit "agitated" and in a hurry so I haven't studied Ashhar's routines and don't fully understand the purpose of each of his tests.? ?(A "manual" for factory alignment would be wonderful....)? ? Others may do a far better job explaining all this.? ?I haven't yet gotten the bravery to upload a sketch to this wonderful machine yet, as I have for the bitx40.? ?A brief listen to the 25 MHz oscillator (without driving the output freq to that, which would have made the signal a LOT stronger) --- it does seem to be about 4kHz high as we noted on bitx40 raduinos.? ?


Hope this helps any other hapless people.....


AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO DRIVE THE USB PORT OF THE RADUINO, PUT FERRITES ON THE INTERCONNECTING CABLE TO YOUR COMPUTER!!!!? ? That made a HUGE improvement in the quality of the signal my little uBitx was creating.


Cheers,


gordon

??


Re: Tuner? Well Sure!

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks to your two suggestions, I just ordered a couple myself. Thanks!

-Mark

On Dec 30, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:

I just ordered one and intend to integrate it with my ?BITX. I'll post the results.

Jack, W8TEE



From: John Kemker <kemkerj3@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuner? Well Sure!

Just finished building a Kits And Parts () SWR bridge.? Says it's good for up to 100W intermittently.? Probably would accept the 10W from the uBitx w/o a problem.? Designed to output to a pair of current meters, it could be hooked up to analog inputs on the Raduino to read forward and reflected power.
--

73 de W5NNH



Laser cut ubitx case SVG

 

Hi All,

If any of you have access to a laser cutter, or are really handy with a fret saw, you may find this useful.



-Cheers Max, G7UOZ.


Re: ubitx example of enclosure

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

And for a not TOO outlandish of a price you can get this one.

?

?

Mike

K5ESS

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure

?

Okay, a Drake knob is just as classy. The 2 inch skirt fits my cabinet perfectly.

?

?

?

?


RL Drake MN-2700 Main Tuning Knob W/2" Skirt | eBay

One has a white pointer line on both the knob and the skirt, and one does not have a white pointer and is normal...

?

?

?

Sent from Yahoo Mail.

?

On Saturday, December 30, 2017 3:07 PM, Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw@...> wrote:

?

Whoops! I should have read the description more thoroughly. It's just the metal inlay. Doggonit!

?

?

?

Sent from Yahoo Mail.

?

On Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:44 PM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:

?

What's its diameter?

?

Jack, W8TEE

?


From: Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure

?

Thanks Shawn, the project still needs a few touches here and there and I think I'm going to cut up some double-sided PC board for the front and back. I found an eBay seller that has a Collins style knob for the tuner.

?

The extended edges are a feature of the project box that I got from Aliexpress and the uBITX just shoehorns into it.

?

It's a work in progress, but I think it'll pull together nicely.

?

73

?

?

$ 5.99

Collins Spinner Tuning Knob Inlay with Finger Hole | eBay

This Collins Spinner Tuning Knob Inlay with Finger Hole for KWM-2 / 75S-3 / 32S-3 / 312B-5. This inlay has a bru...

?

?

?

?

Sent from Yahoo Mail.

?

On Saturday, December 30, 2017 1:03 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io <sreedq1014@...> wrote:

?

Hi Thomas.

I really like your use of material for the inside corners, on the front. And the extended front edges -? look good! Thank you for sharing that photo.

73, Shawnr. kf7yff.

?

?

?

--------------------------------------------

On Sat, 12/30/17, Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw=[email protected]> wrote:

?

Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure

Date: Saturday, December 30, 2017, 9:41 AM

?

?I

know that feeling. It usually takes me one or two tries to

get things where I want them...

?

Sent

from Yahoo Mail. Get the

app

?

? ? On Saturday, December

30, 2017 12:13 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io

<sreedq1014=[email protected]> wrote:

?

?

? Hello Ken. I checked out your web

page. Saw the case makings of yours? for the Tut Hill on

one of your project pages. Nice. I have two of these radios

collected. One with the factory case - 80M. The other I aim

to build it's case custom. Even as far as the symbols,

too generic. Looking at your fabricated ubitx enclosure,

could you tell me how to avoid such a gap - snag - in your

upper right corner of the lid? I, myself would have trouble

living with that. Case building is but one aspect of amature

radio, and not always the objective, pursuant of. Neither,

is it necessarily,? a "case" of agony to display.

Sometime, though, all I am interested in is the enclosure,

and the accommodations needed to consider, in?design,?for

the circuitry inside.

?

?This paragraph of yours was in the

page presentation.....??

"Making your projects look presentable, is not

an absolute necessity. Some even prefer the rustic look of

their projects and see it as a ¡°red badge of courage¡±,

showing the agony of their efforts. After all, scotch tape

and a penciled label can? identify just about anything, or

merely writing on the chassis. Having said that, there is a

very small group of hams that like to see their projects

look like they were done on purpose. I will try to address

that group".

?

Thank you for the tips. I cut with a most

ancient tool, but sharpest edge available. Be that obsidian.

Great joy in crafting something with one's own

imagination, every now and then - a must.

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

73, Shawnr. kf7yff

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?


Re: Power output decreases as a function of frequency? #bitx40

John McFadden
 

Raj,

Could you suggest a method for bypassing L1-L3? I'm not sure how I would do that with any temporary change, any approach I can think of would be permanent and then attempting to reverse the damage later.

And where is the output filter on the board?

Something is definitely off center, I set the Raduino to transmit out of band and the power tails off in a rather symmetrical pattern centered on 7000khz, with another attachment showing the output power vs frequency.

Thanks!

John

On 12/29/2017 11:20 PM, Raj vu2zap wrote:
Could be something with L1-3. Temporarily bypass the filter and try another test.
I have one board with the filter centered a bit and gives less power higher up the band
but we work only till 7.2MHz.

It could be the output filter also.

Raj


At 30-12-2017, you wrote:
Bottom line up front:

I am having a problem with my Bitx40 where the power output decreases as I increase my frequency across the 40m band.


I completed all of Allard's 1.27.3 mods, plus RX/TX lights, and the spurious emissions capacitor, with it transmitting through a SWR meter into a 50W/3.5ghz dummy load. Power is from a variable power supply set to 12.0V, which includes powering the PA.

I'm receiving the following readings from the SWR's forward power gauge and the power supply's current meter as a function of the tuned frequency when using my straight key for ~1 second:

Frequency, SWR meter forward power, power supply current;

7005khz, 4.5W, 1.15A;

7050, 3.8, 1.06;

7100, 3.0, 0.98;

7150, 2.5, 0.91;

7195, 1.9, 0.82;

7250, 1.3, 0.72;


Re: ubitx example of enclosure

 

Okay, a Drake knob is just as classy. The 2 inch skirt fits my cabinet perfectly.

?




Sent from Yahoo Mail.


On Saturday, December 30, 2017 3:07 PM, Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw@...> wrote:


Whoops! I should have read the description more thoroughly. It's just the metal inlay. Doggonit!
?


Sent from Yahoo Mail.


On Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:44 PM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


What's its diameter?

Jack, W8TEE



From: Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure

Thanks Shawn, the project still needs a few touches here and there and I think I'm going to cut up some double-sided PC board for the front and back. I found an eBay seller that has a Collins style knob for the tuner.

The extended edges are a feature of the project box that I got from Aliexpress and the uBITX just shoehorns into it.

It's a work in progress, but I think it'll pull together nicely.

73




?


Sent from Yahoo Mail.


On Saturday, December 30, 2017 1:03 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io <sreedq1014@...> wrote:


Hi Thomas.
I really like your use of material for the inside corners, on the front. And the extended front edges -? look good! Thank you for sharing that photo.
73, Shawnr. kf7yff.



--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 12/30/17, Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw=[email protected]> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure
Date: Saturday, December 30, 2017, 9:41 AM

?I
know that feeling. It usually takes me one or two tries to
get things where I want them...

Sent
from Yahoo Mail. Get the
app

? ? On Saturday, December
30, 2017 12:13 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io
<sreedq1014=[email protected]> wrote:
?

? Hello Ken. I checked out your web
page. Saw the case makings of yours? for the Tut Hill on
one of your project pages. Nice. I have two of these radios
collected. One with the factory case - 80M. The other I aim
to build it's case custom. Even as far as the symbols,
too generic. Looking at your fabricated ubitx enclosure,
could you tell me how to avoid such a gap - snag - in your
upper right corner of the lid? I, myself would have trouble
living with that. Case building is but one aspect of amature
radio, and not always the objective, pursuant of. Neither,
is it necessarily,? a "case" of agony to display.
Sometime, though, all I am interested in is the enclosure,
and the accommodations needed to consider, in?design,?for
the circuitry inside.

?This paragraph of yours was in the
page presentation.....??
"Making your projects look presentable, is not
an absolute necessity. Some even prefer the rustic look of
their projects and see it as a ¡°red badge of courage¡±,
showing the agony of their efforts. After all, scotch tape
and a penciled label can? identify just about anything, or
merely writing on the chassis. Having said that, there is a
very small group of hams that like to see their projects
look like they were done on purpose. I will try to address
that group".
?
Thank you for the tips. I cut with a most
ancient tool, but sharpest edge available. Be that obsidian.
Great joy in crafting something with one's own
imagination, every now and then - a must.
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
73, Shawnr. kf7yff




?
?












Re: Tuner? Well Sure!

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?Ashhar, you are so far ahead of people like me that there is no comparison.? ?I went and googled a T220 just to learn what you were talking about.....


The business, design, and manufacturing skills that you have developed are in a class far above what i think most of us will achieve.? ?I do my trade (medicine) fairly well, but I am unlikely to be able to do what YOU are doing.


i would suggest that you might charge a consultant fee to TEACH people what you have learned.? ?I believe you would need a full day or 2 (or more) at your place of business to do that.? ?


There may be others who know this kind of stuff, or other WAYS of doing it, but I'm just floored by the value that you've created.? My niche in life is more on teaching people how to take such technology and put it to emergency communications usage.?


Cheers!!

Gordon




From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuner? Well Sure!
?
Hfsignals is an enterprise model that is radical. Instead of building more into hfsignala, i would encourage members to try something similar in their own countries and neighbourhoods. Ham radio is small enough a market to not attract big players.
?Low volume, low cost production units are easily organized with small communities. There are smd pick and place machines like th T220 available for a few thousand dollars. Mouser and digikey ship any amount of compoments from around the world for a few dollars. Makers, homebrewers need to grasp this moment and create value.
So, take the plunge!
Have a great 2018, all. Here is hoping for a better world, f.

On 30 Dec 2017 9:04 pm, "Lawrence Galea" <9h1avlaw@...> wrote:
You can count me in.
A 160M addition would encourage more operators to try this band which is also my favourite.

While at it, would it be possible to include 630M??
Although I am not sure that the ¦Ìbitx could be persuaded to tx down there with an additional LPF/BPF it would make more operators try the band.

Couple of quotes from emails.

"I actually changed the lowest frequency to 100000L. I want to see if 2200M will work, also. My antenna will never tune to these frequencies, but I want to see if I can hear anything....?KG5PRT"

"Group,?With a filter front end and a small preamp I was able to hear a NDB beacon at 209.00KHz with my Ubitx. the readout read something like 2.09.059...this was a stock UBitx...Hope this helps! Mike WA3O "

So it may be feasible.

Thanks and regards
Lawrence

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:30 AM, K9HZ <bill@...> wrote:

MFJ.? Huh. Glad to see them using science for a change.

?

I¡¯m a little old school when it comes to RF design, and particularly with matching circuits like a tuner.? The best tuners I¡¯ve ever owned were military tuners¡­ specifically the old Collins 601 and the Harris RF-2601 devices.? If you are a study of these devices you know that the control circuits for the tuners operated essentially transform space with phase and amplitude information to effectively minimize SWR by determining the right transform to make the input see a purely resistive load.? Is that hard to do?? Nope.? You just have to think in a different coordinate system.? Rather than go into several pages of background here, for those interested¡­ there is a wonderful and complete chapter on this very subject in Sabin & Schoenike¡¯s book ¡°Single Sideband Systems and Circuits¡±, Chapter 16.? This book is a must for the serious RF designer.? You can get it off Amazon.? Other chapters in the book will answer questions like why you don¡¯t see grounded gate power amplifiers (a recent topic here), and why the very best IMD and linearity in an RF amplifier comes from a tube design in grounded screen configuration (common in broadcast transmitters¡­ the cathode is at minus screen potential!).? Yikes!

?

I¡¯ll put together a paper on the various loads the tuner will match once I have all of the calculations done.? Off the top of my head, it should match real impedances of 2ohms-10Kohms and reactances of +/-8Kohms.? I¡¯ve configured the capacitor bank to sit on either side of the inductor to complete the entire transform space (read that work for those really low impedance antennas that are usually not covered by antenna tuners).

?

The hardware for me is a breeze¡­ what is not so easy for me is figuring out the Raduino side¡­ for display and setting¡­ like Power, SWR, Bypass, frequency for memories, etc.? I may just build in all these things and ask someone else who is more familiar with the uBITx code to help out.? I have decided to make the tuner an I2C device though¡­so that should help with the communications.? I originally was gonna use RS232 (makes it work with a lot of other radios then too¡­ and even stand-alone) I2C is better for integration.

?

I should have the hardware drawings dome tomorrow¡­

?

?

Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

?

Owner - Operator

Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC

Staunton, Illinois

?

Owner ¨C Operator

Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ

Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.

Rent it:

Like us on Facebook!

?

?

email:? bill@...

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gordon Gibby
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 6:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuner? Well Sure!

?

If you guys can come up with something that works, it might provide a chance for Asher to provide employment for many many more people.

?

Remember the most recent MFJ products measure impedance and use smith chart type calculations to predict the solution in jump to it quicker. ??

?

?

But that is not at all beyond the capabilities of many on this forum.

?



Sent from my iPhone


On Dec 29, 2017, at 19:25, bill richardson <ng1p.bill@...> wrote:

I have been wondering about an internal tuner for my uBitx and/or my BITX40¡¯s. This sounds great please count me in on one.. love to see enough inductance to work on 160m also maybe a mod a future design.

thanks Bill ng1p



Re: ubitx example of enclosure

 

Whoops! I should have read the description more thoroughly. It's just the metal inlay. Doggonit!
?


Sent from Yahoo Mail.


On Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:44 PM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


What's its diameter?

Jack, W8TEE



From: Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure

Thanks Shawn, the project still needs a few touches here and there and I think I'm going to cut up some double-sided PC board for the front and back. I found an eBay seller that has a Collins style knob for the tuner.

The extended edges are a feature of the project box that I got from Aliexpress and the uBITX just shoehorns into it.

It's a work in progress, but I think it'll pull together nicely.

73




?


Sent from Yahoo Mail.


On Saturday, December 30, 2017 1:03 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io <sreedq1014@...> wrote:


Hi Thomas.
I really like your use of material for the inside corners, on the front. And the extended front edges -? look good! Thank you for sharing that photo.
73, Shawnr. kf7yff.



--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 12/30/17, Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw=[email protected]> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure
Date: Saturday, December 30, 2017, 9:41 AM

?I
know that feeling. It usually takes me one or two tries to
get things where I want them...

Sent
from Yahoo Mail. Get the
app

? ? On Saturday, December
30, 2017 12:13 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io
<sreedq1014=[email protected]> wrote:
?

? Hello Ken. I checked out your web
page. Saw the case makings of yours? for the Tut Hill on
one of your project pages. Nice. I have two of these radios
collected. One with the factory case - 80M. The other I aim
to build it's case custom. Even as far as the symbols,
too generic. Looking at your fabricated ubitx enclosure,
could you tell me how to avoid such a gap - snag - in your
upper right corner of the lid? I, myself would have trouble
living with that. Case building is but one aspect of amature
radio, and not always the objective, pursuant of. Neither,
is it necessarily,? a "case" of agony to display.
Sometime, though, all I am interested in is the enclosure,
and the accommodations needed to consider, in?design,?for
the circuitry inside.

?This paragraph of yours was in the
page presentation.....??
"Making your projects look presentable, is not
an absolute necessity. Some even prefer the rustic look of
their projects and see it as a ¡°red badge of courage¡±,
showing the agony of their efforts. After all, scotch tape
and a penciled label can? identify just about anything, or
merely writing on the chassis. Having said that, there is a
very small group of hams that like to see their projects
look like they were done on purpose. I will try to address
that group".
?
Thank you for the tips. I cut with a most
ancient tool, but sharpest edge available. Be that obsidian.
Great joy in crafting something with one's own
imagination, every now and then - a must.
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
73, Shawnr. kf7yff




?
?










Cleaning up digital signal while using CAT

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


Hi,? noticed today while using Ashhar's CAT routines (FT-857 & similar emulation seems to work fine) -- that my transmitted winlink digital signals were.....lousy.? ? ?


When I added some clip on ferrites to the usb line driving the raduino.....the signal magically returned to wonderful sounding WINMOR.? ? I put on two clip ons.? ?


If you use digital signals while controlling the Raduino.....ALE, WINLINK, FLDIGI, FT8, whatever --- you might want to add ferrites to the usb line to the Raduino.?


And I also copied wonderful JT9 with the uBitx today; possibly due to not knowing the above, wasn't able to make any connections, but I'm sure that will come.??




OOPS!! Re-factory alignment....

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


This is not extraordinarily accurate information here.? ?


By some unknown manner, while fiddling with the uBitx today and trying various digital modes.....I accidentally entered "factory alignment" and since I hadn't even read anything about it, I suspect I fouled it up royally.? ?Transmitted signals were no longer "right on frequency".? ?


Approximate settings that might help someone with even less test equipment than *I* have were the following:

1st setting:? 10.000 MHz adjustment was on target at? "15"

2nd setting:? my best guess at when the 7.150 MHz LSB signal (generated by a vacuum tube radio driven by another raduino) was when the last digits were 96.7


At that point I was able to hit other WINLINK servers on 40 meters with less than 10 Hz apparent error.? ?(you only have to be within 200 Hz).? ?



However, it took 3 tries to get to there, as the first go-round was more like 50 Hz off on 40 and twice that on 20m.



I was a bit "agitated" and in a hurry so I haven't studied Ashhar's routines and don't fully understand the purpose of each of his tests.? ?(A "manual" for factory alignment would be wonderful....)? ? Others may do a far better job explaining all this.? ?I haven't yet gotten the bravery to upload a sketch to this wonderful machine yet, as I have for the bitx40.? ?A brief listen to the 25 MHz oscillator (without driving the output freq to that, which would have made the signal a LOT stronger) --- it does seem to be about 4kHz high as we noted on bitx40 raduinos.? ?


Hope this helps any other hapless people.....


AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO DRIVE THE USB PORT OF THE RADUINO, PUT FERRITES ON THE INTERCONNECTING CABLE TO YOUR COMPUTER!!!!? ? That made a HUGE improvement in the quality of the signal my little uBitx was creating.


Cheers,


gordon

??


Re: #ubitx and power supply connection #ubitx

 

Thanks for the heads up!? I'm really looking forward to everything I'm going to learn through this....:)
Tom
AB7WT


Re: #ubitx and power supply connection #ubitx

 

It may work IF you add enough filtering.? As it is, I imagine you'll get a LOT of AC hum mixed in with both your receive and transmit audio & I don't know what other effects you may encounter.

Good luck with your project.


Re: ubitx example of enclosure

Jack Purdum
 

What's its diameter?

Jack, W8TEE



From: Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure

Thanks Shawn, the project still needs a few touches here and there and I think I'm going to cut up some double-sided PC board for the front and back. I found an eBay seller that has a Collins style knob for the tuner.

The extended edges are a feature of the project box that I got from Aliexpress and the uBITX just shoehorns into it.

It's a work in progress, but I think it'll pull together nicely.

73




?


Sent from Yahoo Mail.


On Saturday, December 30, 2017 1:03 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io <sreedq1014@...> wrote:


Hi Thomas.
I really like your use of material for the inside corners, on the front. And the extended front edges -? look good! Thank you for sharing that photo.
73, Shawnr. kf7yff.



--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 12/30/17, Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw=[email protected]> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure
Date: Saturday, December 30, 2017, 9:41 AM

?I
know that feeling. It usually takes me one or two tries to
get things where I want them...

Sent
from Yahoo Mail. Get the
app

? ? On Saturday, December
30, 2017 12:13 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io
<sreedq1014=[email protected]> wrote:
?

? Hello Ken. I checked out your web
page. Saw the case makings of yours? for the Tut Hill on
one of your project pages. Nice. I have two of these radios
collected. One with the factory case - 80M. The other I aim
to build it's case custom. Even as far as the symbols,
too generic. Looking at your fabricated ubitx enclosure,
could you tell me how to avoid such a gap - snag - in your
upper right corner of the lid? I, myself would have trouble
living with that. Case building is but one aspect of amature
radio, and not always the objective, pursuant of. Neither,
is it necessarily,? a "case" of agony to display.
Sometime, though, all I am interested in is the enclosure,
and the accommodations needed to consider, in?design,?for
the circuitry inside.

?This paragraph of yours was in the
page presentation.....??
"Making your projects look presentable, is not
an absolute necessity. Some even prefer the rustic look of
their projects and see it as a ¡°red badge of courage¡±,
showing the agony of their efforts. After all, scotch tape
and a penciled label can? identify just about anything, or
merely writing on the chassis. Having said that, there is a
very small group of hams that like to see their projects
look like they were done on purpose. I will try to address
that group".
?
Thank you for the tips. I cut with a most
ancient tool, but sharpest edge available. Be that obsidian.
Great joy in crafting something with one's own
imagination, every now and then - a must.
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
73, Shawnr. kf7yff




?
?








Re: ubitx example of enclosure

 

Thanks Shawn, the project still needs a few touches here and there and I think I'm going to cut up some double-sided PC board for the front and back. I found an eBay seller that has a Collins style knob for the tuner.

The extended edges are a feature of the project box that I got from Aliexpress and the uBITX just shoehorns into it.

It's a work in progress, but I think it'll pull together nicely.

73




?


Sent from Yahoo Mail.


On Saturday, December 30, 2017 1:03 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io <sreedq1014@...> wrote:


Hi Thomas.
I really like your use of material for the inside corners, on the front. And the extended front edges -? look good! Thank you for sharing that photo.
73, Shawnr. kf7yff.



--------------------------------------------

On Sat, 12/30/17, Thomas Sharka via Groups.Io <sharkatw=[email protected]> wrote:

Subject: Re: [BITX20] ubitx example of enclosure
Date: Saturday, December 30, 2017, 9:41 AM

?I
know that feeling. It usually takes me one or two tries to
get things where I want them...

Sent
from Yahoo Mail. Get the
app

? ? On Saturday, December
30, 2017 12:13 PM, Shawn Reed via Groups.Io
<sreedq1014=[email protected]> wrote:
?

? Hello Ken. I checked out your web
page. Saw the case makings of yours? for the Tut Hill on
one of your project pages. Nice. I have two of these radios
collected. One with the factory case - 80M. The other I aim
to build it's case custom. Even as far as the symbols,
too generic. Looking at your fabricated ubitx enclosure,
could you tell me how to avoid such a gap - snag - in your
upper right corner of the lid? I, myself would have trouble
living with that. Case building is but one aspect of amature
radio, and not always the objective, pursuant of. Neither,
is it necessarily,? a "case" of agony to display.
Sometime, though, all I am interested in is the enclosure,
and the accommodations needed to consider, in?design,?for
the circuitry inside.

?This paragraph of yours was in the
page presentation.....??
"Making your projects look presentable, is not
an absolute necessity. Some even prefer the rustic look of
their projects and see it as a ¡°red badge of courage¡±,
showing the agony of their efforts. After all, scotch tape
and a penciled label can? identify just about anything, or
merely writing on the chassis. Having said that, there is a
very small group of hams that like to see their projects
look like they were done on purpose. I will try to address
that group".
?
Thank you for the tips. I cut with a most
ancient tool, but sharpest edge available. Be that obsidian.
Great joy in crafting something with one's own
imagination, every now and then - a must.
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
73, Shawnr. kf7yff




?
?






Re: Tuner? Well Sure!

 

Hfsignals is an enterprise model that is radical. Instead of building more into hfsignala, i would encourage members to try something similar in their own countries and neighbourhoods. Ham radio is small enough a market to not attract big players.
?Low volume, low cost production units are easily organized with small communities. There are smd pick and place machines like th T220 available for a few thousand dollars. Mouser and digikey ship any amount of compoments from around the world for a few dollars. Makers, homebrewers need to grasp this moment and create value.
So, take the plunge!
Have a great 2018, all. Here is hoping for a better world, f.

On 30 Dec 2017 9:04 pm, "Lawrence Galea" <9h1avlaw@...> wrote:
You can count me in.
A 160M addition would encourage more operators to try this band which is also my favourite.

While at it, would it be possible to include 630M??
Although I am not sure that the ¦Ìbitx could be persuaded to tx down there with an additional LPF/BPF it would make more operators try the band.

Couple of quotes from emails.

"I actually changed the lowest frequency to 100000L. I want to see if 2200M will work, also. My antenna will never tune to these frequencies, but I want to see if I can hear anything....?KG5PRT"

"Group,?With a filter front end and a small preamp I was able to hear a NDB beacon at 209.00KHz with my Ubitx. the readout read something like 2.09.059...this was a stock UBitx...Hope this helps! Mike WA3O "

So it may be feasible.

Thanks and regards
Lawrence

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:30 AM, K9HZ <bill@...> wrote:

MFJ.? Huh. Glad to see them using science for a change.

?

I¡¯m a little old school when it comes to RF design, and particularly with matching circuits like a tuner.? The best tuners I¡¯ve ever owned were military tuners¡­ specifically the old Collins 601 and the Harris RF-2601 devices.? If you are a study of these devices you know that the control circuits for the tuners operated essentially transform space with phase and amplitude information to effectively minimize SWR by determining the right transform to make the input see a purely resistive load.? Is that hard to do?? Nope.? You just have to think in a different coordinate system.? Rather than go into several pages of background here, for those interested¡­ there is a wonderful and complete chapter on this very subject in Sabin & Schoenike¡¯s book ¡°Single Sideband Systems and Circuits¡±, Chapter 16.? This book is a must for the serious RF designer.? You can get it off Amazon.? Other chapters in the book will answer questions like why you don¡¯t see grounded gate power amplifiers (a recent topic here), and why the very best IMD and linearity in an RF amplifier comes from a tube design in grounded screen configuration (common in broadcast transmitters¡­ the cathode is at minus screen potential!).? Yikes!

?

I¡¯ll put together a paper on the various loads the tuner will match once I have all of the calculations done.? Off the top of my head, it should match real impedances of 2ohms-10Kohms and reactances of +/-8Kohms.? I¡¯ve configured the capacitor bank to sit on either side of the inductor to complete the entire transform space (read that work for those really low impedance antennas that are usually not covered by antenna tuners).

?

The hardware for me is a breeze¡­ what is not so easy for me is figuring out the Raduino side¡­ for display and setting¡­ like Power, SWR, Bypass, frequency for memories, etc.? I may just build in all these things and ask someone else who is more familiar with the uBITx code to help out.? I have decided to make the tuner an I2C device though¡­so that should help with the communications.? I originally was gonna use RS232 (makes it work with a lot of other radios then too¡­ and even stand-alone) I2C is better for integration.

?

I should have the hardware drawings dome tomorrow¡­

?

?

Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ

?

Owner - Operator

Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC

Staunton, Illinois

?

Owner ¨C Operator

Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ

Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I.

Rent it:

Like us on Facebook!

?

?

email:? bill@...

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gordon Gibby
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 6:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Tuner? Well Sure!

?

If you guys can come up with something that works, it might provide a chance for Asher to provide employment for many many more people.

?

Remember the most recent MFJ products measure impedance and use smith chart type calculations to predict the solution in jump to it quicker. ??

?

?

But that is not at all beyond the capabilities of many on this forum.

?



Sent from my iPhone


On Dec 29, 2017, at 19:25, bill richardson <ng1p.bill@...> wrote:

I have been wondering about an internal tuner for my uBitx and/or my BITX40¡¯s. This sounds great please count me in on one.. love to see enough inductance to work on 160m also maybe a mod a future design.

thanks Bill ng1p



Re: Weird magic smoke...

Michael Davis
 

The supplied pot wiring is shown on the wire it up photo. If you have gone with the 10 turn pot the center tab is no longer the wiper. See the 10 turn pot specs (if you are using one) on the manufacturer web site.

Sent from Mike's iPad WA1MAD


Re: Additional uBitx specs

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks John and Dave.

Mike

K5ESS

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John T.
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 6:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Additional uBitx specs

?

Check out.