Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Pi Zero Build for sBitx Available
When will the SD Card image for the Raspberry Pi 5 become a standard as the Pi 5 is the most current Pi with more improvement in the works such as RAM and SSD which will enable even faster processing which I am convinced will make the SBitX even better as more code will be written to take advantage of the improved processing. the future has arrived. Next we need an improved quadrature detection to fully exploit the SDR feature capabilities inherent in the SBitX architecture. |
Re: Pi Zero Build for sBitx Available
Is this for the Pi ZERO or the Pi ZERO 2 W ? 73, Joe W2JEJ On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:38?PM JJ - W9JES via <jj=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Pi Zero Build for sBitx Available
Hello JJ Does this also have Rx / TX enable pin via Pi IO ? de Charudatt VU2UPX? On Fri, 24 Jan, 2025, 7:28 am JJ - W9JES via , <jj=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Pi Zero Build for sBitx Available
JJ, Really neat, thanks for sharing. 73.. ????? ¡°If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.¡± ? ¨D Sent from Proton Mail Android -------- Original Message -------- On 1/23/25 9:02 PM, JJ - W9JES wrote: publickey - [email protected] - 0x27213292.asc
publickey - [email protected] - 0x27213292.asc
signature.asc
signature.asc
|
Pi Zero Build for sBitx Available
All -
?
I've added a sBitx SD card image for the Raspberry Pi Zero. ?
?
The same methods apply to writing the SD card image as for the Pi 4 ?
?
?
This SD Card image contains v4.301 64 bit sBitx software and the sBitx Toolbox preinstalled. Please note that there is no DSI port for the built-in touch display. You will have to purchase a Mini HDMI to HDMI Adapter to use a HDMI compatible monitor or enable VNC and use it headless. The Pi Zero has some additional limitations such as once microUSB port so you may need an adapter to connect a USB mouse or keyboard. The resources on this hardware prevent the effective use of resource intensive, 3rd party applications and web browser.
?
This is simply for experimentation and no support will be provided by me. It is a lower cost alternative for those who want to use it.
?
?
?
-JJ
?
? |
Re: Careful with BNC-to-SO239 adapters
Niels, I agree fully. Unfortunately we have to spend more money but the old saying is "you get what you spend" HI HI I found out early in ham journey that alot of companies ,even reputable ones , will sell a junk product just to make a sale. I refuse to buy the junk fittings. cable ends, chassis connections, and adapters. Great post Niels!!!!!! 73 David ac9xh |
Re: Careful with BNC-to-SO239 adapters
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jan 23, 2025, at 11:31, N0YWB via groups.io <n0ywb1@...> wrote:
|
Re: Careful with BNC-to-SO239 adapters
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks, Gary. The difference in the pins is basically only in the CRIMP area. ? The specification gives only 3 thousandths of an inch variation in the pin ?mating area. ?That is just about or slightly greater than the thickness of a piece of paper. ? ?I don¡¯t think that¡¯s going to make much difference and that would indicate that mating is safe either way.I¡¯m certain that there could be manufacturers producing products that do not follow the standard however Gordon kx4z? On Jan 23, 2025, at 11:31, N0YWB via groups.io <n0ywb1@...> wrote:
|
Re: Careful with BNC-to-SO239 adapters
Up to the mid 1970s the center pin diameter was different. IEC 169-8 in 1978 defined interchangeability. The diameter of the center pin in current production BNC plugs is 1.32-1.37mm (0.052-0.054¡±), the same for both 75 ohm (MIL-STD-348B 9Feb2009), and 50 ohm (MIL-STD-348 20 April 1988).? ? I became painfully aware of the issue when I bought a compression N plug for LMR-400 at the local parts store before Field Day.? After set-up, I measured bad SWR on my 75 meter station.? Sweeping peaks and nulls with my antenna analyzer, and knowing the VF of LMR-400 indicated my discontinuity was at the new N connector near the antenna. Prying on the connection suddenly made the SWR good.?? Evidently that connector had been in the store inventory a long time.? ? |
Re: OCTUS project : DSB on 80m
Complete translation thanks to Google translate.
The series started with the "Trenty" and the "Toucan" continues with a voice transceiver using the principle of DSB (double sideband) transmission and direct conversion reception (upper and lower SSB), all driven by a VXO (quartz controlled variable oscillator). This greatly simplifies its construction, makes it possible to mount it on a small circuit and reduces the cost by using a minimum of components, all standard and available. There are of course limits, direct frequency conversion reception is not as selective as that using the superheterodyne principle with a quartz filter, and the transmission, with a power of 1 watt HF, is done on both sidebands instead of just one as in SSB (single sideband). But if the construction is done properly, the results will be up to par. The reception, equipped with an AGC (automatic gain control) circuit is pleasant, and the frequency, thanks to the use of the VXO, is very stable. In transmission, your correspondent, if you do not specify that you are transmitting in DSB, will not see the difference with the SSB. Despite the reduced coverage of a portion of the 80 meter band, many QSOs were made almost daily with the prototype, most with the power of 1 watt, others with the addition of a small amplifier of about twenty watts. In the latter case, the QSOs were practically as pleasant as with a normal station. Description: At reception, there is a low-pass filter C1-C2, L1, C3-C4 (common to transmission). The relay RL1 (at rest) directs the signal to the double input band-pass filter. The first tuned filter L2-CA1 is a low-capacity series filter rejecting low frequencies well to avoid the direct entry of signals from powerful broadcast transmitters in the short wave range. Next comes a parallel tuned filter L3-C5. The good characteristics of these two filters avoid the use of an input attenuator. Diodes D1 and D2 protect the NE612 input from RF overvoltages in transmission. IC1 (NE612) is a gain oscillator-mixer circuit. In the direct conversion receiving system, the local oscillator frequency is very close to the receiving frequency, the difference being in the LF spectrum. There is no IF (intermediate frequency), and the low frequency is directly amplified by IC2 (LM386). The local oscillator frequency is determined by the set of X1-X2, L4-L5 and D3. The combination of these elements makes it possible to "pull" the frequency of the quartz quite significantly without too much harm to the frequency stability. Parallel connection of two quartz of identical frequencies further increases the frequency range. The side-by-side arrangement of the inductors L4 and L5 also increases this range. The smaller the gap, the greater the mutual induction and therefore the frequency range. However, there are limits that should not be exceeded. Indeed, by placing the inductors in contact with each other, we arrive at a range of almost 70 KHz, but it is reasonable not to exceed about twenty KHz, because beyond that the frequency becomes unstable. On the prototype, the available range goes from 3667 to 3684 KHZ, which is largely sufficient, because there are people on these frequencies and in particular quite a few QSOs in French. Beyond these values, the VXO loses its stability, and a slight frequency modulation may appear on transmission. The BF signal from pins 4 and 5 of IC1 is applied to the symmetrical input of IC2 (symmetrical connection). C10 reduces the amplitude of high-pitched signals. C11 and C12 are isolation capacitors for DC voltages. IC2 has its gain set to maximum (46 dB) by using capacitor C14 (maximum applicable value). This is necessary for a receiver of this type if you want to enjoy comfortable listening through a loudspeaker. R4 and C15 have the function of reducing the white noise generated by the high amplification of IC2. R5 and C17 prevent IC2 from oscillating if the impedance of the loudspeaker used is too low. C16 is an isolation capacitor for the DC voltage present at 5 of IC2. The BF, on the other hand, easily passes through this capacitor to reach the loudspeaker. The signals are powerful enough to power a loudspeaker, even a large one (which will provide excellent rendering). A simplified automatic gain control circuit has been added to this assembly, so that signals that are too strong do not saturate the receiver, which makes listening much more pleasant. This very simple system requires some explanation. Click to enlarge The DC voltage, normally present at pins 1 and 2 of the NE612 is about 1.4 volts. If we decrease it, the gain of IC1 also decreases (it's a bit orthodox but it works...). We insert a Led diode |
Re: Careful with BNC-to-SO239 adapters
I was wrong in claiming that the outer conductor of the male BNC connector always has the same diameter for the 2 types. :o)
?
For the 75ohm version, the diameter of both inner and outer conductor are different in the male BNC !
Physical compatibility is somewhat ensured since the outer conductor material is made thinner.
?
The difference in the center-pin is ~0,3mm, but they should be compatible. At least a 75ohm BNC Male -> 50ohm BNC Female.
However, I wouldn't recommend you use a 50ohm BNC male -> 75ohm BNC Female.
?
This is possibly why some 75ohm "quality" BNC connectors are also made with a 1.6mm center pin. ( Although this deviates from the standard. )
example:
?
The full explanation and some pictures can be seen here:
-----------
?
That said. You don't have to look far on ebay/aliexpress to find "non-standard" 75ohm hybrid versions ( Lets call them Frankenstein-BNC's ), where the difference is only a thinner inner conductor. :(
?
Lets just stay away from these cheap unbranded versions. :D
|
Re: Careful with BNC-to-SO239 adapters
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOf course, the IEC 1 69¨C8 specification costs money to buy.? I was surprised in most drawings to see limited information about the male pin. ?Apparently the specification requires that any type be intermateable with others. ? If you look at the information in the female side, given here:?www.spectrum-et.net:81/NEW_WEB2/adapters/pdf/BetweenSeries/BetweenSeries-BNC.pdf, there more information is given about the potential for male pin size differences, as follows: ¡°See interface dimensions shown on next page. Applicable to Females only: oversize pin .055 inch (1.4 mm) max. dia.,.080 inch (2.03 mm) deep; insertion force 2 lbs. (8.9 N) max. with .054 inch (1.37 mm) min. dia. pin; withdrawal force 2.00 oz (.556 N) min. with .052 inch (1.32 mm) max. dia. pin.¡± but still, this isn¡¯t the real standard. This is just one manufacturers presentation. It suggest pins anywhere from .052 inch to . 055 inch.I don¡¯t have the time or money to purchase the real standard. Gordon kx4z? On Jan 23, 2025, at 02:29, Gordon Gibby KX4Z via groups.io <docvacuumtubes@...> wrote:
|
Re: About the sBITX 64Bit Pi Image Available thread
Pierre,
what exactly do you mean? Life is a changing world, isn't it? The only constant here is change. Would you like someone to stop this? ?
And for the topic, for things that change daily, it's impossible to write an article that meets current expectations.
Coders do their work for free in addition to their daily tasks, they can't be expected to document everything up to date.
I, who like to test and write some usage descriptions, these are my experiences. Since I don't speak the language, I use a translator to make every sentence readable for others.
If you're looking for something, you'll find a search box on the forum's chat page. You can enter the word or words you're looking for there and if it's found, you can read the comments written on the topic.
You can change our reading methods by following the topic. --
Gyula HA3HZ |
Re: Careful with BNC-to-SO239 adapters
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jan 22, 2025, at 21:08, Smeden via groups.io <niels@...> wrote:
|