¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: uBitx Function Button ERROR

 

Hi, and thanks for the informations. I would like to say that my antenna is an attic dipole for 40m and I use 50 ohms coax. What I didn't said in the beginning is that I disconnected the display and I used some wires to connect it to the Raduino. But the Raduino itself is still in the original socket. Can it be this happening because of the display wires ? And somebody mentioned above about a capacitor of 0.1uF in the ADC line... should I put this in paralel or in series with ADC line??


Q&A: spur at 12Mhz

 

How big is it? What are the suggested solutions? An effective solution could be adding an external 1/4 wave open stub cut for 12mhz made with reasonably low loss cable. In practice it would consist of adding a Tee connector and a piece (13.5feet) of RG213. It might alter SWR somehow differently across the bands but in case one uses a tuner it should not be a big problem. It might attenuate by some pinnuts the output power.


Re: #bitx40 #parts #bitx40 #parts

 

Is this kit still available or did I miss it?

Thanks,?
Scott


Re: Spectrum purity of uBITX and BIT40

 

A two tone test will check for IMD (intermodulation distortion, google it!).
It does not check for spurs or harmonics, which are the primary issues with the stock uBitx.

IMD can make your signal sound bad, and cause interference to those operating nearby on frequency.
If you have bad IMD, you will probably be told about it.
The stock uBitx with the mike gain set to a reasonable level will have enough IMD to be
slightly alarming when looking for it with a spectrum analyzer.
But the IMD products are way down (50dB or so) once you get a couple khz away.?
And thus it's a legal transmission anywhere AM phone is legal (at least with respect to IMD).
When transmitting at 5 or 10 watts, the IMD is probably not perceptible to someone using an adjacent channel.

If you have bad spurs and/or harmonics, you will be interfering with operations
on totally different frequencies.
For example, when operating at 28mhz, there's a? spur at 45mhz-28mhz=17mhz.

This particular spur is due to the 2*45mhz second harmonic of the first IF?
mixing with the high side clk2 VFO.? The VFO is always at 45mhz+DialFreq.
In this case, the spur is at? 2*45mhz - (45mhz+28mhz) = 45mhz - 28mhz = 17mhz.?

We also have a spur at 12mhz, due to crosstalk within the si5351? from the BFO at clk0
into the VFO at clk2.? This 12mhz energy on clk2 goes through the mixer at T2 unmolested,
and continues on through the transmit power amp and the transmit low pass filters.

Harmonics are simple integer multiples of the operating frequency.
For example, when operating at 7mhz, we get harmonics at 2*7=14mhz and 3*7=21mhz.
The transmit low pass filters at L11 through L22 should take these harmonics out,
but the stock uBitx relays (and to some extent, the board placement and routing)?
allow the harmonics to sneak past the low pass filter.

Also, for various reasons, we have some carrier leakage, though not too bad.
This results in a not quite suppressed carrier riding along with our SSB signal,
sort of like an AM phone signal.? Not really much of an issue at 5 or 10 watts,
but it does make our signal a bit wider than it should be.

Spurs, harmonics, IMD, and residual carrier are why you should think twice
before?adding a linear amp to the uBitx.
Like any rig without ALC (automatic level control), increasing the mike gain
too much (or shouting into the mike) will result in IMD.

The Bitx40 has a much easier job with respect to spurs and harmonics.??
There is a 7mhz bandpass filter before the transmit power amp, which knocks out all those spurs.
And with only one transmit low pass filter there is?no easy path for harmonics to leak out.
With too much mike gain it will have IMD, and there is some carrier leakage,
but these are relatively minor issues.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 09:27 PM, Wayne Leake wrote:
?I notice that nobody mentions the best way to check an SSB outgoing signal.
?You need a good two tone audio signal generator. Along with a wide band scope, check that you see a good sine wave pattern.
??


Re: uBITX V4.3

Jack Purdum
 

Who's code are you trying to download: the stock code from HF Signals or Dr. Lee's code?

Jack, W8TEE



On Monday, December 3, 2018, 10:08:22 AM EST, MONEYSMITH <w4nfr@...> wrote:


I AM VERY NEW TO THIS. I DO HAVE A WORKING uBITX HF RADIO TRANSCEIVER.

I DO NOT KNOW MUCH ABOUT PROGRAMMING.? I HAVE A QUESTION.

HOW DO I GET THE FILE OR FILES TO DECODE THE MD AND UCO FILE EXTENSIONS?

I NEED TO KNOW THIS AND WHICH FILES ACTUALLY GET DOWN LOADED TO THE

NANO?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.






uBITX V4.3

 

I AM VERY NEW TO THIS. I DO HAVE A WORKING uBITX HF RADIO TRANSCEIVER.

I DO NOT KNOW MUCH ABOUT PROGRAMMING.? I HAVE A QUESTION.

HOW DO I GET THE FILE OR FILES TO DECODE THE MD AND UCO FILE EXTENSIONS?

I NEED TO KNOW THIS AND WHICH FILES ACTUALLY GET DOWN LOADED TO THE

NANO?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.


Re: Bitx40 - Not Transmitting #bitx40 #bitx40help

 

The problem is with your Mic connection!

Raj

At 03/12/2018, you wrote:
I have a Bitx40 which was built from the kit and has been functioning rather well.

For no apparent reason the TX seems to have a problem (no TX)
I connected a RF meter to the radio and noted that when I key the mike the needle jumps and straight back down.
This indicated to me that some TX power has been supplied but not continuious.
Subsiquent keying of the ptt do not have any affect
I have changed the Mike , incase it was faulty. (and whistled in it too)
I also have a spare main board and I replaced it, with the problem persisting.

Any ideas on what further I can troubleshoot or test


Bitx40 - Not Transmitting #bitx40 #bitx40help

 

I have a Bitx40 which was built from the kit and has been functioning rather well.

For no apparent reason the TX seems to have a problem (no TX)
I connected a RF meter to the radio and noted that when I key the mike the needle jumps and straight back down.
This indicated to me that some TX power has been supplied but not continuious.
Subsiquent keying of the ptt do not have any affect
I have changed the Mike , incase it was faulty. (and whistled in it too)
I also have a spare main board and I replaced it, with the problem persisting.

Any ideas on what further I can troubleshoot or test


Re: I cant seem to find

LKNDAVE
 

i spent 4 hours on ians site and github. downloaded a dozen or so files, could not get anything going from there. i will builds my project some more then try again.i may be looking too hard. didnt understand the whole CEC thing.
thanks again,
DAVE N4LKN


Re: Power for continuous digimode

 

With standard gain settings I would not suggest it stock on FT8 which is a 50% run time.
With a small fan blowing over the stock heatsinks the output transistors get hot on FT8 after 8 cycles

I have two ubitx and it takes a minimum of about a 2x sized from normal heat sink and small fan The easiest test is to put your finger against the transistor after running it.

That said I have about 3-4x heat sinks and a ducted fan over the finals on my other ubitx and run 20 volts through the finals without any heating of the transistors. Well I am sure that there is heat but it is being dissipated It shows 20 watts power output on a mfj meter.

On FT8 the digital power level control works pretty good for controlling the final modulation.

Antenna matching is real important too. Even a 1.4:1 makes a difference in heating.


Re: Totally Absurd -- Farhan being questioned in a police station about doctored sat picture

 

Happens in every country. However if you feel hurt and you are convinced they did not act properly you may have the possibility to report this to other departments so they may see to investigate internally. Keep calm and ... them politely!


Il 03/dic/2018 07:52, "Wayne Leake" <wayneleake@...> ha scritto:
?Sometimes the police can be a bunch of ignorant buttwipes.
?One sheriffs deputy tried to claim that we HAD to give a refund, when we had a sign that clearly stated no refunds.
?he did not really know the laws.
?Another time was the state police trying to question me on a murder that I had nothing to do with, other than living not too far from where it happened, and some twit claiming they saw me at a particular restaurant that had some bearing on the case.
?I was asked about a particular Saturday night, and I did not recall that particular night.
?Then a friend reminded me that I had spent the night at his place that particular date.
?That got them PO'd. Should not have, but they were defective detectives.

?On the other hand, some police are pretty decent people.
?the Sheriffs deputy we had here was a very good person.
?Sorry that they transferred him. Replaced with one person that was not bad, but then replaced that person with another that I was told was a real butthole..
?Piss on the bad ones..



Re: Spectrum purity of uBITX and BIT40

 

Warren discussed this in detail. TX IMD are quite bad, however it does not sound bad at all. Keep in mind it splatters if you shout into the mike. I will try the VOGAD add on, at least it should deliver an almost constant mic input.


Il 03/dic/2018 06:27, "Wayne Leake" <wayneleake@...> ha scritto:
?I notice that nobody mentions the best way to check an SSB outgoing signal.
?You need a good two tone audio signal generator. Along with a wide band scope, check that you see a good sine wave pattern.
?We had a setup for testing SSB CB Radios that did just this, so we could see how good the pattern was,
?The setup also checked an AM signal modulated with a single tone.
?You wanted a nice even sine wave. No flat topping, which meant over modulation, and modulation to a bit under where it would start to flat top
?this gave you the cleanest signal.
?Even on ham frequencies, you want the same results
?Make sure that the audio signals are a nice clean sine wave.
?Mixed with a nice clean signal on AM.
?I would say best to check the carrier on AM, as well as the audio sine waves for a nice clean sine wave.
?A square wave is not what you want to use for these tests.

?Wayne WA2YNE

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:29 PM Mark McNabb <n7eku@...> wrote:

Hi Simon,

I don't think this is true.? What is true with homebrew, is that the device doesn't not have to be tested by the FCC; the spectral requirements are still the same, but it is up the the user to figure out how to meet them.? That is where the "test, training, education, etc." comes into play!

73,


Mark.


Re: Totally Absurd -- Farhan being questioned in a police station about doctored sat picture

 

?Sometimes the police can be a bunch of ignorant buttwipes.
?One sheriffs deputy tried to claim that we HAD to give a refund, when we had a sign that clearly stated no refunds.
?he did not really know the laws.
?Another time was the state police trying to question me on a murder that I had nothing to do with, other than living not too far from where it happened, and some twit claiming they saw me at a particular restaurant that had some bearing on the case.
?I was asked about a particular Saturday night, and I did not recall that particular night.
?Then a friend reminded me that I had spent the night at his place that particular date.
?That got them PO'd. Should not have, but they were defective detectives.

?On the other hand, some police are pretty decent people.
?the Sheriffs deputy we had here was a very good person.
?Sorry that they transferred him. Replaced with one person that was not bad, but then replaced that person with another that I was told was a real butthole..
?Piss on the bad ones..



Re: Spectrum purity of uBITX and BIT40

 

?I notice that nobody mentions the best way to check an SSB outgoing signal.
?You need a good two tone audio signal generator. Along with a wide band scope, check that you see a good sine wave pattern.
?We had a setup for testing SSB CB Radios that did just this, so we could see how good the pattern was,
?The setup also checked an AM signal modulated with a single tone.
?You wanted a nice even sine wave. No flat topping, which meant over modulation, and modulation to a bit under where it would start to flat top
?this gave you the cleanest signal.
?Even on ham frequencies, you want the same results
?Make sure that the audio signals are a nice clean sine wave.
?Mixed with a nice clean signal on AM.
?I would say best to check the carrier on AM, as well as the audio sine waves for a nice clean sine wave.
?A square wave is not what you want to use for these tests.

?Wayne WA2YNE

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:29 PM Mark McNabb <n7eku@...> wrote:

Hi Simon,

I don't think this is true.? What is true with homebrew, is that the device doesn't not have to be tested by the FCC; the spectral requirements are still the same, but it is up the the user to figure out how to meet them.? That is where the "test, training, education, etc." comes into play!

73,


Mark.


Re: uBITX - Limiting power output

 

Nice to point out that existing pot. I suggest leaving it there, lift one leg and try a second pot in series on front or rear panel to trim the output power. Just he careful to route coax around the board so it does not compromise the filters or provide other unwanted leakage, I think this is the greater challenge.

I used the 1208 until I zapped the preamp. Also mine was an early one with a poor quality circuit board, but it could be restored if I ever have use for it. yes I had also thought 2 watts to be optimal drive.

Curt


Re: 7277 Bitx >Bitx Today 12/2/18

 

I have had that same issue and would recommend 7180.

Evan
AC9TU


Re: uBITX - Limiting power output

 

You could add relays and pots to adjust power across bands.? I'm thinking about using the current system for 'max out' and a second layer for 'max 5W out' when feeding my WA2EBY.



Andy, KG5RKP


On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 06:50 PM, Charles French wrote:
Thanks for the feedback from all of you.
?
Allison, I wonder if that pot could be brought out to the front panel using some silver/teflon coax for the round trip without creating too many isues? Or is that just asking for trouble?
?
Thanks again!

On Dec 2, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Jim Sheldon <w0eb@...> wrote:
?
Don't know for sure. ?Christmas party this afternoon so be tomorrow before much else gets done.

On Dec 2, 2018, at 12:12 PM, AndyH <ahecker@...> wrote:

The stock ?BITX has a drive adjustment at RV1 - the pot that follows the first stage in the RF chain (Q90).? I've used mine to drive a WA2EBY amp on 40 meters and adjusting RV1 was all it took to drop the peaks to 5 W.??

Andy, KG5RKP?


Re: uBITX - Limiting power output

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks for the feedback from all of you.

Allison, I wonder if that pot could be brought out to the front panel using some silver/teflon coax for the round trip without creating too many isues? Or is that just asking for trouble?

Thanks again!

On Dec 2, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Jim Sheldon <w0eb@...> wrote:

Don't know for sure. ?Christmas party this afternoon so be tomorrow before much else gets done.

On Dec 2, 2018, at 12:12 PM, AndyH <ahecker@...> wrote:

The stock ?BITX has a drive adjustment at RV1 - the pot that follows the first stage in the RF chain (Q90).? I've used mine to drive a WA2EBY amp on 40 meters and adjusting RV1 was all it took to drop the peaks to 5 W.??

Andy, KG5RKP?


Re: 7277 Bitx >Bitx Today 12/2/18

 

There is a strong broadcast signal on 7275 which is putting a fairly strong carrier on 7277.? Not good for weak signal work.?? Seems to me the calling frequency should be moved to someplace below 7200 and above 7175 to get away from the broadcast signals.? General class licensees can operate SSB starting on 7175.

Jim
W6yxy


Re: UbitX audio hiss but no rx

David Berkompas
 

I had the same problem.
(Well, at least I thought I did, turns out it was a PICNIC error).

Put the radio in CW mode, and find an AM station.

Hope that helps.

Dave - AI6K