¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: uBITX - A reboot of the old BITX

 

>Calculator shows it should be 22.4 uH.?

I agree, Toroids.info doesn't lie! ?So is there some inductance amplifying affect from the other two parallel windings? ?Can anyone else with a spare 8:8:8 transformer lying around do a reading?



Re: Order has not yet arrived

 

Thanks for all the info. I emailed the guys at HFsigs and they say if I don¡¯t get it by Monday, they¡¯ll re-ship.

Alan K6ZY


Re: uBITX - A reboot of the old BITX

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Calculator shows it should be 22.4 uH.?

Sent by me

On Mar 15, 2017, at 7:07 PM, VK3HN <prt459@...> wrote:

Hi there,

Wound six 8:8:8 trifilar transformers on FT37-43 toroids yesterday. On the LC meter each winding measures in the range 38 to 41 uH. ?Can anyone confirm that this is about as expected?

regards Paul VK3HN. ??


Re: uBITX - A reboot of the old BITX

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý



Sent by me

On Mar 15, 2017, at 7:07 PM, VK3HN <prt459@...> wrote:

Hi there,

Wound six 8:8:8 trifilar transformers on FT37-43 toroids yesterday. On the LC meter each winding measures in the range 38 to 41 uH. ?Can anyone confirm that this is about as expected?

regards Paul VK3HN. ??


Re: doTuning Code Question

 

> ?Having ? If (knob!=old_knob) ? as an outside conditional would avoid executing some code, but that doesn't buy more than a few microseconds.?

It also wouldn't work. ?If the knob is hard left or hard right, then we scan down or up by 10khz continuously once every 200ms, even if the knob stays put.



Re: doTuning Code Question

 

There's plenty of changes that need to be made to the Raduino sketch. ?But those are not changes I'd find compelling:


Tuning position within the current 50khz range at power up may as well be wherever the pot happens to be set.

Having ? ?knob!=old_knob ? ?on first pass is good, the Si5351 gets an initial frequency loaded?

Having ? If (knob!=old_knob) ? as an outside conditional would avoid executing some code, but that doesn't buy more than a few microseconds. ?

It would be better programming practice to initialize dir_knob to either 1 or 0, but in this case it would make no noticeable difference to the user.


Here's a thread you might check out if you are interested in taking an axe to doTuning(): ? ?/g/BITX20/message/23362?

Also read this blog post: ?

And Jack's programming style kibitzing: ? ?/g/BITX20/message/22358


Jerry, KE7ER


On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:29 pm, <jmlynesjr@...> wrote:

At POR the pot could be in any position therefore knob can be anything from 0-1000 counts. Odds are the pot wasn't centered therefore the tuneup range will not be equal to the tunedown range. If you want the ranges to be equal, a routine could be added to setup() to center the pot at POR. The knob position at POR is initially equated to baseTune = 7100000L; //7100 KHz.



First, old_knob is defined as zero - int old_knob = 0;
??? This will force knob != old_knob on the first pass. I'm not sure this is what's wanted.
??? In setup(), I think this should be added to initialize old_knob to the POR position of the pot(it hasn't moved yet):
??? old_knob = analogRead(ANALOG_TUNING) - 10; // Initialize old_knob to POR position of the pot
??? Then doTuning won't trigger until the pot actually moves.

Second, you don't need to do most of doTuning if the pot hasn't changed and further if the pot
??? hasn't changed by more than the deadband. I'd make the else if(knob != old_knob) the
??? outermost loop and change it to something like if(abs(old_knob - knob) > DEADBAND) { ... }

Third, static char dir_knob; doesn't initialize dir_knob(unless the compiler sets it to zero
??? which would set it defacto to tunedown). Does this make any sense? At this point you
??? have no idea if you are tuning up or down. I would expect to see a little tuning glitch
??? at POR until these variables sync up.

?


Re: MAR-3SM+ and new display/VFO board coming

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Jack, FYI - yesterday I ?ordered 2 x boards, and today they are listed as shipped, so they must have stock again.
I¡¯ll keep you posted on progress.

thanks
Darryl



On 15 Mar 2017, at 2:17 am, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <econjack@...> wrote:

The sales surprised us; they sold out in 2 days! More boards are on the way.

Keep us posted on your build. Also, if there's any "fuzzy parts" in the assembly manual, let me know.

Jack, W8TEE



From:?Craig Wadsworth <cwadsworth@...>
To:?[email protected]?
Sent:?Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:45 AM
Subject:?Re: [BITX20] MAR-3SM+ and new display/VFO board coming

I have my board from Qrpguys, and most of the parts should arrive from China in 7-45 days.? This is more fun than I've had in years! Thanks Doc.








Re: MAR-3SM+ and new display/VFO board coming

 

Hi Jack,

Thanks for being a frequent and sage member of this group. I am very much interested in a AGC, CW, and "S" meter solution for my Bitx40 XCVR. I really hate ugly construction and breadboarding. Always looks like hell. If you can think of how I can help you, please don't hesitate to ask. It's been awhile but maybe I could remember most of my "C" programming. I really like this little QRP rig. Thanks Jqck!


73,

Chuck K3VPZ


Re: uBITX - A reboot of the old BITX

 

Hi there,

Wound six 8:8:8 trifilar transformers on FT37-43 toroids yesterday. On the LC meter each winding measures in the range 38 to 41 uH. ?Can anyone confirm that this is about as expected?

regards Paul VK3HN. ??


Re: Order has not yet arrived

 

Ordered mine Feb. 12 arrived mar. 7 ?they say 18 days.? Maybe yours is coming by long path through east coast.
larry

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Alan Whitman <alan7114p@...> wrote:

I ordered a BITX40 on 24 Jan and received a notice that it had been shipped on 30 Jan.? I live in Washington State, USA and have not received it.? Can anyone advise if this is consistent with what others are seeing or has my rig gone astray?

Thanks,

Alan K6ZY



Re: BITX40v3 on 160 M - Modification of the modified BITX80v3 to BITX160v3

 

Try these guys

and instructions for bands from? 2,200m to 6m

At $4.60 it's hardly worth the effort of making it yourself!!

--
73 de Noel, ZL1NC


Re: Wiring up/assembly questions

 

Hey KK6ISP de WA6ISP!

Nice Call Sign


WV6ISP in 1959!


Mike, Yucaipa


Re: doTuning Code Question

 

Thank you for your comments. I'm still getting my head around exactly how doTuning works.

As I don't yet have a functioning Raduino, the following is based on desk checking the code. I may be able to simulate it on a chipKIT UNO that I do have working. Here we go...

The pot wiper varies from 0-5 vdc. The internal representation of the pot, "knob", varies approximately 0-1000 counts. At 50 Hz per count, this makes the tuning range about 50 KHz.

At POR the pot could be in any position therefore knob can be anything from 0-1000 counts. Odds are the pot wasn't centered therefore the tuneup range will not be equal to the tunedown range. If you want the ranges to be equal, a routine could be added to setup() to center the pot at POR. The knob position at POR is initially equated to baseTune = 7100000L; //7100 KHz.

First, old_knob is defined as zero - int old_knob = 0;
??? This will force knob != old_knob on the first pass. I'm not sure this is what's wanted.
??? In setup(), I think this should be added to initialize old_knob to the POR position of the pot(it hasn't moved yet):
??? old_knob = analogRead(ANALOG_TUNING) - 10; // Initialize old_knob to POR position of the pot
??? Then doTuning won't trigger until the pot actually moves.

Second, you don't need to do most of doTuning if the pot hasn't changed and further if the pot
??? hasn't changed by more than the deadband. I'd make the else if(knob != old_knob) the
??? outermost loop and change it to something like if(abs(old_knob - knob) > DEADBAND) { ... }

Third, static char dir_knob; doesn't initialize dir_knob(unless the compiler sets it to zero
??? which would set it defacto to tunedown). Does this make any sense? At this point you
??? have no idea if you are tuning up or down. I would expect to see a little tuning glitch
??? at POR until these variables sync up.

Ok, back to the listing...

James
KE4MIQ



Re: Thought this looked cool for the BITX40

 

Wow!

Just Wow!

Going to MAKE me one of those with my Raduinio!!!

73 de ZL1NC


Arduino Mega 2560 w/AD9850 DDS

Billy Shepherd
 


Hi,


?


Already own both of these. Anyone know where I can find the code and tips for using them with the Bitx40?


?


-B



Re: Wiring up/assembly questions

 

Here's your clue: ? ?Search for ? ?brown + red + calibrate

Here's the story: ?The "Calibrating The Raduino" section ?at the bottom of?? used to say we should short the brown wire, which was incorrect. ?It has now been silently corrected to say we should short the red wire. ? Which was a bit confusing at first, as I had figured whatever WireUp claimed was the calibrate wire, it would be the other wire. ?Would be nice if instructions like that included an edit history. ?

Don't take my word for it. ?If you download the Arduino sketches from the source listed here: ??/g/BITX20/message/23214? you will find a line that says ?"#define CAL_BUTTON (A2)". ?From that you can look in the schematics for the Raduino and see where A2 is, should be the red wire from the 8 in header.



On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 01:59 pm, Clark Martin wrote:

3. I seem to recall reading in one of the recent posts that the instructions at HFsigs are incorrect for one of the wires, but darned if I can find the post. Can somebody shoot me a clue?

?


Re: Wiring up/assembly questions

 

Clark Martin
KK6ISP

On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:33 PM, richard kappler <richkappler@...> wrote:

All,

I'm a computer geek, not an EE, so some of this is not obvious to me.

1. The volume pot has 5 leads, 3 around the circumference and 2 out the back. Am I correct that the two out the back are for the on/off function?
Correct.


2. I've seen mentioned here and on a coupla youtube vids that one needs to wind ones wires. Is that all wires? And why do we do that?
Do you mean twisting the wires. It reduces signal coupling, IE RF getting into the audio via the pot leads for example.


3. I seem to recall reading in one of the recent posts that the instructions at HFsigs are incorrect for one of the wires, but darned if I can find the post. Can somebody shoot me a clue?

4. This is my first ever build, so I'm doing it in a plastic case, essentially storage bin with the slightly larger footprint as the shipping container but about 4 times as tall, to make it easier on me (no workshop at the moment) and to save a few shekels. There has been a lot of talk lately about heat issues, so I've ordered a heat sink for the VR on the raduino board, and concurrently ordered a pair of small (25mm iirc) fans for the case. I intend to use one to blow directly on the AMP heatsink, perhaps the other to exhaust air from the case. Any issue with just tapping off the 12V main for these? Obviously it would work voltage wise, but would it interfere with the radio?
On caution about the storage bins. The type of plastic they are commonly made with grows brittle with age and UV exposure. In normal use it takes some time for this to be a problem. But drilling holes in it will cause trouble sooner.

I think one fan should do, if that is even necessary. Drawing off the radio¡¯s 12V supply shouldn¡¯t be a problem. You might want to check once it¡¯s all working to see if the fan causes in noise in transmit or receive. Try monitoring an ongoing QSO and disconnect / connect the fan to see if you can hear anything.

You may want to run the fan off the transmit power contact on the relay. Ideally the fan would run a few seconds longer but it should work pretty well this way.


Re: Nano in US, Cheap and Free Shipping

 

Mike

No sales tax here in Or. I ordered the 5 pac.

Thanks,

Randy, K7AGE

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Michael Hagen <motdog@...> wrote:

I am in Ca. I would have to pay tax!

Mike, WA6ISP



Re: VFO Display - DDS

Jack Purdum
 

The Beta I refer to below is for the B40 rig, as I'm using an AD9850 and a TFT display. The AA code for the QRPGuys PCB is stable.

Jack, W8TEE



From: W6IDS <w6ids@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] VFO Display - DDS

?
Yes you did, by George.?? It appears I glossed over it in my haste Jack.? My bad.
?
Now, to be patient ¨C I¡¯m assuming you¡¯re still developing.? I recall the picture for sure, but did not make the
connection with your message.? Shucks. . . . it¡¯s stuff like this that makes it painfully obvious how much I do
not know today, still, at 73. Well, it just makes it nicer to have resources such as yourself.
?
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
?
?
Just to show you I did find it:
***
Was on vacation with no internet...a promise to XYL.

I used the MAR-3SM+ part for the antenna analyzer (AA) project because it's easier to find. Right now, I'm using the same AA board for the display/VFO and it seems to be doing well taking the VFO output via RG174 to Farhan's input pins. That said, Farrukh is redesigning the board to bring almost all of the Arduino Mega 2560 Pro Mini pins out to header pins to make it easier to experiment with the BITX40 (I'm lazy...B40). You can see pictures of the AA board that supports the AD9850/Mega and the TFT display by looking at the assembly manual on QRPGuys.com (look for the Antenna Analyzer menu option). The beta for the new board is being tested and I would guess it will be three weeks before we have the "real" board done. I have the code done so that it will autosize to a 2.4", 2.8", 3.5" and 3.95" mcufriend.com TFT displays. That should give some case flexibility.
?
Dennis Kidder (W6DQ and my co-author on the Arduino Projects book) is working on a CW and AGC options for the B40. I'm working on the code for a capacitive touch keyer (from the Projects book) which will do away with the need to drag a paddle with you. Setting CW speed and other menu options as well as tuning it done via a rotary encoder. The code provides for three CW messages to be tied to 3 NO switches on the top of the case. Each switch is tied to one of up to 50 canned messages (changeable at runtime). Press one of the switches and that message is sent via CW. The currently-selected message is displayed at the bottom of the display. It also monitors input voltage and has an S meter. (A repost of the display is below.) I don't know what we'll charge for the board, but it is a little bigger than the AA board to accommodate the different display sizes. All I can say at this point is that it will be less than $10.
?
Jack, W8TEE
***
?
?
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] VFO Display - DDS
?
Yes, and I have posted a picture of it before.

Jack, W8TEE



From: W6IDS <w6ids@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 2:25 PM
Subject: [BITX20] VFO Display - DDS
?
?
Hello All,
?
Just a curiosity question here.
?
Has anyone developed a color display for the VFO showing S-meter, modes, PO, etc?\
for the BITX projects?
?
I¡¯ve seen references to such a display, at one time or another, you tube and the like,
but no real project info or perhaps info on a related kit.
?
So, thought I¡¯d ask and see what results.
?
Howard W6IDS
?
?



Re: Raduino

 

Quite often, the postage from US to Canada is a lot more than the item itself.

73 Ken

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <econjack@...> wrote:
This was a long time ago, in the 1990's or so. Our first class rates have gone up to $.49 and Canada's is $.85 last time I looked.

Jack, W8TEE



From: Ken <chase8043@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Raduino

USPS rates to Canada have tripled in last couple years.

73
Ken VA3ABN

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <econjack@...> wrote:
I remember mailing stuff from Canada to the US when US postage rate was $.24 and Canada was around $.45. When asked why rates were so high in Canada, our Canadian friends would tell us is was $.02 for delivery and $.43 for storage. Given that it often took 3-4 weeks, it may be true.

Jack, W8TEE



From: Larry Acklin <acklin@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Raduino

Ah, yes.? I ordered a kite string winder that took 3 months to arrive.? I ate a lot of lousy cereal to get it, even at 7 yrs old I wondered if it was coming "slow boat from China" (1963)

:-)

Larry
KB3CUF?

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Mark Underkofler <mark@...> wrote:
I noticed that the shipper from China on eBay listed the Delivery Estimate to be between March 31 and May 9.? Wow, that reminds me of the wait for stuff I ordered from Battle Creek, Michigan when I was a child!? Almost two months seems like a very long wait time, if it is indeed true.
Mark, W5MCU