Re: Nano on-board regulator...was: I made a mistake
Hi Jerry,
I know all ebay switchers aren't equal, of course. But, here are some cheapo examples that are success stories; with hundreds deployed in the hamvoip.org project, etc.
At less than $0.80 each, these little boards are fantastic. The 3A rating is intermittent duty cycle, efficiency is excellent, and protected from output short-circuit/overload:
I power Raspberry Pi 3 boards, etc., from these. They don't skip a beat:
I agree that you should stay away from ebay RF power transistors unless you're certain about the reseller/manufacturer. I, too, have purchased some lemons!
73, David KB4FXC
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote: There are clearly a few items of ebay electronics about which some fear, uncertainty and doubt is in order.
For example, good luck getting 20 AH at 12v out of this: ?? ?? ( )
Or getting the maximum rated amps out of any $2 switching (or linear) power supply across the entire claimed input and output voltage ranges. ??Or even half of the rated amps. For more than a few milliseconds.
Ebay RD16HHF1 RF power FET's are often some random switcher FET with fresh ink. That can even happen with the relatively cheap IRF510, why anybody would bother is beyond me.
But many have had surprisingly good luck with the $3 Nano's. Including most Bitx40 owners. Though they must be cutting corners where they can off the design of the $30 original. ?? And I did just order 50pcs of the AD8307 for less than I could get two out of Mouser as per the last paragraph of this post: ??/g/BITX20/message/32675 ( /g/BITX20/message/32675 ) Got my fingers crossed.
Jerry
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 02:40 pm, Arv Evans wrote:
Regardless of what has been said about the on-board regulator being questionable, it is a pretty standard 3-terminal regulator it is usually good for at least 100 ma.?? I have used a couple dozen of the Asian manufactured NANO boards with +13.6 volts input and they all worked just fine.????
I suspect that your concern about exceeding current limits may be valid though because there is no heat sink on those on-board regulators.?? Most of my Arduino based test equipment uses the on-board regulator for NANO and an attached LCD.?? Other circuitry is powered from a 7805L or higher current capable 7805 equivalent.??
There is a lot of not-invented-here and not-manufactured-here sentiment among the ham radio fraternity.?? Some of it justified and some is just myth and FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt).
|
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 22, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
Hearing someone talking to W1LY in and out, but can't make out who. Can't hear Willy. -- John - WA2FZW
|
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 22, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
I heard W1LY on earlier. ?I'm gonna move up to 7.285, it seemed clear
|
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 22, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
I'm also on. Hearing nothing in NJ -- John - WA2FZW
|
Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, October 22, 7pm Local Time, 7277 kHz in North America, 7177 kHz elsewhere
I'm on the air, but there's a lot of traffic from the Illinois QSO party at the moment...
|
Re: Nano on-board regulator...was: I made a mistake
There are clearly a few items of ebay electronics about which some fear, uncertainty and doubt is in order. For example, good luck getting 20 AH at 12v out of this: ? ? Or getting the maximum rated amps out of any $2 switching (or linear) power supply across the entire claimed input and output voltage ranges. ?Or even half of the rated amps. For more than a few milliseconds. Ebay RD16HHF1 RF power FET's are often some random switcher FET with fresh ink. That can even happen with the relatively cheap IRF510, why anybody would bother is beyond me. But many have had surprisingly good luck with the $3 Nano's. Including most Bitx40 owners. Though they must be cutting corners where they can off the design of the $30 original. ? And I did just order 50pcs of the AD8307 for less than I could get two out of Mouser as per the last paragraph of this post: ? /g/BITX20/message/32675Got my fingers crossed. Jerry
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 02:40 pm, Arv Evans wrote:
Regardless of what has been said about the on-board regulator being questionable, it is a pretty
standard 3-terminal regulator it is usually good for at least 100 ma.? I have used a couple dozen
of the Asian manufactured NANO boards with +13.6 volts input and they all worked just fine.??
I suspect that your concern about exceeding current limits may be valid though because there is
no heat sink on those on-board regulators.? Most of my Arduino based test equipment uses the
on-board regulator for NANO and an attached LCD.? Other circuitry is powered from a 7805L or
higher current capable 7805 equivalent.?
There is a lot of not-invented-here and not-manufactured-here sentiment among the ham radio
fraternity.? Some of it justified and some is just myth and FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt).
|
Hi Dale,
I'm hopeful that maybe you got a poorly done batch of clone boards.
I'll do some more testing.
Thanks for your feedback!
73, David KB4FXC
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Master Ice wrote: Nope they didn't survive because the failure of the regulator meant that, when they blew, they went short circuit and slammed full 12V onto the Atmega. The ones that I have had fail were all fitted with supposedly genuine (ha ha ha ) AMS1117-5 5V versions of the regulator. Luckily the problem was dealt with by me before the product went to the client by the simple expedient of kludging a better 5V supply and ignoring the Nano regulator completely. As an aside I puchased a few sacrificial batches of Chinese AMS1117-5 regulators and found that, on test, less than 50% were capable of handling more than 9V input safely. Some manufacturers claim an input of <=12V while other claim 15V. The joys of the game.
Dale G4IPZ
----- Original Message ----- From: Dexter N Muir To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 9:24 PM Subject: Re: [BITX20] I made a mistake
Dale me ol' Chin-wah, commiserations - though if the rest of the chip survives you'll have a ready stock of Nanos to hand! That flaky reg is the reason for the Raduino's 78LM7805 regulator - that and the Nano's current drain being either too close to or over the max spec of a 78L05. p.s. I've taken my 7805 to the other face of the PCB for heatsink clearance and accessibility. It allows me to sit stuff close to that side of the Raduino
|
Re: Nano on-board regulator...was: I made a mistake
Hi Arv,
Thanks for the comments. The Nano's I've got have a (clone, I'm sure) AM1117-5.0 regulator. I noticed the datasheet says the ABS MAX input voltage is 15VDC, a stark contrast to 26+ VDC MAX for LM2940 in the "stock" Nano design, or even the 35VDC limit for 78xx series regulators.
I'll do some additional testing and make sure "LDO" doesn't stand for Low Dropout OSCILLATOR! HiHI.
73, David KB4FXC
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Arv Evans wrote: David KB4FXC
Regardless of what has been said about the on-board regulator being questionable, it is a pretty standard 3-terminal regulator it is usually good for at least 100 ma. I have used a couple dozen of the Asian manufactured NANO boards with +13.6 volts input and they all worked just fine.
I suspect that your concern about exceeding current limits may be valid though because there is no heat sink on those on-board regulators. Most of my Arduino based test equipment uses the on-board regulator for NANO and an attached LCD. Other circuitry is powered from a 7805L or higher current capable 7805 equivalent.
There is a lot of *not-invented-here* and *not-manufactured-here* sentiment among the ham radio fraternity. Some of it justified and some is just myth and FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt).
Arv K7HKL _._
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:11 PM, David McGough <kb4fxc@...> wrote:
Hi Dale,
I'm designing a NANO project right now that uses the on-board regulator at about +12v input. I'm only powering the atmega328p chip and 6 digital outputs, consisting of low-current LEDs/opto-isolators. I've had no problems, so far, with a random sampling of about a dozen cheapo boards....My max current draw is perhaps 25mA. How much current were you drawing from the regulator where it popped??
....Now I'm concerned that I may need to consider an external regulator.
Thanks,
73, David KB4FXC
|
?
Nope they didn't survive because the
failure of the regulator?meant that, when they blew, they went short
circuit and slammed full 12V onto the Atmega.
The ones that I have had fail were all
fitted with supposedly genuine (ha ha ha )?AMS1117-5 5V versions of the
regulator.
Luckily the problem was dealt with by me
before the product went to the client by the simple expedient of kludging a
better 5V supply and ignoring the Nano?regulator completely.
As an aside I puchased a few
sacrificial?batches of Chinese AMS1117-5 regulators and found that, on
test, less than 50% were capable of handling more than 9V input
safely.
Some manufacturers claim an input of
<=12V while other claim 15V.
The joys of the game.
?
Dale G4IPZ
?
?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 9:24
PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] I made a
mistake
Dale me ol' Chin-wah, commiserations - though if the rest of
the chip survives you'll have a ready stock? of Nanos to hand! That flaky
reg is the reason for the Raduino's 78LM7805 regulator - that and the Nano's
current drain being either too close to or over the max spec of a
78L05. p.s. I've taken my 7805 to the other face of the PCB for heatsink
clearance and accessibility. It allows me to sit stuff close to that side of
the Raduino
|
Re: Nano on-board regulator...was: I made a mistake
David KB4FXC
Regardless of what has been said about the on-board regulator being questionable, it is a pretty
standard 3-terminal regulator it is usually good for at least 100 ma.? I have used a couple dozen
of the Asian manufactured NANO boards with +13.6 volts input and they all worked just fine.??
I suspect that your concern about exceeding current limits may be valid though because there is
no heat sink on those on-board regulators.? Most of my Arduino based test equipment uses the
on-board regulator for NANO and an attached LCD.? Other circuitry is powered from a 7805L or
higher current capable 7805 equivalent.?
There is a lot of not-invented-here and not-manufactured-here sentiment among the ham radio
fraternity.? Some of it justified and some is just myth and FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt).
Arv? K7HKL _._
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:11 PM, David McGough <kb4fxc@...> wrote: Hi Dale,
I'm designing a NANO project right now that uses the on-board regulator at about +12v input. I'm only powering the atmega328p chip and? 6 digital outputs, consisting of low-current LEDs/opto-isolators. I've had no problems, so far, with a random sampling of about a dozen cheapo boards....My max current draw is perhaps 25mA. How much current were you drawing from the regulator where it popped??
....Now I'm concerned that I may need to consider an external regulator.
Thanks,
73, David KB4FXC
|
Re: Nano on-board regulator...was: I made a mistake
On the raduino, the si5351 is sucking as much as 35ma+5.6ma=40.6ma of 3.3v from the Nano assembly as per table 3 on p5 of ?https://www.silabs.com/documents/public/data-sheets/Si5351-B.pdf That 3.3v comes from a regulator tucked inside the USB chip at U2, whatever the clones are stuffing there. ? ?? That's a very significant extra load on U2.
The USB chip at U2 is powered from the Nano's 5v rail which could come from 12v vin through the dinky 5v regulator at U3, though on the Raduino we instead have a separate 5v LM7805 in a TO220. ? The Raduino's TO220 can get quite hot. The Raduino would likely blow U3 if it didn't have a separate TO220 LM7805, even if U3 was an honest ua78m05 in the sot223
Unless shaving pennies, I'd tend to just feed the Nano 5v and not borrow any 3.3v from it. Especially if getting pot-luck Nano clones from Ebay.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 02:11 pm, David McGough wrote:
I'm designing a NANO project right now that uses the on-board regulator at about +12v input. I'm only powering the atmega328p chip and? 6 digital outputs, consisting of low-current LEDs/opto-isolators. I've had no problems, so far, with a random sampling of about a dozen cheapo boards....My max current draw is perhaps 25mA. How much current were you drawing from the regulator where it popped??
....Now I'm concerned that I may need to consider an external regulator.
|
Re: Nano on-board regulator...was: I made a mistake
Hi Dale,
I'm designing a NANO project right now that uses the on-board regulator at about +12v input. I'm only powering the atmega328p chip and? 6 digital outputs, consisting of low-current LEDs/opto-isolators. I've had no problems, so far, with a random sampling of about a dozen cheapo boards....My max current draw is perhaps 25mA. How much current were you drawing from the regulator where it popped??
....Now I'm concerned that I may need to consider an external regulator.
Thanks,
73, David KB4FXC
|
Dale me ol' Chin-wah, commiserations - though if the rest of the chip survives you'll have a ready stock? of Nanos to hand! That flaky reg is the reason for the Raduino's 78LM7805 regulator - that and the Nano's current drain being either too close to or over the max spec of a 78L05. p.s. I've taken my 7805 to the other face of the PCB for heatsink clearance and accessibility. It allows me to sit stuff close to that side of the Raduino
|
When you come right down to it, radio is math and physics¡and not much else.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Oct 22, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Steve Black via Groups.Io < kb1chu@...> wrote:
Theres a couple guys over there who know a little
bit about radio too (pun intended). Steve kb1chu
On 10/22/2017 03:41 PM, Simon Thompson
wrote:
Thanks for sharing these anecdotes. There are many people in North
America who do not know about the contribution of South Asian
physicists and mathematicians to our understanding of the
universe, and the Bitx group¡¯s sharing of these stories will help
to spread awareness.
Thanks for the Video Bill!
In '69 I met Sir Raman and along with Balu Balakrishnan
attended many
lectures on Radio Astronomy. Mrs. Raman was related
to Balu and she called us over when there was anything
"radio"
in lectures. We also were allowed to borrow tubes and
parts
from their labs.. a great encouragement.
A year of so later he passed away. Sir Raman's son Dr.
Radhakrishna
became vu3fly and allowed our club to use their halls
etc for lectures and such.
Balu became vu2rvb, went to US did masters and was in
National Semi.. got
a lot of patents and started his own very
successful company Power Intergrations. They made chips
for wall warts
that went to sleep when you did not draw power.
Eventually he got the environmentalist of the year in 1999
as I remember.
The US govt. I believe mandated all equipment
supplied to them should have this tech in it and the US
saves a lot of
power due to the chip.
Raj
At 22/10/2017, you wrote:
I met
chandrashekhar once
? I had no idea who he was my elmer arun, VU2OZ
introduced me to him as
'the astronomer guy'. He sat on the sofa drinking his
south indian filter
coffee from a steel tumbler, chattering away in tamil.
What do i care? It
was my time with the AR88 in his shack.
- f
On 21 Oct 2017 9:44 am, "Keith VE7GDH"
<ve7gdh@...> wrote:
- Bill N2CQR wrote...
- > I thought you would all be
interested in this
- > beautiful video. The Quantum Indians
- So, if half of the BITX40 is made of
Bosons, does
- it mean the other half is made of
Fermions? It's
- all over my head. I just turn it on and
it works.
- All the electrons know exactly how they
are supposed
- to jiggle and when.
- Bose, Raman, Saha and their fellow
scientists were
- very smart cookies. We should probably
include
- Ramanujan in that group.
- "The chief thing is to take some pleasure
in your
- work."
- Ummm... was it Raman or Farhan that said
that? hi!
- --
- 73 Keith VE7GDH
st
|
Theres a couple guys over there who know a little
bit about radio too (pun intended). Steve kb1chu
On 10/22/2017 03:41 PM, Simon Thompson
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for sharing these anecdotes. There are many people in North
America who do not know about the contribution of South Asian
physicists and mathematicians to our understanding of the
universe, and the Bitx group¡¯s sharing of these stories will help
to spread awareness.
Thanks for the Video Bill!
In '69 I met Sir Raman and along with Balu Balakrishnan
attended many
lectures on Radio Astronomy. Mrs. Raman was related
to Balu and she called us over when there was anything
"radio"
in lectures. We also were allowed to borrow tubes and
parts
from their labs.. a great encouragement.
A year of so later he passed away. Sir Raman's son Dr.
Radhakrishna
became vu3fly and allowed our club to use their halls
etc for lectures and such.
Balu became vu2rvb, went to US did masters and was in
National Semi.. got
a lot of patents and started his own very
successful company Power Intergrations. They made chips
for wall warts
that went to sleep when you did not draw power.
Eventually he got the environmentalist of the year in 1999
as I remember.
The US govt. I believe mandated all equipment
supplied to them should have this tech in it and the US
saves a lot of
power due to the chip.
Raj
At 22/10/2017, you wrote:
I met
chandrashekhar once
? I had no idea who he was my elmer arun, VU2OZ
introduced me to him as
'the astronomer guy'. He sat on the sofa drinking his
south indian filter
coffee from a steel tumbler, chattering away in tamil.
What do i care? It
was my time with the AR88 in his shack.
- f
On 21 Oct 2017 9:44 am, "Keith VE7GDH"
<ve7gdh@...> wrote:
- Bill N2CQR wrote...
- > I thought you would all be
interested in this
- > beautiful video. The Quantum Indians
- So, if half of the BITX40 is made of
Bosons, does
- it mean the other half is made of
Fermions? It's
- all over my head. I just turn it on and
it works.
- All the electrons know exactly how they
are supposed
- to jiggle and when.
- Bose, Raman, Saha and their fellow
scientists were
- very smart cookies. We should probably
include
- Ramanujan in that group.
- "The chief thing is to take some pleasure
in your
- work."
- Ummm... was it Raman or Farhan that said
that? hi!
- --
- 73 Keith VE7GDH
st
|
Hi Farhan, Forgive me if I do not understand- you're speaking just about bandpass filters, correct? Or are you suggesting doing this for both the band pass and the low pass filters?? -- Ryan Flowers W7RLF
?
?<-- Learn how to go digital on the BITX40
|
Thanks for sharing these anecdotes. There are many people in North America who do not know about the contribution of South Asian physicists and mathematicians to our understanding of the universe, and the Bitx group¡¯s sharing of these stories will help to spread awareness.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for the Video Bill!
In '69 I met Sir Raman and along with Balu Balakrishnan attended many
lectures on Radio Astronomy. Mrs. Raman was related
to Balu and she called us over when there was anything "radio"
in lectures. We also were allowed to borrow tubes and parts
from their labs.. a great encouragement.
A year of so later he passed away. Sir Raman's son Dr. Radhakrishna
became vu3fly and allowed our club to use their halls
etc for lectures and such.
Balu became vu2rvb, went to US did masters and was in National Semi.. got
a lot of patents and started his own very
successful company Power Intergrations. They made chips for wall warts
that went to sleep when you did not draw power.
Eventually he got the environmentalist of the year in 1999 as I remember.
The US govt. I believe mandated all equipment
supplied to them should have this tech in it and the US saves a lot of
power due to the chip.
Raj
At 22/10/2017, you wrote:
I met chandrashekhar once
? I had no idea who he was my elmer arun, VU2OZ introduced me to him as
'the astronomer guy'. He sat on the sofa drinking his south indian filter
coffee from a steel tumbler, chattering away in tamil. What do i care? It
was my time with the AR88 in his shack.
- f
On 21 Oct 2017 9:44 am, "Keith VE7GDH"
<ve7gdh@...> wrote:
- Bill N2CQR wrote...
- > I thought you would all be interested in this
- > beautiful video. The Quantum Indians
- So, if half of the BITX40 is made of Bosons, does
- it mean the other half is made of Fermions? It's
- all over my head. I just turn it on and it works.
- All the electrons know exactly how they are supposed
- to jiggle and when.
- Bose, Raman, Saha and their fellow scientists were
- very smart cookies. We should probably include
- Ramanujan in that group.
- "The chief thing is to take some pleasure in your
- work."
- Ummm... was it Raman or Farhan that said that? hi!
- --
- 73 Keith VE7GDH
st
|
We all stand on the shoulders of giants. So many of our greatest scientists and artists are obscure until after their passing.
A friend, Bill W6FA was a prof @ CalTech when Nobel winner Richard Feynman was hired to lecture at lunchtime on any topic he wished.? What amazing good fortune!
Thanks for sharing that link. I've passed it to others who share my fascination with India - esp Indian food<grin>.? So glad I now know whom to blame for Bosons.
Thanks for all you do for us!
|
?Has anyone tried changing C115 and C122 from 1uF to 100nF??? (C115 for receive pop, C122 for carrier issue?)
|
?
Certainly forget the Chinese Nano clones
working much above 9V despite many sellers saying they're good for 12V and even
15V.
I had several release the magic smoke
when running them on 12V as the regulators simply popped their tops before I
realised the problem was they all had rubbish regulators.
Either run with 9V maximum or preferably
go in with a good known 5V supply into the 5V in connection.
?
Dale G4IPZ
?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 6:36
PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] I made a
mistake
You're probably right.?
But I would not count on a
$2 Nano clone dealing with 12v at vin. Depends on what regulator these
clones have. Some cheaper regulators may not be good beyond 5v. And at
12v it will be dissipating a bunch of power, if the regulator does not
incorporate a thermal shutdown mode it will be toast.
On Sat, Oct
21, 2017 at 07:42 pm, K5ESS wrote:
Well
that¡¯s not strictly correct.? There is one exception.? Although
it¡¯s apparently not connected in the Raduino configuration the Vin pin on
the Nano goes to a voltage regulator that can take an input of up to a
typical value of 15 v.?
?
|