¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Should we adopt the KD8CEC firmware?


 

How much more space required ?

At 12-05-18, you wrote:

I just noticed that the sketch is too big to get into the nano with the factory alignment enabled. this is a mandatory in the shipped firmware. I don't want to fork out and grandfather the KD8CEC versions. Not sure what to do now...

- f

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote:
Peeps,

Given that Dr.Lee's software is now pretty stable from 1.06 onwards, what do you all say about using this as the 'shipped' firmware? I have some personal quirks that make me modify it for my personal use (ex: I prefere general coverage when changing the bands rather than steps to and from ham bands) but do we consider it to be usable and stable for our needs??

I resisted feature-ful software as the base because smaller code base makes it easier for people to get in and modify, there is space in the memory for modifications, etc.?

If there is a general consensus, then, we will customize it to the standard hardware, and start burning this into the next batch of ubitx.

Opinions, please.

- f

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.