Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: FCC Rules of Operation
John, this reminds me I have tested for the BITX40 for the spurs to be all below -50dbc on my home built spectrum analyzer. I just hope someone else will also doubly test this just to be sure. - f On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:31 AM, iam74@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
FCC Rules of Operation
Don't forget, guys,that EVERY transmitter must meet the rules of operation and emission for your country, no matter how it is originally set up or modified. In the USA, that means meeting the Part 97 FCC Rules. Note that ALL spurious emissions must be at least 43 dB below the transmitting frequency. The responsibility for measuring and verifying this lies with the operator -- that's you, the builder of the rig. You shouldn't rely on any given design. You must verify that it is within limits. "(d) For transmitters installed after January 1, 2003, the mean power of any spurious emission from a station transmitter or external RF power amplifier transmitting on a frequency below 30 MHz must be at least 43 dB below the mean power of the fundamental emission. For transmitters installed on or before January 1, 2003, the mean power of any spurious emission from a station transmitter or external RF power amplifier transmitting on a frequency below 30 MHz must not exceed 50 mW and must be at least 40 dB below the mean power of the fundamental emission. For a transmitter of mean power less than 5 W installed on or before January 1, 2003, the attenuation must be at least 30 dB. A transmitter built before April 15, 1977, or first marketed before January 1, 1978, is exempt from this requirement." john AD5YE |
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Bitx 40 board.
they are all 1206 On 27-Nov-2016 11:15 am, "'Mark W' k3mrk1@... [BITX20]" <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: New Surface Mount Kit Not Working, Current Draw?
the current draw is 90ma in receive On 28-Nov-2016 4:24 am, "qrpbuilder@... [BITX20]" <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Bitx 40 board.
On Sunday, November 27, 2016 6:22 PM, "Mark Walton k3mrk1@... [BITX20]" wrote:
?
I dont mind a little drift, I can work with that. 1 khz per min makes it a little difficult to listen to one signal for very long. To tune a single signal, I must tap the tuning control on top till I get it. It wouldnt be so bad on CW, but within a minute the voice becomes unintelligible. On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 12:49 AM, k7tfc@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Ebay Store Kits Out Of Stock?
Baruch Atta
Are the surface mount parts mounted by the woman's group? ? On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mike Haynes mike.haynes08@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Bitx 40 board.
Mark Walton
I dont mind a little drift, I can work with that. 1 khz per min makes it a little difficult to listen to one signal for very long. To tune a single signal, I must tap the tuning control on top till I get it. It wouldnt be so bad on CW, but within a minute the voice becomes unintelligible. On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 12:49 AM, k7tfc@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Ebay Store Kits Out Of Stock?
Mike Haynes
Thanks for answering John. I didn't know as much about the history.? I have Ashar's SMD version, and it works great, but I wouldn't mind a through-hole version in case I needed or wanted to replace a component. Replacing those teeny tiny SMD parts can be quite a challenge. :-) On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 5:26 PM, iam74@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
--
Mike Haynes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Ebay Store Kits Out Of Stock?
Mark, Sunil Lakhani and Asher Farhan are in completely different companies.
Sunil brought out the BITX20 v.3 some years ago (with Farhan's blessing). He has since expanded the line considerably; parts are available from only circuit boards to complete rigs as kits. Sunil has a long and respected tradition in the BITX arena, but he has no smd kits as far as I know. I have bought several kits from him over the years and have always been treated well. They have become more expensive over time. Farhan invented the BITX and has been involved with the various permutations over the years from start-up. He has decided to market the smd BITX40 partly (or mainly) as an aid to a womens' group in India. At first, the kit was available only in India, but has recently become available internationally. It is only the second smd version that I know of; the first was by eliamady back in 2009. I have the BITX40 and also the eliamady smd version of the rig. (I will probably post pictures of both for comparison to the group shortly). As to which one to use...that is kind of a personal question -- it depends... Sunil's rigs are through-the-hole construction and are designed more or less for complete assemblage by the user, except for making the pcb. Their principal advantage is that missing or different parts are commonly available most everywhere -- including where you live. Asher's rig is pre-assembled and smd, but one has to figure out how to put it in a box and make it work without assembling the main board (or boards). Both are essentially the same design.The one radically different BITX was probably the BITX20A with its push-pull dual output PA. That also is still available. Every single BITX has been tweaked and modified over the years for one purpose or another. Both Sunil and Asher (as well as everybody else) encourage innovation to make things more to the user's liking. The best general summary I know of for the circuit is that of F8VOA, which has all the good mods in it. It is an excellent reference. The next best reference is this list. Search for any topic and you will probably find it discussed somewhere on this list. Hope this helps. john AD5YE ---In BITX20@..., <marktbaldridge@...> wrote : Thanks Mike! I have a few questions: 1. What is story behind the two different sellers? There's like you mentioned, and then what I was referring to: Sunil Lakhani VU3SUA at and he's selling his kits on eBay as sunillakhani The kit I was thinking I wanted to buy was: 2.?Would I want the through-hole version referenced or the SMD version you linked to? Which would be better for experimenting or modifying for other bands? I also see that the SMD version is already assembled, and cheaper! $45? I appreciate the input. Thanks! Mark, KC9DZT |
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: BITX 40 - DDS right connection
Thank you for the AD9850 info!
Well, I had a little Arduino + an AdaFruit Si5351 already setup. I had been experimenting with a 10 Mhz based BFO / VFO combination, and the Si5351 will provide up to THREE (3) signals (a waste of ONE signal!). However, I changed the code, hardcoded the VFO to my (measured 11.998847 Mhz), and changed a couple of other things - and it WORKS! Insanely stable, of course. However, I'm not seeing much of a difference between 'Varactor / Pot' VFO and DDS VFO in incoming audio volume or quality. Of course, the Si5353 is a square-wave clock - not sure how much that brings. I see the CQ WW CW DX contest is still going on!! LOTS & LOTS of CW signals to hear. SSB is clear. I'm goin' with the DDS VFO, but I'll try the AD9850 - seems a waste of two 'clocks' to use the Si5351, and perhaps I can re-purpose it for something else down the line... Maybe I'll see a difference there, I dunno. Mike Y |
||||||||||||||||||||
New Surface Mount Kit Not Working, Current Draw?
A buddy bought a SMD pre-assembled board and says it's completely deaf, while he can hear lots of band activity with his FT-817ND. I volunteered to go over it with my scope and diagnose it.
First things first: What's the typical approximate current draw in milliamps for these boards on a 12.0 volt power supply in receive mode? (Knowing the expected current draw will allow me a rough determination of any gross circuit faults before I start tracing and probing.) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Ebay Store Kits Out Of Stock?
Thanks Mike! I have a few questions: 1. What is story behind the two different sellers? There's like you mentioned, and then what I was referring to:
Sunil Lakhani VU3SUA at and he's selling his kits on eBay as sunillakhani The kit I was thinking I wanted to buy was: 2.?Would I want the through-hole version referenced or the SMD version you linked to? Which would be better for experimenting or modifying for other bands? I also see that the SMD version is already assembled, and cheaper! $45? I appreciate the input. Thanks! Mark, KC9DZT
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Ebay Store Kits Out Of Stock?
Mike Haynes
Try ordering direct from India. It takes a few weeks, but that's how I got mine. - Mike KE0KRY On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Mark Baldridge marktbaldridge@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
--
Mike Haynes
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Bitx40 audio
Ken:??Placement of the BFO freq relative to the IF passband will have an enormous effect on how the rig sounds on receive (and transmit!).??If your Si5351 is supplying both the BFO and VFO signals, you need to look at the frequency of?BFO?signal coming from the Si5351.? I am not using an Si5351 with my BITX40 module, but I measure the (stock) BFO freq at 11.9988.? That is -- as Fahan has said -- the "sweet spot" that produces really nice sounding audio for me. If you are using the Si5351 for VFO only, another thing may be?happening:? Are you attempting to tune in signals?with the freq increment set at 100 Hz or lower?? if you have the increment set at 1kHz,?and if your Si5351 calibration is off (very common), you may simply be?a bit?"off frequency" when you?are tuning in.? Try it?at 100Hz?tuning?increment and tune it in by ear -- see if you can get?it to sound natural.? If you can, take note of hour?many Hz you are from a full integer kHz freq -- that will give you an indication of how far off your Si5351 calibration is. I hope this helps 73? Bill N2CQR?? On Sunday, November 27, 2016 2:57 PM, "llah@... [BITX20]" wrote:
?
I'm going to try and play with a class D audio module with built-in programmable AGC parameters. This coupled with a $3 arduino nano clone could make a nice up-grade for the BITX40? WA6TKD
? |
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: BITX 40 - DDS right connection
Mikele Martincic
i think that dds with ad9850 have only -6dbm ,you have put one small amplifier ;) 73 de 9a3xz
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: BITX 40 - DDS right connection
Thanks Mike.?
Today I done a fast test with my 9850 based dds, it work well but input signals was weak than the original vfo.? Then i think that the level of dds signal need to be buffered to work with passive diode mixer, or i need to desolder some components to prevent to drop dds signal to ground. We need to do more experiments...this is also the purpouse of the project. :-) Bye. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: BITX 40 - DDS right connection
I think all you have to do (if you use the DDS tap) is to remove the VFO Tuning Pot from it's? 3-pin
connector (TUNING1) This removes the voltage to the Toroid / Varactor pair - no oscillation and no current will be used. I was happy to see that the DDS connection is placed before the buffer transistors (Q7, Q8, Q9), so there's a bit of gain for your AD9850 / Si570 / Si5351 / whatever you're using. Sadly, for me, it's the end of a long holiday, so I may not achieve the DDS VFO today. Mike Yancey, KM5Z Dallas, Texas |