Eric Flores
Tom, you¡¯re thinking right up my alley. I was also considering a RPi to handle digital modulation modes.? But, I am also considering using it to run an RTL-SDR for all of the RX work and tap the signal from the 1 mixer (just off C10 and the base of Q10, and completey removing R10, R11, Q10) and send the RX strait to RTL w/ small piece of coax. The IF should be 46Mhz-75MHz (for 160-10m) right there, which is well within the range of the dongle so you wound not need a hamitup upconverter. The one issue that might prevent this is I can¡¯t seem to get rid of a 1/2 second delay in the RTLs.? I was also considering having a headless ubitx so I can have the radio in a shack and operate from the house, which could end up being a few hundred yards away. It would be controlled via a network connection to either another RPi or a computer (possibly via rtl_tcp for RX control, a REST API for general radio control and an RTP stream for TX voice).? As an added plus, raspian supports Docker so each of these little services can be their own container making upgrades a breeze.? Eric On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 21:57 Tom, wb6b <wb6b@...> wrote: The reason Raspberry Pis are so inexpensive is they take advantage of the price advantage of using basically the same processor that is used in hundreds of millions of radio transceivers, already. (smartphones)? |