¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: 7.277mHz Sunday Afternoon

 

Using the neat feature in the Amunter sketch to be able to monitor both VFO A and B on the BotX40, I have listened on both 7177 and 7277 at the 3PM and 7PM times thinking I might just hear some DX on 7177, but I have never heard any BitX on the lower frequency. Often I do hear folks on 7277, though.

=Vic=


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

If either rv2 or rv3 seems twisted to accommodate the heat sink then you probably
have a broken leas under it. replace the one nearest to the back, two of my boards
I had to replace the bias pots.

This fault will only blow one IRF..

If both are blowing then first turn RV2 and 3 fully clockwise before starting bias adjust.

Raj

At 28-11-18, you wrote:
What are the components Q942 and Q952 for? These were missing from my factory assembled board. The main problem I am having is each time I power up the receive works ok etc, but the second I hit the cw or ptt key the finals blow, drain shows grounded.. Three times in a row now, first time i thought there might have been a shorted wire when mounting board, no and blew a second time, check for shorted land etc. and the land from power in to the finals was burnt into, fixed with small jumper, repalce finals for third time and checked for shorts etc. best i can. made a temp fuse by using a one strand of small copper wire to postive connection and it burnt almost on contact, tried again and the receicer works as before but also just as before the finals went, saw what i thought was la little some from maybe a bias pot not sure, just pulled the finals again. Just about to give up on the project but maybe some of you could give me some thoughts , advice , help anything at this point..
.. :)

chuck


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

That missing leg is the problem that MAY cause the IRF to blow. Replace
and only then try again.

At 28-11-18, you wrote:

On Tue, November 27, 2018 8:56 pm, Mike Lichtman via Groups.Io wrote:
>

> Chuck,
> Just a thought ¡ª did you ground the two final heat sinks in any? way? (like
> to a metal case). They should be floating.? 73 Mike KF6KXG
>
>
>
>
They have a insulator and plastic type shoulder washer on the screws aand
a little larger heat sink but tested before applying power each time
before applying power, the one bias pot messing a leg is the only bad
component i have found, will mayb replace and order new 510s ,,, little
done in with this thing for the moment, thanks for the thoughts
73 chuck


Re: Preamp question

 

Thanks Woody -? I guess you've traced it back to clock 0?? (It's winter - maybe even signals need sweaters?? Sorry, couldn't resist.)

Thanks for the image - nice scope!

Andy



On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 04:47 PM, Woody wrote:
AndyH,

Don't know if the clock signals are interfering with reception, but some
noise is interfering with my scope measurements of the low level RX
signal path.? With no antenna and high audio, can hear a tone in the
background and significant microphonics from the ubitx board.? Not so
noticeable with antenna and signals.?? No encoder ticks...

To help explain the difficulty presented when trying to trace RX signals
through the chain, see the attached image. ? Hard to get a lock with
counter on the "noise" - jittering.? Sometimes, for some TPs, seems to
be in the 50 MHz range. It may be something other than clock signal...(?).

I downloaded the MAR-3+SM graphs.? They do show gain at 3 different
currents, but only down to 28 ma.? Was wondering about even lower
currents.?? ...But it seems to work, bringing the gain way down as the
current approaches zero (actually the device voltage of 5). ? Was mainly
wondering about linearity and IP3 at the very low supply currents.

Since my first Nano died, I am using Jim's raduino clone.?? FWIW, the
original Raduino began to work when I tried the good Nano in it. ? Now
have 2 working mother boards and one working nano.

Woody? -?? KZ4AK



On 11/27/2018 20:16, AndyH wrote:
If you've got so much clock signal floating around that you have
trouble receiving, you might want to find the problem.? My radio is
dead quiet with no antenna attached, as is my BITX40.? I can sometimes
hear ticks from the rotary encoder without an antenna, but that's it.

What sort of raduino-like-object are you using?
_._,_._,_
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

On Tue, November 27, 2018 8:56 pm, Mike Lichtman via Groups.Io wrote:
Chuck,
Just a thought ¡ª did you ground the two final heat sinks in any way? (like
to a metal case). They should be floating. 73 Mike KF6KXG



all non shorted and insulated, thans
73 chuck


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

On Tue, November 27, 2018 8:56 pm, Mike Lichtman via Groups.Io wrote:
Chuck,
Just a thought ¡ª did you ground the two final heat sinks in any way? (like
to a metal case). They should be floating. 73 Mike KF6KXG



all non shorted and insulated, thans
73 chuck


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

On Tue, November 27, 2018 8:56 pm, Mike Lichtman via Groups.Io wrote:
Chuck,
Just a thought ¡ª did you ground the two final heat sinks in any way? (like
to a metal case). They should be floating. 73 Mike KF6KXG



all non shorted and insulated, thans
73 chuck


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

On Tue, November 27, 2018 8:56 pm, Mike Lichtman via Groups.Io wrote:
Chuck,
Just a thought ¡ª did you ground the two final heat sinks in any way? (like
to a metal case). They should be floating. 73 Mike KF6KXG



all non shorted and insulated, thans
73 chuck


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

On Tue, November 27, 2018 8:56 pm, Mike Lichtman via Groups.Io wrote:
Chuck,
Just a thought ¡ª did you ground the two final heat sinks in any way? (like
to a metal case). They should be floating. 73 Mike KF6KXG



They have a insulator and plastic type shoulder washer on the screws aand
a little larger heat sink but tested before applying power each time
before applying power, the one bias pot messing a leg is the only bad
component i have found, will mayb replace and order new 510s ,,, little
done in with this thing for the moment, thanks for the thoughts
73 chuck


Re: CAT control #arduino #ubitx

 

I downloaded the original firmware (see above) and still had no CAT control.? So, I downloaded 1.1 from KD8CEC and now I can use the memory mgr and the CAT all works.??

Very nice.

K5KDT
Kevin

Thanks for the suggestions

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:01 AM Jack Purdum via Groups.Io <jjpurdum=[email protected]> wrote:
I would expect different machines to use different COM ports. If I compile for a Nano, it's COM4. For a Teensy, its COM6. I would not be surprised by different COM ports. You can use the Control Panel - Device Manager to see how the ports are allocated.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, November 27, 2018, 10:53:46 AM EST, Kevin Timm <kevindtimm@...> wrote:


I'm pretty sure that COM3 is correct as?that's the value?I used when I reloaded the firmware.

K5KDT
Kevin


Re: Great Results with Mic Preamp

 

That, sir, was a wonderful reply!? I added 4K7 in line with the positive power input to mimic the 4K7 and 220¦¸ in the ?BITX mic bias feed and the clipping is gone.? There's no sign of saturation from zero to cranking the Elecraft 2-tone generator to "11", with input voltages from 2 through 16 VDC.? I'll add this puppy to my ?BITX and BITX40.

Holy cow - I'm learnin' stuff!?

Thank you!
73, Andy, KG5RKP


On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:20 PM, Paul Dobosz wrote:
The preamp performance and biasing will be affected by the impedance of the power supply feeding the phantom power as well as the amplitude of the input signal and the phantom supply voltage. The circuit was designed with the Icom mic circuit in mind which has 8V with about a 1.2K impedance.? The mic cartridge I used was spec'ed at -55dB I didn't attempt to measure distortion other than listening to the transmit audio through headphones using the monitor feature of the Icom transceiver to determine that audio was not noticeably distorted.? Over the air other stations commented that my audio sounded very clean and natural.

The audio sounded clean to my ear with the biasing shown but no attempt was made to optimize it for other radios or microphone cartridges knowing that there is not a universal standard for phantom mic power or microphone response.? ?

If the input is driven hard enough to push the 2N3904 into saturation on positive input peaks the negative output waveform would be clipped.? That asymmetry would be seen if the biasing of the base was slightly high and if the input was being driven at a higher level than a typical dynamic microphone cartridge produces.? It all comes down to a number of variables in both the radio and the microphone so biasing might need to be adjusted to optimize for a particular radio and microphone combination.??

It should also be noted that if the alternate circuit (no phantom mic power available) is used, a resistor will be needed in series with a regulated supply voltage to raise its impedance or the preamp will not operate in its linear region.? Since there are a multitude of potential suppy voltages available in transceivers? the correct resistance value will vary but most likely fall in the 1K to 2K range for most radios.

73 - Paul - K8PD
?


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

Mike Lichtman
 

Chuck,
Just a thought ¡ª did you ground the two final heat sinks in any way? (like to a metal case). They should be floating. 73 Mike KF6KXG


Re: Great Results with Mic Preamp

Paul Dobosz
 

If you don't have a 1uF cap you can parallel a a couple of .47uF caps to get to that approximate value.? The value is not critical but going too small will roll off the frequency response of you microphone.? You can experiment with this value somewhat depending on the sound you are looking for.

73 - Paul - K8PD


Re: Great Results with Mic Preamp

Paul Dobosz
 

The preamp performance and biasing will be affected by the impedance of the power supply feeding the phantom power as well as the amplitude of the input signal and the phantom supply voltage. The circuit was designed with the Icom mic circuit in mind which has 8V with about a 1.2K impedance.? The mic cartridge I used was spec'ed at -55dB I didn't attempt to measure distortion other than listening to the transmit audio through headphones using the monitor feature of the Icom transceiver to determine that audio was not noticeably distorted.? Over the air other stations commented that my audio sounded very clean and natural.

The audio sounded clean to my ear with the biasing shown but no attempt was made to optimize it for other radios or microphone cartridges knowing that there is not a universal standard for phantom mic power or microphone response.? ?

If the input is driven hard enough to push the 2N3904 into saturation on positive input peaks the negative output waveform would be clipped.? That asymmetry would be seen if the biasing of the base was slightly high and if the input was being driven at a higher level than a typical dynamic microphone cartridge produces.? It all comes down to a number of variables in both the radio and the microphone so biasing might need to be adjusted to optimize for a particular radio and microphone combination.??

It should also be noted that if the alternate circuit (no phantom mic power available) is used, a resistor will be needed in series with a regulated supply voltage to raise its impedance or the preamp will not operate in its linear region.? Since there are a multitude of potential suppy voltages available in transceivers? the correct resistance value will vary but most likely fall in the 1K to 2K range for most radios.

73 - Paul - K8PD
?


Re: CW Zero Beat

 

Thanks for all the response, it was kind of a surprise honestly.

All kits are sold or spoken for at this time. I have more on the way so if you missed out and still want one let me know.

73
--
David

?N8DAH


Re: OT: Farhan's satellite - ExseedSat-1 - Possible launch?

 

The slip is official but the next attempt is not officially scheduled yet.

Wednesday's launch attempt of Spaceflight SSO-A from Vandenberg Air Force Base is currently no-go due to extreme high-altitude winds that violate Range requirements. Vehicle and payloads are healthy. We will announce a new launch date once confirmed with the Range.


On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:27 PM, Nick VK4PP wrote:
Thanks Andy.
I see Fox1-Cliff was supposed to be on the same flight as Exseed, but that is already up according to Amsat website...
Not sure whats happening with that.
73 Nick.
Nick - for most launches, the NASA Spaceflight forum usually start an 'update' thread limited to schedule info, and a 'discussion' thread.? There's a bit of info there about which satellites are on the flight, but I think the best info is in a Reddit thread.? I recalled reading that Fox1-Cliff was loaded into the dispenser for launch but I'm pretty sure it's flying on the SSO mission with Farhan's sat.




"Time to spare?? Go by air!"? hi hi

73, Andy


Re: OT: Farhan's satellite - ExseedSat-1 - Possible launch?

 

Thanks Andy.
I see Fox1-Cliff was supposed to be on the same flight as Exseed, but that is already up according to Amsat website...
Not sure whats happening with that.
73 Nick.


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

Chuck,

? ?Q942 and Q952 are alternate finals that should not be installed.? The V4 board included pads for those experimenters that want to replace the IRF510 FETS with the RF15HV1.

? ?That's strange about RV3.? As it's the bias pot for Q94, I'm guessing it would make it hard to function test the amp if it was defective.
?
? ?

? ?Andy


On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 06:54 PM, @Chuck wrote:
What are the components Q942 and Q952 for? These were missing from my factory assembled board. The main problem I am having is each time I power up the receive works ok etc, but the second I hit the cw or ptt key the finals blow, drain shows grounded.. Three times in a row now, first time i thought there might have been a shorted wire when mounting board, no and blew a second time, check for shorted land etc. and the land from power in to the finals was burnt into, fixed with small jumper, repalce finals for third time and checked for shorts etc. best i can. made a temp fuse by using a one strand of small copper wire to postive connection and it burnt almost on contact, tried again and the receicer works as before? but also just as before the finals went, saw what i thought was la little some from maybe a bias pot not sure, just pulled the finals again.? Just about to give up on the project but maybe some of you could give me some thoughts , advice , help anything at this point.... :)

chuck


Re: uBitx VER 4 BRD AND Compornents

 

On Tue, November 27, 2018 6:54 pm, chuckr@... wrote:
What are the components Q942 and Q952 for? These were missing from my
factory assembled board. The main problem I am having is each time I
power up the receive works ok etc, but the second I hit the cw or ptt key
the finals blow, drain shows grounded.. Three times in a row now, first
time i thought there might have been a shorted wire when mounting board,
no and blew a second time, check for shorted land etc. and the land from
power in to the finals was burnt into, fixed with small jumper, repalce
finals for third time and checked for shorts etc. best i can. made a temp
fuse by using a one strand of small copper wire to postive connection and
it burnt almost on contact, tried again and the receicer works as before?
but also just as before the finals went, saw what i thought was la little
some from maybe a bias pot not sure, just pulled the finals again.? Just
about to give up on the project but maybe some of you could give me some
thoughts , advice , help anything at this point.... :)

chuck



RV3 bias pot missing one leg, ???? not sure on the quality of this
build,,,!


Re: OT: Farhan's satellite - ExseedSat-1 - Possible launch?

 

Hi Nick!

? ?I'm also mashing F5 to get updates on this launch.? hi hi? (seriously we need Morse for emoticons? LOL)

? ?The most up to date info can be found on the NASASpaceFlight.com forum, as many of the members are in the 'rocket scientist' social strata, and those that aren't mash F5 on all of the various Twitter feeds.??

? ?It looks like the launch has been pushed forward to 'no earlier than' 1st December due to weather.? The droneship (Just Read the Instructions) that was positioned off the California coast to catch the booster (for the third time) is heading back to port at full speed.

? ?Best,
? ? Andy, KG5RKP


On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 06:59 PM, Nick VK4PP wrote:
Looking at:

and?
Looks like there is a Falcon 9 going up in the next day.

Nov. 28 Falcon 9 ? Spaceflight SSO-A
Launch time: 1831:47 GMT (1:31:47 p.m. EST; 10:31:47 a.m. PST)
Launch site: SLC-4E, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California

All the best.
?