Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: 3d printable enclosures?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYou can also do the same with the back
panel.? On both, I'll assume that 'lower left' means as looking at
the front of the case for the front panel, and looking at the back
of the case for the back panel.
Jim KA9BGT On 1/2/17 12:07 PM, Jim Noeth ka9bgt@... [BITX20] wrote: ? |
Re: 3d printable enclosures?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIf you can let me know where, type and
size of the holes you need in the panel, I'll build a printable
(.stl) file for you that matches.? If you'll respond with
something like:
round hole, d1 mm diameter, center at x, y rectangular hole x1 mm long by y1 mm high at x, y (lower left corner of hole) Repeat the above for as many holes as you need, remember all dimensions are in millimeters (if you want to use inches, just let me know and I'll convert).? All measurements will be taken from the lower left corner of the panel. Jim - KA9BGT On 1/2/17 11:12 AM, Richard Knack ihc73scout2@... [BITX20] wrote: ? |
Re: 3d printable enclosures?
That would be sweet!? Roy? WA0YMH On Jan 2, 2017 10:45 AM, "Richard Knack ihc73scout2@... [BITX20]" <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
Re: 3d printable enclosures?
I have had OpenScad on my computer since I built my 3D printer 3 years ago (it was part of the software download package for the printer), and I never could make heads or tails of it. It's not very "user friendly", in my opinion. Rich KC8MWG On Monday, January 2, 2017 12:05 PM, "Jim Noeth ka9bgt@... [BITX20]" wrote:
|
Re: Receiver comparison
Having a passing familiarity with the inner-workings of the FT-817, one of the problems with it is that its AGC is not well-designed.
Unlike most AGCs, the time constant appears to be different for weak signals (<S9) than above, but this has to do with the unfortunate "volts/dB" curve of the AGC control voltage: For weaker signals, it is reasonable, but for strong signals a small change in voltage = more dB. The net effect of this is that the AGC seems to be inconsistent in the manner described. When I use my FT-817 - particularly on a busy or noisy band - I make use of the attenuator to keep the S-meter in the "lower half" (<S9). In this way, one avoids the de-facto audio compression that seems to occur when the AGC is in its upper range where the time constant - even on "slow" - is faster than what one would ever choose intentionally. Interestingly, I've not see this AGC problem discussed much as its cause isn't immediately obvious and I have not ever seen any attempted fixes but it does explain the sometimes "heavy" sound attributed to this radio. If nothing else it can serve as a cautionary tale to someone designing their own AGC loop. 73, Clint KA7OEI |
Re: 3d printable enclosures?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThere is a piece of software called
OpenScad that is free.? With it, you can import a .STL file (which
is what is usually provided on Thingiverse), you can then
'subtract' cylinders (to make round holes) and cubes (to make
rectangular holes).? Then from that produce a new .STL file, run
it through your favorite slicer program, then print it.
Jim Noeth - KA9BGT On 1/2/17 10:45 AM, Richard Knack ihc73scout2@... [BITX20] wrote: ? |
3d printable enclosures?
Out of curiosity, does anyone on this group play around with CAD software? I found a 3D printable box on Thingiverse ( ) that was sized for the Bitx40 board, but it has plain, un-drilled front and back panels. Maybe someone here who knows how to use CAD software could design a 3D printable enclosure that has a panel that has openings to accommodate the Raduino display, antenna connector, and other controls/jacks? I'd do it, but I don't know how to use CAD software... Rich KC8MWG |
Re: No tracking info
Mine too order date 12-25-2016
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
Re: No tracking info
Mine shipped today. Woo-hoo! Hoping it arrives before the 17th, since that is when our ham radio club meets again and I am hoping to drum up some interest in the club for homebrew projects. Looking forward to it, either way! Rich KC8MWG On Sunday, January 1, 2017 7:09 AM, "Carl Moser mail@... [BITX20]" wrote:
|
Re: It stopped transmitting
Bill Kittilson
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI tested and getting 330 ohms. ?Receive current is 100ma no signal. Transmit is anywhere from 180 ma to almost one amp depending where RV 1 is set to On Jan 2, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Raj vu2zap@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
Re: low power out bitx40 v3
If the gate get too much +ve bias then the IRF will conduct too much current till it blows.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Replace the final IRF and see. 73, Raj vu2zap At 02/01/2017, you wrote:
|
low pwer out bitx40 v3
looks like I broke the transmit for my Bitx40. While adjusting the PA bias I increased the ma value probably to much. The driver Q14 not gets hot while in transmit and no temp change for Q15. The pa adjust remains at 15 ma regardless of adjustment. It adjusted before I overdrove the value. Suspect Q14 or Q15 is my problem. When I speak into the mic I get a small deflection on the watt meter - maybe 1 watt |
Re: It stopped transmitting
Bill,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
While looking at the diagram again it occurred to me that if Q14 was shorted, the power supply would get 2.2 + 10 Ohm load and that would draw almost 1 amp from a 12V power supply. Please check Q14 collector to emitter continuity with the power off. At 02/01/2017, you wrote: ? |
Re: It stopped transmitting
If the final bias adjust preset is untouched then the IRF may have
failed.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Check the voltage on the left side gate pin of IRF (facing you) it should be a small value, I don't have my boards with me here at the farm! It could be the driver or predriver. Whichever is running hot when you press the PTT! At 02/01/2017, you wrote: ? |
Re: It stopped transmitting
Bill Kittilson
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jan 1, 2017, at 10:22 PM, Raj vu2zap@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
Re: VFO tuning pot
From the diagram it is Red Brown Black. If your tuning movement is reverse then just interchange red and black!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73 Raj vu2zap At 02/01/2017, you wrote:
|
Re: Sad reality of stock vfo
> It might be prudent to add a so called "Huff and Puff" vfo stabiliser, > originally made and published by PA0KSB , SK and later simplified by? > Hans?Summers ,G0UPL , probably on his web site. Everything you ever wanted to know about Huff & Puff stabilisers: - there you will find a library of almost every article ever written about the Huff & Puff VFO, various projects, and links to other websites with projects. 73 Hans G0UPL |
Re: BITX40 with QRPLabs VFO
Hi > was a matter of fiddling with it, and I was able to tune it in by listening to? > a known station frequency like East Cars, and calibrating the vfo so it? > sounded natural. Finally I got an on air check with my buddy cross town.? > All good. BTW I have the new corrected software on the way. If it all works fine and you're happy with it, that's fine. But just FYI... The 27MHz crystal in the QRP Labs Si5351A Synth kit usually oscillates between 27.003 and 27.005. I have never heard a case of it oscillating as high as 27.0105. To be absolutely correct what you would need to do is adjust the programmed IF frequency to the actual BFO frequency of your BITX40. You probably entered "IF Offset" parameter "-012,000,000" but in reality the actual BFO frequency of your BITX40 will be a kHz or more lower than that. So what you have done by setting such a high "Ref Freq" parameter (27.0105) is cancelled out the error in the IF you entered. But the cancellation will only be perfect at one particular frequency.? It's not important - because the BITX40 only operates over a narrow frequency range anyway. I'm just saying, to really be technically perfect one should adjust the BFO frequency as well as the 27MHz Ref Freq. But I know that is not necessarily easy if you are doing it by listening to a known station frequency. 73 Hans G0UPL |