Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Problem with demaged BITX40
Tom, SQ9DJE
My second bitx40 came damaged. I found the broken T4 transformer wire, and I fixed it. TRX transmits but with weak power but I leave it to fix later. Unfortunately the reception is still poor but when I touch my finger the L3 ?of bandpass filter, reception is greatly improved, you can see it here . As I watch the coil bandpass filter seems that L2 has more turns than L1 and L3, it is similar to VFO L4. And here my question is how many turns on which core have the L1, L2, L3 bandpass filter coils and what are the characteristic data of the VFO L4 coil. I could unwrap a few turns of L4 to get L2 ( or L3, or L1 ) - it looks like L4 has the same core and same wire diameter .... best regards Tom |
|||
Re: Calibration route
Perhaps the calibrate wire got shorted (to the 12v heatsink on the IRF510?) and blew the IO cell. ?Perhaps that IO cell is inside the mega328 ?in the Raduino's Nano is now sinking lots of extra current, dragging down the main 12v supply. ?The low 12v supply could cause problems with the audio amp. ?That's about the only reason I can see for these two problems to show up simultaneously. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:09 pm, College Professor Simon Thompson wrote:
? |
|||
Re: How to contact Ashar to purchase a new Raduino/SI5351 board
bjorn
开云体育Did you try teamhfsigs@... ? That is the contact address included in the related paypal messages.. I have not tried it though. Bjorn On 2017-03-27 17:31, Mark Underkofler
wrote:
|
|||
How to contact Ashar to purchase a new Raduino/SI5351 board
Mark Underkofler
Does anyone know how to contact Ashar for the purchase of a replacement Raduino/SI5351 board? ?My original BITX40 Raduino/Si5351 board never functioned. ?I purchased another BITX40 kit and used the Raduino/SI5351 board in the 2nd kit to make sure that was the problem. ?It was, and now I'd like to get a new Raduino/SI5351 board to use in the radio I 'stole' the board from. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Mark Underkofler W5MCU |
|||
Re: Calibration route
Jack Purdum
Interesting. When I put a scope on my Nano, it reads HIGH without a digitalWrite() call, which prevents the pin from floating. That said, mine is a clone, so perhaps there is a difference. As a rule, I do usually follow an INPUT_PULLUP for pinMode() with a digitalWrite(), but do that as a documentation courtesy. I'd be interested to know what someone sees with a "real" Nano. Jack, W8TEE From: DJ2AG <ya_duck@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [BITX20] Calibration route Unfortunately the Arduino Digital Pin Tutorial is somewhat misleading ?in that it highlights the Pullup setup for older Arduino Versions in a box and only describes in the text how to do it the new way. The correct way to enable internal pullup, as Jack has written is:? pinMode(CAL_BUTTON, INPUT_PULLUP); but it has to be followed by a digitalWrite(CAL_BUTTON,HIGH); to actually connect the internal?pullup resistor to 5V.
|
|||
Re: Calibration route
开云体育For hardware designed around a pin having a pullup with a
specific purpose, an additional external pullup is preferred to
counter programming error or other issue.? One less chance for a
typo to create havoc. On 3/27/2017 10:41 AM, DJ2AG wrote:
|
|||
Re: Calibration route
It's not all that complicated to make sure you are programming the correct code into the Raduio.. ?I believe good working code similar to what got shipped with the kit can be found at ? ? and described in the thread ?/g/BITX20/topic/4479273? ? Make a minor change to the sketch, in this case perhaps the calibration message: ? ? ?old: ? ?printLine1("Calibrating: Set"); ? new:?printLine1("Calibrate: Set"); Compile and upload to the Raduino. ?If you see the new message, then you know the program is getting successfully loaded. Weird that the Arduino's have occasional reports here of corrupted flash, and need to be reprogrammed. ?On most microcontrollers I've dealt with in the past this never comes up. ? Since Simon is not seeing a high of 5v ?on the calibrate wire, perhaps that wire got shorted to something and it blew the io cell. ?If so, and if adding a 1k pullup resistor from the calibrate wire to 5v does not help, I would try moving the calibrate pin in the Raduino sketch: ? ? old: ?#define CAL_BUTTON (A2) ? ? new: ?#define CAL_BUTTON (A0) and use the black wire on the 8'th pin of the connector for calibrate instead of the red wire on the 6'th pin. Jerry, KE7ER #define CAL_BUTTON (A2) #define CAL_BUTTON (A2) #define CAL_BUTTON (A2) #define CAL_BUTTON (A2)
? |
|||
Re: Calibration route
Unfortunately the Arduino Digital Pin Tutorial is somewhat misleading ?in that it highlights the Pullup setup for older Arduino Versions in a box and only describes in the text how to do it the new way. The correct way to enable internal pullup, as Jack has written is:? pinMode(CAL_BUTTON, INPUT_PULLUP); but it has to be followed by a digitalWrite(CAL_BUTTON,HIGH); to actually connect the internal?pullup resistor to 5V. |
|||
Re: extra surface mount component
Well there you go! :-)) :-)) Roy, WA0YMH On Mar 27, 2017 9:19 AM, "Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io" <jgaffke=[email protected]> wrote:
|
|||
Re: extra surface mount component
I sent an email off to hfsigs asking about that extra SMD cap. ?The answer: ?I should join the Bitx20 group and my technical queries will be solved. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 04:16 pm, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
? |
|||
Re: Calibration route
Jack Purdum
If you want to activate the internal pullups on the Arduino, you would use: ? ?pinMode(CAL_BUTTON, INPUT_PULLUP); to activate that mode. The options for the second argument in the function call are: INPUT, OUTPUT, and?INPUT_PULLUP. If you use INPUT, it explicitly disables the internal pullups.? Jack, W8TEE From: Darryl Harvey <darryl@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 2:18 AM Subject: Re: [BITX20] Calibration route Hi,
"Tie High" means - via a resistor connect this wire to +5V.
Red Wire -----C---- RESISTOR ----------- +5V
Then the junction between the red wire and resistor (Where the "C" is above) is the location you connect to GROUND to set calibration mode.
?
I just checked the code, and it should have the internal pullups active so in theory shouldn't need an external pullup;
but I would still add a pull-up to be sure as you are having problems.
?
The Red wire you are grounding. Connect this to a resistor (anything above 1K will do) and the other end of the resistor goes to the 5v rail.
Red Wire --------- RESISTOR ----------- +5V
?
The 5v rail can be found on the raduino board. ?
See the circuit attached and note the location/pins of the +5V signal on the connectors, this is what you want to tap into at anyone of those available pins..
?
I dont have one in front of me to show you a physical location.?
Possible locations to pickup +5V;
Hope that helps
Darryl
?
?
?
On 2017-03-27 04:52 PM, College Professor Simon Thompson wrote:
Hi Darryl |
|||
Re: Bitx40 First contact
Petry, Kevin
开云体育Congrats Phil !? It would be a fun exercise to have folks post the distance covered in their first contact with the BitX.? Mine was a bit over 600 miles (1000 km), quite a thrill to see this little board covering those distances! 73, Kevin - N8DLP |
|||
Re: smoking board
Petry, Kevin
开云体育We used to say “fuses are for sissies”. LoL? Have fun guys, it’s a toy! ? |
|||
Re: smoking board
Petry, Kevin
开云体育The wiring directions on the hfsigs website are correct when they call for the orange wire of the 5-PIN connector to go to +12 volt power (through the on/off switch). My now painfully obvious mistake was made by using the orange wire of the 8-PIN CONNECTOR.? This wire is not used at all, and in fact goes directly to a pin on the processor chip.? When 12 volts is applied to this orange wire the chip gets a nice hole burned through its case, and much smoke exits. Kevin N8DLP |
|||
Re: 80 Meters on BITX40?
What are the values of the capacitor to be used in the filter for 80 meter . I dont want to by the filter because qrn and grm is very high in our location . Thanks in advance . Vu2rjw Soundar On Mar 27, 2017 7:13 AM, "Ryan Flowers" <geocrasher@...> wrote:
|
|||
Re: Bitx40 low volume oscillation squeal
Graham
Still no luck in resolving my "squeal".
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
So far, I have removed C113 across pins 1 and 8 of the LM386 in order to reduce it's gain. Big improvement to audio, at least to my ears. The "squeal" at low audio levels existed before I removed C113 and persists after removal. I have now tried three different 10K pots - the two that were included with the kit and a third new 10K pot (linear taper). I have now tried three different small speakers, two are 4 ohm and the third is marked 8 ohm. And for good measure, combinations of these different 10K pots and speakers. All of this to no avail - I still get a "squeal" i.e. oscillation at very low volume level for about five degrees or so of pot rotation from full counter clockwise position turning clockwise to a higher volume setting. The "squeal" i.e. oscillation, disappears once the control has been turned past this very low volume setting. I am using a good quality HP / Agilent lab power supply and have tried another with the same reuslts. Still at a loss. There is something I don't quite understand about the why of this behaviour. I guess it's back to basics and to prototype the circuit to see if I can replicate the behaviour and if so then what I need to fix it. News at 11..... cheers, Graham ve3gtc On 3/27/2017, "Michael Davis" <maddmd818@...> wrote:
I was going to mention speaker impedance. Mine did oscillate with a 4 ohm speaker, but not 8 ohm. I believe you said that there was no oscillation before removing the capacitor. Try adding an 8-16 ohm resistor in series with the speaker, or try a 16 ohm speaker, to see if the circuit change somehow affected what the audio amplifier load will be happy with. |
|||
Re: Trouble With Alternate Audio Inputs (BITX40 Module)
Are you using screened audio leads or simply two wires? If you are not using screened wired between the source you are using and the mic input you are courting all sorts of problems. Regards Lawrence On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:02 AM, <bruce@...> wrote:
|