¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: CW Mistakes


Jack, W8TEE
 

The Teensy is orders of magnitude more powerful than the Nano:

Absolutely correct! Al and I are using it for an SDT were working on and as you can see here:

Inline image

we're doing a lot of stuff, but only using 13.3% of the processor's power. Not shown is that we're only using 2% of its flash. It is a beast in sheep's clothing!

For those who might be interested, the Teensy LC sell for $12 and has 27 I/O pins, 62K of flash, 8K SRAM and is clock at 48mHz (3x the Nano). Still, for $20 you can buy the 4.0 which is several orders of magnitude better than the Nano or the LC. ().


Jack, W8TEE


On Sunday, May 16, 2021, 12:18:15 PM EDT, jerry@... <jerry@...> wrote:


On 2021-05-16 07:33, Evan Hand wrote:
> Arv,
> Here is a link to a company that produces the hardware and software to
> replace the v6 Raduino with one that is designed for the Teensy 4.1.
>
>

*** I have it!? Running right now.? The Teensy is orders of magnitude
more powerful than the Nano:? 600MHz clock, a floating point unit( could
do DSP stuff! ) , 8 megabytes of flash, 1 megabyte of RAM, buckets &
barrels of I/O, and built in Ethernet!

? I did have to get a new display.? With the original one, the clone
Raduino made unacceptable tuning ticks.? Replacement with a "Hiletgo"
display from
Amazon cured that problem.? So now I have a spare display... More about
that later.

? Only thing is... the Teensy is a $30 processor - as opposed to the
nano which costs IIRC $3.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Jerry KF6VB






--
Jack, W8TEE

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.