So how do you suggest we handle such disputes within the context of this forum??
Find out who all has a PhD, ask them to form a committee to pass judgment?
I prefer arguing it out till (hopefully) we can agree on a way to test the various hyphotheses.
Which is to say I prefer science, not politics.??
Yes, I have somehow managed to avoid the politics of post-graduate academia.
Jerry?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Mike aka KC2WVB wrote:
Ok, Jerry if your really interested in truth prevailing rather than calling it as you see it prevailing then there is only one tried and true method. It is what civilized people do when they present their argument to a committee of PHD's that are expert in the area of concern and either the argument is accepted or faulted. I know this because I have been tested in this manner, any other method is a bit sophomoric but unless you have gone through the process I don't expect you to agree and so be it.
