Tim,
I am a little confused by your post titled Re: [BITX20] Should we adopt the KD8CEC firmware?
You mention a feature you may want to implement.
To me, whether the 'base load' is hfsignals firmware, or KD8CEC firmware, the problem
seems to be the same. You can add or delete features to/from either firmware.
I quote your email:
It's my opinion that we *need* a base load with a set of common
functionality that experimenters can build on. The current software
that Ashar provides seems to fit that bill.
If someone wants to load other software then it is up to them to
manage all the complexity.
--end quote--
In your example, especially the second paragraph quoted above, it seems
to me that either 'base load' would suffice. Am I missing something?
Rod KM6SN
