¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: One question only...


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

All,

when I first looked on the schemtaic of the ?BITX I felt a bit sceptical about the way how the low pass filters are switched. Only one relay for input and output of the lpf? What about the crosstalk within the relay?

So my scepticism comes true.

Personally I always would use two relays one of the input and one for the output, even short circuiting the non switched filter. And remember: every relay contact has a few pF of capacitance. This will add to the existing filter cap.

The remedy would be an extra lpf board.

And in addition please also use bpf?s in the transmit and receive path in order not to overdrive the first stages / mixer.

Recently i read an interesting blog from an austrian ham: he destroyed xtal-filters when his high performance (high IP3) receiver was connected to a high performing antenna! Out of ham band stations were overdriving the stages--- please remind that xtal filters do not want "high power signals" in the range >0 dBm even at stop band!!!

Henning Weddig
DK5LV

Am 06.08.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Kees T:

Allison,

Yes, I see that another thread (Harmonic performance - SSB vs CW) is also discussing the same subject and the plots are "troublesome". No offense, but I hope those plots were taken "correctly" ......50 ohm impedance matching and terminations, proper grounding, etc. Looks like some work to be done. Might be interesting to understand how the original testing was done.

Yes, any filter with x pF connected from input to output screws up the filter performance. I have seen that many times in the testing I have done with my old Marconi SA/TG.??

This will be interesting and fun to resolve.

73 Kees K5BCQ

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.