¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

I made many CQ BITX calls between 2130 and 2200 CDT. ?No responses and no other stations heard other than at about 2138 when a male voice called "BITX40 awww-dio" twice. ?He didn't respond to a call.

Next week. ;)


QSO night

 

It's been a good night here at WA9DOH a few QSO so far from N. Illinois

KC1FSZ ? Bruce 59
VE3RRD ?Al ? at times 59+
QSB and QRM at times but very good copy

AA4AG Scott 55 QRM at both ends

Good night BITXing
Larry
WA9DOH


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

Same here Dave heard nothing. I just checked in to the 3905 late net, you should give it a shot the frequency is 7188.


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

Heavy sigh... heard nothing, no reply to multiple CQ's. I tried moving around a bit, but heard only a very strong station at 7176 or so.


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

'Evening! ? I made a few calls on 7179. ?A guy in OK City fired up with 600W on 7178 and is wiping out any possibility of using 7179 at the moment. ?I'll see what happens after 9 central.


Andy KG5RKP


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

Petry, Kevin
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Conditions not bad in Cleveland, a few contacts made in the NEQP
Kevin


On May 7, 2017, at 9:16 PM, KC8WBK via Groups.Io <cruisenewsnet@...> wrote:

I only heard static here, sorry if missed anyone.
This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of the email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately, by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. WARNING: Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission.


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

I only heard static here, sorry if missed anyone.


Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

I will be listening/ calling from RI. Worked west coast with excption of AZ and NV last night with the BitX40 running 7 watts with battery pwr. Have worked 16 DX countries in last week with inverted V at 50 feet. This thing is amazing. There is something that sounds like over horizon radar hr in RI from 7.185 to 7.2 MHz. Willy W1LY

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 7:44 PM, KC8WBK via Groups.Io <cruisenewsnet@...> wrote:
Yes, and you may wish to try at 7pm and 8pm as well to get the neighboring time zones.




Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

Yes, and you may wish to try at 7pm and 8pm as well to get the neighboring time zones.



Re: BITX QSO Night, Sunday, May 7, 9pm Local Time, 7.179 MHz

 

We are switching to 9PM local right? I'll be on here in CA PST time.


New BITX40 owner, and a few issues

 

Hello to the BITX20 community,


I'm a new happy BITX40 owner, still a SWL for now and soon to become a Ham. In the meantime, I'm fiddling with RX antennas, and now I'm trying to understand the inner workings of transceivers. I have to say, buying that BITX40 v3 and trying to overcome some of its limitations has been really instructive to me so far. I'm in the process of making some breakout boards based on the new ?BITX design (), to experiment further, try different crystal filters with relay switching for AM, SSB, CW, maybe try to use some INRAD 8-pole filters (9kHz IF or others) since sadly I don't yet have the equipment to match crystals and test DIY filters, so that will be for later.


Anyway, about my current BITX40, like a lot of you guys here, I'm trying to get the best out of it. So far I've 3D printed a faceplate, tuning knob and volume knob, I swapped the tuning pot for a 400 steps optical encoder, I'm still waiting for a couple OLED displays (one is plug and play, and the other one is 256x64 pixels). I added 4 buttons, two of which are in use for now for tuning step selection and LSB/USB switching. I added a red LED that lights up when transmitting. I also added a socket for an external mic and I use a TechnoFix electret replacement mic for Icom transceivers.


Today I spent some time disabling the BFO circuit (by removing R101 and C106) and wiring the CLK0 as the BFO using a short piece of coax from the Raduino board to the product detector transformer pins. It works a treat and with some code tinkering, I can now seemlessly switch between LSB and USB (still monoband on 40m though). I'm now using a high side VFO and I removed C91 and C92 which attenuates too much the higher VFO frequency.




I still have a few issues though:


1. First thing I noticed when listening with the low side VFO, I had quite a few noticeable birdies which was obviously to be expected. I got rid of almost all of them with the high side VFO, but the one near 7.1975MHz still remains and is quite strong. I'm not sure where this one comes from, I know there is nothing there on my SDR receiver (RSP2).


2. I know it's not the best idea to use one receive antenna for multiple receivers, I'm planning on building a simple splitter soon, but for now it works well enough for me that way. I noticed some carrier leakage on receive on my RSP2 which is S4 (my noise floor is S2 average). I tried on transmit (no worries, the SDR and BITX40 are *not* interconnected when transmitting), but I did not have any dummy load at hand today, so I just left the antenna disconnected. I had a lot of carrier leakage alongside the LSB signal around -80dBm on my SDR. What I did is, I removed the BAT54 matched pair, soldered a 10k multiturn pot, and tried a few combinaison of 1N4148 diodes I had at hand. Fortunately, I managed to find one good pair, which gave me -110dBm. It was still there, but a lot lower now. The problem is, now I had a lot of unwanted noise on receive and signals were now buried in the noise, I had to adjust the pot again to get a good reception but at the expense of more carrier leakage (-85dBm on transmit). I don't really understand what's going on here.


3. The AF amplifier, the LM386 is outputing a lot of white noise even with the trimpot disconnected, which means the noise comes from the amplifier itself and not the signal to be amplified. It's barely noticeable and well acceptable when listening on a small low quality speaker, but when I use my headphones or a higher quality speaker, I can hear higher pitch noise above the noise floor and the signal I'm listening to. I can still copy signals just fine, but it's really not pleasant when listening for more than short periods of time. I tried a few things already, including removing C113 to lower the gain, I couldn't get rid of that noise.


Do you guys have any ideas about these points?


My future plans about the BITX are to implement AGC, probably AF level AGC here (IF for the ?BITX if I can), and RF gain. I probably won't try to make my BITX40 multiband, I'll leave that to my other project which is the ?BITX. I'll go a bit further with that, and probably have someone machine an aluminum faceplate, backplate/heatsink, and panels. That will be for later though.


Thank you guys!


Etienne, from Reunion Island.


Re: Raduino Sketches

Jack Purdum
 

Allard, PE1NWL, is keeping an alternative sketch at:
\


I think the latest version is 1.09.

Jack, W8TEE



From: Dale Brooks KG7SSB <kg7ssb@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 4:36 PM
Subject: [BITX20] Raduino Sketches

Hi BITX20 Group,
I just completed building the BITX40v3 transceiver and I have made some DX contacts within the U.S.. The power shows very weak on my MFJ 969 set to 30 watt scale however the current and voltage calculates at about 5-7 watts input power to the antenna. Probably after traveling through coax and connectors it is much lower. Can't complain however because it is getting a signal out and the receiver is surprisingly very sensitive. The lack of AVC is a downside to this rig, It does however, it keeps the cost down. A circuit could be developed to improve this if desired.?
I do need help in one area of concern. I'm very weak on the Raduino end of this project. It came with the standard issue sketch already installed however I want to save it to a file in the event I screw it up or it just screws up. Bottom line how can I obtain a copy of this software and any other versions that may be updates? As a side note I downloaded GitHub and expected it to guide me to the BITX40 sketches only to see a blank you develop your own sketch screen. Like that could happen, at least right now. LOL
Need your expertise and please keep it layman talk only,,,,Thanks For the help,,,,Dale, ?kg7ssb



Raduino Sketches

Dale Brooks KG7SSB
 

Hi BITX20 Group,

I just completed building the BITX40v3 transceiver and I have made some DX contacts within the U.S.. The power shows very weak on my MFJ 969 set to 30 watt scale however the current and voltage calculates at about 5-7 watts input power to the antenna. Probably after traveling through coax and connectors it is much lower. Can't complain however because it is getting a signal out and the receiver is surprisingly very sensitive. The lack of AVC is a downside to this rig, It does however, it keeps the cost down. A circuit could be developed to improve this if desired.?

I do need help in one area of concern. I'm very weak on the Raduino end of this project. It came with the standard issue sketch already installed however I want to save it to a file in the event I screw it up or it just screws up. Bottom line how can I obtain a copy of this software and any other versions that may be updates? As a side note I downloaded GitHub and expected it to guide me to the BITX40 sketches only to see a blank you develop your own sketch screen. Like that could happen, at least right now. LOL

Need your expertise and please keep it layman talk only,,,,Thanks For the help,,,,Dale, ?kg7ssb


Re: Newbie here with PTT issue

 

Glad you got it glenn.

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 2:03 PM, <gsilver33@...> wrote:

Now I feel real dumb :( ? ?The power supply was set on 7.5 volts. ? ?Thanks for the replies!


Glenn



Re: Newbie here with PTT issue

 

Fred and Glen

After several years of experience it seems that many of us develop a
sort of 6th-sense for analyzing electronic problems.? But in this case
the voltage through the relay coil should be essentially the supply
voltage if there is no load, the PTT switch is not closed.? Thus that
7.5 volts on the PTT pin was a strong indicator of low supply voltage.?

Sometimes we get blinded by being too close to the problem.? 8-)

Arv? K7HKL
_._


On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Dr Fred Hambrecht <AAR4MI@...> wrote:

Don¡¯t ask me how I knew to ask the question. Hi Hi? The only people that don¡¯t make mistakes are those that do nothing!

?

v/r

Fred W4JLE

?

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of gsilver33@...
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 14:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Newbie here with PTT issue

?

Now I feel real dumb :( ? ?The power supply was set on 7.5 volts. ? ?Thanks for the replies!

?

Glenn



Re: Newbie here with PTT issue

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Don¡¯t ask me how I knew to ask the question. Hi Hi? The only people that don¡¯t make mistakes are those that do nothing!

?

v/r

Fred W4JLE

?

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of gsilver33@...
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 14:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Newbie here with PTT issue

?

Now I feel real dumb :( ? ?The power supply was set on 7.5 volts. ? ?Thanks for the replies!

?

Glenn


Re: Newbie here with PTT issue

M Garza
 

Don't feel dumb, at least it was simple and not anything major!

73s

Marco - KG5PRT?

On May 7, 2017 1:04 PM, <gsilver33@...> wrote:

Now I feel real dumb :( ? ?The power supply was set on 7.5 volts. ? ?Thanks for the replies!


Glenn


Re: Newbie here with PTT issue

 

Now I feel real dumb :( ? ?The power supply was set on 7.5 volts. ? ?Thanks for the replies!


Glenn


Re: Newbie here with PTT issue

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

What is your supply voltage?

?

v/r

Fred W4JLE

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of gsilver33@...
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 12:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: [BITX20] Newbie here with PTT issue

?

I finally got the Bitx40 wired up and the receiver is great. ?The frequency is off by .02 but that is not an issue right now. ?The PTT does not seem to be working. When using the supplied switch, an existing PTT switch wired to the connector or just touching the connector wires does not trip the PTT relay. ?I continue to hear the received signal in the headset and nothing on the watt meter. ?The voltage across the contacts is around 7.3. ?Any ideas??

?

Thanks,

Glenn - WU3Z


Re: Newbie here with PTT issue

 

Glenn,

Your power supply is not delivering 12V to the heart of the board, Check!

At 07/05/2017, you wrote:

I finally got the Bitx40 wired up and the receiver is great. The frequency is off by .02 but that is not an issue right now. The PTT does not seem to be working. When using the supplied switch, an existing PTT switch wired to the connector or just touching the connector wires does not trip the PTT relay. I continue to hear the received signal in the headset and nothing on the watt meter. The voltage across the contacts is around 7.3. Any ideas??