Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
setting up to upload and download new files to the radio with Arduino 1.8.2
I messed up and erased my program and have a blank screen can some one help me setup my program so I can bring my radio back to life again. Trying to locate the files in the group but can't find them. If someone has the files and e-mail them to me would really help and instructions to setup the program to talk to the radio. Thanks I'm new at this ?? |
Re: Birdie at 7199 - a surprising observation!
Increase the VFO drive level.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Raj At 31-03-2017, you wrote:
I seem to have less birdies with a high side vfo at 19 MHz but I feel like I lost some sensitivity. How about the bfo, does anyone know if it should be driven more than 2ma? Guess I can test this out. |
Re: Tuning clicks
Let us try to feed both 12V? &? ground to the raduino, thro a noise suppressing toroidal choke with 10uF caps on either side close to the readuino pcb. I suppose it should helpOn Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Allard PE1NWL <pe1nwl@...> wrote: Terry, --
Regards
Sarma ? |
Re: State of the EEPROM After a Download
Jack Purdum
I'm pretty sure that a "virgin" Nano's EEPROM has each memory cell set to 255. The EEPROM is unaffected by an IDE upload, unless the program changes the EEPROM memory. Jack, W8TEE From: "jmlynesjr@..." <jmlynesjr@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 7:25 PM Subject: [BITX20] State of the EEPROM After a Download Does anyone know the state of the EEPROM after a new program is downloaded? Erased or left alone? i.e. is the calibration factor clobbered? What's the value of EEPROM cells 0-3 before calibaration is done for the first time? Thanks, James KE4MIQ |
Re: Birdie at 7199 - a surprising observation!
I just tested this.? I still had the birdie at 4ma, but it wasn't as loud as 2. ?6 and 8ma were much louder than 2 or 4. 73, Ben KE0KKM On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Allard PE1NWL <pe1nwl@...> wrote:
|
Re: Bitx qso night
Ralph Mills
Came too late for the party! At 0045 UTC heard a ragchew on 7195 KHz. Dropped down to 7193 KHz only to hear another ragchew. ? QTH: Greenwood, Maine ANT: Home made 40 Meter inverted-V wire dipole @ 39 feet high center drops to 20 feet each end. I hope we'll try again soon. On Thursday, March 30, 2017 8:23 PM, John Smith via Groups.Io <johnlinux77@...> wrote: This is KG5KYJ in Oklahoma City, I copy N5YAV Darwin Phillips Corinth, MS for relay, RST 45. Net control in Florida, barely audible, not quite intelligible. Everyone else too weak to make out so far. |
Re: Bitx qso night
Simon Thompson
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI am listening, and I have been calling for the last 20 minutes, but nothing yet!
|
Re: Birdie at 7199 - a surprising observation!
Should the SI5351 drive be 8ma. As far as I understand from several sources, diodes need to be driven hard. 73 Ken VA3ABN On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Allard PE1NWL <pe1nwl@...> wrote:
|
Re: Bitx qso night
We are on 7.195MHZ Join us for The BitX 40 Meter Net On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Tim - K7PTM <tamccain@...> wrote: I'll try to be on next week.? Unfortunately I'll have to miss tonight. ? |
Birdie at 7199 - a surprising observation!
As has been discussed in several earlier threads, many of us suffer from an extremely strong birdie at 7199 kHz. Today, while experimenting with the VFO drive strength, I had a surprising observation: By default the VFO drive strength is 2 mA. I increased the drive strength by adding the following line to the setup() routine: si5351.drive_strength(SI5351_CLK2, SI5351_DRIVE_4MA); Then the birdie at 7199 completely disappeared! So far I haven't noticed any other negative side effects on the receiver. Can other BITX40 users perhaps try this too and share the results please? You can try other drive strength values too (accepted values are 2, 4, 6, 8 mA) If this is indeed a good fix then we may have to include this in the standard Raduino code, 73, Allard PE1NWL |