Jack, W8TEE
We went through that same questioning process. Someone dinged us a few days ago because we're using the IRF510's. Out answer may be different because we are aiming the T41 at experimenters who may well blow a few while they're experimenting. Since we bought a bunch several years ago and still have some left, that's what we went with. If enough people are upset about the power drop above 20M, I'm sure someone will replace the PA board. Also, we felt a lot of experimenters have experience with the 510's and probably have some spares. Also, they're still easy to find (Mouser have 27000+!). Your situation is different in that changing the PA would be a little harder. Also, assuming they have spares is, perhaps, less likely. Also, I searched for the RD16HHF1 at Mouser and Digikey...nada. Jack, W8TEE
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 11:59:04 AM EDT, Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:
I guess the best way out is to use a robust transistor pair like the RD16HHF1 which can withstand infinite SWR, match the antenna regardless of the impedance at either end with an inline swr meter. Remember the ol' 807 transmitters with a Pi network? You just did a dip and load until you came up to the full power. The design question is, should we go for more expensive and difficult to get RF transistors or just use inexpensive IRF series and keep many spares? - f On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 8:33 PM Jerry Gaffke via <jgaffke=[email protected]> wrote: Not sure which statement that would be. --
Jack, W8TEE |