¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Better choice quartz for 11.059 filter


 

The resonators used on the Nano clones are less accurate?and much easier to move in frequency than the?quartz crystals used on the original Arduino Nano.
The datasheet for a Murata CSTNE16M0V530000R0 ceramic resonator says it has an accuracy of +/-0.50%, and can drift over its temperature range of -40C to +85C by up to another +/-0.30%
The Murata?XRCGB16M000FXN00R0 16mhz quartz crystal has an accuracy of +/-40ppm, including variations due to temperature.? So?100*40/1e6 = 0.004%, 125 times more accurate.

If pulling does not work, might replace the resonator with a quartz crystal near but not on 16.000mhz,? perhaps 15mhz or 16.384mhz.
Or drive the processor clock pin from a quartz crystal oscillator.
A different clock frequency would change timing determined in Arduino firmware, such as CW keying speed.
I would not know what all this might affect on current firmware, but doubt it's catastrophic.

Jerry, KE7ER



On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 06:26 AM, Jerry Gaffke wrote:

The Raduino comes with a $2 Nano clone using the CH340 chip for the USB-to-UART interface.
Not the $20 original Arduino design.? Here's a description and a schematic:


Note that there are pads for caps on each side of the resonator, but they are not used.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.