开云体育

The mention of not plugging or unplugging the headphone/speaker with the radio on reminded me of an incident years ago. I did radio repairs in my brothrs TV hop yers ago. Had a customer brought in a

I agree with Vic that the standard selection should be the CW offset option. I can not see why anyone would not use CW this way. But I am open to be convinced. rOn

This is a post I made last year: Found this video explaining CW Zero-beating. So based on this explanation the following is illustrated for 7.040.000: Dial displays 07.040.000, you transmit on

If you use the CW offset option (which really should be the standard setup) mentioned above, then both you and the station you are working will be on the same indicated frequency. Offsetting the

I would pay $25 for your old board(s) plus $7 shipping too hihi Il 06/mar/2019 22:54, "Ted via Groups.Io" <k3rta@...> ha scritto:

It will be + or - depending on the bands, try on 14.050 and check with the websdr the exact frequency. About the logging mismatch, consider who uses vintage equipment without digital readout. I

I'll pay $25 for your old board(s) plus $7 shipping.? There's plenty to do with them, transverters being among them :) TedK3RTA

Just to help make things clearer, I did the screen for 7 inch. It is based on the features at that time. I built some enhanced graphics etc. I have not updated the 7 inch to reflect the latest

Thanks Bill! ? I adjusted mine to 11.055.3 and The carrier is greatly diminished! Thanks for all who responded 73's Mike WA3O

Hello. Don’t forgot all. I’m looking for a uBitx full mounted because I’m not good with DIY..... Anyone more selling, in EU prefered? 73's de Carlos CT1GFQ SKCC#466T www.skccgroup.com REP#1406

ALL pre-orders have shipped wooh!. Tracking can? be found via your paypal transaction, if for any reason can not get to it let us know and we will forward the info to you. We should have more up on

I don't actually do CW -- so I'm playing conceptual catchup.? If the uBITX screen shows -780hz relative to the external receiver received freq, and if this is typical, normal, and std,then I'm happy.

I should add that I have not calibrated the V5 at all and that is using stock firmware, not Ian's beta v5. I was focusing only on the spurs and so far from an FCC point of view at first looks it looks

Thank-you Peter,I look forward to hearing from you. 73. Ian M0IDR Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 7:10:22 PM To:

I guess I should have stated this but the carrier is zero beat on my SSB signal. So there is no tone on my transmit that I know of. Thanks Mike WA3O

The carrier suppression is related to the BFO adjustment.? There is just one filter section for SSB that does double duty for both transmit and receive.? There is also only one BFO that provides the

Some seem to replace the older ubitx boards with ver 5. I too am thinking about that. But then what to do with the older boards? One idea that comes to mind is to use the ubitx up to the PA and drive

OK Ian, you were first in the queue. I'll email you direct with details etc. Peter.

Hi Michael. Please share your test results when you can. I have this issue on 20m only in cw on the v4, where I have close harmonic spurs about 10b down only. I already mentioned it on list The rest

I beg to differ! Sir, if the carrier is only down by 20dB then its not a question of looking at regulations! It is a strong indication of 'something being rotten in the state of Denmark' Translated